THIRD AND DATA

Miami game log

2025: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 31vs #10 Notre Dame27–24 W683324.937–12720–31–205205–141–206–5133:5750%45%
Sep 6vs Bethune-Cookman45–3 W665438.230–19930–36–344314–60–104–5028:0567%24%
Sep 13vs South Florida49–12 W685768.538–20525–30–371277–111–129–6936:0149%30%
Sep 20vs Florida26–7 W743494.744–18917–30–160218–161–116–3036:3046%29%
Oct 4at Florida State28–22 W593385.732–9720–27–241145–142–3013–11430:2642%41%
Oct 17vs Louisville21–24 L593345.724–6325–35–271155–121–249–6728:4439%42%
Oct 25vs Stanford42–7 W744045.544–19922–30–205258–153–505–3036:4255%28%
Nov 1at SMU20–26 L784335.640–15926–38–274237–160–1212–9637:4245%43%
Nov 8vs Syracuse38–10 W573856.832–12419–25–261223–90–005–5430:2341%35%
Nov 15vs NC State41–7 W705818.337–21424–33–367285–100–018–7536:4351%20%
Nov 22at Virginia Tech34–17 W634186.630–8328–33–335227–132–209–8833:2944%43%
Nov 29at Pittsburgh38–7 W714165.939–14024–32–276285–80–015–2835:5560%26%
Dec 20at #8 Texas A&M10–3 W492785.728–17514–21–103123–120–014–3026:1628%39%
Dec 31vs #5 Ohio State24–14 W632914.637–15319–26–138187–141–110–033:2043%44%
Jan 8vs #3 Ole Miss31–27 W884595.251–19123–37–2682811–192–2110–7441:2242%41%
Jan 19vs #1 Indiana21–27 L533426.521–11019–32–232153–111–117–6023:3643%38%
Season16 games13–31,0606,4796.1564–2428355–496–4,05134993–20015–2215112–9168:49:1147%36%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Miami on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Miami's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Miami offense 47% (496 of 1049)Opponent offense / Miami defense 36% (365 of 1003)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%#10 Notre Dame: opponent offense 45% of 58#10 Notre Dame: Miami offense 50% of 68Bethune-Cookman: opponent offense 24% of 49Bethune-Cookman: Miami offense 67% of 66South Florida: opponent offense 30% of 69South Florida: Miami offense 49% of 65Florida: opponent offense 29% of 52Florida: Miami offense 46% of 76Florida State: opponent offense 41% of 83Florida State: Miami offense 42% of 59Louisville: opponent offense 42% of 66Louisville: Miami offense 39% of 56Stanford: opponent offense 28% of 54Stanford: Miami offense 55% of 74SMU: opponent offense 43% of 69SMU: Miami offense 45% of 77Syracuse: opponent offense 35% of 71Syracuse: Miami offense 41% of 56NC State: opponent offense 20% of 49NC State: Miami offense 51% of 70Virginia Tech: opponent offense 43% of 67Virginia Tech: Miami offense 44% of 63Pittsburgh: opponent offense 26% of 53Pittsburgh: Miami offense 60% of 70#8 Texas A&M: opponent offense 39% of 75#8 Texas A&M: Miami offense 28% of 47#5 Ohio State: opponent offense 44% of 59#5 Ohio State: Miami offense 43% of 61#3 Ole Miss: opponent offense 41% of 58#3 Ole Miss: Miami offense 42% of 88#1 Indiana: opponent offense 38% of 71#1 Indiana: Miami offense 43% of 53
#10 Notre DameBethune-CookmanSouth FloridaFlorida@ Florida StateLouisvilleStanford@ SMUSyracuseNC State@ Virginia Tech@ Pittsburgh@ #8 Texas A&M#5 Ohio State *#3 Ole Miss *#1 Indiana *
Miami offenseOpponent offense (Miami defense)
Success rate by player
PlayerSuccess · snaps

vs #10 Notre Dame

27–24 W · 68 plays to 58
Miami offense 50% (34/68)Notre Dame offense 45% (26/58)

vs Bethune-Cookman

45–3 W · 66 plays to 49
Miami offense 67% (44/66)Bethune-Cookman offense 24% (12/49)

vs South Florida

49–12 W · 65 plays to 69
Miami offense 49% (32/65)South Florida offense 30% (21/69)

vs Florida

26–7 W · 76 plays to 52
Miami offense 46% (35/76)Florida offense 29% (15/52)

at Florida State

28–22 W · 59 plays to 83
Miami offense 42% (25/59)Florida State offense 41% (34/83)

vs Louisville

21–24 L · 56 plays to 66
Miami offense 39% (22/56)Louisville offense 42% (28/66)

vs Stanford

42–7 W · 74 plays to 54
Miami offense 55% (41/74)Stanford offense 28% (15/54)

at SMU

20–26 L · 77 plays to 69
Miami offense 45% (35/77)SMU offense 43% (30/69)

vs Syracuse

38–10 W · 56 plays to 71
Miami offense 41% (23/56)Syracuse offense 35% (25/71)

vs NC State

41–7 W · 70 plays to 49
Miami offense 51% (36/70)NC State offense 20% (10/49)

at Virginia Tech

34–17 W · 63 plays to 67
Miami offense 44% (28/63)Virginia Tech offense 43% (29/67)

at Pittsburgh

38–7 W · 70 plays to 53
Miami offense 60% (42/70)Pittsburgh offense 26% (14/53)

at #8 Texas A&M

10–3 W · 47 plays to 75
Miami offense 28% (13/47)Texas A&M offense 39% (29/75)

vs #5 Ohio State

24–14 W · 61 plays to 59
Miami offense 43% (26/61)Ohio State offense 44% (26/59)

vs #3 Ole Miss

31–27 W · 88 plays to 58
Miami offense 42% (37/88)Ole Miss offense 41% (24/58)

vs #1 Indiana

21–27 L · 53 plays to 71
Miami offense 43% (23/53)Indiana offense 38% (27/71)