THIRD AND DATA

Gardner-Webb game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 27at Austin Peay17–35 L693445.020–3227–49–312223–132–512–523:2143%39%
Sep 5at Wofford13–17 L824385.328–6031–54–378247–160–139–7733:5137%35%
Sep 12at Liberty23–24 L713044.333–11816–38–186235–140–135–2730:5232%39%
Sep 19vs North Carolina Central44–20 W754455.937–13624–38–309237–162–219–9935:0443%26%
Sep 26at Marshall35–36 L604587.627–16022–33–298199–151–2112–10126:4738%43%
Oct 3at Charleston Southern12–10 W812873.534–9027–47–197205–184–425–4533:3833%29%
Oct 10vs Eastern Illinois7–21 L702463.546–13814–24–108132–162–563–1529:2529%26%
Oct 17at UT Martin6–17 L521683.215–2012–37–14870–120–135–3418:5923%32%
Oct 31at Southeast Missouri State34–10 W724105.746–20113–26–209252–110–132–2034:3538%27%
Season9 games3–66323,1004.9286–955186–346–2,14517640–13111–222352–4234:26:3235%34%

Success rate

Gardner-Webb on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game35.4% · 33.7%
43
39
37
35
32
39
43
26
38
43
33
29
29
26
23
32
38
27
@ Austin Peay
@ Wofford
@ Liberty
North Carolina Central
@ Marshall
@ Charleston Southern
Eastern Illinois
@ UT Martin
@ Southeast Missouri State
Lindenwood
@ Western Illinois
Tennessee State

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Gardner-Webb on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Gardner-Webb's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Gardner-Webb offense 35% (222 of 627)Opponent offense / Gardner-Webb defense 34% (185 of 549)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Austin Peay: opponent offense 39% of 67Austin Peay: Gardner-Webb offense 43% of 69Wofford: opponent offense 35% of 54Wofford: Gardner-Webb offense 37% of 82Liberty: opponent offense 39% of 64Liberty: Gardner-Webb offense 32% of 71North Carolina Central: opponent offense 26% of 46North Carolina Central: Gardner-Webb offense 43% of 75Marshall: opponent offense 43% of 74Marshall: Gardner-Webb offense 38% of 61Charleston Southern: opponent offense 29% of 51Charleston Southern: Gardner-Webb offense 33% of 79Eastern Illinois: opponent offense 26% of 53Eastern Illinois: Gardner-Webb offense 29% of 70UT Martin: opponent offense 32% of 77UT Martin: Gardner-Webb offense 23% of 52Southeast Missouri State: opponent offense 27% of 63Southeast Missouri State: Gardner-Webb offense 38% of 68
Gardner-Webb offenseOpponent offense (Gardner-Webb defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at Austin Peay

17–35 L · 69 plays to 67
Gardner-Webb offense 43% (30/69)Austin Peay offense 39% (26/67)

at Wofford

13–17 L · 82 plays to 54
Gardner-Webb offense 37% (30/82)Wofford offense 35% (19/54)

at Liberty

23–24 L · 71 plays to 64
Gardner-Webb offense 32% (23/71)Liberty offense 39% (25/64)

vs North Carolina Central

44–20 W · 75 plays to 46
Gardner-Webb offense 43% (32/75)N.C. Central offense 26% (12/46)

at Marshall

35–36 L · 61 plays to 74
Gardner-Webb offense 38% (23/61)Marshall offense 43% (32/74)

at Charleston Southern

12–10 W · 79 plays to 51
Gardner-Webb offense 33% (26/79)Charleston S. offense 29% (15/51)

vs Eastern Illinois

7–21 L · 70 plays to 53
Gardner-Webb offense 29% (20/70)Eastern Illinois offense 26% (14/53)

at UT Martin

6–17 L · 52 plays to 77
Gardner-Webb offense 23% (12/52)UT Martin offense 32% (25/77)

at Southeast Missouri State

34–10 W · 68 plays to 63
Gardner-Webb offense 38% (26/68)SE. Missouri St. offense 27% (17/63)