THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Michigan StateSpartans

Season
‹

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Michigan State played 6 such games.

Big Ten, 2026

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026Michigan State2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 243.7 yds/g · 1,462 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 15.7 pts/g · 94 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 391.5 yds/g allowed · 2,349 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 179 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -14.2 /g · -85 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 3 taken, 10 given · -1.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:31 /g · 2h 39m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 138 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 138 teams · 685.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 0.180 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.033 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 1.173 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 18 Big Ten teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #7–#69. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#66. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#65. 5 of 18 in the top 10.)#27 (Scoring defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#68. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#32 (Point margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #4–#68. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#29 (Turnover margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#66. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#34 (Possession: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#68. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#45 (Returning passing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#123. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning receiving: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #5–#126. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning rushing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#131. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#30 (Team talent: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #3–#61. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#69. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#24 (Defensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #1–#68. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#42 (Offensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #9–#68. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #1–#66. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#30 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #6–#69. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #1–#65. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)
2026UCLA8–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 458.8 yds/g · 2,753 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 213 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 286.8 yds/g allowed · 1,721 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 97 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +19.3 /g · +116 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +11 in these games · 21 taken, 10 given · +1.83 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34:12 /g · 3h 25m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 138 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 138 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 138 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 138 teams · 774.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 69 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 1.237 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Northwestern6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 69 teams · 428.7 yds/g · 2,572 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 190 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 2,201 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · +12.0 /g · +72 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +8 in these games · 11 taken, 3 given · +1.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33:43 /g · 3h 22m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 89% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 138 teams · 688.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.272 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Nebraska5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 69 teams · 367.2 yds/g · 1,836 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 120 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 1,489 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 90 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +6.0 /g · +30 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 32:55 /g · 2h 45m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 138 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 138 teams · 787.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 69 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 1.265 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 1.204 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Indiana8–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 69 teams · 398.8 yds/g · 2,393 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 147 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 287.0 yds/g allowed · 1,722 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 96 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +8.5 /g · +51 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 6 taken, 5 given · +0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 28:59 /g · 2h 54m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 138 teams · 15% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 138 teams · 735.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 69 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 1.351 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.357 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Michigan5–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 304.0 yds/g · 1,824 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 17.5 pts/g · 105 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 271.5 yds/g allowed · 1,629 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 102 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · +0.5 /g · +3 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 8 taken, 8 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 31:50 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 138 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 138 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 138 teams · 890.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 69 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 1.228 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Ohio State6–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 69 teams · 433.3 yds/g · 2,600 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 178 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 314.8 yds/g allowed · 1,889 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · +10.0 /g · +60 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33:43 /g · 3h 22m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 138 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 964.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 69 teams · 0.216 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 1.302 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026USC7–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 69 teams · 379.3 yds/g · 2,276 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 162 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 384.0 yds/g allowed · 2,304 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 162 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 5 taken, 5 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 28:04 /g · 2h 48m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 138 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 138 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 899.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 69 teams · 0.204 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 46% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 1.269 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Iowa6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 69 teams · 320.3 yds/g · 1,922 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 131 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 321.5 yds/g allowed · 1,929 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 100 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +5.2 /g · +31 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 5 taken, 7 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 28:50 /g · 2h 53m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#89 (of 138 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 138 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 138 teams · 722.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 69 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 1.172 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Oregon5–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#36 (of 69 teams · 361.0 yds/g · 2,166 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 148 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 392.8 yds/g allowed · 2,357 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 144 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · +0.7 /g · +4 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · -4 in these games · 8 taken, 12 given · -0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:30 /g · 2h 39m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 138 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 69 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Washington5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 69 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 1,670 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 124 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 382.4 yds/g allowed · 1,912 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 129 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · -1.0 /g · -5 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 7 taken, 8 given · -0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 27:51 /g · 2h 19m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 138 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 138 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 138 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 138 teams · 777.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 69 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 39% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 1.357 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Wisconsin5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 276.8 yds/g · 1,661 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 99 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 300.8 yds/g allowed · 1,805 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · -3.2 /g · -19 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 6 taken, 8 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 27:40 /g · 2h 46m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 138 teams · 52% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 138 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 138 teams · 767.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 1.284 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Illinois5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 69 teams · 386.5 yds/g · 2,319 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 142 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 382.5 yds/g allowed · 2,295 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · -3.2 /g · -19 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 4 taken, 5 given · -0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 31:07 /g · 3h 07m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 138 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 138 teams · 704.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 69 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.327 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 1.259 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Penn State4–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 69 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 1,670 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 105 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 353.4 yds/g allowed · 1,767 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · -4.4 /g · -22 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 8 taken, 7 given · +0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 31:56 /g · 2h 40m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#131 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 138 teams · 774.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 69 teams · 0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 39% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 1.154 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.387 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Minnesota5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 263.7 yds/g · 1,582 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 17.0 pts/g · 102 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 351.5 yds/g allowed · 2,109 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 150 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -8.0 /g · -48 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +5 in these games · 12 taken, 7 given · +0.83 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 30:36 /g · 3h 04m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 138 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 138 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 138 teams · 728.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 33% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 1.223 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Purdue3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 69 teams · 359.4 yds/g · 2,516 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 192 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 437.9 yds/g allowed · 3,065 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · -6.6 /g · -46 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 9 taken, 8 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 29:36 /g · 3h 27m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 138 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 138 teams · 698.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 69 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 1.318 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Rutgers2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 69 teams · 355.5 yds/g · 2,133 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 460.5 yds/g allowed · 2,763 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36.2 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -12.3 /g · -74 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -6 in these games · 4 taken, 10 given · -1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 29:43 /g · 2h 58m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 138 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 138 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 709.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 69 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.378 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.405 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.352 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Maryland2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 301.8 yds/g · 1,811 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 115 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 444.2 yds/g allowed · 2,665 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 39.8 pts/g allowed · 239 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -20.7 /g · -124 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 7 taken, 9 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:11 /g · 2h 37m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 138 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 138 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 138 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 138 teams · 719.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 0.245 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20262026 Michigan StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #7 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #14 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #16 of 69; 2026 Indiana #25 of 69; 2026 Illinois #29 of 69; 2026 USC #30 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #35 of 69; 2026 Oregon #36 of 69; 2026 Purdue #37 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #40 of 69; 2026 Penn State #49 of 69; 2026 Washington #49 of 69; 2026 Iowa #58 of 69; 2026 Michigan #63 of 69; 2026 Maryland #64 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #66 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #67 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 69 of 69. Big Ten median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #8 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #17 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #18 of 69; 2026 Purdue #26 of 69; 2026 USC #29 of 69; 2026 Washington #33 of 69; 2026 Oregon #34 of 69; 2026 Indiana #35 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #38 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #39 of 69; 2026 Illinois #42 of 69; 2026 Iowa #48 of 69; 2026 Penn State #54 of 69; 2026 Maryland #57 of 69; 2026 Michigan #60 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #61 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #64 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 66 of 69. Big Ten median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Michigan #2 of 69; 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 Indiana #5 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #7 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #9 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #12 of 69; 2026 Iowa #15 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #22 of 69; 2026 Penn State #24 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #29 of 69; 2026 Washington #35 of 69; 2026 Illinois #36 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 Oregon #46 of 69; 2026 Purdue #61 of 69; 2026 Maryland #62 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 43 of 69. Big Ten median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #27
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Indiana #2 of 69; 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 Iowa #6 of 69; 2026 Michigan #9 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #11 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #16 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #16 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #16 of 69; 2026 Oregon #27 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #30 of 69; 2026 Penn State #32 of 69; 2026 Washington #33 of 69; 2026 Illinois #37 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 Purdue #61 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #65 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 49 of 69. Big Ten median rank 27.
Point marginmedian #32
Point margin. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #11 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #15 of 69; 2026 Indiana #19 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #22 of 69; 2026 Iowa #25 of 69; 2026 Oregon #30 of 69; 2026 Michigan #31 of 69; 2026 USC #32 of 69; 2026 Washington #34 of 69; 2026 Illinois #39 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #39 of 69; 2026 Penn State #43 of 69; 2026 Purdue #50 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #52 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 63 of 69. Big Ten median rank 32.
Turnover marginmedian #29
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #2 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #4 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #9 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #19 of 69; 2026 Penn State #19 of 69; 2026 Indiana #22 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #22 of 69; 2026 Purdue #25 of 69; 2026 Michigan #29 of 69; 2026 USC #29 of 69; 2026 Illinois #40 of 69; 2026 Washington #44 of 69; 2026 Iowa #45 of 69; 2026 Maryland #45 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #45 of 69; 2026 Oregon #56 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 66 of 69. Big Ten median rank 29.
Possessionmedian #34
Possession. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #2 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #3 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #3 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #9 of 69; 2026 Penn State #14 of 69; 2026 Michigan #15 of 69; 2026 Illinois #22 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #27 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #34 of 69; 2026 Purdue #37 of 69; 2026 Indiana #43 of 69; 2026 Iowa #47 of 69; 2026 USC #55 of 69; 2026 Washington #57 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #59 of 69; 2026 Oregon #67 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 66 of 69. Big Ten median rank 34.
Returning passingmedian #45
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #8 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #20 of 138; 2026 Michigan #24 of 138; 2026 Oregon #26 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #33 of 138; 2026 USC #36 of 138; 2026 Maryland #37 of 138; 2026 Washington #38 of 138; 2026 UCLA #45 of 138; 2026 Purdue #53 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #64 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #69 of 138; 2026 Iowa #89 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #94 of 138; 2026 Illinois #111 of 138; 2026 Indiana #111 of 138; 2026 Penn State #123 of 138. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 65 of 138. Big Ten median rank 45.
Returning receivingmedian #59
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #5 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #23 of 138; 2026 Oregon #30 of 138; 2026 Iowa #39 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #44 of 138; 2026 Illinois #48 of 138; 2026 Michigan #49 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #54 of 138; 2026 Maryland #59 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #61 of 138; 2026 Washington #66 of 138; 2026 UCLA #96 of 138; 2026 USC #101 of 138; 2026 Purdue #105 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #106 of 138; 2026 Indiana #116 of 138; 2026 Penn State #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 112 of 138. Big Ten median rank 59.
Returning rushingmedian #40
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #8 of 138; 2026 Illinois #17 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #20 of 138; 2026 USC #24 of 138; 2026 Maryland #25 of 138; 2026 UCLA #28 of 138; 2026 Michigan #29 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #31 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #40 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #45 of 138; 2026 Iowa #46 of 138; 2026 Oregon #60 of 138; 2026 Washington #77 of 138; 2026 Purdue #81 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #90 of 138; 2026 Indiana #111 of 138; 2026 Penn State #131 of 138. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 96 of 138. Big Ten median rank 40.
Team talentmedian #30
Team talent. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Oregon #3 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #5 of 138; 2026 USC #9 of 138; 2026 Michigan #11 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #22 of 138; 2026 Washington #24 of 138; 2026 UCLA #25 of 138; 2026 Penn State #26 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #30 of 138; 2026 Indiana #38 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #41 of 138; 2026 Iowa #44 of 138; 2026 Maryland #46 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #48 of 138; 2026 Illinois #51 of 138; 2026 Purdue #55 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #60 of 138. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 61 of 138. Big Ten median rank 30.
Offensive EPAmedian #35
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #8 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #17 of 69; 2026 USC #19 of 69; 2026 UCLA #22 of 69; 2026 Indiana #23 of 69; 2026 Illinois #25 of 69; 2026 Purdue #28 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #34 of 69; 2026 Washington #35 of 69; 2026 Oregon #42 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #49 of 69; 2026 Iowa #50 of 69; 2026 Michigan #53 of 69; 2026 Penn State #54 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #61 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #66 of 69; 2026 Maryland #67 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 69 of 69. Big Ten median rank 35.
Defensive EPAmedian #24
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #1 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #3 of 69; 2026 Michigan #4 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #7 of 69; 2026 Indiana #11 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #19 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #20 of 69; 2026 Washington #23 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #24 of 69; 2026 Oregon #26 of 69; 2026 Iowa #28 of 69; 2026 Penn State #38 of 69; 2026 USC #46 of 69; 2026 Maryland #58 of 69; 2026 Purdue #65 of 69; 2026 Illinois #66 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 48 of 69. Big Ten median rank 24.
Offensive success ratemedian #42
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #9 of 69; 2026 UCLA #14 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #15 of 69; 2026 USC #18 of 69; 2026 Illinois #20 of 69; 2026 Purdue #30 of 69; 2026 Iowa #31 of 69; 2026 Indiana #36 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #45 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #46 of 69; 2026 Washington #48 of 69; 2026 Penn State #50 of 69; 2026 Michigan #53 of 69; 2026 Oregon #55 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #62 of 69; 2026 Maryland #67 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 42 of 69. Big Ten median rank 42.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #1 of 69; 2026 Indiana #3 of 69; 2026 Michigan #4 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #6 of 69; 2026 Iowa #11 of 69; 2026 Oregon #15 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #19 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #26 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #36 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #37 of 69; 2026 Penn State #38 of 69; 2026 Washington #39 of 69; 2026 USC #42 of 69; 2026 Maryland #59 of 69; 2026 Illinois #63 of 69; 2026 Purdue #64 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #66 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 56 of 69. Big Ten median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #30
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Rutgers #6 of 69; 2026 Washington #13 of 69; 2026 Indiana #15 of 69; 2026 Oregon #21 of 69; 2026 Illinois #22 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #23 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #28 of 69; 2026 Purdue #29 of 69; 2026 USC #30 of 69; 2026 Maryland #32 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #34 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #38 of 69; 2026 UCLA #39 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #51 of 69; 2026 Michigan #52 of 69; 2026 Penn State #56 of 69; 2026 Iowa #60 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 69 of 69. Big Ten median rank 30.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wisconsin #1 of 69; 2026 Iowa #12 of 69; 2026 Washington #19 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #21 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #27 of 69; 2026 Michigan #30 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #31 of 69; 2026 Illinois #35 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 UCLA #39 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #44 of 69; 2026 Maryland #45 of 69; 2026 Oregon #50 of 69; 2026 Purdue #51 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69; 2026 Indiana #62 of 69; 2026 Penn State #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan State, ranked 13 of 69. Big Ten median rank 35.