Miami game log

2026: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Sep 4at Stanford45–6 W675498.232–12130–35–428278–110–025–5036:3457%34%
Sep 10vs Florida A&M77–7 W7385611.744–43027–29–426421–30–111–537:0072%26%
Sep 18at Wake Forest33–20 W683785.634–15830–34–220235–130–007–7533:2445%42%
Sep 26vs Central Michigan52–3 W685728.434–20127–34–371316–91–1013–10731:1059%27%
Oct 3at Clemson41–13 W624196.835–19218–27–227254–111–206–5832:2952%40%
Season5 games5–03382,7748.2179–1102132–159–1,67214824–472–4332–2952:50:3757%35%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Miami on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Miami's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Miami offense 57% (191 of 333)Opponent offense / Miami defense 35% (104 of 300)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%Stanford: opponent offense 34% of 65Stanford: Miami offense 57% of 68Florida A&M: opponent offense 26% of 47Florida A&M: Miami offense 72% of 71Wake Forest: opponent offense 42% of 62Wake Forest: Miami offense 45% of 64Central Michigan: opponent offense 27% of 51Central Michigan: Miami offense 59% of 68Clemson: opponent offense 40% of 75Clemson: Miami offense 52% of 62
Miami offenseOpponent offense (Miami defense)Success rate per game for the current filters. Home games are bold; away games read @ opponent; * is a neutral site; faint names are still to play.
Miami players
PlayerSuccess · snaps

Snaps a player passed, ran or was targeted on, under the down, play and yards-to-go filters. To qualify: 20% of the busiest player in his role (passing 28, running 11, targeted 10), at least 3. Click a name to filter the grid to him.

at Stanford

45–6 W · 68 plays to 65
Miami offense 57% (39/68)Stanford offense 34% (22/65)

vs Florida A&M

77–7 W · 71 plays to 47
Miami offense 72% (51/71)Florida A&M offense 26% (12/47)

at Wake Forest

33–20 W · 64 plays to 62
Miami offense 45% (29/64)Wake Forest offense 42% (26/62)

vs Central Michigan

52–3 W · 68 plays to 51
Miami offense 59% (40/68)Central Michigan offense 27% (14/51)

at Clemson

41–13 W · 62 plays to 75
Miami offense 52% (32/62)Clemson offense 40% (30/75)