THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

HoustonCougars

Season
‹
›Current

American Athletic

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Houston played 2 such games.

American Athletic, 2015

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Houston13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #9 Florida State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #21 Navy, #24 Temple · postseason: #9 Florida State)— (416.5 yds/g · 833 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g · 68 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (290.0 yds/g allowed · 580 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (15.5 pts/g allowed · 31 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+18.5 /g · +37 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+5 in these games · 8 taken, 3 given · +2.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33:15 /g · 1h 07m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#74 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 511.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof 12 American Athletic teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#45 (Total offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #45–#45. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#42 (Scoring offense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #42–#42. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Total defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #29–#29. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Scoring defense: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #53–#53. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Point margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #47–#47. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#9 — top 10 (Turnover margin: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #9–#9. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Possession: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #54–#54. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning passing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #1–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Returning receiving: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #1–#125. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning rushing: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #1–#92. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Team talent: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #61–#121. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#31 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #31–#31. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #40–#40. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#21 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #21–#21. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #29–#29. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #62–#62. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range #68–#68. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2015Tulsa6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (603.0 yds/g · 603 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38.0 pts/g · 38 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (773.0 yds/g allowed · 773 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52.0 pts/g allowed · 52 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-14.0 /g · -14 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 2 taken, 0 given · +2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:37 /g · 0h 28m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 404.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.346 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.468 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (60% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.412 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.350 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Cincinnati7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (446.0 yds/g · 446 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g · 34 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (427.0 yds/g allowed · 427 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23.0 pts/g allowed · 23 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+11.0 /g · +11 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-1 in these games · 0 taken, 1 given · -1.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:22 /g · 0h 25m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#66 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 494.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.292 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (57% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.020 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.062 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Memphis9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Ole Miss)— (571.0 yds/g · 1,142 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (46.0 pts/g · 92 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (419.5 yds/g allowed · 839 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23.5 pts/g allowed · 47 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+22.5 /g · +45 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 2 taken, 4 given · -1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32:57 /g · 1h 06m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#35 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 381.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.307 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.118 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (53% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.184 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.154 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015SMU2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (438.5 yds/g · 877 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29.0 pts/g · 58 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (721.5 yds/g allowed · 1,443 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (56.0 pts/g allowed · 112 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-27.0 /g · -54 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (35:25 /g · 1h 11m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#67 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 128 teams · 446.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.616 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (59% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.355 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.565 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015South Florida8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 Temple)#45 (of 75 teams · 371.3 yds/g · 1,114 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 76 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 385.7 yds/g allowed · 1,157 yds · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 31.0 pts/g allowed · 93 points · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · -5.7 /g · -17 in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 6 taken, 4 given · +0.67 /g · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 28:13 /g · 1h 25m in these games · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#83 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 128 teams · 529.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 75 teams · 0.163 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 0.171 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 1.189 average PPA on successful plays · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.411 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 3 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Temple10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (306.0 yds/g · 612 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (23.5 pts/g · 47 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (325.0 yds/g allowed · 650 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (17.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+6.5 /g · +13 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1 in these games · 3 taken, 2 given · +0.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32:16 /g · 1h 05m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#50 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 405.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.092 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.444 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.510 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Tulane3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (259.5 yds/g · 519 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (8.5 pts/g · 17 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (550.5 yds/g allowed · 1,101 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (51.0 pts/g allowed · 102 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-42.5 /g · -85 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 3 taken, 3 given · +0.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:02 /g · 0h 50m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#64 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 408.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.340 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.237 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.297 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015UConn6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Houston)— (233.0 yds/g · 233 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (6.0 pts/g · 6 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (270.0 yds/g allowed · 270 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (9.0 pts/g allowed · 9 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3.0 /g · -3 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 2 taken, 2 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (30:18 /g · 0h 30m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#93 (of 128 teams · 19% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 128 teams · 402.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.073 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.051 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.996 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015East Carolina5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (371.5 yds/g · 743 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29.5 pts/g · 59 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (406.0 yds/g allowed · 812 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (29.5 pts/g allowed · 59 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0.0 /g · +0 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 3 taken, 5 given · -1.00 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27:52 /g · 0h 56m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 128 teams · 403.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.652 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015Navy11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (340.0 yds/g · 340 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (24.0 pts/g · 24 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (459.0 yds/g allowed · 459 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41.0 pts/g allowed · 41 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-17.0 /g · -17 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-2 in these games · 1 taken, 3 given · -2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28:53 /g · 0h 29m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#26 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 306.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.263 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.420 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (40% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (54% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.573 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2015UCF0–120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 American Athletic teams in 2015. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (205.5 yds/g · 411 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.5 pts/g · 21 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (445.5 yds/g allowed · 891 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31.0 pts/g allowed · 62 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-20.5 /g · -41 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 1 taken, 4 given · -1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (25:16 /g · 0h 51m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#35 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#73 (of 128 teams · 484.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.122 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.709 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

American Athletic, 20152015 HoustonAmerican Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #45
Total offense. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #45 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 45.
Scoring offensemedian #42
Scoring offense. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #42 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 42.
Total defensemedian #29
Total defense. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #29 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 29.
Scoring defensemedian #53
Scoring defense. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #53 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 53.
Point marginmedian #47
Point margin. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #47 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 47.
Turnover marginmedian #9
Turnover margin. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #9 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 9.
Possessionmedian #54
Possession. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #54 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 54.
Returning passingmedian #64
Returning passing. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tulsa #1 of 128; 2015 Navy #26 of 128; 2015 Memphis #35 of 128; 2015 UCF #35 of 128; 2015 Temple #50 of 128; 2015 Tulane #64 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #66 of 128; 2015 SMU #67 of 128; 2015 South Florida #83 of 128; 2015 UConn #93 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 Houston, ranked 74 of 128. American Athletic median rank 64.
Returning receivingmedian #74
Returning receiving. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Cincinnati #1 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #4 of 128; 2015 Memphis #42 of 128; 2015 SMU #54 of 128; 2015 Tulane #71 of 128; 2015 Navy #74 of 128; 2015 Temple #80 of 128; 2015 South Florida #92 of 128; 2015 UConn #101 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #112 of 128; 2015 UCF #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 Houston, ranked 103 of 128. American Athletic median rank 74.
Returning rushingmedian #40
Returning rushing. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Tulsa #1 of 128; 2015 South Florida #19 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #23 of 128; 2015 Tulane #27 of 128; 2015 UCF #40 of 128; 2015 SMU #42 of 128; 2015 UConn #50 of 128; 2015 Navy #68 of 128; 2015 Memphis #74 of 128; 2015 Temple #84 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #92 of 128. Marked: 2015 Houston, ranked 26 of 128. American Athletic median rank 40.
Team talentmedian #83
Team talent. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #61 of 128; 2015 Cincinnati #71 of 128; 2015 UCF #73 of 128; 2015 SMU #75 of 128; 2015 Tulane #83 of 128; 2015 Temple #85 of 128; 2015 Tulsa #86 of 128; 2015 East Carolina #87 of 128; 2015 UConn #89 of 128; 2015 Memphis #96 of 128; 2015 Navy #121 of 128. Marked: 2015 Houston, ranked 65 of 128. American Athletic median rank 83.
Offensive EPAmedian #31
Offensive EPA. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #31 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 31.
Defensive EPAmedian #40
Defensive EPA. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #40 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 40.
Offensive success ratemedian #21
Offensive success rate. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #21 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 21.
Defensive success ratemedian #29
Defensive success rate. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #29 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 29.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #62
Offensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #62 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 62.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #68
Defensive explosiveness. American Athletic, 2015, best rank first: 2015 South Florida #68 of 75. Marked: 2015 Houston, which has no value for this metric. American Athletic median rank 68.