THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Kansas StateWildcats

Season
‹
›Current

Big 12

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Big 12, 2012

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2012Kansas State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 124 teams · 401.4 yds/g · 5,218 yds)#11 (of 124 teams · 38.9 pts/g · 505 points)#46 (of 124 teams · 375.3 yds/g allowed · 4,879 yds)#28 (of 124 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 288 points)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +16.7 /g · +217 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +19 on the season · 31 taken, 12 given · +1.46 /g)#23 (of 124 teams · 32:27 /g · 7h 02m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 124 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#86 (of 124 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#22 (of 124 teams · 45% of plays successful)#110 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#107 (of 124 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 124 teams · 0.871 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Big 12 teams in 20120 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#13 (Total offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #2–#95. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#15 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #3–#118. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#69 (Total defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #17–#123. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#64 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #28–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#45 (Point margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #8–#119. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#52 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #3–#110. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#52 (Possession: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #2–#119. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#21 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #3–#103. 4 of 10 in the top 10.)#86 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #6–#114. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#18 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #1–#110. 4 of 10 in the top 10.)#63 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #16–#117. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #24–#111. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#76 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range #9–#121. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)
2012Oklahoma State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 547.0 yds/g · 7,111 yds)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 45.7 pts/g · 594 points)#82 (of 124 teams · 421.4 yds/g allowed · 5,478 yds)#64 (of 124 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 367 points)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · +17.5 /g · +227 on the season)#60 (of 124 teams · +0 on the season · 22 taken, 22 given · +0.00 /g)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 27:13 /g · 5h 54m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 124 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 48% of plays successful)#59 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 124 teams · 0.915 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 124 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012TCU7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#73 (of 124 teams · 388.6 yds/g · 5,052 yds)#68 (of 124 teams · 28.3 pts/g · 368 points)#17 (of 124 teams · 323.9 yds/g allowed · 4,211 yds)#30 (of 124 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#48 (of 124 teams · +5.7 /g · +74 on the season)#49 (of 124 teams · +3 on the season · 32 taken, 29 given · +0.23 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 34:42 /g · 7h 31m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 124 teams · 0.058 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · -0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#80 (of 124 teams · 40% of plays successful)#16 (of 124 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 124 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.836 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Baylor8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 572.2 yds/g · 7,439 yds)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 44.5 pts/g · 578 points)#123 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 502.2 yds/g allowed · 6,529 yds)#113 (of 124 teams · 37.2 pts/g allowed · 484 points)#41 (of 124 teams · +7.2 /g · +94 on the season)#52 (of 124 teams · +2 on the season · 25 taken, 23 given · +0.15 /g)#115 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 27:35 /g · 5h 59m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 124 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#8 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 48% of plays successful)#108 (of 124 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 124 teams · 0.961 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 124 teams · 0.918 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Texas Tech8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#13 (of 124 teams · 495.9 yds/g · 6,446 yds)#20 (of 124 teams · 37.5 pts/g · 487 points)#40 (of 124 teams · 367.3 yds/g allowed · 4,775 yds)#92 (of 124 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 413 points)#48 (of 124 teams · +5.7 /g · +74 on the season)#110 (of 124 teams · -13 on the season · 11 taken, 24 given · -1.00 /g)#74 (of 124 teams · 30:05 /g · 6h 31m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 124 teams · 0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#1 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 50% of plays successful)#45 (of 124 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 124 teams · 0.896 average PPA on successful plays)#88 (of 124 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Oklahoma10–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#12 (of 124 teams · 497.9 yds/g · 6,472 yds)#15 (of 124 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 496 points)#66 (of 124 teams · 398.3 yds/g allowed · 5,178 yds)#50 (of 124 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#23 (of 124 teams · +12.7 /g · +165 on the season)#82 (of 124 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.31 /g)#14 (of 124 teams · 33:04 /g · 7h 10m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 124 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#4 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 49% of plays successful)#28 (of 124 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 124 teams · 0.870 average PPA on successful plays)#121 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 1.047 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Texas9–45 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 124 teams · 434.6 yds/g · 5,650 yds)#23 (of 124 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 464 points)#69 (of 124 teams · 404.1 yds/g allowed · 5,254 yds)#74 (of 124 teams · 29.2 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#45 (of 124 teams · +6.5 /g · +84 on the season)#41 (of 124 teams · +5 on the season · 21 taken, 16 given · +0.38 /g)#52 (of 124 teams · 30:59 /g · 6h 43m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 124 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 124 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#38 (of 124 teams · 44% of plays successful)#69 (of 124 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 124 teams · 0.959 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 124 teams · 0.984 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012West Virginia7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#10 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 502.0 yds/g · 6,526 yds)#9 — top 10 (of 124 teams · 39.5 pts/g · 513 points)#112 (of 124 teams · 472.5 yds/g allowed · 6,142 yds)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 38.1 pts/g allowed · 495 points)#67 (of 124 teams · +1.4 /g · +18 on the season)#34 (of 124 teams · +7 on the season · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.54 /g)#101 (of 124 teams · 28:33 /g · 6h 11m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 124 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#98 (of 124 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#18 (of 124 teams · 46% of plays successful)#63 (of 124 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 124 teams · 0.977 average PPA on successful plays)#119 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 1.039 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Iowa State6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 124 teams · 364.1 yds/g · 4,734 yds)#87 (of 124 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 319 points)#97 (of 124 teams · 442.1 yds/g allowed · 5,748 yds)#38 (of 124 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#69 (of 124 teams · +0.6 /g · +8 on the season)#60 (of 124 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#119 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 27:02 /g · 5h 51m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#102 (of 124 teams · 0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#92 (of 124 teams · 0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#110 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#84 (of 124 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 124 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 124 teams · 0.948 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2012Kansas1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2012. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#95 (of 124 teams · 360.3 yds/g · 4,324 yds)#118 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 219 points)#116 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 481.8 yds/g allowed · 5,782 yds)#112 (of 124 teams · 36.1 pts/g allowed · 433 points)#119 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · -17.8 /g · -214 on the season)#80 (of 124 teams · -3 on the season · 20 taken, 23 given · -0.25 /g)#29 (of 124 teams · 32:03 /g · 6h 25m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 124 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 124 teams · 0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#102 (of 124 teams · 38% of plays successful)#117 — bottom 10 (of 124 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 124 teams · 0.921 average PPA on successful plays)#83 (of 124 teams · 0.957 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20122012 Kansas StateBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #13
Total offense. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Baylor #2 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #4 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #10 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #12 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #13 of 124; 2012 Texas #40 of 124; 2012 TCU #73 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #93 of 124; 2012 Kansas #95 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 59 of 124. Big 12 median rank 13.
Scoring offensemedian #15
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oklahoma State #3 of 124; 2012 Baylor #4 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #9 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #15 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #20 of 124; 2012 Texas #23 of 124; 2012 TCU #68 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #87 of 124; 2012 Kansas #118 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 11 of 124. Big 12 median rank 15.
Total defensemedian #69
Total defense. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #17 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #40 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #66 of 124; 2012 Texas #69 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #82 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #97 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #112 of 124; 2012 Kansas #116 of 124; 2012 Baylor #123 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 46 of 124. Big 12 median rank 69.
Scoring defensemedian #64
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #30 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #38 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #50 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #64 of 124; 2012 Texas #74 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #92 of 124; 2012 Kansas #112 of 124; 2012 Baylor #113 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #117 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 28 of 124. Big 12 median rank 64.
Point marginmedian #45
Point margin. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Oklahoma State #8 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #23 of 124; 2012 Baylor #41 of 124; 2012 Texas #45 of 124; 2012 TCU #48 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #48 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #67 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #69 of 124; 2012 Kansas #119 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 9 of 124. Big 12 median rank 45.
Turnover marginmedian #52
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 West Virginia #34 of 124; 2012 Texas #41 of 124; 2012 TCU #49 of 124; 2012 Baylor #52 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #60 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #60 of 124; 2012 Kansas #80 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #82 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 3 of 124. Big 12 median rank 52.
Possessionmedian #52
Possession. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #2 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #14 of 124; 2012 Kansas #29 of 124; 2012 Texas #52 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #74 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #101 of 124; 2012 Baylor #115 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #117 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #119 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 23 of 124. Big 12 median rank 52.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: . Marked: 2012 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #21
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Texas Tech #3 of 124; 2012 Baylor #6 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #8 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #9 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #21 of 124; 2012 Texas #31 of 124; 2012 TCU #68 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #102 of 124; 2012 Kansas #103 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 27 of 124. Big 12 median rank 21.
Defensive EPAmedian #86
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #6 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #46 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #57 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #74 of 124; 2012 Baylor #90 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #92 of 124; 2012 Texas #97 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #98 of 124; 2012 Kansas #114 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 86 of 124. Big 12 median rank 86.
Offensive success ratemedian #18
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 Texas Tech #1 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #4 of 124; 2012 Baylor #8 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #9 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #18 of 124; 2012 Texas #38 of 124; 2012 TCU #80 of 124; 2012 Kansas #102 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #110 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 22 of 124. Big 12 median rank 18.
Defensive success ratemedian #63
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #16 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #28 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #45 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #59 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #63 of 124; 2012 Texas #69 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #84 of 124; 2012 Baylor #108 of 124; 2012 Kansas #117 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 110 of 124. Big 12 median rank 63.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #67
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 West Virginia #24 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #34 of 124; 2012 Baylor #36 of 124; 2012 Texas #38 of 124; 2012 Kansas #67 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #73 of 124; 2012 TCU #80 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #89 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #111 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 107 of 124. Big 12 median rank 67.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #76
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2012, best rank first: 2012 TCU #9 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma State #47 of 124; 2012 Baylor #49 of 124; 2012 Iowa State #76 of 124; 2012 Kansas #83 of 124; 2012 Texas Tech #88 of 124; 2012 Texas #100 of 124; 2012 West Virginia #119 of 124; 2012 Oklahoma #121 of 124. Marked: 2012 Kansas State, ranked 21 of 124. Big 12 median rank 76.