THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

MichiganWolverines

Season
‹

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Michigan played 6 such games.

Big Ten, 2026

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2026Michigan5–33 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 304.0 yds/g · 1,824 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 17.5 pts/g · 105 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 271.5 yds/g allowed · 1,629 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 102 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · +0.5 /g · +3 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 8 taken, 8 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 31:50 /g · 3h 11m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 138 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 138 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#11 (of 138 teams · 890.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 69 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 1.228 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 18 Big Ten teams in 20260 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#37 (Total offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #7–#69. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#66. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#65. 5 of 18 in the top 10.)#27 (Scoring defense: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#68. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#32 (Point margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #4–#68. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#29 (Turnover margin: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#66. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#34 (Possession: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #2–#68. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#45 (Returning passing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#123. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning receiving: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #5–#126. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#40 (Returning rushing: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#131. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#30 (Team talent: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #3–#61. 3 of 18 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #8–#69. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#24 (Defensive EPA: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #1–#68. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#42 (Offensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #9–#68. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#36 (Defensive success rate: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #1–#66. 4 of 18 in the top 10.)#30 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #6–#69. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range #1–#65. 1 of 18 in the top 10.)
2026UCLA8–00 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 458.8 yds/g · 2,753 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 213 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 286.8 yds/g allowed · 1,721 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 97 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +19.3 /g · +116 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +11 in these games · 21 taken, 10 given · +1.83 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34:12 /g · 3h 25m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 138 teams · 91% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 138 teams · 27% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 138 teams · 69% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 138 teams · 774.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 69 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.154 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 1.237 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 1.272 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Northwestern6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 69 teams · 428.7 yds/g · 2,572 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 69 teams · 31.7 pts/g · 190 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 2,201 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · +12.0 /g · +72 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +8 in these games · 11 taken, 3 given · +1.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33:43 /g · 3h 22m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 89% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 95% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 138 teams · 688.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 0.272 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Nebraska5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 69 teams · 367.2 yds/g · 1,836 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 120 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 1,489 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 18.0 pts/g allowed · 90 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +6.0 /g · +30 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 32:55 /g · 2h 45m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 (of 138 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#23 (of 138 teams · 61% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#90 (of 138 teams · 29% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 138 teams · 787.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 69 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.055 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 1.265 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 1.204 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Indiana8–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#25 (of 69 teams · 398.8 yds/g · 2,393 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 147 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 287.0 yds/g allowed · 1,722 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.0 pts/g allowed · 96 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +8.5 /g · +51 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 6 taken, 5 given · +0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 28:59 /g · 2h 54m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#116 (of 138 teams · 15% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#111 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 138 teams · 735.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 69 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 0.005 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 41% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 1.351 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.357 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Ohio State6–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 69 teams · 433.3 yds/g · 2,600 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 178 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 314.8 yds/g allowed · 1,889 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · +10.0 /g · +60 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 7 taken, 6 given · +0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 33:43 /g · 3h 22m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 138 teams · 65% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 964.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#17 (of 69 teams · 0.216 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 47% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 1.244 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · 1.302 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026USC7–22 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#30 (of 69 teams · 379.3 yds/g · 2,276 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 162 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 384.0 yds/g allowed · 2,304 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 27.0 pts/g allowed · 162 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · +0.0 /g · +0 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · +0 in these games · 5 taken, 5 given · +0.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 28:04 /g · 2h 48m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 138 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 138 teams · 25% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 138 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#9 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 899.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 69 teams · 0.204 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 0.178 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 69 teams · 46% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 1.278 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 1.269 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Iowa6–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#58 (of 69 teams · 320.3 yds/g · 1,922 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 21.8 pts/g · 131 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 321.5 yds/g allowed · 1,929 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 16.7 pts/g allowed · 100 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +5.2 /g · +31 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 5 taken, 7 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 69 teams · 28:50 /g · 2h 53m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#89 (of 138 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 138 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 138 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 138 teams · 722.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 69 teams · 0.047 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 69 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.144 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 69 teams · 1.172 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Oregon5–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#36 (of 69 teams · 361.0 yds/g · 2,166 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 148 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 392.8 yds/g allowed · 2,357 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 24.0 pts/g allowed · 144 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · +0.7 /g · +4 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · -4 in these games · 8 taken, 12 given · -0.67 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:30 /g · 2h 39m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 138 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 138 teams · 53% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#60 (of 138 teams · 49% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#3 — top 10 (of 138 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 69 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 69 teams · 38% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 69 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 69 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 1.316 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Washington5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 69 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 1,670 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 124 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 382.4 yds/g allowed · 1,912 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 69 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 129 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · -1.0 /g · -5 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 7 taken, 8 given · -0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 27:51 /g · 2h 19m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 138 teams · 94% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#66 (of 138 teams · 38% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 138 teams · 36% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#24 (of 138 teams · 777.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 69 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 69 teams · 0.074 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 39% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 1.357 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Wisconsin5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 276.8 yds/g · 1,661 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 16.5 pts/g · 99 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 300.8 yds/g allowed · 1,805 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 69 teams · 19.7 pts/g allowed · 118 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · -3.2 /g · -19 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 6 taken, 8 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 27:40 /g · 2h 46m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 (of 138 teams · 52% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#106 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#40 (of 138 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 138 teams · 767.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.002 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 69 teams · -0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 69 teams · 1.284 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.000 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Illinois5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#29 (of 69 teams · 386.5 yds/g · 2,319 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 23.7 pts/g · 142 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 382.5 yds/g allowed · 2,295 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 161 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · -3.2 /g · -19 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 69 teams · -1 in these games · 4 taken, 5 given · -0.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 31:07 /g · 3h 07m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#111 (of 138 teams · 1% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 46% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 138 teams · 83% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 138 teams · 704.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 69 teams · 0.175 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.327 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 69 teams · 44% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 69 teams · 1.259 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Penn State4–41 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 69 teams · 334.0 yds/g · 1,670 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 69 teams · 21.0 pts/g · 105 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 353.4 yds/g allowed · 1,767 yds · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 127 points · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · -4.4 /g · -22 in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 8 taken, 7 given · +0.20 /g · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 69 teams · 31:56 /g · 2h 40m in these games · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#123 (of 138 teams · 0% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 (of 138 teams · 11% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#131 — bottom 10 (of 138 teams · 2% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 138 teams · 774.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 69 teams · 0.039 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 0.139 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · 39% of plays successful · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 69 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 1.154 average PPA on successful plays · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.387 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 5 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Minnesota5–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 263.7 yds/g · 1,582 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 17.0 pts/g · 102 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 69 teams · 351.5 yds/g allowed · 2,109 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 25.0 pts/g allowed · 150 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 69 teams · -8.0 /g · -48 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 69 teams · +5 in these games · 12 taken, 7 given · +0.83 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 30:36 /g · 3h 04m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 138 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#54 (of 138 teams · 43% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 138 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 138 teams · 728.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 69 teams · 0.075 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 33% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 69 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 1.198 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#27 (of 69 teams · 1.223 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Purdue3–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#37 (of 69 teams · 359.4 yds/g · 2,516 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 69 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 192 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 437.9 yds/g allowed · 3,065 yds · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 238 points · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 69 teams · -6.6 /g · -46 in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 69 teams · +1 in these games · 9 taken, 8 given · +0.14 /g · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 69 teams · 29:36 /g · 3h 27m in these games · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 138 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 138 teams · 23% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#81 (of 138 teams · 34% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 138 teams · 698.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 69 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.299 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 69 teams · 42% of plays successful · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 69 teams · 1.283 average PPA on successful plays · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 69 teams · 1.318 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 7 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Rutgers2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#40 (of 69 teams · 355.5 yds/g · 2,133 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 69 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 143 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 460.5 yds/g allowed · 2,763 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 36.2 pts/g allowed · 217 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -12.3 /g · -74 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -6 in these games · 4 taken, 10 given · -1.00 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 69 teams · 29:43 /g · 2h 58m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#94 (of 138 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 138 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 138 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 138 teams · 709.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 69 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 0.378 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 69 teams · 1.405 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.352 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Maryland2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#64 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 301.8 yds/g · 1,811 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 69 teams · 19.2 pts/g · 115 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 444.2 yds/g allowed · 2,665 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 39.8 pts/g allowed · 239 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -20.7 /g · -124 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · -2 in these games · 7 taken, 9 given · -0.33 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:11 /g · 2h 37m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 138 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 138 teams · 42% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 138 teams · 73% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 138 teams · 719.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 69 teams · 0.245 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 35% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 69 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 69 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 69 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2026Michigan State2–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 18 Big Ten teams in 2026. Range 0–5.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 243.7 yds/g · 1,462 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 15.7 pts/g · 94 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 69 teams · 391.5 yds/g allowed · 2,349 yds · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 69 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 179 points · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -14.2 /g · -85 in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -7 in these games · 3 taken, 10 given · -1.17 /g · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 26:31 /g · 2h 39m in these games · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 (of 138 teams · 45% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#112 (of 138 teams · 18% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 138 teams · 26% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 138 teams · 685.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · -0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 69 teams · 0.180 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 69 teams · 40% of plays successful · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 69 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 69 teams · 1.033 average PPA on successful plays · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 69 teams · 1.173 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 6 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20262026 MichiganBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #37
Total offense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #7 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #14 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #16 of 69; 2026 Indiana #25 of 69; 2026 Illinois #29 of 69; 2026 USC #30 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #35 of 69; 2026 Oregon #36 of 69; 2026 Purdue #37 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #40 of 69; 2026 Penn State #49 of 69; 2026 Washington #49 of 69; 2026 Iowa #58 of 69; 2026 Maryland #64 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #66 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #67 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 63 of 69. Big Ten median rank 37.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #8 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #17 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #18 of 69; 2026 Purdue #26 of 69; 2026 USC #29 of 69; 2026 Washington #33 of 69; 2026 Oregon #34 of 69; 2026 Indiana #35 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #38 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #39 of 69; 2026 Illinois #42 of 69; 2026 Iowa #48 of 69; 2026 Penn State #54 of 69; 2026 Maryland #57 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #61 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #64 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #66 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 60 of 69. Big Ten median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 Indiana #5 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #7 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #9 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #12 of 69; 2026 Iowa #15 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #22 of 69; 2026 Penn State #24 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #29 of 69; 2026 Washington #35 of 69; 2026 Illinois #36 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #43 of 69; 2026 Oregon #46 of 69; 2026 Purdue #61 of 69; 2026 Maryland #62 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 2 of 69. Big Ten median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #27
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Indiana #2 of 69; 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 Iowa #6 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #11 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #16 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #16 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #16 of 69; 2026 Oregon #27 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #30 of 69; 2026 Penn State #32 of 69; 2026 Washington #33 of 69; 2026 Illinois #37 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #49 of 69; 2026 Purdue #61 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #65 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 9 of 69. Big Ten median rank 27.
Point marginmedian #32
Point margin. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #4 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #11 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #15 of 69; 2026 Indiana #19 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #22 of 69; 2026 Iowa #25 of 69; 2026 Oregon #30 of 69; 2026 USC #32 of 69; 2026 Washington #34 of 69; 2026 Illinois #39 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #39 of 69; 2026 Penn State #43 of 69; 2026 Purdue #50 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #52 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #63 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 31 of 69. Big Ten median rank 32.
Turnover marginmedian #29
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #2 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #4 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #9 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #19 of 69; 2026 Penn State #19 of 69; 2026 Indiana #22 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #22 of 69; 2026 Purdue #25 of 69; 2026 USC #29 of 69; 2026 Illinois #40 of 69; 2026 Washington #44 of 69; 2026 Iowa #45 of 69; 2026 Maryland #45 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #45 of 69; 2026 Oregon #56 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #66 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 29 of 69. Big Ten median rank 29.
Possessionmedian #34
Possession. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #2 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #3 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #3 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #9 of 69; 2026 Penn State #14 of 69; 2026 Illinois #22 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #27 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #34 of 69; 2026 Purdue #37 of 69; 2026 Indiana #43 of 69; 2026 Iowa #47 of 69; 2026 USC #55 of 69; 2026 Washington #57 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #59 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #66 of 69; 2026 Oregon #67 of 69; 2026 Maryland #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 15 of 69. Big Ten median rank 34.
Returning passingmedian #45
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #8 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #20 of 138; 2026 Oregon #26 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #33 of 138; 2026 USC #36 of 138; 2026 Maryland #37 of 138; 2026 Washington #38 of 138; 2026 UCLA #45 of 138; 2026 Purdue #53 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #64 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #65 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #69 of 138; 2026 Iowa #89 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #94 of 138; 2026 Illinois #111 of 138; 2026 Indiana #111 of 138; 2026 Penn State #123 of 138. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 24 of 138. Big Ten median rank 45.
Returning receivingmedian #59
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #5 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #23 of 138; 2026 Oregon #30 of 138; 2026 Iowa #39 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #44 of 138; 2026 Illinois #48 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #54 of 138; 2026 Maryland #59 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #61 of 138; 2026 Washington #66 of 138; 2026 UCLA #96 of 138; 2026 USC #101 of 138; 2026 Purdue #105 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #106 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #112 of 138; 2026 Indiana #116 of 138; 2026 Penn State #126 of 138. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 49 of 138. Big Ten median rank 59.
Returning rushingmedian #40
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #8 of 138; 2026 Illinois #17 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #20 of 138; 2026 USC #24 of 138; 2026 Maryland #25 of 138; 2026 UCLA #28 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #31 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #40 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #45 of 138; 2026 Iowa #46 of 138; 2026 Oregon #60 of 138; 2026 Washington #77 of 138; 2026 Purdue #81 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #90 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #96 of 138; 2026 Indiana #111 of 138; 2026 Penn State #131 of 138. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 29 of 138. Big Ten median rank 40.
Team talentmedian #30
Team talent. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Oregon #3 of 138; 2026 Ohio State #5 of 138; 2026 USC #9 of 138; 2026 Nebraska #22 of 138; 2026 Washington #24 of 138; 2026 UCLA #25 of 138; 2026 Penn State #26 of 138; 2026 Wisconsin #30 of 138; 2026 Indiana #38 of 138; 2026 Minnesota #41 of 138; 2026 Iowa #44 of 138; 2026 Maryland #46 of 138; 2026 Rutgers #48 of 138; 2026 Illinois #51 of 138; 2026 Purdue #55 of 138; 2026 Northwestern #60 of 138; 2026 Michigan State #61 of 138. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 11 of 138. Big Ten median rank 30.
Offensive EPAmedian #35
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #8 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #17 of 69; 2026 USC #19 of 69; 2026 UCLA #22 of 69; 2026 Indiana #23 of 69; 2026 Illinois #25 of 69; 2026 Purdue #28 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #34 of 69; 2026 Washington #35 of 69; 2026 Oregon #42 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #49 of 69; 2026 Iowa #50 of 69; 2026 Penn State #54 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #61 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #66 of 69; 2026 Maryland #67 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 53 of 69. Big Ten median rank 35.
Defensive EPAmedian #24
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #1 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #3 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #7 of 69; 2026 Indiana #11 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #19 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #20 of 69; 2026 Washington #23 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #24 of 69; 2026 Oregon #26 of 69; 2026 Iowa #28 of 69; 2026 Penn State #38 of 69; 2026 USC #46 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #48 of 69; 2026 Maryland #58 of 69; 2026 Purdue #65 of 69; 2026 Illinois #66 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 4 of 69. Big Ten median rank 24.
Offensive success ratemedian #42
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Northwestern #9 of 69; 2026 UCLA #14 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #15 of 69; 2026 USC #18 of 69; 2026 Illinois #20 of 69; 2026 Purdue #30 of 69; 2026 Iowa #31 of 69; 2026 Indiana #36 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #42 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #45 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #46 of 69; 2026 Washington #48 of 69; 2026 Penn State #50 of 69; 2026 Oregon #55 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #62 of 69; 2026 Maryland #67 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #68 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 53 of 69. Big Ten median rank 42.
Defensive success ratemedian #36
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 UCLA #1 of 69; 2026 Indiana #3 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #6 of 69; 2026 Iowa #11 of 69; 2026 Oregon #15 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #19 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #26 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #36 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #37 of 69; 2026 Penn State #38 of 69; 2026 Washington #39 of 69; 2026 USC #42 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #56 of 69; 2026 Maryland #59 of 69; 2026 Illinois #63 of 69; 2026 Purdue #64 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #66 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 4 of 69. Big Ten median rank 36.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #30
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Rutgers #6 of 69; 2026 Washington #13 of 69; 2026 Indiana #15 of 69; 2026 Oregon #21 of 69; 2026 Illinois #22 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #23 of 69; 2026 Wisconsin #28 of 69; 2026 Purdue #29 of 69; 2026 USC #30 of 69; 2026 Maryland #32 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #34 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #38 of 69; 2026 UCLA #39 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #51 of 69; 2026 Penn State #56 of 69; 2026 Iowa #60 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #69 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 52 of 69. Big Ten median rank 30.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2026, best rank first: 2026 Wisconsin #1 of 69; 2026 Iowa #12 of 69; 2026 Michigan State #13 of 69; 2026 Washington #19 of 69; 2026 Nebraska #21 of 69; 2026 Minnesota #27 of 69; 2026 Northwestern #31 of 69; 2026 Illinois #35 of 69; 2026 USC #38 of 69; 2026 UCLA #39 of 69; 2026 Ohio State #44 of 69; 2026 Maryland #45 of 69; 2026 Oregon #50 of 69; 2026 Purdue #51 of 69; 2026 Rutgers #60 of 69; 2026 Indiana #62 of 69; 2026 Penn State #65 of 69. Marked: 2026 Michigan, ranked 30 of 69. Big Ten median rank 35.