Metrics

Kansas StateWildcats

Season
Current

Big 12

Big 12, 2013

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013Kansas State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#72 (of 125 teams · 402.7 yds/g · 5,235 yards)#37 (of 125 teams · 33.2 pts/g · 432 points)#26 (of 125 teams · 358.9 yds/g allowed · 4,665 yards)#31 (of 125 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 298 points)#34 (of 125 teams · +10.3 /g · +134 on the season)#61 (of 125 teams · +0 on the season · 25 taken, 25 given · +0.00 /g)#17 (of 125 teams · 32:32 /g · 7h 03m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 125 teams · 0.141 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 125 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 125 teams · 47% of plays successful)#91 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 125 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.803 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Big 12 teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#63 (Total offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #1–#119. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #1–#120. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#53 (Total defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #20–#106. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #19–#109. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#52 (Point margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #2–#112. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)#54 (Turnover margin: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #4–#123. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#58 (Possession: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #17–#119. 0 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#73 (Offensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #11–#123. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive EPA: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #2–#65. 3 of 10 in the top 10.)#79 (Offensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #17–#123. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive success rate: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #3–#91. 2 of 10 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #20–#122. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#44 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range #1–#111. 1 of 10 in the top 10.)
2013Baylor1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 618.8 yds/g · 8,044 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 52.4 pts/g · 681 points)#28 (of 125 teams · 360.3 yds/g allowed · 4,684 yards)#36 (of 125 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 306 points)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +28.9 /g · +375 on the season)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +13 on the season · 29 taken, 16 given · +1.00 /g)#114 (of 125 teams · 27:26 /g · 5h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 125 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 125 teams · 46% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 125 teams · 1.005 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 125 teams · 0.988 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Iowa State390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#97 (of 125 teams · 363.0 yds/g · 4,356 yards)#90 (of 125 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 298 points)#106 (of 125 teams · 463.1 yds/g allowed · 5,557 yards)#109 (of 125 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 432 points)#105 (of 125 teams · -11.2 /g · -134 on the season)#71 (of 125 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#34 (of 125 teams · 31:38 /g · 6h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#104 (of 125 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 125 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#73 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 125 teams · 0.888 average PPA on successful plays)#44 (of 125 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Kansas390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#119 (of 125 teams · 294.5 yds/g · 3,534 yards)#120 (of 125 teams · 15.3 pts/g · 184 points)#97 (of 125 teams · 432.3 yds/g allowed · 5,188 yards)#94 (of 125 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 382 points)#112 (of 125 teams · -16.5 /g · -198 on the season)#54 (of 125 teams · +1 on the season · 24 taken, 23 given · +0.08 /g)#77 (of 125 teams · 29:31 /g · 5h 54m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#123 (of 125 teams · -0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 125 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#123 (of 125 teams · 34% of plays successful)#48 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 125 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#67 (of 125 teams · 0.950 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Oklahoma1123 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#52 (of 125 teams · 423.0 yds/g · 5,499 yards)#40 (of 125 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#20 (of 125 teams · 350.1 yds/g allowed · 4,552 yards)#22 (of 125 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#33 (of 125 teams · +10.8 /g · +140 on the season)#21 (of 125 teams · +9 on the season · 25 taken, 16 given · +0.69 /g)#20 (of 125 teams · 32:17 /g · 7h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 125 teams · 0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 125 teams · 0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 125 teams · 43% of plays successful)#35 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 125 teams · 0.872 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 125 teams · 0.912 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Oklahoma State1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 125 teams · 448.8 yds/g · 5,834 yards)#14 (of 125 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 508 points)#53 (of 125 teams · 384.9 yds/g allowed · 5,004 yards)#19 (of 125 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 281 points)#11 (of 125 teams · +17.5 /g · +227 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +15 on the season · 33 taken, 18 given · +1.15 /g)#119 (of 125 teams · 26:42 /g · 5h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 125 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#14 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#33 (of 125 teams · 0.988 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 125 teams · 0.916 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013TCU480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#106 (of 125 teams · 344.8 yds/g · 4,138 yards)#88 (of 125 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 301 points)#24 (of 125 teams · 356.4 yds/g allowed · 4,277 yards)#54 (of 125 teams · 25.3 pts/g allowed · 303 points)#70 (of 125 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 on the season)#74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 28 taken, 30 given · -0.17 /g)#41 (of 125 teams · 31:14 /g · 6h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 125 teams · -0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 125 teams · 40% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 125 teams · 0.810 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 125 teams · 1.041 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Texas855 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 125 teams · 408.7 yds/g · 5,313 yards)#65 (of 125 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 381 points)#69 (of 125 teams · 407.2 yds/g allowed · 5,294 yards)#57 (of 125 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#59 (of 125 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#39 (of 125 teams · +4 on the season · 26 taken, 22 given · +0.31 /g)#58 (of 125 teams · 30:14 /g · 6h 33m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 125 teams · -0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 125 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful)#56 (of 125 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 125 teams · 0.883 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 125 teams · 0.922 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Texas Tech850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 511.0 yds/g · 6,643 yards)#23 (of 125 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 465 points)#85 (of 125 teams · 418.5 yds/g allowed · 5,441 yards)#88 (of 125 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 397 points)#52 (of 125 teams · +5.2 /g · +68 on the season)#123 (of 125 teams · -14 on the season · 19 taken, 33 given · -1.08 /g)#96 (of 125 teams · 28:42 /g · 6h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 125 teams · 0.123 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#28 (of 125 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#44 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 125 teams · 0.969 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 125 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013West Virginia480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Big 12 teams in 2013. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 (of 125 teams · 410.8 yds/g · 4,929 yards)#79 (of 125 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 316 points)#102 (of 125 teams · 455.0 yds/g allowed · 5,460 yards)#100 (of 125 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 400 points)#94 (of 125 teams · -7.0 /g · -84 on the season)#87 (of 125 teams · -4 on the season · 28 taken, 32 given · -0.33 /g)#61 (of 125 teams · 30:08 /g · 6h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 125 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 125 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 125 teams · 38% of plays successful)#52 (of 125 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 125 teams · 0.993 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 125 teams · 0.927 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big 12, 20132013 Kansas StateBig 12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #63
Total offense. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #1 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #8 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #37 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #52 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #63 of 125; 2013 Texas #65 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #97 of 125; 2013 TCU #106 of 125; 2013 Kansas #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 72 of 125. Big 12 median rank 63.
Scoring offensemedian #40
Scoring offense. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #1 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #14 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #23 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #40 of 125; 2013 Texas #65 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #79 of 125; 2013 TCU #88 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #90 of 125; 2013 Kansas #120 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 37 of 125. Big 12 median rank 40.
Total defensemedian #53
Total defense. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oklahoma #20 of 125; 2013 TCU #24 of 125; 2013 Baylor #28 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #53 of 125; 2013 Texas #69 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #85 of 125; 2013 Kansas #97 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #102 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #106 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 26 of 125. Big 12 median rank 53.
Scoring defensemedian #54
Scoring defense. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oklahoma State #19 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #22 of 125; 2013 Baylor #36 of 125; 2013 TCU #54 of 125; 2013 Texas #57 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #88 of 125; 2013 Kansas #94 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #100 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 31 of 125. Big 12 median rank 54.
Point marginmedian #52
Point margin. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #2 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #11 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #33 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #52 of 125; 2013 Texas #59 of 125; 2013 TCU #70 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #94 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #105 of 125; 2013 Kansas #112 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 34 of 125. Big 12 median rank 52.
Turnover marginmedian #54
Turnover margin. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oklahoma State #4 of 125; 2013 Baylor #8 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #21 of 125; 2013 Texas #39 of 125; 2013 Kansas #54 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #71 of 125; 2013 TCU #74 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #87 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 61 of 125. Big 12 median rank 54.
Possessionmedian #58
Possession. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Oklahoma #20 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #34 of 125; 2013 TCU #41 of 125; 2013 Texas #58 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #61 of 125; 2013 Kansas #77 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #96 of 125; 2013 Baylor #114 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 17 of 125. Big 12 median rank 58.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Kansas State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #73
Offensive EPA. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #11 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #33 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #72 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #73 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #99 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #104 of 125; 2013 Texas #115 of 125; 2013 TCU #119 of 125; 2013 Kansas #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 22 of 125. Big 12 median rank 73.
Defensive EPAmedian #32
Defensive EPA. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #2 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #5 of 125; 2013 TCU #7 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #28 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #32 of 125; 2013 Texas #53 of 125; 2013 Kansas #55 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #58 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #65 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 44 of 125. Big 12 median rank 32.
Offensive success ratemedian #79
Offensive success rate. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #27 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #40 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #61 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #79 of 125; 2013 TCU #88 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #94 of 125; 2013 Texas #104 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #112 of 125; 2013 Kansas #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 17 of 125. Big 12 median rank 79.
Defensive success ratemedian #44
Defensive success rate. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 TCU #3 of 125; 2013 Baylor #5 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #14 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #35 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #44 of 125; 2013 Kansas #48 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #52 of 125; 2013 Texas #56 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #73 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 91 of 125. Big 12 median rank 44.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #60
Offensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Baylor #20 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #31 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #33 of 125; 2013 Texas Tech #47 of 125; 2013 Kansas #60 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #97 of 125; 2013 Texas #101 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #108 of 125; 2013 TCU #122 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 94 of 125. Big 12 median rank 60.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #44
Defensive explosiveness. Big 12, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Texas Tech #33 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma #40 of 125; 2013 Oklahoma State #43 of 125; 2013 Iowa State #44 of 125; 2013 Texas #45 of 125; 2013 West Virginia #50 of 125; 2013 Kansas #67 of 125; 2013 Baylor #92 of 125; 2013 TCU #111 of 125. Marked: 2013 Kansas State, ranked 1 of 125. Big 12 median rank 44.