THIRD AND DATA

Houston Christian game log

2025: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 28vs Arkansas Baptist69–0 W765317.055–40214–21–129317–110–125–4033:5559%—
Sep 6at Eastern Kentucky10–20 L772533.332–4222–45–211175–182–347–6827:0028%28%
Sep 13at Nebraska7–59 L531603.035–9311–18–67114–142–229–7029:4333%63%
Sep 20vs Northern Colorado23–26 L582003.423–4017–35–16081–151–218–5021:3514%41%
Oct 4at UT Rio Grande Valley7–27 L692143.134–4918–35–165165–151–423–2028:3733%38%
Oct 11vs Northwestern State20–17 W633595.739–24213–24–117208–150–219–8328:0037%44%
Oct 18at McNeese0–27 L502795.624–1639–26–116124–120–127–6521:1334%51%
Oct 25vs SE Louisiana14–38 L501994.028–11411–22–8582–130–215–4522:1430%46%
Nov 1at Nicholls7–31 L592975.028–11016–31–187162–110–2410–10622:1336%46%
Nov 8vs Stephen F. Austin3–50 L541342.534–212–20–13291–140–0210–7228:2719%44%
Nov 15at East Texas A&M32–37 L774175.444–22816–33–189229–160–218–5227:2544%50%
Nov 22vs Incarnate Word10–31 L673204.831–4819–36–272145–170–3010–9825:41——
Season12 games2–107533,3634.5407–1533178–346–1,83018453–1716–242291–7695:16:0335%44%

Success rate

HCU on offense, and what its defense allowed. Same rule as the table above.

Success rate by game34.5% · 44.2%
59
28
28
33
63
14
41
33
38
37
44
34
51
30
46
36
46
19
44
44
50
Arkansas Baptist
@ Eastern Kentucky
@ Nebraska
Northern Colorado
@ UT Rio Grande Valley
Northwestern State
@ McNeese
SE Louisiana
@ Nicholls
Stephen F. Austin
@ East Texas A&M
Incarnate Word

Against Power 4 opponents (bold): offense 32.7%, defense allows 62.5%.

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: HCU on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is HCU's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:HCU offense 35% (256 of 741)Opponent offense / HCU defense 44% (317 of 717)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Arkansas Baptist: HCU offense 59% of 83Eastern Kentucky: opponent offense 28% of 112Eastern Kentucky: HCU offense 28% of 149Nebraska: opponent offense 63% of 72Nebraska: HCU offense 33% of 52Northern Colorado: opponent offense 41% of 49Northern Colorado: HCU offense 14% of 37UT Rio Grande Valley: opponent offense 38% of 60UT Rio Grande Valley: HCU offense 33% of 69Northwestern State: opponent offense 44% of 71Northwestern State: HCU offense 37% of 65McNeese: opponent offense 51% of 75McNeese: HCU offense 34% of 50SE Louisiana: opponent offense 46% of 68SE Louisiana: HCU offense 30% of 50Nicholls: opponent offense 46% of 70Nicholls: HCU offense 36% of 59Stephen F. Austin: opponent offense 44% of 66Stephen F. Austin: HCU offense 19% of 52East Texas A&M: opponent offense 50% of 74East Texas A&M: HCU offense 44% of 75
HCU offenseOpponent offense (HCU defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

No player qualifies under these filters.

vs Arkansas Baptist

69–0 W · 83 plays to 0
HCU offense 59% (49/83)Arkansas Baptist offense — (0/0)

at Eastern Kentucky

10–20 L · 149 plays to 112
HCU offense 28% (42/149)Eastern Kentucky offense 28% (31/112)

at Nebraska

7–59 L · 52 plays to 72
HCU offense 33% (17/52)Nebraska offense 63% (45/72)

vs Northern Colorado

23–26 L · 37 plays to 49
HCU offense 14% (5/37)Northern Colo. offense 41% (20/49)

at UT Rio Grande Valley

7–27 L · 69 plays to 60
HCU offense 33% (23/69)UT Rio Grande offense 38% (23/60)

vs Northwestern State

20–17 W · 65 plays to 71
HCU offense 37% (24/65)Northwestern St. offense 44% (31/71)

at McNeese

0–27 L · 50 plays to 75
HCU offense 34% (17/50)McNeese offense 51% (38/75)

vs SE Louisiana

14–38 L · 50 plays to 68
HCU offense 30% (15/50)SE Louisiana offense 46% (31/68)

at Nicholls

7–31 L · 59 plays to 70
HCU offense 36% (21/59)Nicholls offense 46% (32/70)

vs Stephen F. Austin

3–50 L · 52 plays to 66
HCU offense 19% (10/52)SFA offense 44% (29/66)

at East Texas A&M

32–37 L · 75 plays to 74
HCU offense 44% (33/75)East Texas A&M offense 50% (37/74)