THIRD AND DATA

Houston Christian game log

2022: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 3at Northern Colorado46–34 W705177.441–21215–29–305217–141–120–024:18——
Sep 10vs Lindenwood20–21 L773845.030–5026–47–334214–163–419–8524:5835%45%
Sep 24at Texas State0–34 L551422.619–3923–36–10384–150–118–7524:5531%46%
Oct 1at Lamar37–34 W733234.427–6632–46–257172–151–316–6029:0532%32%
Oct 8vs Nicholls17–19 L603525.922–7227–38–280163–120–116–6120:4142%48%
Oct 15vs Northwestern State10–37 L822673.333–11123–49–156186–201–628–8527:2427%43%
Oct 22at East Texas A&M3–31 L642033.221–9623–43–107113–160–226–4322:2427%35%
Oct 29vs UT Martin28–52 L824475.536–5331–46–3941910–201–169–8528:5452%50%
Nov 5at Incarnate Word20–73 L823654.535–9028–47–275225–171–343–2633:4540%44%
Nov 12vs McNeese10–21 L642503.938–10814–26–142125–160–116–5024:5628%44%
Nov 19at Tarleton State7–49 L631352.127–-2119–36–156102–160–148–6925:0419%47%
Season11 games2–97723,3854.4329–876261–443–2,50917551–1778–242569–6394:46:2432%43%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: HCU on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is HCU's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:HCU offense 32% (209 of 647)Opponent offense / HCU defense 43% (295 of 689)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Lindenwood: opponent offense 45% of 80Lindenwood: HCU offense 35% of 79Texas State: opponent offense 46% of 78Texas State: HCU offense 31% of 55Lamar: opponent offense 32% of 76Lamar: HCU offense 32% of 74Nicholls: opponent offense 48% of 84Nicholls: HCU offense 42% of 59Northwestern State: opponent offense 43% of 79Northwestern State: HCU offense 27% of 82East Texas A&M: opponent offense 35% of 77East Texas A&M: HCU offense 27% of 64UT Martin: opponent offense 50% of 14UT Martin: HCU offense 52% of 25Incarnate Word: opponent offense 44% of 57Incarnate Word: HCU offense 40% of 82McNeese: opponent offense 44% of 72McNeese: HCU offense 28% of 64Tarleton State: opponent offense 47% of 72Tarleton State: HCU offense 19% of 63
@ Northern ColoradoLindenwood@ Texas State@ LamarNichollsNorthwestern State@ East Texas A&MUT Martin@ Incarnate WordMcNeese@ Tarleton State
HCU offenseOpponent offense (HCU defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Lindenwood

20–21 L · 79 plays to 80
HCU offense 35% (28/79)Lindenwood offense 45% (36/80)

at Texas State

0–34 L · 55 plays to 78
HCU offense 31% (17/55)Texas State offense 46% (36/78)

at Lamar

37–34 W · 74 plays to 76
HCU offense 32% (24/74)Lamar offense 32% (24/76)

vs Nicholls

17–19 L · 59 plays to 84
HCU offense 42% (25/59)Nicholls offense 48% (40/84)

vs Northwestern State

10–37 L · 82 plays to 79
HCU offense 27% (22/82)Northwestern St. offense 43% (34/79)

at East Texas A&M

3–31 L · 64 plays to 77
HCU offense 27% (17/64)East Texas A&M offense 35% (27/77)

vs UT Martin

28–52 L · 25 plays to 14
HCU offense 52% (13/25)UT Martin offense 50% (7/14)

at Incarnate Word

20–73 L · 82 plays to 57
HCU offense 40% (33/82)Incarnate Word offense 44% (25/57)

vs McNeese

10–21 L · 64 plays to 72
HCU offense 28% (18/64)McNeese offense 44% (32/72)

at Tarleton State

7–49 L · 63 plays to 72
HCU offense 19% (12/63)Tarleton State offense 47% (34/72)