THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Michigan StateSpartans

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Michigan State played 10 such games.

Big Ten, 2025

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2025Michigan State4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#51 (of 74 teams · 336.4 yds/g · 3,364 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 23.1 pts/g · 231 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 400.3 yds/g allowed · 4,003 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 32.9 pts/g allowed · 329 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · -9.8 /g · -98 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 7 taken, 9 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 29:33 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 136 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 136 teams · 51% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 136 teams · 717.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 74 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 18 Big Ten teams in 20250 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#45 (Total offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #5–#73. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#73. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#72. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#31 (Scoring defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#69. 5 of 18 in the top 10.)#38 (Point margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#70. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#33 (Turnover margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #3–#69. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#73. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#71 (Returning passing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#127. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning receiving: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #9–#114. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#63 (Returning rushing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #5–#120. 2 of 18 in the top 10.)#37 (Team talent: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #3–#72. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#72. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#50 (Defensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #2–#73. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#26 (Offensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#71. 5 of 18 in the top 10.)#57 (Defensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #3–#73. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#47 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #15–#74. 0 of 18 in the top 10.)#11 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range #1–#70. 8 of 18 in the top 10.)
2025Indiana16–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 5 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #2 Ohio State, #5 Oregon, #23 Iowa · postseason: #5 Oregon, #9 Alabama, #10 Miami)#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 455.2 yds/g · 4,097 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 41.8 pts/g · 376 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 262.1 yds/g allowed · 2,359 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 12.0 pts/g allowed · 108 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +29.8 /g · +268 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +13 in these games · 19 taken, 6 given · +1.44 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:55 /g · 4h 56m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#117 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#63 (of 136 teams · 35% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 136 teams · 645.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.383 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.045 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.233 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 1.285 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Oregon13–23 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #4 Texas Tech)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #16 USC, #23 Iowa · postseason: #4 Texas Tech, #24 James Madison)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 449.1 yds/g · 4,491 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 35.8 pts/g · 358 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 264.5 yds/g allowed · 2,645 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 15.8 pts/g allowed · 158 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +20.0 /g · +200 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · +7 in these games · 16 taken, 9 given · +0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 74 teams · 30:25 /g · 5h 04m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#110 (of 136 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 136 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 941.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.350 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 1.303 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.158 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #13 Texas, #18 Michigan)#21 (of 74 teams · 404.4 yds/g · 4,044 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 33.7 pts/g · 337 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 208.9 yds/g allowed · 2,089 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 8.4 pts/g allowed · 84 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · +25.3 /g · +253 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 9 taken, 5 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 34:10 /g · 5h 42m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#104 (of 136 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#32 (of 136 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 136 teams · 13% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 973.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.355 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · -0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.141 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.998 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Washington9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 74 teams · 375.7 yds/g · 3,381 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 238 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 327.7 yds/g allowed · 2,949 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 19.8 pts/g allowed · 178 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · +6.7 /g · +60 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 9 taken, 12 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 28:55 /g · 4h 20m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 (of 136 teams · 29% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 136 teams · 720.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 74 teams · 0.247 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 1.171 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025USC9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Michigan, #23 Iowa)#13 (of 74 teams · 430.3 yds/g · 4,303 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 306 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 358.1 yds/g allowed · 3,581 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 236 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · +7.0 /g · +70 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 74 teams · 29:50 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 (of 136 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 40% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 136 teams · 15% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 136 teams · 847.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 0.313 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 74 teams · 1.288 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.157 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Iowa9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #14 Vanderbilt)#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 298.9 yds/g · 2,989 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 266 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 300.0 yds/g allowed · 3,000 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 16.8 pts/g allowed · 168 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · +9.8 /g · +98 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 74 teams · 30:48 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#80 (of 136 teams · 14% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#69 (of 136 teams · 37% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#42 (of 136 teams · 710.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 74 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 74 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#74 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.074 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.063 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Penn State7–61 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 74 teams · 333.0 yds/g · 2,997 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 249 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 74 teams · 372.2 yds/g allowed · 3,350 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 26.7 pts/g allowed · 240 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · +1.0 /g · +9 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 6 taken, 9 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 29:12 /g · 4h 23m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 136 teams · 90% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 136 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#10 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 910.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 74 teams · 0.235 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 1.210 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 74 teams · 1.192 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Northwestern7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 74 teams · 324.2 yds/g · 2,918 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 20.3 pts/g · 183 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · 349.3 yds/g allowed · 3,144 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 23.8 pts/g allowed · 214 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · -3.4 /g · -31 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 32:43 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 136 teams · 4% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#91 (of 136 teams · 26% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#57 (of 136 teams · 678.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 74 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 74 teams · 0.254 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 43% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Michigan9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#39 (of 74 teams · 372.3 yds/g · 3,723 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 23.4 pts/g · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 74 teams · 334.2 yds/g allowed · 3,342 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 204 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 74 teams · +3.0 /g · +30 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 29:24 /g · 4h 54m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 136 teams · 68% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#120 (of 136 teams · 11% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 136 teams · 907.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 74 teams · 0.194 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 74 teams · 0.152 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.111 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Nebraska7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#59 (of 74 teams · 321.7 yds/g · 3,217 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 224 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 343.3 yds/g allowed · 3,433 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 269 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · -4.5 /g · -45 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 10 taken, 9 given · +0.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 30:33 /g · 5h 05m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 136 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 45% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 136 teams · 821.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 74 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 74 teams · 0.249 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 74 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 74 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 74 teams · 1.254 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Illinois9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 USC)#43 (of 74 teams · 364.6 yds/g · 3,646 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 74 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 262 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 74 teams · 384.4 yds/g allowed · 3,844 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 27.6 pts/g allowed · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · -1.4 /g · -14 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 74 teams · +3 in these games · 14 taken, 11 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 74 teams · 30:11 /g · 5h 02m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 136 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 136 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 136 teams · 71% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 136 teams · 662.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 74 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 74 teams · 46% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 74 teams · 1.207 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 74 teams · 1.181 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Maryland4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 74 teams · 354.0 yds/g · 3,186 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 19.9 pts/g · 179 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 435.9 yds/g allowed · 3,923 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 74 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 285 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · -11.8 /g · -106 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · +1 in these games · 13 taken, 12 given · +0.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 25:44 /g · 3h 52m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#120 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#109 (of 136 teams · 19% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 136 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 699.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 74 teams · 0.131 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 74 teams · 0.228 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 74 teams · 1.337 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.160 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Minnesota8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 263.5 yds/g · 2,635 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 74 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 190 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 74 teams · 392.2 yds/g allowed · 3,922 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 271 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · -8.1 /g · -81 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 74 teams · +4 in these games · 10 taken, 6 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 28:05 /g · 4h 41m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#113 (of 136 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#52 (of 136 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#35 (of 136 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 136 teams · 711.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 74 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 74 teams · 0.235 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 (of 74 teams · 37% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 74 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.252 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025UCLA3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 (of 74 teams · 308.4 yds/g · 3,084 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 18.5 pts/g · 185 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 384.3 yds/g allowed · 3,843 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 74 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 336 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15.1 /g · -151 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · -2 in these games · 8 taken, 10 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 29:32 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#127 — bottom 10 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#36 (of 136 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 136 teams · 39% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 136 teams · 766.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 74 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · 0.282 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 1.208 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 74 teams · 1.161 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Rutgers5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#29 (of 74 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 3,508 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 74 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 205 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 464.4 yds/g allowed · 4,180 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36.0 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 74 teams · -13.2 /g · -119 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · -3 in these games · 8 taken, 11 given · -0.33 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 74 teams · 31:30 /g · 4h 43m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 136 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 136 teams · 43% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 136 teams · 689.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 74 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.406 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 74 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 74 teams · 1.213 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Wisconsin4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 224.8 yds/g · 2,248 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#73 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 9.5 pts/g · 95 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 74 teams · 352.5 yds/g allowed · 3,525 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 74 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 249 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -15.4 /g · -154 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 3 taken, 14 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 74 teams · 29:46 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#122 (of 136 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 136 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 136 teams · 33% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 136 teams · 763.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 74 teams · 0.226 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 (of 74 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 74 teams · 1.175 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 74 teams · 1.100 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2025Purdue2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2025. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#54 (of 74 teams · 330.6 yds/g · 3,306 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 16.0 pts/g · 160 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 460.1 yds/g allowed · 4,601 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 36.5 pts/g allowed · 365 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -20.5 /g · -205 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · -11 in these games · 9 taken, 20 given · -1.10 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 27:20 /g · 4h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 (of 136 teams · 25% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#114 (of 136 teams · 17% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 136 teams · 63% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 136 teams · 687.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 (of 74 teams · 0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 0.316 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 74 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 74 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 74 teams · 1.240 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 74 teams · 1.277 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20252025 Michigan StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #45
Total offense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #5 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 USC #13 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #21 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #29 of 74; 2025 Washington #35 of 74; 2025 Michigan #39 of 74; 2025 Illinois #43 of 74; 2025 Maryland #45 of 74; 2025 Penn State #52 of 74; 2025 Purdue #54 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #58 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #59 of 74; 2025 UCLA #64 of 74; 2025 Iowa #67 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #72 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 51 of 74. Big Ten median rank 45.
Scoring offensemedian #43
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #8 of 74; 2025 USC #17 of 74; 2025 Penn State #29 of 74; 2025 Iowa #33 of 74; 2025 Washington #34 of 74; 2025 Illinois #35 of 74; 2025 Michigan #43 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #45 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #46 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2025 Maryland #57 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #59 of 74; 2025 UCLA #63 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 44 of 74. Big Ten median rank 43.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Washington #15 of 74; 2025 Michigan #16 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #19 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #22 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #24 of 74; 2025 USC #27 of 74; 2025 Penn State #34 of 74; 2025 UCLA #41 of 74; 2025 Illinois #42 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #46 of 74; 2025 Maryland #62 of 74; 2025 Purdue #70 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 48 of 74. Big Ten median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #31
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #6 of 74; 2025 Washington #9 of 74; 2025 Michigan #12 of 74; 2025 USC #24 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #26 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #31 of 74; 2025 Penn State #41 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #42 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #45 of 74; 2025 Illinois #47 of 74; 2025 Maryland #57 of 74; 2025 UCLA #61 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #68 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 60 of 74. Big Ten median rank 31.
Point marginmedian #38
Point margin. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #5 of 74; 2025 Iowa #12 of 74; 2025 USC #18 of 74; 2025 Washington #19 of 74; 2025 Michigan #29 of 74; 2025 Penn State #35 of 74; 2025 Illinois #38 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #43 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #47 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #53 of 74; 2025 Maryland #59 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #64 of 74; 2025 UCLA #67 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #68 of 74; 2025 Purdue #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 55 of 74. Big Ten median rank 38.
Turnover marginmedian #33
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #13 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #20 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #20 of 74; 2025 Illinois #22 of 74; 2025 Iowa #22 of 74; 2025 Maryland #31 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #31 of 74; 2025 Michigan #33 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #33 of 74; 2025 USC #33 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Penn State #50 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #50 of 74; 2025 Washington #50 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #69 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 45 of 74. Big Ten median rank 33.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Indiana #7 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #10 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #19 of 74; 2025 Iowa #25 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #27 of 74; 2025 Oregon #30 of 74; 2025 Illinois #37 of 74; 2025 USC #40 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #41 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Michigan #49 of 74; 2025 Penn State #53 of 74; 2025 Washington #56 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #65 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Maryland #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 44 of 74. Big Ten median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #71
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Rutgers #1 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #9 of 136; 2025 Illinois #18 of 136; 2025 Penn State #30 of 136; 2025 Michigan #48 of 136; 2025 USC #66 of 136; 2025 Washington #69 of 136; 2025 Purdue #71 of 136; 2025 Iowa #80 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #102 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #104 of 136; 2025 Oregon #110 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #113 of 136; 2025 Indiana #117 of 136; 2025 Maryland #120 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #122 of 136; 2025 UCLA #127 of 136. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 31 of 136. Big Ten median rank 71.
Returning receivingmedian #48
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Iowa #9 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #24 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #26 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #32 of 136; 2025 UCLA #36 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #45 of 136; 2025 Michigan #47 of 136; 2025 Illinois #48 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #52 of 136; 2025 Washington #53 of 136; 2025 USC #54 of 136; 2025 Oregon #61 of 136; 2025 Penn State #62 of 136; 2025 Indiana #63 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #91 of 136; 2025 Maryland #109 of 136; 2025 Purdue #114 of 136. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 30 of 136. Big Ten median rank 48.
Returning rushingmedian #63
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Penn State #5 of 136; 2025 Washington #10 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #19 of 136; 2025 Illinois #20 of 136; 2025 Purdue #28 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #35 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #52 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #55 of 136; 2025 UCLA #64 of 136; 2025 Iowa #69 of 136; 2025 Oregon #71 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #77 of 136; 2025 Maryland #93 of 136; 2025 USC #110 of 136; 2025 Indiana #111 of 136; 2025 Ohio State #115 of 136; 2025 Michigan #120 of 136. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 63 of 136. Big Ten median rank 63.
Team talentmedian #37
Team talent. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #3 of 136; 2025 Oregon #5 of 136; 2025 Penn State #10 of 136; 2025 Michigan #11 of 136; 2025 USC #17 of 136; 2025 Nebraska #20 of 136; 2025 UCLA #26 of 136; 2025 Wisconsin #28 of 136; 2025 Washington #37 of 136; 2025 Minnesota #41 of 136; 2025 Iowa #42 of 136; 2025 Maryland #52 of 136; 2025 Rutgers #53 of 136; 2025 Purdue #54 of 136; 2025 Northwestern #57 of 136; 2025 Illinois #64 of 136; 2025 Indiana #72 of 136. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 38 of 136. Big Ten median rank 37.
Offensive EPAmedian #35
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #2 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #3 of 74; 2025 Oregon #4 of 74; 2025 USC #8 of 74; 2025 Washington #16 of 74; 2025 Penn State #21 of 74; 2025 Illinois #26 of 74; 2025 Michigan #31 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #35 of 74; 2025 Iowa #41 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #45 of 74; 2025 Maryland #46 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #49 of 74; 2025 UCLA #50 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2025 Purdue #63 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #72 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 42 of 74. Big Ten median rank 35.
Defensive EPAmedian #50
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #3 of 74; 2025 Indiana #4 of 74; 2025 Washington #12 of 74; 2025 Iowa #13 of 74; 2025 Michigan #28 of 74; 2025 USC #31 of 74; 2025 Penn State #46 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #50 of 74; 2025 Maryland #51 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #53 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #55 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #56 of 74; 2025 Illinois #57 of 74; 2025 UCLA #64 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 59 of 74. Big Ten median rank 50.
Offensive success ratemedian #26
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #1 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #2 of 74; 2025 Oregon #6 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Washington #8 of 74; 2025 Penn State #16 of 74; 2025 Illinois #17 of 74; 2025 Michigan #21 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #26 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #27 of 74; 2025 Iowa #36 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #37 of 74; 2025 Purdue #48 of 74; 2025 UCLA #52 of 74; 2025 Maryland #59 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #62 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #71 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 44 of 74. Big Ten median rank 26.
Defensive success ratemedian #57
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Indiana #3 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Washington #20 of 74; 2025 Iowa #28 of 74; 2025 Michigan #41 of 74; 2025 Penn State #42 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #44 of 74; 2025 USC #57 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #61 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #63 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #64 of 74; 2025 Illinois #67 of 74; 2025 Purdue #69 of 74; 2025 Maryland #70 of 74; 2025 UCLA #72 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #73 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 65 of 74. Big Ten median rank 57.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #47
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Maryland #15 of 74; 2025 Oregon #20 of 74; 2025 USC #23 of 74; 2025 Purdue #38 of 74; 2025 Indiana #39 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #43 of 74; 2025 Penn State #44 of 74; 2025 UCLA #45 of 74; 2025 Illinois #47 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #54 of 74; 2025 Washington #56 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #60 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #64 of 74; 2025 Michigan #65 of 74; 2025 Ohio State #66 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #73 of 74; 2025 Iowa #74 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 49 of 74. Big Ten median rank 47.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #11
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2025, best rank first: 2025 Ohio State #1 of 74; 2025 Iowa #2 of 74; 2025 Wisconsin #3 of 74; 2025 Michigan #5 of 74; 2025 USC #7 of 74; 2025 Oregon #8 of 74; 2025 Washington #9 of 74; 2025 Maryland #10 of 74; 2025 UCLA #12 of 74; 2025 Illinois #14 of 74; 2025 Penn State #18 of 74; 2025 Northwestern #28 of 74; 2025 Minnesota #38 of 74; 2025 Nebraska #39 of 74; 2025 Purdue #49 of 74; 2025 Indiana #53 of 74; 2025 Rutgers #70 of 74. Marked: 2025 Michigan State, ranked 11 of 74. Big Ten median rank 11.