Metrics

Kent StateGolden Flashes

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2023

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2023Kent State1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#131 (of 133 teams · 270.4 yds/g · 3,245 yards)#133 (of 133 teams · 14.7 pts/g · 176 points)#83 (of 133 teams · 390.6 yds/g allowed · 4,687 yards)#122 (of 133 teams · 34.6 pts/g allowed · 415 points)#133 (of 133 teams · -19.9 /g · -239 on the season)#92 (of 133 teams · -3 on the season · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.25 /g)#98 (of 133 teams · 28:50 /g · 5h 46m on the season)#90 (of 133 teams · 16% of last season's passing production returning)#129 (of 133 teams · 12% of last season's receiving production returning)#130 (of 133 teams · 9% of last season's rushing production returning)#118 (of 133 teams · 373.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#128 (of 133 teams · 0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#127 (of 133 teams · 0.285 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#132 (of 133 teams · 34% of plays successful)#104 (of 133 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#63 (of 133 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 133 teams · 1.329 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Mid-American teams in 20230 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#108 (Total offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #38–#132. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#90 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #30–#133. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#27 (Total defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #4–#100. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#55 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #6–#122. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#98 (Point margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #20–#133. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #12–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#62 (Possession: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #4–#118. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#23 (Returning passing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #1–#129. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#79 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #5–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#31 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #1–#130. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#113 (Team talent: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #88–#127. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#86 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #20–#129. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #8–#129. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#97 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #26–#132. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #12–#111. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#88 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #32–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range #5–#107. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2023Akron2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#129 (of 133 teams · 278.6 yds/g · 3,343 yards)#130 (of 133 teams · 16.3 pts/g · 195 points)#33 (of 133 teams · 335.6 yds/g allowed · 4,027 yards)#81 (of 133 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#122 (of 133 teams · -11.8 /g · -141 on the season)#128 (of 133 teams · -10 on the season · 11 taken, 21 given · -0.83 /g)#76 (of 133 teams · 29:34 /g · 5h 55m on the season)#11 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#50 (of 133 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#59 (of 133 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning)#102 (of 133 teams · 445.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#129 (of 133 teams · 0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 133 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#119 (of 133 teams · 37% of plays successful)#39 (of 133 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 133 teams · 1.132 average PPA on successful plays)#107 (of 133 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Ball State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#122 (of 133 teams · 308.1 yds/g · 3,697 yards)#122 (of 133 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 219 points)#17 (of 133 teams · 315.8 yds/g allowed · 3,790 yards)#55 (of 133 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 293 points)#98 (of 133 teams · -6.2 /g · -74 on the season)#104 (of 133 teams · -5 on the season · 11 taken, 16 given · -0.42 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 32:45 /g · 6h 33m on the season)#129 (of 133 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#112 (of 133 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning)#126 (of 133 teams · 15% of last season's rushing production returning)#111 (of 133 teams · 403.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 133 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 133 teams · 0.157 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 133 teams · 40% of plays successful)#56 (of 133 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 133 teams · 1.124 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 133 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Bowling Green760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#108 (of 133 teams · 326.1 yds/g · 4,240 yards)#74 (of 133 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 340 points)#25 (of 133 teams · 326.1 yds/g allowed · 4,239 yards)#52 (of 133 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 312 points)#64 (of 133 teams · +2.1 /g · +28 on the season)#12 (of 133 teams · +9 on the season · 28 taken, 19 given · +0.69 /g)#55 (of 133 teams · 30:33 /g · 6h 37m on the season)#95 (of 133 teams · 14% of last season's passing production returning)#78 (of 133 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#21 (of 133 teams · 87% of last season's rushing production returning)#113 (of 133 teams · 397.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 133 teams · 0.179 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 133 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 133 teams · 42% of plays successful)#66 (of 133 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#32 (of 133 teams · 1.315 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 133 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Buffalo390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#114 (of 133 teams · 318.8 yds/g · 3,826 yards)#111 (of 133 teams · 20.9 pts/g · 251 points)#55 (of 133 teams · 367.1 yds/g allowed · 4,405 yards)#77 (of 133 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 329 points)#101 (of 133 teams · -6.5 /g · -78 on the season)#67 (of 133 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#56 (of 133 teams · 30:32 /g · 6h 06m on the season)#23 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#115 (of 133 teams · 31% of last season's receiving production returning)#11 (of 133 teams · 93% of last season's rushing production returning)#127 (of 133 teams · 296.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#122 (of 133 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 133 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#110 (of 133 teams · 38% of plays successful)#36 (of 133 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 133 teams · 1.181 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 133 teams · 1.303 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Central Michigan570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#98 (of 133 teams · 344.2 yds/g · 4,130 yards)#97 (of 133 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 278 points)#100 (of 133 teams · 407.1 yds/g allowed · 4,885 yards)#107 (of 133 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 373 points)#113 (of 133 teams · -7.9 /g · -95 on the season)#120 (of 133 teams · -7 on the season · 8 taken, 15 given · -0.58 /g)#62 (of 133 teams · 30:13 /g · 6h 03m on the season)#89 (of 133 teams · 16% of last season's passing production returning)#116 (of 133 teams · 30% of last season's receiving production returning)#80 (of 133 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning)#125 (of 133 teams · 332.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#86 (of 133 teams · 0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#129 (of 133 teams · 0.298 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 133 teams · 40% of plays successful)#111 (of 133 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 133 teams · 1.257 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 133 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Eastern Michigan670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#132 (of 133 teams · 264.1 yds/g · 3,433 yards)#120 (of 133 teams · 19.5 pts/g · 254 points)#95 (of 133 teams · 401.5 yds/g allowed · 5,220 yards)#69 (of 133 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 347 points)#107 (of 133 teams · -7.2 /g · -93 on the season)#63 (of 133 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#93 (of 133 teams · 29:00 /g · 6h 17m on the season)#79 (of 133 teams · 30% of last season's passing production returning)#105 (of 133 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning)#19 (of 133 teams · 88% of last season's rushing production returning)#116 (of 133 teams · 377.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#121 (of 133 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 133 teams · 0.171 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#125 (of 133 teams · 36% of plays successful)#86 (of 133 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 (of 133 teams · 1.129 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 133 teams · 1.205 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Miami (OH)1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#110 (of 133 teams · 323.5 yds/g · 4,529 yards)#79 (of 133 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 359 points)#26 (of 133 teams · 330.4 yds/g allowed · 4,626 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 15.9 pts/g allowed · 223 points)#26 (of 133 teams · +9.7 /g · +136 on the season)#55 (of 133 teams · +2 on the season · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.14 /g)#75 (of 133 teams · 29:38 /g · 6h 55m on the season)#23 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#76 (of 133 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#31 (of 133 teams · 79% of last season's rushing production returning)#109 (of 133 teams · 408.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#83 (of 133 teams · 0.146 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 133 teams · 0.096 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 133 teams · 38% of plays successful)#45 (of 133 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 133 teams · 1.277 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 1.106 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Northern Illinois760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#77 (of 133 teams · 369.4 yds/g · 4,802 yards)#81 (of 133 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 324 points)#23 (of 133 teams · 321.0 yds/g allowed · 4,173 yards)#27 (of 133 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 273 points)#52 (of 133 teams · +3.9 /g · +51 on the season)#91 (of 133 teams · -3 on the season · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.23 /g)#26 (of 133 teams · 31:32 /g · 6h 50m on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#120 (of 133 teams · 26% of last season's receiving production returning)#100 (of 133 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#120 (of 133 teams · 352.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 133 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#42 (of 133 teams · 0.122 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#61 (of 133 teams · 42% of plays successful)#43 (of 133 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 133 teams · 1.237 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 1.124 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Ohio1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#96 (of 133 teams · 348.0 yds/g · 4,524 yards)#84 (of 133 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 316 points)#4 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 273.9 yds/g allowed · 3,561 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 206 points)#33 (of 133 teams · +8.5 /g · +110 on the season)#12 (of 133 teams · +9 on the season · 22 taken, 13 given · +0.69 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 33:24 /g · 7h 14m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 86% of last season's receiving production returning)#12 (of 133 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#122 (of 133 teams · 342.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 133 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 133 teams · 45% of plays successful)#12 (of 133 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#128 (of 133 teams · 1.098 average PPA on successful plays)#70 (of 133 teams · 1.265 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Toledo1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#38 (of 133 teams · 419.1 yds/g · 5,867 yards)#30 (of 133 teams · 32.3 pts/g · 452 points)#27 (of 133 teams · 331.3 yds/g allowed · 4,638 yards)#22 (of 133 teams · 20.3 pts/g allowed · 284 points)#20 (of 133 teams · +12.0 /g · +168 on the season)#90 (of 133 teams · -3 on the season · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.21 /g)#118 (of 133 teams · 27:56 /g · 6h 31m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#29 (of 133 teams · 64% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 133 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#88 (of 133 teams · 497.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 133 teams · 0.276 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#19 (of 133 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 133 teams · 46% of plays successful)#35 (of 133 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 133 teams · 1.290 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 133 teams · 1.161 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2023Western Michigan480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Mid-American teams in 2023. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#81 (of 133 teams · 364.5 yds/g · 4,374 yards)#90 (of 133 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 284 points)#87 (of 133 teams · 393.4 yds/g allowed · 4,721 yards)#109 (of 133 teams · 31.8 pts/g allowed · 381 points)#114 (of 133 teams · -8.1 /g · -97 on the season)#36 (of 133 teams · +4 on the season · 17 taken, 13 given · +0.33 /g)#67 (of 133 teams · 29:56 /g · 5h 59m on the season)#17 (of 133 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#79 (of 133 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#113 (of 133 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning)#112 (of 133 teams · 401.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 133 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#100 (of 133 teams · 0.220 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 133 teams · 39% of plays successful)#97 (of 133 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 133 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 133 teams · 1.267 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20232023 Kent StateMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #108
Total offense. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Toledo #38 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #77 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #81 of 133; 2023 Ohio #96 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #98 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #108 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #110 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #114 of 133; 2023 Ball State #122 of 133; 2023 Akron #129 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #132 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 131 of 133. Mid-American median rank 108.
Scoring offensemedian #90
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Toledo #30 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #74 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #79 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #81 of 133; 2023 Ohio #84 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #90 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #97 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #111 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #120 of 133; 2023 Ball State #122 of 133; 2023 Akron #130 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 133 of 133. Mid-American median rank 90.
Total defensemedian #27
Total defense. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Ohio #4 of 133; 2023 Ball State #17 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #23 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #25 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #26 of 133; 2023 Toledo #27 of 133; 2023 Akron #33 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #55 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #87 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #95 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #100 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 83 of 133. Mid-American median rank 27.
Scoring defensemedian #55
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Ohio #6 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #8 of 133; 2023 Toledo #22 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #27 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #52 of 133; 2023 Ball State #55 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #69 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #77 of 133; 2023 Akron #81 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #107 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #109 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 122 of 133. Mid-American median rank 55.
Point marginmedian #98
Point margin. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Toledo #20 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #26 of 133; 2023 Ohio #33 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #52 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #64 of 133; 2023 Ball State #98 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #101 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #107 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #113 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #114 of 133; 2023 Akron #122 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 133 of 133. Mid-American median rank 98.
Turnover marginmedian #67
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Bowling Green #12 of 133; 2023 Ohio #12 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #36 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #55 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #63 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #67 of 133; 2023 Toledo #90 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #91 of 133; 2023 Ball State #104 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #120 of 133; 2023 Akron #128 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 92 of 133. Mid-American median rank 67.
Possessionmedian #62
Possession. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Ohio #4 of 133; 2023 Ball State #10 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #26 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #55 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #56 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #62 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #67 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #75 of 133; 2023 Akron #76 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #93 of 133; 2023 Toledo #118 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 98 of 133. Mid-American median rank 62.
Returning passingmedian #23
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Ohio #1 of 133; 2023 Toledo #1 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #9 of 133; 2023 Akron #11 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #17 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #23 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #23 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #79 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #89 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #95 of 133; 2023 Ball State #129 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 90 of 133. Mid-American median rank 23.
Returning receivingmedian #79
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Ohio #5 of 133; 2023 Toledo #29 of 133; 2023 Akron #50 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #76 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #78 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #79 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #105 of 133; 2023 Ball State #112 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #115 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #116 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #120 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 129 of 133. Mid-American median rank 79.
Returning rushingmedian #31
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Toledo #1 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #11 of 133; 2023 Ohio #12 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #19 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #21 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #31 of 133; 2023 Akron #59 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #80 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #100 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #113 of 133; 2023 Ball State #126 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 130 of 133. Mid-American median rank 31.
Team talentmedian #113
Team talent. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Toledo #88 of 133; 2023 Akron #102 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #109 of 133; 2023 Ball State #111 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #112 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #113 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #116 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #120 of 133; 2023 Ohio #122 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #125 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #127 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 118 of 133. Mid-American median rank 113.
Offensive EPAmedian #86
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Toledo #20 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #55 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #65 of 133; 2023 Ohio #70 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #83 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #86 of 133; 2023 Ball State #95 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #100 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #121 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #122 of 133; 2023 Akron #129 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 128 of 133. Mid-American median rank 86.
Defensive EPAmedian #51
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Ohio #8 of 133; 2023 Toledo #19 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #24 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #42 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #48 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #51 of 133; 2023 Akron #52 of 133; 2023 Ball State #67 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #76 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #100 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #129 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 127 of 133. Mid-American median rank 51.
Offensive success ratemedian #97
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Toledo #26 of 133; 2023 Ohio #39 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #61 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #70 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #95 of 133; 2023 Ball State #97 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #104 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #110 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #115 of 133; 2023 Akron #119 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #125 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 132 of 133. Mid-American median rank 97.
Defensive success ratemedian #45
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Ohio #12 of 133; 2023 Toledo #35 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #36 of 133; 2023 Akron #39 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #43 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #45 of 133; 2023 Ball State #56 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #66 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #86 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #97 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #111 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 104 of 133. Mid-American median rank 45.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #88
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Bowling Green #32 of 133; 2023 Toledo #50 of 133; 2023 Miami (OH) #61 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #73 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #88 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #109 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #110 of 133; 2023 Akron #122 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #123 of 133; 2023 Ball State #124 of 133; 2023 Ohio #128 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 63 of 133. Mid-American median rank 88.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #40
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2023, best rank first: 2023 Miami (OH) #5 of 133; 2023 Northern Illinois #8 of 133; 2023 Toledo #17 of 133; 2023 Bowling Green #33 of 133; 2023 Eastern Michigan #37 of 133; 2023 Ball State #40 of 133; 2023 Ohio #70 of 133; 2023 Western Michigan #72 of 133; 2023 Buffalo #93 of 133; 2023 Central Michigan #98 of 133; 2023 Akron #107 of 133. Marked: 2023 Kent State, ranked 103 of 133. Mid-American median rank 40.