THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

IndianaHoosiers

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Indiana played 9 such games.

Big Ten, 2015

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Indiana6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#15 (of 75 teams · 468.4 yds/g · 4,216 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 34.7 pts/g · 312 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 494.9 yds/g allowed · 4,454 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 37.9 pts/g allowed · 341 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · -3.2 /g · -29 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · +3 in these games · 12 taken, 9 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 27:56 /g · 4h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#122 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 559.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 75 teams · 0.201 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 0.228 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 42% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 75 teams · 1.304 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.445 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#46 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #15–#70. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #11–#65. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#17 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #1–#71. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#20 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #2–#69. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #2–#70. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#43 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #1–#72. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #5–#70. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #15–#108. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#84 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #24–#120. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#88 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #15–#125. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#46 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #3–#64. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #7–#69. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#18 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #4–#66. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#46 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #4–#72. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#22 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #4–#59. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #5–#61. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range #9–#72. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)
2015Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #13 Northwestern · postseason: #19 Florida)#40 (of 75 teams · 381.9 yds/g · 3,819 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 308 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 303.6 yds/g allowed · 3,036 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 199 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +10.9 /g · +109 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · -7 in these games · 8 taken, 15 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 32:46 /g · 5h 28m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#89 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 851.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 75 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 75 teams · 1.226 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 1.343 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Ohio State12–14 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #8 Notre Dame)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #14 Michigan · postseason: #8 Notre Dame)#20 (of 75 teams · 441.7 yds/g · 3,975 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 324 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 327.7 yds/g allowed · 2,949 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 143 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +20.1 /g · +181 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 12 taken, 10 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 29:06 /g · 4h 22m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 907.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.295 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 1.276 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Wisconsin10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 USC)#54 (of 75 teams · 351.6 yds/g · 3,164 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 282.0 yds/g allowed · 2,538 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 154 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · +6.3 /g · +57 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#107 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 635.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 75 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 1.195 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Iowa12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Northwestern)#34 (of 75 teams · 393.2 yds/g · 3,932 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 311 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 339.3 yds/g allowed · 3,393 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +11.7 /g · +117 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +14 in these games · 22 taken, 8 given · +1.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 75 teams · 32:15 /g · 5h 22m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#92 (of 128 teams · 21% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#94 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 128 teams · 573.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 75 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 75 teams · 1.272 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 1.207 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Michigan State12–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Iowa, #7 Ohio State, #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#28 (of 75 teams · 410.3 yds/g · 3,693 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 299 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 75 teams · 337.7 yds/g allowed · 3,039 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 75 teams · 22.0 pts/g allowed · 198 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +11.2 /g · +101 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 75 teams · +9 in these games · 19 taken, 10 given · +1.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 34:05 /g · 5h 07m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#118 (of 128 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 128 teams · 715.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 75 teams · 0.183 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 0.086 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 75 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 1.311 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 1.281 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 294.9 yds/g · 2,949 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 75 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 183 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 322.9 yds/g allowed · 3,229 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 178 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 75 teams · +0.5 /g · +5 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 75 teams · +6 in these games · 18 taken, 12 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 29:06 /g · 4h 51m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#84 (of 128 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 595.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -0.000 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 32% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 1.264 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Nebraska6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Michigan State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Michigan State)#27 (of 75 teams · 410.4 yds/g · 3,694 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 278 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 390.9 yds/g allowed · 3,518 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 75 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 75 teams · +1.7 /g · +15 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -13 in these games · 8 taken, 21 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 31:20 /g · 4h 42m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#87 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 699.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 75 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 75 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.372 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 1.363 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Penn State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#46 (of 75 teams · 369.5 yds/g · 2,956 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 190 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 345.6 yds/g allowed · 2,765 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 23.0 pts/g allowed · 184 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 75 teams · +0.8 /g · +6 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 75 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.13 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 75 teams · 29:27 /g · 3h 56m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 732.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 75 teams · 0.122 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 75 teams · 0.083 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 75 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 75 teams · 1.331 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 75 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Minnesota6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 75 teams · 346.2 yds/g · 3,116 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 211 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 75 teams · 383.0 yds/g allowed · 3,447 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 29.1 pts/g allowed · 262 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · -5.7 /g · -51 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · -2 in these games · 13 taken, 15 given · -0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 27:22 /g · 4h 06m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 128 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 516.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 75 teams · 0.109 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 75 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 75 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 75 teams · 1.245 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Illinois5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 75 teams · 361.3 yds/g · 3,252 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 75 teams · 16.6 pts/g · 149 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 75 teams · 384.0 yds/g allowed · 3,456 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · -11.3 /g · -102 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 75 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 75 teams · 28:53 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#78 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#104 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 531.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 75 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 75 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 75 teams · 1.196 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Maryland3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#49 (of 75 teams · 363.2 yds/g · 3,269 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 75 teams · 20.4 pts/g · 184 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 75 teams · 420.7 yds/g allowed · 3,786 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 75 teams · 36.3 pts/g allowed · 327 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -15.9 /g · -143 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -13 in these games · 15 taken, 28 given · -1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 27:38 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 128 teams · 11% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 603.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.015 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 75 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 34% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 75 teams · 1.408 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 75 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Purdue2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#60 (of 75 teams · 333.7 yds/g · 3,003 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 75 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 467.8 yds/g allowed · 4,210 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 38.7 pts/g allowed · 348 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -16.0 /g · -144 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · -6 in these games · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 26:24 /g · 3h 58m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 534.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 75 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 75 teams · 0.229 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 75 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 75 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 75 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 75 teams · 1.344 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2015Rutgers4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 75 teams · 362.6 yds/g · 3,626 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 75 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 231 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 494.7 yds/g allowed · 4,947 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 38.5 pts/g allowed · 385 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · -15.4 /g · -154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · -4 in these games · 13 taken, 17 given · -0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 75 teams · 31:38 /g · 5h 16m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#21 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 602.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 75 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 0.261 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 75 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 75 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 75 teams · 1.216 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 75 teams · 1.406 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20152015 IndianaBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #46
Total offense. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #20 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #27 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #28 of 75; 2015 Iowa #34 of 75; 2015 Michigan #40 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 Maryland #49 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #50 of 75; 2015 Illinois #51 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #54 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #56 of 75; 2015 Purdue #60 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #70 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 15 of 75. Big Ten median rank 46.
Scoring offensemedian #46
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #15 of 75; 2015 Iowa #24 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #25 of 75; 2015 Michigan #27 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #47 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #50 of 75; 2015 Purdue #52 of 75; 2015 Maryland #58 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #60 of 75; 2015 Illinois #65 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 12 of 75. Big Ten median rank 46.
Total defensemedian #17
Total defense. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Wisconsin #1 of 75; 2015 Michigan #5 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #9 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #10 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #12 of 75; 2015 Iowa #14 of 75; 2015 Penn State #17 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #27 of 75; 2015 Illinois #28 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #32 of 75; 2015 Maryland #49 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #70 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 71 of 75. Big Ten median rank 17.
Scoring defensemedian #20
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #2 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #4 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #6 of 75; 2015 Iowa #10 of 75; 2015 Michigan #11 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #16 of 75; 2015 Penn State #20 of 75; 2015 Illinois #36 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #44 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #45 of 75; 2015 Maryland #63 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #68 of 75; 2015 Purdue #69 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 66 of 75. Big Ten median rank 20.
Point marginmedian #34
Point margin. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #2 of 75; 2015 Iowa #8 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #9 of 75; 2015 Michigan #10 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #17 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #31 of 75; 2015 Penn State #34 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #35 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 Illinois #63 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #68 of 75; 2015 Maryland #69 of 75; 2015 Purdue #70 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 42 of 75. Big Ten median rank 34.
Turnover marginmedian #43
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Iowa #1 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #3 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #13 of 75; 2015 Illinois #25 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #25 of 75; 2015 Penn State #43 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #48 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #48 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #54 of 75; 2015 Purdue #59 of 75; 2015 Michigan #62 of 75; 2015 Maryland #72 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #72 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 21 of 75. Big Ten median rank 43.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Michigan State #5 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #7 of 75; 2015 Michigan #10 of 75; 2015 Iowa #14 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #20 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #22 of 75; 2015 Penn State #40 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #45 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #46 of 75; 2015 Illinois #48 of 75; 2015 Maryland #62 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #66 of 75; 2015 Purdue #70 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 58 of 75. Big Ten median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #41
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Michigan State #21 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #25 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #32 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #38 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #41 of 128; 2015 Penn State #41 of 128; 2015 Purdue #73 of 128; 2015 Illinois #78 of 128; 2015 Iowa #92 of 128; 2015 Michigan #99 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #102 of 128; 2015 Maryland #104 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #108 of 128. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 15 of 128. Big Ten median rank 41.
Returning receivingmedian #84
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Penn State #24 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #31 of 128; 2015 Illinois #34 of 128; 2015 Ohio State #36 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #56 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #58 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #84 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #86 of 128; 2015 Michigan #89 of 128; 2015 Iowa #94 of 128; 2015 Purdue #95 of 128; 2015 Maryland #111 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #120 of 128. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 119 of 128. Big Ten median rank 84.
Returning rushingmedian #88
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #15 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #21 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #55 of 128; 2015 Michigan #67 of 128; 2015 Maryland #80 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #87 of 128; 2015 Penn State #88 of 128; 2015 Illinois #104 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #107 of 128; 2015 Iowa #108 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #114 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #118 of 128; 2015 Purdue #125 of 128. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 122 of 128. Big Ten median rank 88.
Team talentmedian #46
Team talent. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #3 of 128; 2015 Michigan #9 of 128; 2015 Penn State #21 of 128; 2015 Michigan State #23 of 128; 2015 Nebraska #24 of 128; 2015 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2015 Maryland #46 of 128; 2015 Rutgers #47 of 128; 2015 Northwestern #48 of 128; 2015 Iowa #51 of 128; 2015 Purdue #59 of 128; 2015 Illinois #60 of 128; 2015 Minnesota #64 of 128. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 54 of 128. Big Ten median rank 46.
Offensive EPAmedian #44
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #7 of 75; 2015 Iowa #23 of 75; 2015 Michigan #26 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #28 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #40 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #44 of 75; 2015 Penn State #46 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #50 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #64 of 75; 2015 Illinois #66 of 75; 2015 Maryland #68 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #69 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 20 of 75. Big Ten median rank 44.
Defensive EPAmedian #18
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Northwestern #4 of 75; 2015 Michigan #7 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #8 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 Iowa #13 of 75; 2015 Penn State #17 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #18 of 75; 2015 Illinois #20 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #29 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #32 of 75; 2015 Maryland #36 of 75; 2015 Purdue #61 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #66 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 60 of 75. Big Ten median rank 18.
Offensive success ratemedian #46
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Ohio State #4 of 75; 2015 Michigan #22 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #24 of 75; 2015 Iowa #29 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #42 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #46 of 75; 2015 Penn State #47 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #49 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #56 of 75; 2015 Purdue #64 of 75; 2015 Illinois #66 of 75; 2015 Maryland #67 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #72 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 36 of 75. Big Ten median rank 46.
Defensive success ratemedian #22
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Wisconsin #4 of 75; 2015 Michigan #5 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #9 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #11 of 75; 2015 Penn State #18 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #21 of 75; 2015 Iowa #22 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #31 of 75; 2015 Illinois #38 of 75; 2015 Maryland #41 of 75; 2015 Purdue #42 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #47 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #59 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 37 of 75. Big Ten median rank 22.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #29
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Maryland #5 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #9 of 75; 2015 Penn State #15 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #22 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #27 of 75; 2015 Illinois #29 of 75; 2015 Iowa #33 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #36 of 75; 2015 Minnesota #44 of 75; 2015 Michigan #53 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #54 of 75; 2015 Purdue #57 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #61 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 23 of 75. Big Ten median rank 29.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #40
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Minnesota #9 of 75; 2015 Illinois #19 of 75; 2015 Iowa #21 of 75; 2015 Penn State #22 of 75; 2015 Northwestern #25 of 75; 2015 Wisconsin #28 of 75; 2015 Ohio State #40 of 75; 2015 Michigan State #42 of 75; 2015 Maryland #47 of 75; 2015 Michigan #60 of 75; 2015 Purdue #62 of 75; 2015 Nebraska #64 of 75; 2015 Rutgers #66 of 75. Marked: 2015 Indiana, ranked 72 of 75. Big Ten median rank 40.