Metrics

Kent StateGolden Flashes

Season
Current

Mid-American

Mid-American, 2025

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Kent State570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#128 (of 136 teams · 295.4 yds/g · 3,545 yards)#115 (of 136 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 255 points)#125 (of 136 teams · 428.3 yds/g allowed · 5,139 yards)#128 (of 136 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 403 points)#124 (of 136 teams · -12.3 /g · -148 on the season)#91 (of 136 teams · -3 on the season · 10 taken, 13 given · -0.25 /g)#125 (of 136 teams · 27:45 /g · 5h 33m on the season)#60 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's passing production returning)#98 (of 136 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#89 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's rushing production returning)#128 (of 136 teams · 456.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 136 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 136 teams · 0.199 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#132 (of 136 teams · 35% of plays successful)#108 (of 136 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 136 teams · 1.359 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 136 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Mid-American teams in 20250 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#108 (Total offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #34–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#105 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #37–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#53 (Total defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #2–#129. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#63 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #4–#136. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#98 (Point margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #9–#136. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#54 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #15–#114. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#73 (Possession: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #12–#130. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#61 (Returning passing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #7–#108. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#94 (Returning receiving: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #19–#129. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#98 (Returning rushing: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #13–#128. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#112 (Team talent: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #75–#128. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#113 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #40–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#60 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #1–#128. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#107 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #40–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#55 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #4–#131. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#87 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #15–#136. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#62 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range #11–#106. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)
2025Akron570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#92 (of 136 teams · 355.4 yds/g · 4,265 yards)#108 (of 136 teams · 22.3 pts/g · 267 points)#81 (of 136 teams · 385.3 yds/g allowed · 4,624 yards)#86 (of 136 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 329 points)#102 (of 136 teams · -5.2 /g · -62 on the season)#46 (of 136 teams · +3 on the season · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.25 /g)#70 (of 136 teams · 29:52 /g · 5h 58m on the season)#29 (of 136 teams · 91% of last season's passing production returning)#68 (of 136 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning)#98 (of 136 teams · 21% of last season's rushing production returning)#104 (of 136 teams · 537.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#117 (of 136 teams · 0.070 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 136 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#107 (of 136 teams · 40% of plays successful)#53 (of 136 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 136 teams · 1.181 average PPA on successful plays)#106 (of 136 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Ball State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#134 (of 136 teams · 271.7 yds/g · 3,260 yards)#132 (of 136 teams · 15.8 pts/g · 190 points)#104 (of 136 teams · 406.5 yds/g allowed · 4,878 yards)#103 (of 136 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#128 (of 136 teams · -14.0 /g · -168 on the season)#91 (of 136 teams · -3 on the season · 13 taken, 16 given · -0.25 /g)#77 (of 136 teams · 29:44 /g · 5h 57m on the season)#108 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#116 (of 136 teams · 16% of last season's receiving production returning)#113 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's rushing production returning)#115 (of 136 teams · 495.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#133 (of 136 teams · -0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#87 (of 136 teams · 0.183 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#136 (of 136 teams · 32% of plays successful)#113 (of 136 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 136 teams · 1.322 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 136 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Bowling Green480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#125 (of 136 teams · 306.8 yds/g · 3,681 yards)#117 (of 136 teams · 20.5 pts/g · 246 points)#41 (of 136 teams · 342.5 yds/g allowed · 4,110 yards)#63 (of 136 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#98 (of 136 teams · -3.8 /g · -45 on the season)#54 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 16 taken, 14 given · +0.17 /g)#33 (of 136 teams · 31:19 /g · 6h 16m on the season)#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#129 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's receiving production returning)#124 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's rushing production returning)#107 (of 136 teams · 527.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#129 (of 136 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 136 teams · 0.146 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#127 (of 136 teams · 36% of plays successful)#55 (of 136 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 136 teams · 1.239 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 136 teams · 1.304 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Buffalo570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#85 (of 136 teams · 362.2 yds/g · 4,346 yards)#93 (of 136 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 288 points)#44 (of 136 teams · 344.2 yds/g allowed · 4,130 yards)#54 (of 136 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#77 (of 136 teams · +0.5 /g · +6 on the season)#114 (of 136 teams · -7 on the season · 15 taken, 22 given · -0.58 /g)#119 (of 136 teams · 28:04 /g · 5h 37m on the season)#50 (of 136 teams · 67% of last season's passing production returning)#25 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#13 (of 136 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#112 (of 136 teams · 513.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 136 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 136 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 136 teams · 40% of plays successful)#38 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 136 teams · 1.167 average PPA on successful plays)#62 (of 136 teams · 1.239 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Central Michigan760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#112 (of 136 teams · 332.1 yds/g · 4,318 yards)#105 (of 136 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 293 points)#53 (of 136 teams · 356.5 yds/g allowed · 4,634 yards)#55 (of 136 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 306 points)#85 (of 136 teams · -1.0 /g · -13 on the season)#35 (of 136 teams · +5 on the season · 21 taken, 16 given · +0.38 /g)#21 (of 136 teams · 32:06 /g · 6h 57m on the season)#43 (of 136 teams · 77% of last season's passing production returning)#126 (of 136 teams · 10% of last season's receiving production returning)#118 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 136 teams · 481.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 136 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 136 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 136 teams · 41% of plays successful)#52 (of 136 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 136 teams · 1.161 average PPA on successful plays)#22 (of 136 teams · 1.168 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Eastern Michigan480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#78 (of 136 teams · 377.5 yds/g · 4,530 yards)#92 (of 136 teams · 24.1 pts/g · 289 points)#112 (of 136 teams · 414.2 yds/g allowed · 4,970 yards)#101 (of 136 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#106 (of 136 teams · -5.7 /g · -68 on the season)#105 (of 136 teams · -5 on the season · 9 taken, 14 given · -0.42 /g)#119 (of 136 teams · 28:04 /g · 5h 37m on the season)#108 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#88 (of 136 teams · 27% of last season's receiving production returning)#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing production returning)#94 (of 136 teams · 572.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 136 teams · 0.199 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#124 (of 136 teams · 0.250 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 136 teams · 43% of plays successful)#103 (of 136 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 136 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 136 teams · 1.294 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Massachusetts0120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#136 (of 136 teams · 247.5 yds/g · 2,970 yards)#136 (of 136 teams · 11.1 pts/g · 133 points)#129 (of 136 teams · 434.6 yds/g allowed · 5,215 yards)#136 (of 136 teams · 38.6 pts/g allowed · 463 points)#136 (of 136 teams · -27.5 /g · -330 on the season)#114 (of 136 teams · -7 on the season · 9 taken, 16 given · -0.58 /g)#130 (of 136 teams · 26:56 /g · 5h 23m on the season)#70 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's receiving production returning)#128 (of 136 teams · 7% of last season's rushing production returning)#118 (of 136 teams · 488.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#136 (of 136 teams · -0.031 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#128 (of 136 teams · 0.262 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#134 (of 136 teams · 34% of plays successful)#131 (of 136 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 136 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 136 teams · 1.137 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Miami (OH)770 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#108 (of 136 teams · 338.1 yds/g · 4,733 yards)#95 (of 136 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 329 points)#36 (of 136 teams · 334.6 yds/g allowed · 4,684 yards)#41 (of 136 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#70 (of 136 teams · +1.8 /g · +25 on the season)#42 (of 136 teams · +5 on the season · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.36 /g)#73 (of 136 teams · 29:48 /g · 6h 57m on the season)#99 (of 136 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#128 (of 136 teams · 8% of last season's receiving production returning)#104 (of 136 teams · 18% of last season's rushing production returning)#87 (of 136 teams · 592.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#104 (of 136 teams · 0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 136 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 136 teams · 39% of plays successful)#44 (of 136 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 136 teams · 1.206 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 136 teams · 1.194 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Northern Illinois390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#133 (of 136 teams · 284.4 yds/g · 3,413 yards)#129 (of 136 teams · 17.1 pts/g · 205 points)#57 (of 136 teams · 357.7 yds/g allowed · 4,292 yards)#64 (of 136 teams · 24.3 pts/g allowed · 292 points)#111 (of 136 teams · -7.3 /g · -87 on the season)#54 (of 136 teams · +2 on the season · 13 taken, 11 given · +0.17 /g)#91 (of 136 teams · 29:13 /g · 5h 51m on the season)#61 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's passing production returning)#123 (of 136 teams · 12% of last season's receiving production returning)#62 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#125 (of 136 teams · 471.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#125 (of 136 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 136 teams · 0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#131 (of 136 teams · 35% of plays successful)#109 (of 136 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 136 teams · 1.243 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 136 teams · 1.176 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Ohio940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 136 teams · 412.3 yds/g · 5,360 yards)#67 (of 136 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 361 points)#51 (of 136 teams · 352.3 yds/g allowed · 4,580 yards)#42 (of 136 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#52 (of 136 teams · +5.8 /g · +76 on the season)#81 (of 136 teams · -2 on the season · 17 taken, 19 given · -0.15 /g)#20 (of 136 teams · 32:07 /g · 6h 58m on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#22 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning)#67 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's rushing production returning)#126 (of 136 teams · 470.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 136 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 136 teams · 0.125 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 136 teams · 45% of plays successful)#62 (of 136 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 136 teams · 1.220 average PPA on successful plays)#84 (of 136 teams · 1.270 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Toledo850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#34 (of 136 teams · 415.8 yds/g · 5,405 yards)#37 (of 136 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 401 points)#2 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 255.5 yds/g allowed · 3,321 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 13.3 pts/g allowed · 173 points)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · +17.5 /g · +228 on the season)#28 (of 136 teams · +6 on the season · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.46 /g)#51 (of 136 teams · 30:26 /g · 6h 36m on the season)#15 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#19 (of 136 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#22 (of 136 teams · 67% of last season's rushing production returning)#75 (of 136 teams · 620.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#44 (of 136 teams · 0.204 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · -0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 136 teams · 45% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 136 teams · 1.210 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 136 teams · 1.147 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2025Western Michigan1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Mid-American teams in 2025. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#103 (of 136 teams · 343.0 yds/g · 4,802 yards)#88 (of 136 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 348 points)#17 (of 136 teams · 305.5 yds/g allowed · 4,277 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#37 (of 136 teams · +7.5 /g · +105 on the season)#15 (of 136 teams · +9 on the season · 24 taken, 15 given · +0.64 /g)#12 (of 136 teams · 32:35 /g · 7h 36m on the season)#101 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#79 (of 136 teams · 30% of last season's receiving production returning)#75 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's rushing production returning)#105 (of 136 teams · 534.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 136 teams · 0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 136 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#69 (of 136 teams · 42% of plays successful)#23 (of 136 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#136 (of 136 teams · 1.054 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 136 teams · 1.228 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mid-American, 20252025 Kent StateMid-American medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #108
Total offense. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #34 of 136; 2025 Ohio #35 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #78 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #85 of 136; 2025 Akron #92 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #103 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #108 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #112 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #125 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #133 of 136; 2025 Ball State #134 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #136 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 128 of 136. Mid-American median rank 108.
Scoring offensemedian #105
Scoring offense. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #37 of 136; 2025 Ohio #67 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #88 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #92 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #93 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #95 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #105 of 136; 2025 Akron #108 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #117 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #129 of 136; 2025 Ball State #132 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #136 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 115 of 136. Mid-American median rank 105.
Total defensemedian #53
Total defense. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #2 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #17 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #36 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #41 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #44 of 136; 2025 Ohio #51 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #53 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #57 of 136; 2025 Akron #81 of 136; 2025 Ball State #104 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #112 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #129 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 125 of 136. Mid-American median rank 53.
Scoring defensemedian #63
Scoring defense. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #4 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #9 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #41 of 136; 2025 Ohio #42 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #54 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #55 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #63 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #64 of 136; 2025 Akron #86 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #101 of 136; 2025 Ball State #103 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #136 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 128 of 136. Mid-American median rank 63.
Point marginmedian #98
Point margin. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #9 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #37 of 136; 2025 Ohio #52 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #70 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #77 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #85 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #98 of 136; 2025 Akron #102 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #106 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #111 of 136; 2025 Ball State #128 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #136 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 124 of 136. Mid-American median rank 98.
Turnover marginmedian #54
Turnover margin. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Western Michigan #15 of 136; 2025 Toledo #28 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #35 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #42 of 136; 2025 Akron #46 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #54 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #54 of 136; 2025 Ohio #81 of 136; 2025 Ball State #91 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #105 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #114 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #114 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 91 of 136. Mid-American median rank 54.
Possessionmedian #73
Possession. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Western Michigan #12 of 136; 2025 Ohio #20 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #21 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #33 of 136; 2025 Toledo #51 of 136; 2025 Akron #70 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #73 of 136; 2025 Ball State #77 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #91 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #119 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #119 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #130 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 125 of 136. Mid-American median rank 73.
Returning passingmedian #61
Returning passing. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio #7 of 136; 2025 Toledo #15 of 136; 2025 Akron #29 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #43 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #50 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #61 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #70 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #99 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #101 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #104 of 136; 2025 Ball State #108 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #108 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 60 of 136. Mid-American median rank 61.
Returning receivingmedian #94
Returning receiving. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #19 of 136; 2025 Ohio #22 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #25 of 136; 2025 Akron #68 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #79 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #88 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #94 of 136; 2025 Ball State #116 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #123 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #126 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #128 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #129 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 98 of 136. Mid-American median rank 94.
Returning rushingmedian #98
Returning rushing. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Buffalo #13 of 136; 2025 Toledo #22 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #62 of 136; 2025 Ohio #67 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #75 of 136; 2025 Akron #98 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #104 of 136; 2025 Ball State #113 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #115 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #118 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #124 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #128 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 89 of 136. Mid-American median rank 98.
Team talentmedian #112
Team talent. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #75 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #87 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #94 of 136; 2025 Akron #104 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #105 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #107 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #112 of 136; 2025 Ball State #115 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #118 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #121 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #125 of 136; 2025 Ohio #126 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 128 of 136. Mid-American median rank 112.
Offensive EPAmedian #113
Offensive EPA. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio #40 of 136; 2025 Toledo #44 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #46 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #88 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #104 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #106 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #113 of 136; 2025 Akron #117 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #125 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #129 of 136; 2025 Ball State #133 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #136 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 118 of 136. Mid-American median rank 113.
Defensive EPAmedian #60
Defensive EPA. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #1 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #17 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #33 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #34 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #48 of 136; 2025 Ohio #57 of 136; 2025 Akron #60 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #62 of 136; 2025 Ball State #87 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #89 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #124 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #128 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 103 of 136. Mid-American median rank 60.
Offensive success ratemedian #107
Offensive success rate. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio #40 of 136; 2025 Toledo #43 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #65 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #69 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #91 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #106 of 136; 2025 Akron #107 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #109 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #127 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #131 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #134 of 136; 2025 Ball State #136 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 132 of 136. Mid-American median rank 107.
Defensive success ratemedian #55
Defensive success rate. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Toledo #4 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #23 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #38 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #44 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #52 of 136; 2025 Akron #53 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #55 of 136; 2025 Ohio #62 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #103 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #109 of 136; 2025 Ball State #113 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #131 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 108 of 136. Mid-American median rank 55.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #87
Offensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ball State #29 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #67 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #68 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #69 of 136; 2025 Ohio #80 of 136; 2025 Toledo #87 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #93 of 136; 2025 Akron #105 of 136; 2025 Massachusetts #108 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #114 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #119 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #136 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 15 of 136. Mid-American median rank 87.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #62
Defensive explosiveness. Mid-American, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Massachusetts #11 of 136; 2025 Toledo #12 of 136; 2025 Central Michigan #22 of 136; 2025 Northern Illinois #25 of 136; 2025 Miami (OH) #39 of 136; 2025 Western Michigan #59 of 136; 2025 Buffalo #62 of 136; 2025 Ball State #75 of 136; 2025 Ohio #84 of 136; 2025 Eastern Michigan #98 of 136; 2025 Bowling Green #103 of 136; 2025 Akron #106 of 136. Marked: 2025 Kent State, ranked 71 of 136. Mid-American median rank 62.