Metrics

HoustonCougars

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2012

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Houston570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#15 (of 124 teams · 479.6 yds/g · 5,755 yards)#38 (of 124 teams · 32.4 pts/g · 389 points)#118 (of 124 teams · 483.0 yds/g allowed · 5,796 yards)#110 (of 124 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 432 points)#84 (of 124 teams · -3.6 /g · -43 on the season)#85 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 31 taken, 35 given · -0.33 /g)#120 (of 124 teams · 26:54 /g · 5h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 124 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 124 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#70 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 124 teams · 0.992 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 124 teams · 0.928 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Conference USA teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#56 (Total offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #6–#113. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #7–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#84 (Total defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #26–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#81 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #27–#123. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#79 (Point margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #19–#120. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#70 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #11–#118. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#58 (Possession: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #3–#120. 2 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#71 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #15–#99. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#72 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #16–#111. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #27–#103. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #10–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#46 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #4–#71. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range #23–#122. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2012East Carolina850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 124 teams · 408.5 yds/g · 5,311 yards)#47 (of 124 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#89 (of 124 teams · 430.7 yds/g allowed · 5,599 yards)#90 (of 124 teams · 31.6 pts/g allowed · 411 points)#72 (of 124 teams · -0.1 /g · -2 on the season)#60 (of 124 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g)#58 (of 124 teams · 30:37 /g · 6h 38m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 124 teams · 0.090 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 124 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 124 teams · 43% of plays successful)#101 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#49 (of 124 teams · 0.946 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 124 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Marshall570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 534.3 yds/g · 6,411 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 40.9 pts/g · 491 points)#104 (of 124 teams · 456.6 yds/g allowed · 5,479 yards)#123 (of 124 teams · 43.1 pts/g allowed · 517 points)#79 (of 124 teams · -2.2 /g · -26 on the season)#75 (of 124 teams · -2 on the season · 18 taken, 20 given · -0.17 /g)#88 (of 124 teams · 29:25 /g · 5h 53m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#15 (of 124 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 124 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 124 teams · 45% of plays successful)#90 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#35 (of 124 teams · 0.961 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 124 teams · 0.894 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Memphis480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#113 (of 124 teams · 318.3 yds/g · 3,820 yards)#88 (of 124 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 293 points)#53 (of 124 teams · 383.6 yds/g allowed · 4,603 yards)#81 (of 124 teams · 30.3 pts/g allowed · 363 points)#90 (of 124 teams · -5.8 /g · -70 on the season)#70 (of 124 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.08 /g)#42 (of 124 teams · 31:26 /g · 6h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 124 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 124 teams · 0.048 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#49 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 124 teams · 0.937 average PPA on successful plays)#63 (of 124 teams · 0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Rice760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 124 teams · 427.4 yds/g · 5,556 yards)#41 (of 124 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 414 points)#83 (of 124 teams · 423.8 yds/g allowed · 5,509 yards)#79 (of 124 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 390 points)#64 (of 124 teams · +1.9 /g · +24 on the season)#41 (of 124 teams · +5 on the season · 27 taken, 22 given · +0.38 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 34:18 /g · 7h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 124 teams · 0.091 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 124 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 124 teams · 43% of plays successful)#53 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 124 teams · 0.937 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 124 teams · 1.024 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012SMU760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 124 teams · 367.3 yds/g · 4,775 yards)#54 (of 124 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 397 points)#65 (of 124 teams · 397.1 yds/g allowed · 5,163 yards)#54 (of 124 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 334 points)#53 (of 124 teams · +4.8 /g · +63 on the season)#11 (of 124 teams · +14 on the season · 37 taken, 23 given · +1.08 /g)#5 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 33:45 /g · 7h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 124 teams · 0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 124 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#23 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 124 teams · 0.916 average PPA on successful plays)#122 (of 124 teams · 1.081 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Southern Miss0120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#109 (of 124 teams · 322.8 yds/g · 3,874 yards)#112 (of 124 teams · 19.7 pts/g · 236 points)#84 (of 124 teams · 424.4 yds/g allowed · 5,093 yards)#116 (of 124 teams · 37.8 pts/g allowed · 454 points)#120 (of 124 teams · -18.2 /g · -218 on the season)#118 (of 124 teams · -16 on the season · 12 taken, 28 given · -1.33 /g)#108 (of 124 teams · 28:03 /g · 5h 37m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 124 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 124 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 124 teams · 39% of plays successful)#119 (of 124 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 124 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 124 teams · 0.877 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Tulane2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 124 teams · 319.8 yds/g · 3,838 yards)#99 (of 124 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 257 points)#117 (of 124 teams · 482.6 yds/g allowed · 5,791 yards)#118 (of 124 teams · 38.4 pts/g allowed · 461 points)#118 (of 124 teams · -17.0 /g · -204 on the season)#104 (of 124 teams · -9 on the season · 24 taken, 33 given · -0.75 /g)#61 (of 124 teams · 30:33 /g · 6h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 124 teams · 0.020 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 124 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#103 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#74 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 124 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 124 teams · 0.984 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Tulsa1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#28 (of 124 teams · 457.1 yds/g · 6,400 yards)#30 (of 124 teams · 34.7 pts/g · 486 points)#26 (of 124 teams · 347.8 yds/g allowed · 4,869 yards)#35 (of 124 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#28 (of 124 teams · +11.1 /g · +155 on the season)#50 (of 124 teams · +3 on the season · 27 taken, 24 given · +0.21 /g)#60 (of 124 teams · 30:34 /g · 7h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 124 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 124 teams · -0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 124 teams · 0.931 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 124 teams · 0.969 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012UAB390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 124 teams · 417.0 yds/g · 5,004 yards)#69 (of 124 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 339 points)#86 (of 124 teams · 427.3 yds/g allowed · 5,127 yards)#114 (of 124 teams · 37.5 pts/g allowed · 450 points)#102 (of 124 teams · -9.3 /g · -111 on the season)#104 (of 124 teams · -9 on the season · 18 taken, 27 given · -0.75 /g)#43 (of 124 teams · 31:25 /g · 6h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 124 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 124 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#61 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 1.045 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 124 teams · 0.938 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012UCF1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#57 (of 124 teams · 407.4 yds/g · 5,703 yards)#25 (of 124 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 496 points)#43 (of 124 teams · 373.6 yds/g allowed · 5,230 yards)#27 (of 124 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 309 points)#19 (of 124 teams · +13.4 /g · +187 on the season)#16 (of 124 teams · +12 on the season · 27 taken, 15 given · +0.86 /g)#35 (of 124 teams · 31:43 /g · 7h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 124 teams · 0.107 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 124 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 124 teams · 43% of plays successful)#58 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 124 teams · 0.947 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 124 teams · 0.884 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012UTEP390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Conference USA teams in 2012. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#88 (of 124 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,470 yards)#102 (of 124 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 254 points)#93 (of 124 teams · 440.5 yds/g allowed · 5,286 yards)#78 (of 124 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#100 (of 124 teams · -8.6 /g · -103 on the season)#85 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 19 taken, 23 given · -0.33 /g)#92 (of 124 teams · 29:18 /g · 5h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 124 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#104 (of 124 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#101 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#102 (of 124 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 124 teams · 0.947 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 124 teams · 0.896 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20122012 HoustonConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #56
Total offense. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Marshall #6 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #28 of 124; 2012 Rice #44 of 124; 2012 UAB #53 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #56 of 124; 2012 UCF #57 of 124; 2012 UTEP #88 of 124; 2012 SMU #91 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #109 of 124; 2012 Tulane #112 of 124; 2012 Memphis #113 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 15 of 124. Conference USA median rank 56.
Scoring offensemedian #47
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Marshall #7 of 124; 2012 UCF #25 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #30 of 124; 2012 Rice #41 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #47 of 124; 2012 SMU #54 of 124; 2012 UAB #69 of 124; 2012 Memphis #88 of 124; 2012 Tulane #99 of 124; 2012 UTEP #102 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #112 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 38 of 124. Conference USA median rank 47.
Total defensemedian #84
Total defense. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Tulsa #26 of 124; 2012 UCF #43 of 124; 2012 Memphis #53 of 124; 2012 SMU #65 of 124; 2012 Rice #83 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #84 of 124; 2012 UAB #86 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #89 of 124; 2012 UTEP #93 of 124; 2012 Marshall #104 of 124; 2012 Tulane #117 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 118 of 124. Conference USA median rank 84.
Scoring defensemedian #81
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 UCF #27 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #35 of 124; 2012 SMU #54 of 124; 2012 UTEP #78 of 124; 2012 Rice #79 of 124; 2012 Memphis #81 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #90 of 124; 2012 UAB #114 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #116 of 124; 2012 Tulane #118 of 124; 2012 Marshall #123 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 110 of 124. Conference USA median rank 81.
Point marginmedian #79
Point margin. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 UCF #19 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #28 of 124; 2012 SMU #53 of 124; 2012 Rice #64 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #72 of 124; 2012 Marshall #79 of 124; 2012 Memphis #90 of 124; 2012 UTEP #100 of 124; 2012 UAB #102 of 124; 2012 Tulane #118 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #120 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 84 of 124. Conference USA median rank 79.
Turnover marginmedian #70
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 SMU #11 of 124; 2012 UCF #16 of 124; 2012 Rice #41 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #50 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #60 of 124; 2012 Memphis #70 of 124; 2012 Marshall #75 of 124; 2012 UTEP #85 of 124; 2012 Tulane #104 of 124; 2012 UAB #104 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #118 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 85 of 124. Conference USA median rank 70.
Possessionmedian #58
Possession. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Rice #3 of 124; 2012 SMU #5 of 124; 2012 UCF #35 of 124; 2012 Memphis #42 of 124; 2012 UAB #43 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #58 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #60 of 124; 2012 Tulane #61 of 124; 2012 Marshall #88 of 124; 2012 UTEP #92 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #108 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 120 of 124. Conference USA median rank 58.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Houston, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Houston, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Houston, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Houston, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #71
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Marshall #15 of 124; 2012 UCF #36 of 124; 2012 Rice #40 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #41 of 124; 2012 UAB #63 of 124; 2012 Memphis #71 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #78 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #86 of 124; 2012 UTEP #93 of 124; 2012 Tulane #95 of 124; 2012 SMU #99 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 74 of 124. Conference USA median rank 71.
Defensive EPAmedian #72
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Tulsa #16 of 124; 2012 SMU #37 of 124; 2012 UCF #41 of 124; 2012 Memphis #55 of 124; 2012 Tulane #72 of 124; 2012 Marshall #84 of 124; 2012 UAB #94 of 124; 2012 Rice #102 of 124; 2012 UTEP #104 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #110 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #111 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 53 of 124. Conference USA median rank 72.
Offensive success ratemedian #74
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Marshall #27 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #40 of 124; 2012 UCF #43 of 124; 2012 Rice #52 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #71 of 124; 2012 UAB #74 of 124; 2012 Memphis #89 of 124; 2012 SMU #91 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #97 of 124; 2012 UTEP #101 of 124; 2012 Tulane #103 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 84 of 124. Conference USA median rank 74.
Defensive success ratemedian #61
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Tulsa #10 of 124; 2012 SMU #23 of 124; 2012 Memphis #49 of 124; 2012 Rice #53 of 124; 2012 UCF #58 of 124; 2012 UAB #61 of 124; 2012 Tulane #74 of 124; 2012 Marshall #90 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #101 of 124; 2012 UTEP #102 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #119 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 70 of 124. Conference USA median rank 61.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #46
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 UAB #4 of 124; 2012 Southern Miss #20 of 124; 2012 Tulane #28 of 124; 2012 Marshall #35 of 124; 2012 UCF #46 of 124; 2012 UTEP #47 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #49 of 124; 2012 Rice #54 of 124; 2012 Memphis #55 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #60 of 124; 2012 SMU #71 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 18 of 124. Conference USA median rank 46.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #63
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Southern Miss #23 of 124; 2012 UCF #28 of 124; 2012 Marshall #31 of 124; 2012 UTEP #35 of 124; 2012 Memphis #63 of 124; 2012 UAB #66 of 124; 2012 East Carolina #72 of 124; 2012 Tulsa #90 of 124; 2012 Tulane #101 of 124; 2012 Rice #116 of 124; 2012 SMU #122 of 124. Marked: 2012 Houston, ranked 57 of 124. Conference USA median rank 63.