Metrics

IndianaHoosiers

Season
Current

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2014

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2014Indiana480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Missouri)#64 (of 128 teams · 405.0 yds/g · 4,860 yards)#90 (of 128 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 301 points)#95 (of 128 teams · 433.8 yds/g allowed · 5,205 yards)#102 (of 128 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 394 points)#100 (of 128 teams · -7.8 /g · -93 on the season)#78 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 17 taken, 19 given · -0.17 /g)#103 (of 128 teams · 28:46 /g · 5h 45m on the season)#59 (of 128 teams · 69% of last season's passing production returning)#115 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's receiving production returning)#76 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 128 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 128 teams · 0.156 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#74 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#76 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 128 teams · 1.216 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 128 teams · 1.164 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20140 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#76 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #9–#115. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#71 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #5–#113. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #2–#112. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #7–#109. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#68 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #3–#103. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#75 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #2–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #2–#120. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#52 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #1–#108. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#42 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #1–#124. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #1–#90. 4 of 14 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#63 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #9–#121. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #1–#110. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#64 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #2–#111. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#51 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #7–#100. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#61 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #37–#112. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range #5–#121. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2014Illinois670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Minnesota)#97 (of 128 teams · 367.2 yds/g · 4,774 yards)#87 (of 128 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 337 points)#112 (of 128 teams · 456.4 yds/g allowed · 5,933 yards)#109 (of 128 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 442 points)#103 (of 128 teams · -8.1 /g · -105 on the season)#84 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 19 taken, 22 given · -0.23 /g)#112 (of 128 teams · 28:07 /g · 6h 06m on the season)#108 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#99 (of 128 teams · 46% of last season's receiving production returning)#47 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 128 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 128 teams · 0.190 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#37 (of 128 teams · 1.238 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 128 teams · 1.269 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Iowa760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 (of 128 teams · 400.1 yds/g · 5,201 yards)#71 (of 128 teams · 28.2 pts/g · 367 points)#22 (of 128 teams · 344.2 yds/g allowed · 4,475 yards)#51 (of 128 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 333 points)#66 (of 128 teams · +2.6 /g · +34 on the season)#105 (of 128 teams · -6 on the season · 16 taken, 22 given · -0.46 /g)#39 (of 128 teams · 31:24 /g · 6h 48m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 128 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 128 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#62 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#57 (of 128 teams · 1.202 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 128 teams · 1.113 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Maryland760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#112 (of 128 teams · 341.9 yds/g · 4,445 yards)#68 (of 128 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points)#97 (of 128 teams · 436.2 yds/g allowed · 5,671 yards)#89 (of 128 teams · 30.1 pts/g allowed · 392 points)#80 (of 128 teams · -1.7 /g · -22 on the season)#60 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g)#120 (of 128 teams · 27:22 /g · 5h 56m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#26 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving production returning)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 128 teams · 0.059 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 128 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#98 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#64 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 128 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 128 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Michigan573 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#115 (of 128 teams · 333.0 yds/g · 3,996 yards)#112 (of 128 teams · 20.9 pts/g · 251 points)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 311.3 yds/g allowed · 3,736 yards)#27 (of 128 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 269 points)#78 (of 128 teams · -1.5 /g · -18 on the season)#124 (of 128 teams · -16 on the season · 10 taken, 26 given · -1.33 /g)#49 (of 128 teams · 30:56 /g · 6h 11m on the season)#16 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#101 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning)#69 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 128 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 128 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#48 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 128 teams · 1.134 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.052 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Michigan State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #5 Baylor)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #5 Baylor)#11 (of 128 teams · 500.8 yds/g · 6,510 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.0 pts/g · 559 points)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 315.8 yds/g allowed · 4,105 yards)#22 (of 128 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +21.5 /g · +279 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +19 on the season · 34 taken, 15 given · +1.46 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35:15 /g · 7h 38m on the season)#41 (of 128 teams · 92% of last season's passing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.296 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 128 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 128 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays)#121 (of 128 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Minnesota850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#106 (of 128 teams · 357.3 yds/g · 4,645 yards)#69 (of 128 teams · 28.4 pts/g · 369 points)#39 (of 128 teams · 368.1 yds/g allowed · 4,786 yards)#34 (of 128 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#60 (of 128 teams · +4.2 /g · +55 on the season)#14 (of 128 teams · +10 on the season · 30 taken, 20 given · +0.77 /g)#34 (of 128 teams · 31:34 /g · 6h 50m on the season)#83 (of 128 teams · 29% of last season's passing production returning)#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#28 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 128 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 128 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#60 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#92 (of 128 teams · 1.135 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 128 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Nebraska940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#33 (of 128 teams · 452.3 yds/g · 5,880 yards)#13 (of 128 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 491 points)#53 (of 128 teams · 383.7 yds/g allowed · 4,988 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#20 (of 128 teams · +11.4 /g · +148 on the season)#75 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.15 /g)#62 (of 128 teams · 30:08 /g · 6h 32m on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's passing production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#23 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 128 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 128 teams · 0.091 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#28 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#65 (of 128 teams · 1.185 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 128 teams · 1.206 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Northwestern570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Wisconsin)#107 (of 128 teams · 353.1 yds/g · 4,237 yards)#101 (of 128 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#54 (of 128 teams · 384.3 yds/g allowed · 4,611 yards)#48 (of 128 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 302 points)#83 (of 128 teams · -2.2 /g · -26 on the season)#41 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 27 taken, 23 given · +0.33 /g)#66 (of 128 teams · 30:03 /g · 6h 01m on the season)#52 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's passing production returning)#41 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving production returning)#81 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#114 (of 128 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 128 teams · 0.092 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#51 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 128 teams · 1.086 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 128 teams · 1.167 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Ohio State1414 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State · postseason: #1 Alabama, #2 Oregon)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #8 Michigan State, #18 Wisconsin, #25 Minnesota · postseason: #1 Alabama, #2 Oregon)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 511.6 yds/g · 7,674 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 44.8 pts/g · 672 points)#19 (of 128 teams · 342.4 yds/g allowed · 5,136 yards)#26 (of 128 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 330 points)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +22.8 /g · +342 on the season)#33 (of 128 teams · +7 on the season · 33 taken, 26 given · +0.47 /g)#28 (of 128 teams · 31:59 /g · 8h 00m on the season)#55 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's passing production returning)#42 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving production returning)#90 (of 128 teams · 45% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.303 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 128 teams · 0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 52% of plays successful)#44 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 128 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 128 teams · 1.194 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Penn State760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#114 (of 128 teams · 335.3 yds/g · 4,359 yards)#113 (of 128 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 268 points)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 278.2 yds/g allowed · 3,617 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#68 (of 128 teams · +2.0 /g · +26 on the season)#98 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.38 /g)#45 (of 128 teams · 31:12 /g · 6h 46m on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#113 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's receiving production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#121 (of 128 teams · -0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · -0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#111 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 128 teams · 1.097 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.996 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Purdue390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#111 (of 128 teams · 344.6 yds/g · 4,135 yards)#98 (of 128 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 286 points)#82 (of 128 teams · 416.0 yds/g allowed · 4,992 yards)#99 (of 128 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#101 (of 128 teams · -7.8 /g · -94 on the season)#103 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 19 taken, 24 given · -0.42 /g)#102 (of 128 teams · 28:54 /g · 5h 47m on the season)#62 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's passing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving production returning)#31 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#101 (of 128 teams · 0.072 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 128 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#89 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 128 teams · 1.199 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 128 teams · 1.148 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Rutgers850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#76 (of 128 teams · 390.0 yds/g · 5,070 yards)#83 (of 128 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 347 points)#100 (of 128 teams · 442.8 yds/g allowed · 5,756 yards)#89 (of 128 teams · 30.1 pts/g allowed · 392 points)#86 (of 128 teams · -3.5 /g · -45 on the season)#75 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 18 taken, 20 given · -0.15 /g)#64 (of 128 teams · 30:07 /g · 6h 31m on the season)#56 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's passing production returning)#47 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 128 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 128 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#45 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#100 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 128 teams · 1.155 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 128 teams · 1.265 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2014Wisconsin1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2014. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #25 Minnesota · postseason: #19 Auburn)#22 (of 128 teams · 468.9 yds/g · 6,564 yards)#29 (of 128 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 484 points)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 294.1 yds/g allowed · 4,117 yards)#17 (of 128 teams · 20.8 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#13 (of 128 teams · +13.8 /g · +193 on the season)#113 (of 128 teams · -9 on the season · 17 taken, 26 given · -0.64 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:35 /g · 7h 50m on the season)#37 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving production returning)#70 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 128 teams · 0.239 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 128 teams · 0.056 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#22 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#13 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 128 teams · 1.182 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 128 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20142014 IndianaBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #76
Total offense. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Ohio State #9 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #11 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #22 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #33 of 128; 2014 Iowa #66 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #76 of 128; 2014 Illinois #97 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #106 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #107 of 128; 2014 Purdue #111 of 128; 2014 Maryland #112 of 128; 2014 Penn State #114 of 128; 2014 Michigan #115 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 64 of 128. Big Ten median rank 76.
Scoring offensemedian #71
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Ohio State #5 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #7 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #13 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #29 of 128; 2014 Maryland #68 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #69 of 128; 2014 Iowa #71 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #83 of 128; 2014 Illinois #87 of 128; 2014 Purdue #98 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #101 of 128; 2014 Michigan #112 of 128; 2014 Penn State #113 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 90 of 128. Big Ten median rank 71.
Total defensemedian #39
Total defense. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Penn State #2 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #4 of 128; 2014 Michigan #7 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #8 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #19 of 128; 2014 Iowa #22 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #39 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #53 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #54 of 128; 2014 Purdue #82 of 128; 2014 Maryland #97 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #100 of 128; 2014 Illinois #112 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 95 of 128. Big Ten median rank 39.
Scoring defensemedian #48
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Penn State #7 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #17 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #22 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #26 of 128; 2014 Michigan #27 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #34 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #48 of 128; 2014 Iowa #51 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #60 of 128; 2014 Maryland #89 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #89 of 128; 2014 Purdue #99 of 128; 2014 Illinois #109 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 102 of 128. Big Ten median rank 48.
Point marginmedian #68
Point margin. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Ohio State #3 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #6 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #13 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #20 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #60 of 128; 2014 Iowa #66 of 128; 2014 Penn State #68 of 128; 2014 Michigan #78 of 128; 2014 Maryland #80 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #83 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #86 of 128; 2014 Purdue #101 of 128; 2014 Illinois #103 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 100 of 128. Big Ten median rank 68.
Turnover marginmedian #75
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Michigan State #2 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #14 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #33 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #41 of 128; 2014 Maryland #60 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #75 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #75 of 128; 2014 Illinois #84 of 128; 2014 Penn State #98 of 128; 2014 Purdue #103 of 128; 2014 Iowa #105 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #113 of 128; 2014 Michigan #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 78 of 128. Big Ten median rank 75.
Possessionmedian #49
Possession. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Michigan State #2 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #7 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #28 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #34 of 128; 2014 Iowa #39 of 128; 2014 Penn State #45 of 128; 2014 Michigan #49 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #62 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #64 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #66 of 128; 2014 Purdue #102 of 128; 2014 Illinois #112 of 128; 2014 Maryland #120 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 103 of 128. Big Ten median rank 49.
Returning passingmedian #52
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Iowa #1 of 128; 2014 Maryland #1 of 128; 2014 Michigan #16 of 128; 2014 Penn State #34 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #41 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #52 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #55 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #56 of 128; 2014 Purdue #62 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #79 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #83 of 128; 2014 Illinois #108 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 59 of 128. Big Ten median rank 52.
Returning receivingmedian #42
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Michigan State #1 of 128; 2014 Purdue #9 of 128; 2014 Maryland #26 of 128; 2014 Iowa #32 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #38 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #41 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #42 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #47 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #55 of 128; 2014 Illinois #99 of 128; 2014 Michigan #101 of 128; 2014 Penn State #113 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #124 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 115 of 128. Big Ten median rank 42.
Returning rushingmedian #28
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Iowa #1 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #1 of 128; 2014 Maryland #4 of 128; 2014 Penn State #6 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #11 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #23 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #28 of 128; 2014 Purdue #31 of 128; 2014 Illinois #47 of 128; 2014 Michigan #69 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #70 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #81 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #90 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 76 of 128. Big Ten median rank 28.
Team talent
Team talent. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: . Marked: 2014 Indiana, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #63
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Ohio State #9 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #10 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #26 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #51 of 128; 2014 Iowa #61 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #63 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #72 of 128; 2014 Michigan #95 of 128; 2014 Illinois #100 of 128; 2014 Purdue #101 of 128; 2014 Maryland #106 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #114 of 128; 2014 Penn State #121 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 47 of 128. Big Ten median rank 63.
Defensive EPAmedian #39
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Penn State #1 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #21 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #25 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #29 of 128; 2014 Michigan #32 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #34 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #39 of 128; 2014 Iowa #42 of 128; 2014 Maryland #51 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #54 of 128; 2014 Purdue #69 of 128; 2014 Illinois #100 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #110 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 77 of 128. Big Ten median rank 39.
Offensive success ratemedian #64
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Ohio State #2 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #19 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #22 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #41 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #45 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #58 of 128; 2014 Michigan #64 of 128; 2014 Iowa #70 of 128; 2014 Illinois #95 of 128; 2014 Maryland #98 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #100 of 128; 2014 Purdue #109 of 128; 2014 Penn State #111 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 74 of 128. Big Ten median rank 64.
Defensive success ratemedian #51
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Michigan State #7 of 128; 2014 Penn State #8 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #13 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #28 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #44 of 128; 2014 Michigan #48 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #51 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #60 of 128; 2014 Iowa #62 of 128; 2014 Maryland #64 of 128; 2014 Illinois #86 of 128; 2014 Purdue #89 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #100 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 76 of 128. Big Ten median rank 51.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #61
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Illinois #37 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #40 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #50 of 128; 2014 Iowa #57 of 128; 2014 Purdue #59 of 128; 2014 Maryland #61 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #65 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #67 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #76 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #92 of 128; 2014 Michigan #93 of 128; 2014 Penn State #108 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #112 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 48 of 128. Big Ten median rank 61.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #49
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2014, best rank first: 2014 Penn State #5 of 128; 2014 Michigan #10 of 128; 2014 Iowa #27 of 128; 2014 Maryland #35 of 128; 2014 Purdue #37 of 128; 2014 Northwestern #49 of 128; 2014 Minnesota #51 of 128; 2014 Ohio State #64 of 128; 2014 Wisconsin #66 of 128; 2014 Nebraska #76 of 128; 2014 Rutgers #104 of 128; 2014 Illinois #106 of 128; 2014 Michigan State #121 of 128. Marked: 2014 Indiana, ranked 47 of 128. Big Ten median rank 49.