THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

MiamiHurricanes

Season
‹
›Current

ACC

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Miami played 9 such games.

ACC, 2017

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Miami10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Notre Dame, #22 Virginia Tech)#35 (of 70 teams · 390.6 yds/g · 3,515 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 258 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 356.3 yds/g allowed · 3,207 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 17.6 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · +11.1 /g · +100 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +15 in these games · 26 taken, 11 given · +1.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:42 /g · 4h 09m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#76 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 130 teams · 749.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 70 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.007 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.436 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 ACC teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#31 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #3–#63. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#42 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #6–#62. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#26 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #7–#68. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #6–#60. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #8–#59. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#31 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #1–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #4–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#64 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #1–#125. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#70 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #1–#117. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#91 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #14–#128. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #5–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#45 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #2–#65. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#28 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #3–#67. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #3–#60. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#33 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #5–#60. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #5–#67. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #7–#69. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)
2017Clemson12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami)4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami, #22 Virginia Tech, #24 NC State)#25 (of 70 teams · 416.8 yds/g · 4,168 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 305 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 306.3 yds/g allowed · 3,063 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +14.8 /g · +148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 31:42 /g · 5h 17m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#95 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 853.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 70 teams · 0.178 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.013 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.125 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Louisville8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 551.1 yds/g · 5,511 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 371 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 441.1 yds/g allowed · 4,411 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 312 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · +5.9 /g · +59 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 30:24 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#88 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 130 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.347 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.452 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 1.256 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Georgia Tech5–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech)#31 (of 70 teams · 398.6 yds/g · 3,986 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 272 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 370.8 yds/g allowed · 3,708 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 282 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1.0 /g · -10 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -8 in these games · 7 taken, 15 given · -0.80 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33:43 /g · 5h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 130 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#30 (of 70 teams · 0.170 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 0.162 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 1.214 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017NC State9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#16 (of 70 teams · 441.6 yds/g · 4,416 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 70 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 281 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 374.6 yds/g allowed · 3,746 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 26.1 pts/g allowed · 261 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · +2.0 /g · +20 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 12 taken, 12 given · +0.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33:07 /g · 5h 31m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 130 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 70 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 1.319 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Boston College7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 70 teams · 401.2 yds/g · 3,611 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 224 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 411.3 yds/g allowed · 3,702 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 226 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 18 taken, 13 given · +0.56 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 30:14 /g · 4h 32m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#65 (of 130 teams · 535.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 70 teams · 0.066 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 1.227 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Duke7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Northwestern)#43 (of 70 teams · 376.0 yds/g · 3,760 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 23.3 pts/g · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 359.9 yds/g allowed · 3,599 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 221 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 70 teams · +1.2 /g · +12 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 31:13 /g · 5h 12m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 130 teams · 627.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 70 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 1.215 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 1.348 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Virginia Tech9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#48 (of 70 teams · 365.4 yds/g · 3,289 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 216 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 334.4 yds/g allowed · 3,010 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 16.1 pts/g allowed · 145 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +7.9 /g · +71 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 31:46 /g · 4h 46m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#125 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#33 (of 130 teams · 662.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#58 (of 70 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.444 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Wake Forest8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 NC State)#15 (of 70 teams · 443.3 yds/g · 3,990 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 287 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 480.2 yds/g allowed · 4,322 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 280 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0.8 /g · +7 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 16 taken, 10 given · +0.67 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:57 /g · 3h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 130 teams · 527.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 70 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 0.163 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 1.368 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 1.356 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Florida State7–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 313.7 yds/g · 3,137 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 20.1 pts/g · 201 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 355.2 yds/g allowed · 3,552 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · -4.6 /g · -46 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 12 taken, 19 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 925.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 0.110 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 1.273 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Pittsburgh5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami)#51 (of 70 teams · 356.5 yds/g · 3,565 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 217 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 406.4 yds/g allowed · 4,064 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 288 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · -7.1 /g · -71 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 12 taken, 14 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 32:05 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#115 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#56 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 130 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#47 (of 70 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · 0.166 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.150 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 1.330 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Virginia6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Boise State)#60 (of 70 teams · 317.1 yds/g · 2,854 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 178 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 359.7 yds/g allowed · 3,237 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · -10.1 /g · -91 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 70 teams · -1 in these games · 14 taken, 15 given · -0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 30:58 /g · 4h 39m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 603.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 36% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 70 teams · 1.212 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Syracuse4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson)#14 (of 70 teams · 444.8 yds/g · 4,003 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 70 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 215 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 490.7 yds/g allowed · 4,416 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 36.9 pts/g allowed · 332 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · -13.0 /g · -117 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -12 in these games · 5 taken, 17 given · -1.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 27m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 130 teams · 539.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 70 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.309 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 1.270 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.430 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017North Carolina3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#57 (of 70 teams · 331.3 yds/g · 3,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 19.4 pts/g · 194 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 461.1 yds/g allowed · 4,611 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 34.2 pts/g allowed · 342 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · -14.8 /g · -148 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -10 in these games · 11 taken, 21 given · -1.00 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 25:59 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#117 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#128 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 6% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 130 teams · 697.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 0.232 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 70 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 1.298 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

ACC, 20172017 MiamiACC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #31
Total offense. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #3 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #14 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #15 of 70; 2017 NC State #16 of 70; 2017 Clemson #25 of 70; 2017 Boston College #29 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #31 of 70; 2017 Duke #43 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #48 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #51 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #57 of 70; 2017 Virginia #60 of 70; 2017 Florida State #63 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 35 of 70. ACC median rank 31.
Scoring offensemedian #42
Scoring offense. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #6 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #17 of 70; 2017 Clemson #21 of 70; 2017 NC State #27 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #35 of 70; 2017 Boston College #42 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #47 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #48 of 70; 2017 Duke #52 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #54 of 70; 2017 Florida State #60 of 70; 2017 Virginia #61 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #62 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 24 of 70. ACC median rank 42.
Total defensemedian #26
Total defense. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Clemson #7 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #11 of 70; 2017 Florida State #17 of 70; 2017 Virginia #20 of 70; 2017 Duke #21 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #29 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #35 of 70; 2017 Boston College #37 of 70; 2017 Louisville #47 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #57 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #62 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #68 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 18 of 70. ACC median rank 26.
Scoring defensemedian #28
Scoring defense. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Clemson #6 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #7 of 70; 2017 Duke #18 of 70; 2017 Florida State #25 of 70; 2017 Boston College #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #32 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #38 of 70; 2017 Virginia #41 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #44 of 70; 2017 Louisville #45 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #54 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #60 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 8 of 70. ACC median rank 28.
Point marginmedian #33
Point margin. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #15 of 70; 2017 Louisville #20 of 70; 2017 NC State #26 of 70; 2017 Duke #30 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #33 of 70; 2017 Boston College #35 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #39 of 70; 2017 Florida State #45 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #50 of 70; 2017 Virginia #54 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #57 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #59 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 12 of 70. ACC median rank 33.
Turnover marginmedian #31
Turnover margin. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wake Forest #9 of 70; 2017 Boston College #14 of 70; 2017 Louisville #15 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #21 of 70; 2017 Clemson #25 of 70; 2017 Duke #31 of 70; 2017 NC State #33 of 70; 2017 Virginia #39 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #43 of 70; 2017 Florida State #53 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #61 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #63 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #68 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 1 of 70. ACC median rank 31.
Possessionmedian #23
Possession. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Georgia Tech #4 of 70; 2017 NC State #6 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #12 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #15 of 70; 2017 Clemson #16 of 70; 2017 Duke #20 of 70; 2017 Virginia #23 of 70; 2017 Louisville #28 of 70; 2017 Boston College #31 of 70; 2017 Florida State #37 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #41 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #65 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #66 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 61 of 70. ACC median rank 23.
Returning passingmedian #64
Returning passing. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Duke #1 of 130; 2017 NC State #1 of 130; 2017 Florida State #45 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #48 of 130; 2017 Louisville #51 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #55 of 130; 2017 Virginia #64 of 130; 2017 Boston College #105 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #106 of 130; 2017 Clemson #110 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #111 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #115 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #125 of 130. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 122 of 130. ACC median rank 64.
Returning receivingmedian #70
Returning receiving. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wake Forest #1 of 130; 2017 Boston College #7 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #8 of 130; 2017 Duke #27 of 130; 2017 NC State #31 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #56 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #70 of 130; 2017 Virginia #72 of 130; 2017 Louisville #88 of 130; 2017 Clemson #95 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #109 of 130; 2017 Florida State #111 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #117 of 130. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 81 of 130. ACC median rank 70.
Returning rushingmedian #91
Returning rushing. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wake Forest #14 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #23 of 130; 2017 Boston College #58 of 130; 2017 Louisville #62 of 130; 2017 Duke #66 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #91 of 130; 2017 NC State #92 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #106 of 130; 2017 Florida State #109 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #117 of 130; 2017 Clemson #119 of 130; 2017 Virginia #126 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 76 of 130. ACC median rank 91.
Team talentmedian #36
Team talent. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida State #5 of 130; 2017 Clemson #9 of 130; 2017 North Carolina #27 of 130; 2017 Virginia Tech #33 of 130; 2017 Pittsburgh #34 of 130; 2017 Louisville #36 of 130; 2017 Duke #40 of 130; 2017 NC State #44 of 130; 2017 Virginia #47 of 130; 2017 Georgia Tech #52 of 130; 2017 Syracuse #63 of 130; 2017 Boston College #65 of 130; 2017 Wake Forest #66 of 130. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 20 of 130. ACC median rank 36.
Offensive EPAmedian #45
Offensive EPA. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #2 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #14 of 70; 2017 NC State #23 of 70; 2017 Clemson #27 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #30 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #45 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #47 of 70; 2017 Boston College #57 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #58 of 70; 2017 Duke #60 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #61 of 70; 2017 Florida State #62 of 70; 2017 Virginia #65 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 34 of 70. ACC median rank 45.
Defensive EPAmedian #28
Defensive EPA. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Clemson #4 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #10 of 70; 2017 Duke #14 of 70; 2017 Florida State #23 of 70; 2017 Virginia #26 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Boston College #30 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #37 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #38 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #39 of 70; 2017 Louisville #46 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #55 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #67 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 3 of 70. ACC median rank 28.
Offensive success ratemedian #34
Offensive success rate. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #3 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #18 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #25 of 70; 2017 NC State #28 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #29 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #34 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #43 of 70; 2017 Boston College #48 of 70; 2017 Florida State #55 of 70; 2017 Duke #57 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #59 of 70; 2017 Virginia #60 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 47 of 70. ACC median rank 34.
Defensive success ratemedian #33
Defensive success rate. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Virginia Tech #5 of 70; 2017 Clemson #8 of 70; 2017 Duke #12 of 70; 2017 Virginia #25 of 70; 2017 Boston College #31 of 70; 2017 Florida State #33 of 70; 2017 NC State #34 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #35 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #42 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #46 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #49 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #56 of 70; 2017 Louisville #60 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 18 of 70. ACC median rank 33.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #44
Offensive explosiveness. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisville #5 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #13 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #23 of 70; 2017 NC State #24 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #36 of 70; 2017 Boston College #44 of 70; 2017 Duke #48 of 70; 2017 Georgia Tech #49 of 70; 2017 Virginia #50 of 70; 2017 Florida State #52 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #60 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #64 of 70; 2017 Clemson #67 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 6 of 70. ACC median rank 44.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. ACC, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Georgia Tech #7 of 70; 2017 Clemson #24 of 70; 2017 NC State #25 of 70; 2017 Virginia #29 of 70; 2017 Louisville #30 of 70; 2017 Florida State #35 of 70; 2017 North Carolina #40 of 70; 2017 Pittsburgh #49 of 70; 2017 Boston College #50 of 70; 2017 Duke #53 of 70; 2017 Wake Forest #57 of 70; 2017 Syracuse #67 of 70; 2017 Virginia Tech #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Miami, ranked 23 of 70. ACC median rank 35.