THIRD AND DATA

Houston Christian game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 27at SE Louisiana34–28 W603616.041–16111–19–200178–140–016–6024:2836%41%
Sep 5at Rice3–31 L582444.235–1488–23–96134–130–413–2520:2831%55%
Sep 12vs Arkansas Baptist88–0 W565109.139–2759–17–235243–81–103–4010:3147%—
Sep 19at Incarnate Word23–30 L743785.136–11619–38–262155–191–318–7321:5034%44%
Sep 26at North Texas14–63 L622383.836–9015–26–148123–151–335–4529:0732%73%
Oct 3vs Nicholls16–2 W662924.435–11919–31–173175–141–104–3530:3035%33%
Oct 17vs East Texas A&M43–24 W713625.138–17419–33–188218–150–118–8325:2238%39%
Oct 24at Lamar10–35 L541953.628–7914–26–116123–131–134–2022:5437%48%
Oct 31at Stephen F. Austin6–37 L802653.341–8121–39–184165–202–417–5535:4129%39%
Season9 games4–55812,8454.9329–1243135–252–1,60214744–1317–181148–4363:40:5135%46%

Success rate

HCU on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game35.1% · 46.2%
36
41
31
55
47
34
44
32
73
35
33
38
39
37
48
29
39
@ SE Louisiana
@ Rice
Arkansas Baptist
@ Incarnate Word
@ North Texas
Nicholls
East Texas A&M
@ Lamar
@ Stephen F. Austin
McNeese
@ Northwestern State
UT Rio Grande Valley

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense —, defense allows —.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: HCU on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is HCU's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:HCU offense 35% (202 of 575)Opponent offense / HCU defense 46% (274 of 593)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%SE Louisiana: opponent offense 41% of 76SE Louisiana: HCU offense 36% of 59Rice: opponent offense 55% of 80Rice: HCU offense 31% of 58Arkansas Baptist: HCU offense 47% of 55Incarnate Word: opponent offense 44% of 88Incarnate Word: HCU offense 34% of 73North Texas: opponent offense 73% of 64North Texas: HCU offense 32% of 62Nicholls: opponent offense 33% of 75Nicholls: HCU offense 35% of 63East Texas A&M: opponent offense 39% of 80East Texas A&M: HCU offense 38% of 71Lamar: opponent offense 48% of 71Lamar: HCU offense 37% of 54Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 39% of 59Stephen F. Austin: HCU offense 29% of 80
@ SE Louisiana@ RiceArkansas Baptist@ Incarnate Word@ North TexasNichollsEast Texas A&M@ Lamar@ Stephen F. AustinMcNeese@ Northwestern StateUT Rio Grande Valley
HCU offenseOpponent offense (HCU defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

at SE Louisiana

34–28 W · 59 plays to 76
HCU offense 36% (21/59)SE Louisiana offense 41% (31/76)

at Rice

3–31 L · 58 plays to 80
HCU offense 31% (18/58)Rice offense 55% (44/80)

vs Arkansas Baptist

88–0 W · 55 plays to 0
HCU offense 47% (26/55)Arkansas Baptist offense — (0/0)

at Incarnate Word

23–30 L · 73 plays to 88
HCU offense 34% (25/73)Incarnate Word offense 44% (39/88)

at North Texas

14–63 L · 62 plays to 64
HCU offense 32% (20/62)North Texas offense 73% (47/64)

vs Nicholls

16–2 W · 63 plays to 75
HCU offense 35% (22/63)Nicholls offense 33% (25/75)

vs East Texas A&M

43–24 W · 71 plays to 80
HCU offense 38% (27/71)East Texas A&M offense 39% (31/80)

at Lamar

10–35 L · 54 plays to 71
HCU offense 37% (20/54)Lamar offense 48% (34/71)

at Stephen F. Austin

6–37 L · 80 plays to 59
HCU offense 29% (23/80)SFA offense 39% (23/59)