Marshall game log

2016: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 10vs Morgan State62–0 W625308.540–21714–22–313212–113–318–7026:51——
Sep 17vs Akron38–65 L975605.838–11433–59–446316–173–3417–18036:4542%48%
Sep 24vs #21 Louisville28–59 L642073.243–1489–21–59162–151–129–9529:0631%54%
Oct 1at Pittsburgh27–43 L623445.530–10420–32–240187–151–215–6727:0644%52%
Oct 8at North Texas21–38 L702713.928–1320–42–258168–191–216–7023:5330%45%
Oct 15vs Florida Atlantic27–21 W814365.442–10627–39–330256–141–314–4035:49——
Oct 22vs Charlotte24–27 L703505.024–8832–46–262224–120–0212–11527:3046%40%
Oct 29at Southern Miss14–24 L592263.825–6020–34–166111–141–105–6525:5025%35%
Nov 5at Old Dominion14–38 L492144.420–7620–29–138103–121–205–3924:3829%44%
Nov 12vs Middle Tennessee42–17 W784535.841–20721–37–246296–142–303–3532:4247%31%
Nov 19at Florida International14–31 L683795.626–7829–42–301246–131–125–5528:4849%56%
Nov 26vs Western Kentucky6–60 L742303.139–8719–35–143188–191–3211–9039:2032%52%
Season12 games3–98344,2005.0396–1298264–438–2,90224159–17516–241690–9215:58:1838%46%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Marshall on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Marshall's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Marshall offense 38% (264 of 691)Opponent offense / Marshall defense 46% (331 of 726)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Akron: opponent offense 48% of 62Akron: Marshall offense 42% of 97#21 Louisville: opponent offense 54% of 85#21 Louisville: Marshall offense 31% of 64Pittsburgh: opponent offense 52% of 65Pittsburgh: Marshall offense 44% of 62North Texas: opponent offense 45% of 82North Texas: Marshall offense 30% of 70Charlotte: opponent offense 40% of 81Charlotte: Marshall offense 46% of 70Southern Miss: opponent offense 35% of 85Southern Miss: Marshall offense 25% of 59Old Dominion: opponent offense 44% of 77Old Dominion: Marshall offense 29% of 49Middle Tennessee: opponent offense 31% of 62Middle Tennessee: Marshall offense 47% of 78Florida International: opponent offense 56% of 66Florida International: Marshall offense 49% of 68Western Kentucky: opponent offense 52% of 61Western Kentucky: Marshall offense 32% of 74
Marshall offenseOpponent offense (Marshall defense)
Successful snaps by player
PlayerSuccessful · rate of snaps

vs Akron

38–65 L · 97 plays to 62
Marshall offense 42% (41/97)Akron offense 48% (30/62)

vs #21 Louisville

28–59 L · 64 plays to 85
Marshall offense 31% (20/64)Louisville offense 54% (46/85)

at Pittsburgh

27–43 L · 62 plays to 65
Marshall offense 44% (27/62)Pittsburgh offense 52% (34/65)

at North Texas

21–38 L · 70 plays to 82
Marshall offense 30% (21/70)North Texas offense 45% (37/82)

vs Charlotte

24–27 L · 70 plays to 81
Marshall offense 46% (32/70)Charlotte offense 40% (32/81)

at Southern Miss

14–24 L · 59 plays to 85
Marshall offense 25% (15/59)Southern Miss offense 35% (30/85)

at Old Dominion

14–38 L · 49 plays to 77
Marshall offense 29% (14/49)Old Dominion offense 44% (34/77)

vs Middle Tennessee

42–17 W · 78 plays to 62
Marshall offense 47% (37/78)Middle Tennessee offense 31% (19/62)

at Florida International

14–31 L · 68 plays to 66
Marshall offense 49% (33/68)FIU offense 56% (37/66)

vs Western Kentucky

6–60 L · 74 plays to 61
Marshall offense 32% (24/74)Western Kentucky offense 52% (32/61)