Metrics

LouisvilleCardinals

Season
Current

Big East

Big East, 2005

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2005Louisville930 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 482.1 yds/g · 5,785 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 43.4 pts/g · 521 points)#27 (of 119 teams · 324.0 yds/g allowed · 3,888 yards)#47 (of 119 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +19.7 /g · +236 on the season)#11 (of 119 teams · +13 on the season · 36 taken, 23 given · +1.08 /g)#103 (of 119 teams · 16:13 /g · 3h 15m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 0.189 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 119 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 48% of plays successful)#26 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 119 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 119 teams · 1.073 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 8 Big East teams in 20050 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#75 (Total offense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #7–#118. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#66 (Scoring offense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #3–#115. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#27 (Total defense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #11–#83. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#30 (Scoring defense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #13–#98. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#41 (Point margin: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #5–#108. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#50 (Turnover margin: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #7–#99. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#45 (Possession: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #23–#106. 0 of 8 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#72 (Offensive EPA: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #5–#115. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#23 (Defensive EPA: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #4–#59. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#58 (Offensive success rate: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #4–#116. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#27 (Defensive success rate: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #3–#54. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#73 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #7–#95. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range #21–#111. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)
2005Cincinnati470 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 119 teams · 324.4 yds/g · 3,569 yards)#106 (of 119 teams · 17.4 pts/g · 192 points)#83 (of 119 teams · 400.7 yds/g allowed · 4,408 yards)#98 (of 119 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#108 (of 119 teams · -13.9 /g · -153 on the season)#87 (of 119 teams · -5 on the season · 22 taken, 27 given · -0.45 /g)#37 (of 119 teams · 18:30 /g · 3h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#110 (of 119 teams · -0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 119 teams · 0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 119 teams · 36% of plays successful)#34 (of 119 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 119 teams · 0.951 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 119 teams · 0.991 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Pittsburgh560 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 119 teams · 335.8 yds/g · 3,694 yards)#73 (of 119 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 267 points)#39 (of 119 teams · 338.0 yds/g allowed · 3,718 yards)#30 (of 119 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 243 points)#53 (of 119 teams · +2.2 /g · +24 on the season)#99 (of 119 teams · -8 on the season · 20 taken, 28 given · -0.73 /g)#73 (of 119 teams · 17:21 /g · 3h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 119 teams · 0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 119 teams · 0.034 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#44 (of 119 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 119 teams · 1.011 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 119 teams · 0.919 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Rutgers750 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#38 (of 119 teams · 397.1 yds/g · 4,765 yards)#48 (of 119 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)#63 (of 119 teams · 372.3 yds/g allowed · 4,468 yards)#59 (of 119 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 307 points)#50 (of 119 teams · +3.1 /g · +37 on the season)#61 (of 119 teams · -1 on the season · 23 taken, 24 given · -0.08 /g)#57 (of 119 teams · 17:59 /g · 3h 36m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 119 teams · 0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#59 (of 119 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#42 (of 119 teams · 41% of plays successful)#52 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#79 (of 119 teams · 0.972 average PPA on successful plays)#78 (of 119 teams · 1.028 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005South Florida660 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 119 teams · 347.6 yds/g · 4,171 yards)#80 (of 119 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 276 points)#22 (of 119 teams · 311.9 yds/g allowed · 3,743 yards)#14 (of 119 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 216 points)#41 (of 119 teams · +5.0 /g · +60 on the season)#17 (of 119 teams · +10 on the season · 36 taken, 26 given · +0.83 /g)#106 (of 119 teams · 16:01 /g · 3h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 119 teams · 0.028 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#17 (of 119 teams · 0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#76 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#24 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#56 (of 119 teams · 1.009 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 119 teams · 1.069 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005Syracuse1100 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#118 (of 119 teams · 234.4 yds/g · 2,579 yards)#115 (of 119 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 152 points)#36 (of 119 teams · 334.9 yds/g allowed · 3,684 yards)#67 (of 119 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#104 (of 119 teams · -13.0 /g · -143 on the season)#82 (of 119 teams · -4 on the season · 25 taken, 29 given · -0.36 /g)#45 (of 119 teams · 18:17 /g · 3h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#115 (of 119 teams · -0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 119 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 119 teams · 28% of plays successful)#27 (of 119 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 1.177 average PPA on successful plays)#36 (of 119 teams · 0.966 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005UConn560 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#94 (of 119 teams · 323.4 yds/g · 3,557 yards)#66 (of 119 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 272 points)#11 (of 119 teams · 297.2 yds/g allowed · 3,269 yards)#21 (of 119 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#39 (of 119 teams · +5.5 /g · +61 on the season)#50 (of 119 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.09 /g)#23 (of 119 teams · 19:00 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#104 (of 119 teams · -0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 119 teams · -0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#82 (of 119 teams · 37% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 119 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 119 teams · 0.961 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 119 teams · 1.127 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2005West Virginia1110 / 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2005. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 119 teams · 388.9 yds/g · 4,667 yards)#31 (of 119 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 385 points)#20 (of 119 teams · 310.8 yds/g allowed · 3,729 yards)#13 (of 119 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 214 points)#12 (of 119 teams · +14.3 /g · +171 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 119 teams · +15 on the season · 32 taken, 17 given · +1.25 /g)#27 (of 119 teams · 18:55 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 119 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 119 teams · 0.014 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 119 teams · 39% of plays successful)#54 (of 119 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 119 teams · 0.983 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 119 teams · 0.938 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big East, 20052005 LouisvilleBig East medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #75
Total offense. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Rutgers #38 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #44 of 119; 2005 South Florida #75 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #82 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #92 of 119; 2005 UConn #94 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #118 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 7 of 119. Big East median rank 75.
Scoring offensemedian #66
Scoring offense. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 West Virginia #31 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #48 of 119; 2005 UConn #66 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #73 of 119; 2005 South Florida #80 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #106 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 3 of 119. Big East median rank 66.
Total defensemedian #27
Total defense. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 UConn #11 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #20 of 119; 2005 South Florida #22 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #36 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #39 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #63 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #83 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 27 of 119. Big East median rank 27.
Scoring defensemedian #30
Scoring defense. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 West Virginia #13 of 119; 2005 South Florida #14 of 119; 2005 UConn #21 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #30 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #59 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #67 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #98 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 47 of 119. Big East median rank 30.
Point marginmedian #41
Point margin. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 West Virginia #12 of 119; 2005 UConn #39 of 119; 2005 South Florida #41 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #50 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #53 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #104 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #108 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 5 of 119. Big East median rank 41.
Turnover marginmedian #50
Turnover margin. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 West Virginia #7 of 119; 2005 South Florida #17 of 119; 2005 UConn #50 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #61 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #82 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #87 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #99 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 11 of 119. Big East median rank 50.
Possessionmedian #45
Possession. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 UConn #23 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #27 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #37 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #45 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #57 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #73 of 119; 2005 South Florida #106 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 103 of 119. Big East median rank 45.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big East, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Louisville, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big East, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Louisville, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big East, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Louisville, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big East, 2005, best rank first: . Marked: 2005 Louisville, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #72
Offensive EPA. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Rutgers #34 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #41 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #72 of 119; 2005 South Florida #74 of 119; 2005 UConn #104 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #110 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #115 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 5 of 119. Big East median rank 72.
Defensive EPAmedian #23
Defensive EPA. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 UConn #4 of 119; 2005 South Florida #17 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #21 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #23 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #32 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #39 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #59 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 35 of 119. Big East median rank 23.
Offensive success ratemedian #58
Offensive success rate. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Rutgers #42 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #56 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #58 of 119; 2005 South Florida #76 of 119; 2005 UConn #82 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #91 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #116 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 4 of 119. Big East median rank 58.
Defensive success ratemedian #27
Defensive success rate. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 UConn #3 of 119; 2005 South Florida #24 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #27 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #34 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #44 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #52 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #54 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 26 of 119. Big East median rank 27.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #73
Offensive explosiveness. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Syracuse #7 of 119; 2005 Pittsburgh #53 of 119; 2005 South Florida #56 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #73 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #79 of 119; 2005 UConn #89 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #95 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 80 of 119. Big East median rank 73.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #50
Defensive explosiveness. Big East, 2005, best rank first: 2005 Pittsburgh #21 of 119; 2005 West Virginia #27 of 119; 2005 Syracuse #36 of 119; 2005 Cincinnati #50 of 119; 2005 Rutgers #78 of 119; 2005 South Florida #95 of 119; 2005 UConn #111 of 119. Marked: 2005 Louisville, ranked 97 of 119. Big East median rank 50.