THIRD AND DATA

Grambling game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 29vs Clark Atlanta49–7 W744876.639–22326–35–264287–131–1010–9534:0349%26%
Sep 5vs Central State48–26 W686449.540–36119–28–283269–121–134–3833:1157%40%
Sep 12at TCU7–63 L532104.028–2014–25–19071–140–027–5430:2621%68%
Sep 26vs Prairie View A&M14–21 L542654.930–7212–24–193157–130–1010–9028:2033%46%
Oct 3vs Alcorn State63–59 W695998.734–22924–35–370266–111–1214–11732:3547%48%
Oct 10vs Jackson State45–38 W694386.342–20120–27–237237–130–138–4632:4549%41%
Oct 17at Alabama A&M31–61 L522414.632–929–20–149132–121–136–5026:2323%54%
Oct 31at Texas Southern20–23 L692864.145–16611–24–120168–181–103–2532:3732%39%
Season8 games4–45083,1706.2290–1364135–218–1,80615447–1065–71362–5154:10:2040%46%

Success rate

Grambling on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game40.4% · 46.3%
49
26
57
40
21
68
33
46
47
48
49
41
23
54
32
39
Clark Atlanta
Central State
@ TCU
Prairie View A&M
Alcorn State
Jackson State
@ Alabama A&M
@ Texas Southern
Arkansas-Pine Bluff
@ Bethune-Cookman
Southern

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 20.8%, defense allows 67.6%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Grambling on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Grambling's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Grambling offense 40% (204 of 505)Opponent offense / Grambling defense 46% (235 of 508)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Clark Atlanta: opponent offense 26% of 54Clark Atlanta: Grambling offense 49% of 75Central State: opponent offense 40% of 58Central State: Grambling offense 57% of 68TCU: opponent offense 68% of 68TCU: Grambling offense 21% of 53Prairie View A&M: opponent offense 46% of 61Prairie View A&M: Grambling offense 33% of 52Alcorn State: opponent offense 48% of 71Alcorn State: Grambling offense 47% of 68Jackson State: opponent offense 41% of 61Jackson State: Grambling offense 49% of 69Alabama A&M: opponent offense 54% of 79Alabama A&M: Grambling offense 23% of 52Texas Southern: opponent offense 39% of 56Texas Southern: Grambling offense 32% of 68
Clark AtlantaCentral State@ TCUPrairie View A&M *Alcorn StateJackson State@ Alabama A&M@ Texas SouthernArkansas-Pine Bluff@ Bethune-CookmanSouthern *
Grambling offenseOpponent offense (Grambling defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Clark Atlanta

49–7 W · 75 plays to 54
Grambling offense 49% (37/75)Clark Atlanta offense 26% (14/54)

vs Central State

48–26 W · 68 plays to 58
Grambling offense 57% (39/68)Central State offense 40% (23/58)

at TCU

7–63 L · 53 plays to 68
Grambling offense 21% (11/53)TCU offense 68% (46/68)

vs Prairie View A&M

14–21 L · 52 plays to 61
Grambling offense 33% (17/52)Prairie View A&M offense 46% (28/61)

vs Alcorn State

63–59 W · 68 plays to 71
Grambling offense 47% (32/68)Alcorn State offense 48% (34/71)

vs Jackson State

45–38 W · 69 plays to 61
Grambling offense 49% (34/69)Jackson State offense 41% (25/61)

at Alabama A&M

31–61 L · 52 plays to 79
Grambling offense 23% (12/52)Alabama A&M offense 54% (43/79)

at Texas Southern

20–23 L · 68 plays to 56
Grambling offense 32% (22/68)Texas Southern offense 39% (22/56)