Metrics

MinnesotaGolden Gophers

Season
Current

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2013

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013Minnesota850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#107 (of 125 teams · 343.3 yds/g · 4,463 yards)#85 (of 125 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 334 points)#43 (of 125 teams · 373.2 yds/g allowed · 4,852 yards)#25 (of 125 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#59 (of 125 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#42 (of 125 teams · +3 on the season · 19 taken, 16 given · +0.23 /g)#14 (of 125 teams · 32:51 /g · 7h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 125 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 125 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#80 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 125 teams · 1.000 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 125 teams · 0.928 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big Ten teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#59 (Total offense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #7–#121. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #3–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Total defense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #2–#123. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #3–#116. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Point margin: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #6–#119. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #10–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#46 (Possession: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #1–#124. 2 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#55 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #6–#109. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #1–#116. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #2–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#70 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #1–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#95 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #22–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#25 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #7–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2013Illinois480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 125 teams · 426.7 yds/g · 5,120 yards)#61 (of 125 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 356 points)#112 (of 125 teams · 481.5 yds/g allowed · 5,778 yards)#105 (of 125 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 425 points)#90 (of 125 teams · -5.8 /g · -69 on the season)#115 (of 125 teams · -10 on the season · 11 taken, 21 given · -0.83 /g)#89 (of 125 teams · 29:07 /g · 5h 49m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 125 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 125 teams · 0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 125 teams · 46% of plays successful)#115 (of 125 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 125 teams · 0.933 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 125 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Indiana570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 508.5 yds/g · 6,102 yards)#16 (of 125 teams · 38.4 pts/g · 461 points)#123 (of 125 teams · 527.9 yds/g allowed · 6,335 yards)#116 (of 125 teams · 38.8 pts/g allowed · 466 points)#71 (of 125 teams · -0.4 /g · -5 on the season)#81 (of 125 teams · -3 on the season · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.25 /g)#124 (of 125 teams · 25:42 /g · 5h 08m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 125 teams · 0.104 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 (of 125 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#46 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#113 (of 125 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 125 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 125 teams · 0.990 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Iowa850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#85 (of 125 teams · 377.0 yds/g · 4,901 yards)#80 (of 125 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 342 points)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 303.1 yds/g allowed · 3,940 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 18.9 pts/g allowed · 246 points)#41 (of 125 teams · +7.4 /g · +96 on the season)#69 (of 125 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#46 (of 125 teams · 30:58 /g · 6h 43m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 125 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#24 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 (of 125 teams · 0.787 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.852 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Michigan762 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#87 (of 125 teams · 373.5 yds/g · 4,855 yards)#46 (of 125 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 419 points)#41 (of 125 teams · 371.5 yds/g allowed · 4,829 yards)#67 (of 125 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 349 points)#51 (of 125 teams · +5.4 /g · +70 on the season)#32 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 26 taken, 21 given · +0.38 /g)#24 (of 125 teams · 32:13 /g · 6h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 125 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 125 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 125 teams · 42% of plays successful)#86 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 125 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.838 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Michigan State1310 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#81 (of 125 teams · 385.5 yds/g · 5,397 yards)#64 (of 125 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 411 points)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 251.9 yds/g allowed · 3,527 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 13.2 pts/g allowed · 185 points)#12 (of 125 teams · +16.1 /g · +226 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +13 on the season · 28 taken, 15 given · +0.93 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34:49 /g · 8h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 125 teams · 0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 125 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 125 teams · 1.048 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Nebraska940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 125 teams · 412.4 yds/g · 5,361 yards)#48 (of 125 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 415 points)#40 (of 125 teams · 370.8 yds/g allowed · 4,820 yards)#50 (of 125 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points)#43 (of 125 teams · +7.1 /g · +92 on the season)#119 (of 125 teams · -11 on the season · 18 taken, 29 given · -0.85 /g)#87 (of 125 teams · 29:09 /g · 6h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 125 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 125 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#34 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#65 (of 125 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 125 teams · 0.865 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 125 teams · 0.874 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Northwestern570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 125 teams · 399.6 yds/g · 4,795 yards)#83 (of 125 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 314 points)#89 (of 125 teams · 423.5 yds/g allowed · 5,082 yards)#69 (of 125 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#74 (of 125 teams · -0.9 /g · -11 on the season)#41 (of 125 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.25 /g)#85 (of 125 teams · 29:13 /g · 5h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 125 teams · 0.098 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 125 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 125 teams · 47% of plays successful)#105 (of 125 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 (of 125 teams · 0.827 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 125 teams · 0.857 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Ohio State1224 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 511.9 yds/g · 7,167 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 45.5 pts/g · 637 points)#47 (of 125 teams · 377.4 yds/g allowed · 5,284 yards)#28 (of 125 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +22.9 /g · +320 on the season)#36 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.36 /g)#40 (of 125 teams · 31:20 /g · 7h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 125 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 52% of plays successful)#70 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 125 teams · 0.891 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 125 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Penn State750 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 125 teams · 433.2 yds/g · 5,198 yards)#69 (of 125 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)#49 (of 125 teams · 381.3 yds/g allowed · 4,576 yards)#59 (of 125 teams · 26.2 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#66 (of 125 teams · +2.5 /g · +30 on the season)#74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 20 taken, 22 given · -0.17 /g)#70 (of 125 teams · 29:52 /g · 5h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 125 teams · 0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 125 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#44 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#36 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 125 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 125 teams · 1.021 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Purdue1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#121 (of 125 teams · 282.9 yds/g · 3,395 yards)#121 (of 125 teams · 14.9 pts/g · 179 points)#105 (of 125 teams · 459.9 yds/g allowed · 5,519 yards)#113 (of 125 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 456 points)#119 (of 125 teams · -23.1 /g · -277 on the season)#74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 20 taken, 22 given · -0.17 /g)#113 (of 125 teams · 27:29 /g · 5h 30m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 125 teams · 0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 125 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#111 (of 125 teams · 38% of plays successful)#123 (of 125 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 125 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 125 teams · 0.871 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Wisconsin940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 125 teams · 480.9 yds/g · 6,251 yards)#27 (of 125 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 453 points)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 305.1 yds/g allowed · 3,966 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 16.3 pts/g allowed · 212 points)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +18.5 /g · +241 on the season)#56 (of 125 teams · +1 on the season · 20 taken, 19 given · +0.08 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 33:34 /g · 7h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 125 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 125 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 125 teams · 48% of plays successful)#19 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 125 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 125 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20132013 MinnesotaBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #59
Total offense. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #7 of 125; 2013 Indiana #9 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #18 of 125; 2013 Penn State #43 of 125; 2013 Illinois #46 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #59 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #74 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #81 of 125; 2013 Iowa #85 of 125; 2013 Michigan #87 of 125; 2013 Purdue #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 107 of 125. Big Ten median rank 59.
Scoring offensemedian #61
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #3 of 125; 2013 Indiana #16 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #27 of 125; 2013 Michigan #46 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #48 of 125; 2013 Illinois #61 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #64 of 125; 2013 Penn State #69 of 125; 2013 Iowa #80 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #83 of 125; 2013 Purdue #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 85 of 125. Big Ten median rank 61.
Total defensemedian #43
Total defense. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #2 of 125; 2013 Iowa #6 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #7 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #40 of 125; 2013 Michigan #41 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #47 of 125; 2013 Penn State #49 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #89 of 125; 2013 Purdue #105 of 125; 2013 Illinois #112 of 125; 2013 Indiana #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 43 of 125. Big Ten median rank 43.
Scoring defensemedian #50
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #3 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #6 of 125; 2013 Iowa #9 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #28 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #50 of 125; 2013 Penn State #59 of 125; 2013 Michigan #67 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #69 of 125; 2013 Illinois #105 of 125; 2013 Purdue #113 of 125; 2013 Indiana #116 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 25 of 125. Big Ten median rank 50.
Point marginmedian #51
Point margin. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #6 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #9 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #12 of 125; 2013 Iowa #41 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #43 of 125; 2013 Michigan #51 of 125; 2013 Penn State #66 of 125; 2013 Indiana #71 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #74 of 125; 2013 Illinois #90 of 125; 2013 Purdue #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 59 of 125. Big Ten median rank 51.
Turnover marginmedian #56
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #10 of 125; 2013 Michigan #32 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #36 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #41 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #56 of 125; 2013 Iowa #69 of 125; 2013 Penn State #74 of 125; 2013 Purdue #74 of 125; 2013 Indiana #81 of 125; 2013 Illinois #115 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 42 of 125. Big Ten median rank 56.
Possessionmedian #46
Possession. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #1 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #8 of 125; 2013 Michigan #24 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #40 of 125; 2013 Iowa #46 of 125; 2013 Penn State #70 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #85 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #87 of 125; 2013 Illinois #89 of 125; 2013 Purdue #113 of 125; 2013 Indiana #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 14 of 125. Big Ten median rank 46.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Minnesota, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Minnesota, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Minnesota, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Minnesota, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #55
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #6 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #21 of 125; 2013 Illinois #36 of 125; 2013 Indiana #49 of 125; 2013 Penn State #51 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #55 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #56 of 125; 2013 Michigan #65 of 125; 2013 Iowa #90 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #95 of 125; 2013 Purdue #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 60 of 125. Big Ten median rank 55.
Defensive EPAmedian #38
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #1 of 125; 2013 Iowa #8 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #13 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #24 of 125; 2013 Michigan #29 of 125; 2013 Penn State #38 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #66 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #68 of 125; 2013 Purdue #106 of 125; 2013 Illinois #110 of 125; 2013 Indiana #116 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 67 of 125. Big Ten median rank 38.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #2 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #11 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #20 of 125; 2013 Illinois #24 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #34 of 125; 2013 Penn State #44 of 125; 2013 Indiana #46 of 125; 2013 Iowa #52 of 125; 2013 Michigan #68 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #77 of 125; 2013 Purdue #111 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 80 of 125. Big Ten median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #70
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #1 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #19 of 125; 2013 Iowa #24 of 125; 2013 Penn State #36 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #65 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #70 of 125; 2013 Michigan #86 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #105 of 125; 2013 Indiana #113 of 125; 2013 Illinois #115 of 125; 2013 Purdue #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 80 of 125. Big Ten median rank 70.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #95
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Indiana #23 of 125; 2013 Michigan #40 of 125; 2013 Purdue #50 of 125; 2013 Illinois #75 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #95 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #96 of 125; 2013 Penn State #105 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #106 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #113 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #119 of 125; 2013 Iowa #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 22 of 125. Big Ten median rank 95.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #25
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan #7 of 125; 2013 Iowa #10 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #11 of 125; 2013 Purdue #19 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #20 of 125; 2013 Illinois #25 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #28 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #34 of 125; 2013 Indiana #93 of 125; 2013 Penn State #104 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #112 of 125. Marked: 2013 Minnesota, ranked 54 of 125. Big Ten median rank 25.