Metrics

LouisvilleCardinals

Season
Current

Big East

Big East, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008Louisville570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 120 teams · 376.7 yds/g · 4,520 yards)#68 (of 120 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 296 points)#72 (of 120 teams · 368.8 yds/g allowed · 4,426 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#89 (of 120 teams · -5.2 /g · -62 on the season)#114 (of 120 teams · -14 on the season · 19 taken, 33 given · -1.17 /g)#15 (of 120 teams · 19:14 /g · 3h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.041 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#55 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.875 average PPA on successful plays)#114 (of 120 teams · 1.044 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 8 Big East teams in 20080 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#51 (Total offense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #31–#114. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#55 (Scoring offense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #39–#108. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#32 (Total defense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #7–#104. 2 of 8 in the top 10.)#24 (Scoring defense: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #11–#102. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#38 (Point margin: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #24–#111. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#80 (Turnover margin: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #9–#114. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#45 (Possession: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #6–#111. 1 of 8 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#62 (Offensive EPA: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #26–#92. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive EPA: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #4–#105. 1 of 8 in the top 10.)#48 (Offensive success rate: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #14–#116. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#25 (Defensive success rate: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #4–#109. 3 of 8 in the top 10.)#87 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #68–#118. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#47 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range #21–#114. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)
2008Cincinnati1130 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#51 (of 120 teams · 370.6 yds/g · 5,189 yards)#55 (of 120 teams · 25.9 pts/g · 362 points)#32 (of 120 teams · 321.9 yds/g allowed · 4,507 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 20.1 pts/g allowed · 282 points)#38 (of 120 teams · +5.7 /g · +80 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 23 taken, 30 given · -0.50 /g)#85 (of 120 teams · 17:33 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#25 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.933 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Pittsburgh940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 120 teams · 342.5 yds/g · 4,452 yards)#50 (of 120 teams · 27.1 pts/g · 352 points)#28 (of 120 teams · 317.1 yds/g allowed · 4,123 yards)#35 (of 120 teams · 21.5 pts/g allowed · 279 points)#39 (of 120 teams · +5.6 /g · +73 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 26 taken, 31 given · -0.38 /g)#26 (of 120 teams · 19:07 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 120 teams · -0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 120 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#34 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 120 teams · 0.876 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.891 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Rutgers850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#39 (of 120 teams · 398.4 yds/g · 5,179 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 377 points)#33 (of 120 teams · 326.9 yds/g allowed · 4,250 yards)#19 (of 120 teams · 18.9 pts/g allowed · 245 points)#24 (of 120 teams · +10.2 /g · +132 on the season)#54 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 23 taken, 22 given · +0.08 /g)#48 (of 120 teams · 18:36 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#32 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.853 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008South Florida850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#31 (of 120 teams · 405.0 yds/g · 5,265 yards)#45 (of 120 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 359 points)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 287.6 yds/g allowed · 3,739 yards)#24 (of 120 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 260 points)#28 (of 120 teams · +7.6 /g · +99 on the season)#93 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 19 taken, 26 given · -0.54 /g)#45 (of 120 teams · 18:38 /g · 4h 02m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 120 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 120 teams · -0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.865 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.941 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Syracuse390 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#114 (of 120 teams · 270.2 yds/g · 3,242 yards)#108 (of 120 teams · 18.1 pts/g · 217 points)#104 (of 120 teams · 414.5 yds/g allowed · 4,974 yards)#102 (of 120 teams · 32.7 pts/g allowed · 392 points)#111 (of 120 teams · -14.6 /g · -175 on the season)#77 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.25 /g)#111 (of 120 teams · 16:42 /g · 3h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 120 teams · -0.016 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 120 teams · 33% of plays successful)#109 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.886 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 120 teams · 0.851 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008UConn850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 120 teams · 356.1 yds/g · 4,629 yards)#65 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 324 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 278.0 yds/g allowed · 3,614 yards)#22 (of 120 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#42 (of 120 teams · +5.2 /g · +67 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 25 taken, 30 given · -0.38 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 19:58 /g · 4h 20m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.011 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.089 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 120 teams · 0.758 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.847 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008West Virginia940 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Big East teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#57 (of 120 teams · 360.4 yds/g · 4,685 yards)#73 (of 120 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 319 points)#36 (of 120 teams · 328.9 yds/g allowed · 4,276 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 221 points)#29 (of 120 teams · +7.5 /g · +98 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16 on the season · 32 taken, 16 given · +1.23 /g)#79 (of 120 teams · 17:44 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#73 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.857 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.845 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big East, 20082008 LouisvilleBig East medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #51
Total offense. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 South Florida #31 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #39 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #51 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #57 of 120; 2008 UConn #60 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #74 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #114 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 45 of 120. Big East median rank 51.
Scoring offensemedian #55
Scoring offense. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Rutgers #39 of 120; 2008 South Florida #45 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #50 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #55 of 120; 2008 UConn #65 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #73 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #108 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 68 of 120. Big East median rank 55.
Total defensemedian #32
Total defense. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 UConn #7 of 120; 2008 South Florida #10 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #28 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #32 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #33 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #36 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #104 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 72 of 120. Big East median rank 32.
Scoring defensemedian #24
Scoring defense. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 West Virginia #11 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #19 of 120; 2008 UConn #22 of 120; 2008 South Florida #24 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #25 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #35 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #102 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 89 of 120. Big East median rank 24.
Point marginmedian #38
Point margin. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Rutgers #24 of 120; 2008 South Florida #28 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #29 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #38 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #39 of 120; 2008 UConn #42 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #111 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 89 of 120. Big East median rank 38.
Turnover marginmedian #80
Turnover margin. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 West Virginia #9 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #54 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #77 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #80 of 120; 2008 UConn #80 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #90 of 120; 2008 South Florida #93 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 114 of 120. Big East median rank 80.
Possessionmedian #45
Possession. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 UConn #6 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #26 of 120; 2008 South Florida #45 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #48 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #79 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #85 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #111 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 15 of 120. Big East median rank 45.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big East, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Louisville, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big East, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Louisville, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big East, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Louisville, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big East, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 Louisville, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #62
Offensive EPA. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 South Florida #26 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #38 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #62 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #71 of 120; 2008 UConn #75 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #91 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #92 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 58 of 120. Big East median rank 62.
Defensive EPAmedian #40
Defensive EPA. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 UConn #4 of 120; 2008 South Florida #13 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #22 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #40 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #49 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #63 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #105 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 50 of 120. Big East median rank 40.
Offensive success ratemedian #48
Offensive success rate. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 South Florida #14 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #33 of 120; 2008 UConn #47 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #48 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #66 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #71 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #116 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 55 of 120. Big East median rank 48.
Defensive success ratemedian #25
Defensive success rate. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 UConn #4 of 120; 2008 South Florida #5 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #25 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #32 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #34 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #73 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #109 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 8 of 120. Big East median rank 25.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #87
Offensive explosiveness. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Cincinnati #68 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #80 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #86 of 120; 2008 South Florida #94 of 120; 2008 West Virginia #96 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #97 of 120; 2008 UConn #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 87 of 120. Big East median rank 87.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #47
Defensive explosiveness. Big East, 2008, best rank first: 2008 West Virginia #21 of 120; 2008 UConn #23 of 120; 2008 Syracuse #28 of 120; 2008 Pittsburgh #47 of 120; 2008 Cincinnati #77 of 120; 2008 South Florida #85 of 120; 2008 Rutgers #93 of 120. Marked: 2008 Louisville, ranked 114 of 120. Big East median rank 47.