THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

IdahoVandals

Season
‹
›Current

Sun Belt

Peers are the 25 teams ranked in the last regular-season College Football Playoff poll of 2016, released in week 15.

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Idaho played 2 such games.

CFP Top 25, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Idaho9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (289.5 yds/g · 579 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (10.0 pts/g · 20 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (495.5 yds/g allowed · 991 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (57.5 pts/g allowed · 115 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-47.5 /g · -95 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-3 in these games · 2 taken, 5 given · -1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:58 /g · 1h 04m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#63 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 256.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (-0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.410 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (38% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (53% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.033 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
Medianof the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#18 (Total offense: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#60. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Scoring offense: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#50. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#15 (Total defense: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#65. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#13 (Scoring defense: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#61. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#12 (Point margin: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#31. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#24 (Turnover margin: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#45. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Possession: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #3–#59. 6 of 25 in the top 10.)#67 (Returning passing: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#122. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#55 (Returning receiving: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#125. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#51 (Returning rushing: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #2–#127. 2 of 25 in the top 10.)#20 (Team talent: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#117. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Offensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#57. 7 of 25 in the top 10.)#16 (Defensive EPA: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#56. 10 of 25 in the top 10.)#14 (Offensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#48. 8 of 25 in the top 10.)#12 (Defensive success rate: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #1–#52. 9 of 25 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #3–#69. 4 of 25 in the top 10.)#42 (Defensive explosiveness: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range #4–#71. 1 of 25 in the top 10.)
2016Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 560.0 yds/g · 5,040 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.0 pts/g · 405 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +22.6 /g · +203 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 28:36 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 654.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.391 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 USC · postseason: #4 Washington)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #9 USC, #14 Auburn, #17 Florida, #20 LSU, #21 Tennessee · postseason: #4 Washington)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 494.0 yds/g · 4,446 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 356 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 263.6 yds/g allowed · 2,372 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.8 pts/g allowed · 124 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +25.8 /g · +232 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 31:59 /g · 4h 48m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#101 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#127 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 982.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.290 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 1.369 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Clemson14–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #11 Florida State, #13 Louisville, #14 Auburn, #22 Virginia Tech · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 513.5 yds/g · 5,135 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 320.7 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +21.1 /g · +211 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 30:07 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 846.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 71 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Washington12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado, #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 493.1 yds/g · 4,931 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 344.3 yds/g allowed · 3,443 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 197 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.0 /g · +240 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13 in these games · 23 taken, 10 given · +1.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 31:21 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#43 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 699.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.380 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 1.295 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)#29 (of 71 teams · 431.3 yds/g · 4,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 378 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 246.9 yds/g allowed · 2,469 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.3 pts/g allowed · 133 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.5 /g · +245 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 852.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 71 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 1.194 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Ohio State11–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)#18 (of 71 teams · 456.1 yds/g · 4,561 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 38.7 pts/g · 387 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 295.6 yds/g allowed · 2,956 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +23.0 /g · +230 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 16 taken, 7 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:29 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 902.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 71 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.091 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #20 LSU · postseason: #15 Western Michigan)#55 (of 71 teams · 358.7 yds/g · 3,587 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 265 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 137 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.8 /g · +128 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34:25 /g · 5h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 643.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.130 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.121 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oklahoma11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #12 Oklahoma State, #16 West Virginia · postseason: #14 Auburn)#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 565.5 yds/g · 5,655 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.4 pts/g · 454 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 451.7 yds/g allowed · 4,517 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 30.6 pts/g allowed · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +14.8 /g · +148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · +0 in these games · 14 taken, 14 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:04 /g · 5h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#83 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 777.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 0.219 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 50% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 1.383 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016LSU8–44 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #13 Louisville)#31 (of 71 teams · 428.1 yds/g · 3,853 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 232 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 327.0 yds/g allowed · 2,943 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · +8.3 /g · +75 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 32:07 /g · 4h 49m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 917.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 71 teams · 0.226 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 1.241 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Florida · postseason: #6 Michigan)#16 (of 71 teams · 460.7 yds/g · 4,607 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 316 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 354.2 yds/g allowed · 3,542 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +6.6 /g · +66 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:10 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 906.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.267 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 1.355 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Oklahoma State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Colorado)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #16 West Virginia, #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #10 Colorado)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 517.0 yds/g · 5,170 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 376 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 486.3 yds/g allowed · 4,863 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · +7.6 /g · +76 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 28:43 /g · 4h 47m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 128 teams · 68% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 631.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.300 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 0.218 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.436 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 1.231 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Colorado10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#23 (of 71 teams · 446.4 yds/g · 4,464 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 317 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 3,564 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · +10.6 /g · +106 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 31:17 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 128 teams · 526.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 71 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 1.294 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Penn State11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin, #24 Temple)#26 (of 71 teams · 439.9 yds/g · 4,399 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37.2 pts/g · 372 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 355.8 yds/g allowed · 3,558 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13.9 /g · +139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 742.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 71 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.455 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016USC10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)#14 (of 71 teams · 473.2 yds/g · 5,205 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 350 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 368.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · +8.3 /g · +91 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 16 taken, 18 given · -0.18 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 31:43 /g · 5h 49m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#114 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 936.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 71 teams · 0.234 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 1.259 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.348 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Auburn8–54 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 LSU)#48 (of 71 teams · 377.7 yds/g · 3,399 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 223 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 386.0 yds/g allowed · 3,474 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 166 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · +6.3 /g · +57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 27:55 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 865.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 71 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 0.103 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Western Michigan13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (426.5 yds/g · 853 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g · 56 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (317.0 yds/g allowed · 634 yds · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (15.5 pts/g allowed · 31 points · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+12.5 /g · +25 in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+3 in these games · 3 taken, 0 given · +1.50 /g · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (37:02 /g · 1h 14m in these games · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 128 teams · 443.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.222 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.120 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (42% of plays successful · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.151 average PPA on successful plays · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 2 games vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016West Virginia10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 497.8 yds/g · 4,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 31.8 pts/g · 318 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 424.8 yds/g allowed · 4,248 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 228 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · +9.0 /g · +90 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 29:17 /g · 4h 53m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 654.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#18 (of 71 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.299 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)#17 (of 71 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 4,577 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 490.8 yds/g allowed · 4,908 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 39.3 pts/g allowed · 393 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · +4.4 /g · +44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31:26 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 649.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.324 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 0.242 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.492 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida9–43 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #20 LSU)#60 (of 71 teams · 338.4 yds/g · 3,046 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 209 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 330.1 yds/g allowed · 2,971 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · +6.1 /g · +55 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 30:26 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#124 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 798.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 71 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia Tech10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Pittsburgh)#20 (of 71 teams · 452.1 yds/g · 4,521 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 338.3 yds/g allowed · 3,383 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · +10.7 /g · +107 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 646.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 71 teams · 0.184 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Stanford10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#54 (of 71 teams · 359.6 yds/g · 3,955 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 276 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 372.4 yds/g allowed · 4,096 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 225 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · +4.6 /g · +51 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 17 taken, 18 given · -0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · 32:51 /g · 6h 01m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#109 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 778.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 71 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 1.310 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Utah9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#30 (of 71 teams · 430.4 yds/g · 3,874 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 284 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 427.1 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · +3.7 /g · +33 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 20 taken, 12 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:02 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#123 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 580.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 71 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 0.202 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Temple10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Navy)— (324.0 yds/g · 324 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (403.0 yds/g allowed · 403 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (34.0 pts/g allowed · 34 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (-7.0 /g · -7 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+2 in these games · 3 taken, 1 given · +2.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (31:27 /g · 0h 31m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#13 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 492.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.145 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.161 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (32% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.528 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.484 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)
2016Tennessee9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #17 Florida, #22 Virginia Tech)#21 (of 71 teams · 450.3 yds/g · 4,053 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 520.9 yds/g allowed · 4,688 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 319 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · +1.4 /g · +13 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 27:46 /g · 4h 10m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#16 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 128 teams · 813.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 71 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 0.233 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 1.374 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Navy9–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of the 25 teams in 2016's final CFP poll. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)— (368.0 yds/g · 368 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (28.0 pts/g · 28 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (370.0 yds/g allowed · 370 yds · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (27.0 pts/g allowed · 27 points · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+1.0 /g · +1 in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (+0 in these games · 0 taken, 0 given · +0.00 /g · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (33:53 /g · 0h 34m in these games · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 17% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 128 teams · 342.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (0.365 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (0.424 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (47% of plays successful · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.373 average PPA on successful plays · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)— (1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 1 game vs power opponents (regular season) · not ranked: fewer than 3)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

CFP Top 25, 20162016 IdahoCFP Top 25 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #18
Total offense. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #8 of 71; 2016 Alabama #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 USC #14 of 71; 2016 Florida State #16 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #17 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #18 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #21 of 71; 2016 Colorado #23 of 71; 2016 Penn State #26 of 71; 2016 Michigan #29 of 71; 2016 Utah #30 of 71; 2016 LSU #31 of 71; 2016 Auburn #48 of 71; 2016 Stanford #54 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #55 of 71; 2016 Florida #60 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 18.
Scoring offensemedian #13
Scoring offense. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Louisville #2 of 71; 2016 Washington #3 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #3 of 71; 2016 Alabama #7 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #9 of 71; 2016 Michigan #10 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #11 of 71; 2016 Penn State #12 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #13 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 USC #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Colorado #21 of 71; 2016 Florida State #22 of 71; 2016 Utah #23 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 71; 2016 LSU #39 of 71; 2016 Stanford #43 of 71; 2016 Auburn #45 of 71; 2016 Florida #50 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Total defensemedian #15
Total defense. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Alabama #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 LSU #7 of 71; 2016 Florida #8 of 71; 2016 Louisville #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #10 of 71; 2016 Washington #11 of 71; 2016 Florida State #15 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 Colorado #17 of 71; 2016 USC #19 of 71; 2016 Stanford #21 of 71; 2016 Auburn #24 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #38 of 71; 2016 Utah #42 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #48 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #59 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #60 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #65 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 15.
Scoring defensemedian #13
Scoring defense. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #2 of 71; 2016 Alabama #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Florida #6 of 71; 2016 LSU #7 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Auburn #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 Stanford #11 of 71; 2016 Colorado #13 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #15 of 71; 2016 Louisville #17 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Penn State #20 of 71; 2016 USC #24 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Utah #35 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #41 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #43 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #56 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #61 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 13.
Point marginmedian #12
Point margin. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Washington #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Louisville #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #7 of 71; 2016 Penn State #8 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #11 of 71; 2016 Colorado #12 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #13 of 71; 2016 LSU #15 of 71; 2016 USC #16 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #17 of 71; 2016 Florida State #18 of 71; 2016 Auburn #20 of 71; 2016 Florida #21 of 71; 2016 Stanford #23 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #25 of 71; 2016 Utah #26 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #31 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 12.
Turnover marginmedian #24
Turnover margin. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Utah #5 of 71; 2016 Colorado #7 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #10 of 71; 2016 Penn State #14 of 71; 2016 Florida #18 of 71; 2016 Auburn #22 of 71; 2016 Michigan #24 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #24 of 71; 2016 LSU #28 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #30 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #33 of 71; 2016 Stanford #35 of 71; 2016 Alabama #36 of 71; 2016 Louisville #36 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #36 of 71; 2016 USC #40 of 71; 2016 Clemson #45 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #45 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 24.
Possessionmedian #20
Possession. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 71; 2016 Michigan #7 of 71; 2016 Florida State #8 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #9 of 71; 2016 Utah #10 of 71; 2016 Stanford #11 of 71; 2016 LSU #16 of 71; 2016 Alabama #17 of 71; 2016 USC #19 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #23 of 71; 2016 Washington #25 of 71; 2016 Colorado #26 of 71; 2016 Florida #39 of 71; 2016 Clemson #40 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #44 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #47 of 71; 2016 Louisville #49 of 71; 2016 Penn State #51 of 71; 2016 Auburn #56 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #59 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Returning passingmedian #67
Returning passing. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Auburn #1 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #1 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #1 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #17 of 128; 2016 Clemson #25 of 128; 2016 Washington #30 of 128; 2016 LSU #30 of 128; 2016 Temple #34 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #51 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #58 of 128; 2016 Colorado #67 of 128; 2016 Florida State #82 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #85 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #86 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #100 of 128; 2016 Alabama #101 of 128; 2016 Penn State #102 of 128; 2016 Michigan #105 of 128; 2016 Stanford #109 of 128; 2016 USC #114 of 128; 2016 Navy #115 of 128; 2016 Florida #121 of 128; 2016 Utah #122 of 128. Marked: 2016 Idaho, ranked 63 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 67.
Returning receivingmedian #55
Returning receiving. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisville #1 of 128; 2016 Florida State #3 of 128; 2016 USC #11 of 128; 2016 Michigan #17 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2016 LSU #23 of 128; 2016 Penn State #28 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #32 of 128; 2016 Clemson #35 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #50 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #51 of 128; 2016 Alabama #54 of 128; 2016 Navy #55 of 128; 2016 Colorado #58 of 128; 2016 Stanford #66 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #80 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #83 of 128; 2016 Utah #88 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #98 of 128; 2016 Florida #101 of 128; 2016 Temple #104 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #108 of 128; 2016 Auburn #110 of 128; 2016 Washington #111 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Idaho, ranked 74 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 55.
Returning rushingmedian #51
Returning rushing. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Michigan #2 of 128; 2016 LSU #2 of 128; 2016 Louisville #12 of 128; 2016 Temple #13 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #16 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #23 of 128; 2016 Clemson #26 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #27 of 128; 2016 Florida State #39 of 128; 2016 Washington #43 of 128; 2016 Penn State #49 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 USC #51 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #54 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #70 of 128; 2016 Colorado #71 of 128; 2016 Michigan #72 of 128; 2016 Stanford #77 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #94 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #121 of 128; 2016 Auburn #122 of 128; 2016 Utah #123 of 128; 2016 Florida #124 of 128; 2016 Navy #126 of 128; 2016 Alabama #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Idaho, ranked 113 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 51.
Team talentmedian #20
Team talent. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 128; 2016 USC #2 of 128; 2016 LSU #3 of 128; 2016 Florida State #4 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 128; 2016 Auburn #7 of 128; 2016 Michigan #8 of 128; 2016 Clemson #9 of 128; 2016 Tennessee #14 of 128; 2016 Florida #16 of 128; 2016 Stanford #17 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma #18 of 128; 2016 Penn State #20 of 128; 2016 Washington #24 of 128; 2016 West Virginia #31 of 128; 2016 Louisville #32 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #35 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #36 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2016 Oklahoma State #39 of 128; 2016 Utah #51 of 128; 2016 Colorado #62 of 128; 2016 Temple #71 of 128; 2016 Western Michigan #81 of 128; 2016 Navy #117 of 128. Marked: 2016 Idaho, ranked 126 of 128. CFP Top 25 median rank 20.
Offensive EPAmedian #16
Offensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Oklahoma #1 of 71; 2016 Washington #2 of 71; 2016 Louisville #3 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #4 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #5 of 71; 2016 Alabama #6 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #12 of 71; 2016 Clemson #13 of 71; 2016 USC #14 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 LSU #17 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #18 of 71; 2016 Michigan #22 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #25 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #28 of 71; 2016 Colorado #32 of 71; 2016 Utah #37 of 71; 2016 Stanford #38 of 71; 2016 Auburn #39 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #49 of 71; 2016 Florida #57 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Defensive EPAmedian #16
Defensive EPA. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Florida #5 of 71; 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Louisville #7 of 71; 2016 Colorado #8 of 71; 2016 LSU #9 of 71; 2016 Washington #10 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Auburn #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #21 of 71; 2016 Penn State #22 of 71; 2016 Florida State #23 of 71; 2016 USC #25 of 71; 2016 Stanford #41 of 71; 2016 Utah #44 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #47 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #48 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #52 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #56 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 16.
Offensive success ratemedian #14
Offensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 71; 2016 Clemson #2 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #3 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Alabama #6 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #7 of 71; 2016 USC #8 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #12 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #13 of 71; 2016 Michigan #14 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #15 of 71; 2016 LSU #18 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #19 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #22 of 71; 2016 Utah #28 of 71; 2016 Colorado #29 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #31 of 71; 2016 Penn State #34 of 71; 2016 Stanford #36 of 71; 2016 Auburn #38 of 71; 2016 Florida #48 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 14.
Defensive success ratemedian #12
Defensive success rate. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Alabama #1 of 71; 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Louisville #4 of 71; 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 LSU #6 of 71; 2016 Colorado #7 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #10 of 71; 2016 Florida #11 of 71; 2016 Washington #12 of 71; 2016 Florida State #14 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 USC #17 of 71; 2016 Auburn #24 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #27 of 71; 2016 Utah #29 of 71; 2016 Stanford #31 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #34 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #36 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #49 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #52 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 12.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #38
Offensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Penn State #3 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #4 of 71; 2016 Louisville #6 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #7 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #13 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #17 of 71; 2016 Florida State #28 of 71; 2016 LSU #29 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #32 of 71; 2016 Washington #34 of 71; 2016 Alabama #38 of 71; 2016 Stanford #42 of 71; 2016 USC #43 of 71; 2016 Colorado #52 of 71; 2016 Florida #53 of 71; 2016 Michigan #54 of 71; 2016 Utah #55 of 71; 2016 Clemson #56 of 71; 2016 Auburn #61 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #62 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #65 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 38.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #42
Defensive explosiveness. CFP Top 25, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 West Virginia #14 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma State #23 of 71; 2016 Auburn #25 of 71; 2016 Michigan #28 of 71; 2016 LSU #29 of 71; 2016 Washington #30 of 71; 2016 Clemson #32 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #33 of 71; 2016 Florida #38 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #42 of 71; 2016 Colorado #44 of 71; 2016 Tennessee #46 of 71; 2016 Stanford #47 of 71; 2016 Penn State #48 of 71; 2016 USC #56 of 71; 2016 Florida State #57 of 71; 2016 Oklahoma #59 of 71; 2016 Alabama #60 of 71; 2016 Utah #61 of 71; 2016 Louisville #62 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Idaho, which has no value for this metric. CFP Top 25 median rank 42.