THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

LouisvilleCardinals

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Louisville played 9 such games.

ACC, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Louisville9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State)#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 560.0 yds/g · 5,040 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 45.0 pts/g · 405 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 335.3 yds/g allowed · 3,018 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 202 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +22.6 /g · +203 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 28:36 /g · 4h 17m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#12 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 128 teams · 654.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.374 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.027 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 49% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.391 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #2–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #2–#69. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #5–#69. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#30 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #8–#66. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#27 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #5–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #2–#59. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #8–#70. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#25 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#112. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#108. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#39 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #1–#80. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #4–#67. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #3–#70. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#27 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #6–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#24 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #2–#71. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #4–#64. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #5–#66. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#51 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range #3–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2016Clemson14–12 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #11 Florida State, #13 Louisville, #14 Auburn, #22 Virginia Tech · postseason: #1 Alabama, #3 Ohio State)#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 513.5 yds/g · 5,135 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 320.7 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 180 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +21.1 /g · +211 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 30:07 /g · 5h 01m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 846.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 71 teams · 0.241 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 51% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 1.178 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Florida State10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #17 Florida · postseason: #6 Michigan)#16 (of 71 teams · 460.7 yds/g · 4,607 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 31.6 pts/g · 316 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 354.2 yds/g allowed · 3,542 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 250 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · +6.6 /g · +66 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:10 /g · 5h 32m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#82 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 906.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.267 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 1.355 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Georgia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#47 (of 71 teams · 378.2 yds/g · 3,782 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 424.2 yds/g allowed · 4,242 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 30:28 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 582.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 71 teams · 0.207 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.432 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.163 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Miami9–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #23 Pittsburgh · postseason: #16 West Virginia)#39 (of 71 teams · 403.6 yds/g · 3,632 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 262 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 399.2 yds/g allowed · 3,593 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · +6.4 /g · +58 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +8 in these games · 14 taken, 6 given · +0.89 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 28:13 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 128 teams · 745.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 71 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · 0.142 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 1.343 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016North Carolina8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 Florida State, #23 Pittsburgh)#28 (of 71 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 4,318 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 300 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 415.6 yds/g allowed · 4,156 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 71 teams · +3.6 /g · +36 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 24:40 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#97 (of 128 teams · 13% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#80 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 128 teams · 669.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.266 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 44% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.415 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.085 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Pittsburgh8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #2 Clemson, #5 Penn State)#17 (of 71 teams · 457.7 yds/g · 4,577 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 43.7 pts/g · 437 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 490.8 yds/g allowed · 4,908 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 39.3 pts/g allowed · 393 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 71 teams · +4.4 /g · +44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · +1 in these games · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 31:26 /g · 5h 14m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 128 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#50 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 128 teams · 649.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 0.324 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 0.242 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.492 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016NC State7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 71 teams · 393.8 yds/g · 3,544 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 183 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 370.9 yds/g allowed · 3,338 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · -3.0 /g · -27 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · -1 in these games · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 32:15 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 97% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 616.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 71 teams · 0.101 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 1.293 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 1.341 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia Tech10–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Pittsburgh)#20 (of 71 teams · 452.1 yds/g · 4,521 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g · 330 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 338.3 yds/g allowed · 3,383 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 71 teams · +10.7 /g · +107 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#85 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 128 teams · 646.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 71 teams · 0.184 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 0.088 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 1.292 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Duke4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 71 teams · 399.6 yds/g · 3,996 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 218 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 465.0 yds/g allowed · 4,650 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 326 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · -10.8 /g · -108 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 14 taken, 17 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 30:53 /g · 5h 09m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#103 (of 128 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 599.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 71 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 71 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.129 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.419 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Virginia2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 331.4 yds/g · 2,983 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 21.2 pts/g · 191 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 71 teams · 451.4 yds/g allowed · 4,063 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 35.6 pts/g allowed · 320 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -14.3 /g · -129 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 30:29 /g · 4h 34m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 128 teams · 618.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 0.251 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 1.204 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 1.325 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wake Forest7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #24 Temple)#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 298.0 yds/g · 2,682 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 173 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 409.3 yds/g allowed · 3,684 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · -4.9 /g · -44 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +10 in these games · 22 taken, 12 given · +1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · 31:24 /g · 4h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 128 teams · 517.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.013 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 32% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.296 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 1.234 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#37 (of 71 teams · 413.1 yds/g · 3,718 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 554.6 yds/g allowed · 4,991 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 43.0 pts/g allowed · 387 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -18.1 /g · -163 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · +2 in these games · 18 taken, 16 given · +0.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 28:16 /g · 4h 14m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#18 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 87% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 128 teams · 520.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 71 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.311 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 1.301 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.426 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 236.0 yds/g · 1,888 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 12.0 pts/g · 96 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 413.8 yds/g allowed · 3,310 yds · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 34.4 pts/g allowed · 275 points · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -22.4 /g · -179 in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · +0 in these games · 15 taken, 15 given · +0.00 /g · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 30:55 /g · 4h 07m in these games · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 70% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 128 teams · 533.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.079 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 0.189 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 29% of plays successful · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 1.222 average PPA on successful plays · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.422 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 8 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20162016 LouisvilleACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Florida State #16 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #17 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #28 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #37 of 71; 2016 Miami #39 of 71; 2016 Duke #42 of 71; 2016 NC State #43 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #47 of 71; 2016 Virginia #63 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #66 of 71; 2016 Boston College #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 2 of 71. ACC median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #29
Scoring offense. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Pittsburgh #3 of 71; 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Florida State #22 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #26 of 71; 2016 Miami #29 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #38 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #44 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 NC State #60 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #63 of 71; 2016 Boston College #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 2 of 71. ACC median rank 29.
Total defensemedian #32
Total defense. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #10 of 71; 2016 Florida State #15 of 71; 2016 NC State #20 of 71; 2016 Miami #28 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #32 of 71; 2016 Boston College #35 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #36 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #37 of 71; 2016 Virginia #47 of 71; 2016 Duke #50 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #60 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 9 of 71. ACC median rank 32.
Scoring defensemedian #30
Scoring defense. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #8 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #15 of 71; 2016 Miami #18 of 71; 2016 NC State #21 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #32 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #33 of 71; 2016 Duke #46 of 71; 2016 Boston College #53 of 71; 2016 Virginia #57 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #61 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #66 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 17 of 71. ACC median rank 30.
Point marginmedian #27
Point margin. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #11 of 71; 2016 Florida State #18 of 71; 2016 Miami #19 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #25 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #27 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #33 of 71; 2016 NC State #37 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #43 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Virginia #63 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #65 of 71; 2016 Boston College #68 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 5 of 71. ACC median rank 27.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wake Forest #2 of 71; 2016 Miami #5 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #14 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #26 of 71; 2016 Florida State #30 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #30 of 71; 2016 Boston College #33 of 71; 2016 NC State #36 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #42 of 71; 2016 Clemson #45 of 71; 2016 Duke #45 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #45 of 71; 2016 Virginia #59 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 36 of 71. ACC median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #33
Possession. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Florida State #8 of 71; 2016 NC State #14 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #23 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #24 of 71; 2016 Boston College #31 of 71; 2016 Duke #33 of 71; 2016 Virginia #37 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #38 of 71; 2016 Clemson #40 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #53 of 71; 2016 Miami #54 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 49 of 71. ACC median rank 33.
Returning passingmedian #25
Returning passing. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Virginia #12 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #12 of 128; 2016 Boston College #19 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #22 of 128; 2016 Clemson #25 of 128; 2016 Miami #25 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #34 of 128; 2016 Duke #36 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 Florida State #82 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #85 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #97 of 128; 2016 NC State #112 of 128. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 1 of 128. ACC median rank 25.
Returning receivingmedian #34
Returning receiving. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Florida State #3 of 128; 2016 NC State #5 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #6 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #18 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #20 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #34 of 128; 2016 Clemson #35 of 128; 2016 Boston College #49 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #60 of 128; 2016 Virginia #65 of 128; 2016 Miami #71 of 128; 2016 Duke #103 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #108 of 128. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 1 of 128. ACC median rank 34.
Returning rushingmedian #39
Returning rushing. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wake Forest #1 of 128; 2016 Miami #9 of 128; 2016 Virginia #10 of 128; 2016 Clemson #26 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #34 of 128; 2016 Boston College #39 of 128; 2016 Florida State #39 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #47 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #50 of 128; 2016 Duke #52 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #54 of 128; 2016 NC State #58 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #80 of 128. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 12 of 128. ACC median rank 39.
Team talentmedian #36
Team talent. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Florida State #4 of 128; 2016 Clemson #9 of 128; 2016 Miami #19 of 128; 2016 North Carolina #29 of 128; 2016 Pittsburgh #35 of 128; 2016 Virginia Tech #36 of 128; 2016 Virginia #42 of 128; 2016 NC State #44 of 128; 2016 Duke #48 of 128; 2016 Georgia Tech #50 of 128; 2016 Boston College #60 of 128; 2016 Syracuse #66 of 128; 2016 Wake Forest #67 of 128. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 32 of 128. ACC median rank 36.
Offensive EPAmedian #23
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Pittsburgh #4 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #10 of 71; 2016 Clemson #13 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #20 of 71; 2016 Miami #23 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #25 of 71; 2016 Duke #45 of 71; 2016 NC State #53 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #58 of 71; 2016 Virginia #65 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #68 of 71; 2016 Boston College #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 3 of 71. ACC median rank 23.
Defensive EPAmedian #27
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #6 of 71; 2016 NC State #15 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #16 of 71; 2016 Florida State #23 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Miami #27 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #39 of 71; 2016 Boston College #42 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #54 of 71; 2016 Duke #55 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #56 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #65 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 7 of 71. ACC median rank 27.
Offensive success ratemedian #24
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #2 of 71; 2016 Florida State #9 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #13 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #15 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #23 of 71; 2016 Duke #24 of 71; 2016 Miami #43 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #46 of 71; 2016 NC State #57 of 71; 2016 Virginia #58 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #60 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #68 of 71; 2016 Boston College #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 4 of 71. ACC median rank 24.
Defensive success ratemedian #32
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Clemson #5 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Florida State #14 of 71; 2016 NC State #15 of 71; 2016 Miami #30 of 71; 2016 Boston College #32 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #36 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #37 of 71; 2016 Duke #41 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #53 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #60 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #64 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 4 of 71. ACC median rank 32.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #31
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Georgia Tech #5 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #7 of 71; 2016 North Carolina #8 of 71; 2016 Miami #20 of 71; 2016 Florida State #28 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #31 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #33 of 71; 2016 NC State #35 of 71; 2016 Boston College #50 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 Clemson #56 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #62 of 71; 2016 Duke #66 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 6 of 71. ACC median rank 31.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #51
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2016, best rank first: 2016 North Carolina #3 of 71; 2016 Georgia Tech #8 of 71; 2016 Wake Forest #26 of 71; 2016 Clemson #32 of 71; 2016 Miami #39 of 71; 2016 Virginia Tech #42 of 71; 2016 Virginia #51 of 71; 2016 NC State #55 of 71; 2016 Florida State #57 of 71; 2016 Duke #65 of 71; 2016 Boston College #67 of 71; 2016 Syracuse #68 of 71; 2016 Pittsburgh #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Louisville, ranked 62 of 71. ACC median rank 51.