THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

MinnesotaGolden Gophers

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Minnesota played 10 such games.

Big Ten, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Minnesota9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 335.5 yds/g · 3,355 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 350.6 yds/g allowed · 3,506 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +5.2 /g · +52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 31:05 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 535.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#53 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #18–#70. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #9–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#18 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #1–#52. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #1–#64. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#24 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #2–#70. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#24 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #3–#66. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #3–#69. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #1–#106. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #8–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #6–#121. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #5–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #12–#69. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#19 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #2–#63. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #7–#67. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#18 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #2–#65. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #3–#70. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #4–#58. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)
2016Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)#29 (of 71 teams · 431.3 yds/g · 4,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 378 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 246.9 yds/g allowed · 2,469 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.3 pts/g allowed · 133 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.5 /g · +245 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 852.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 71 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 1.194 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Ohio State11–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)#18 (of 71 teams · 456.1 yds/g · 4,561 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 38.7 pts/g · 387 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 295.6 yds/g allowed · 2,956 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +23.0 /g · +230 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 16 taken, 7 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:29 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 902.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 71 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.091 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #20 LSU · postseason: #15 Western Michigan)#55 (of 71 teams · 358.7 yds/g · 3,587 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 265 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 137 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.8 /g · +128 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34:25 /g · 5h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 643.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.130 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.121 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan)#61 (of 71 teams · 336.4 yds/g · 3,364 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 25.5 pts/g · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 344.7 yds/g allowed · 3,447 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 171 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +8.4 /g · +84 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 12 taken, 8 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 31:02 /g · 5h 10m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 558.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 71 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Northwestern7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #23 Pittsburgh)#38 (of 71 teams · 411.9 yds/g · 4,119 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 279 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 403.1 yds/g allowed · 4,031 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +4.5 /g · +45 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 19 taken, 13 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 29:02 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 613.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Penn State11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin, #24 Temple)#26 (of 71 teams · 439.9 yds/g · 4,399 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37.2 pts/g · 372 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 355.8 yds/g allowed · 3,558 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13.9 /g · +139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 742.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 71 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.455 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Michigan State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 71 teams · 417.3 yds/g · 4,173 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 375.4 yds/g allowed · 3,754 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -4.2 /g · -42 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 32:26 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 719.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 71 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 0.165 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Nebraska9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#53 (of 71 teams · 367.7 yds/g · 3,677 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 226 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · -2.0 /g · -20 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 32:28 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 691.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 71 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Indiana6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 71 teams · 425.8 yds/g · 4,258 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 376.9 yds/g allowed · 3,769 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -4.8 /g · -48 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -12 in these games · 13 taken, 25 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 27:39 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 565.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 71 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Maryland6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 71 teams · 353.9 yds/g · 3,185 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 182 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 456.4 yds/g allowed · 4,108 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 297 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · -12.8 /g · -115 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -10 in these games · 5 taken, 15 given · -1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 27:32 /g · 4h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 652.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 71 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.397 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Illinois3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 295.1 yds/g · 2,951 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 17.4 pts/g · 174 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 425.9 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 34.6 pts/g allowed · 346 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -17.2 /g · -172 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:21 /g · 4h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 523.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 1.269 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.156 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Purdue3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 71 teams · 356.8 yds/g · 3,211 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 206 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 465.2 yds/g allowed · 4,187 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 383 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -19.7 /g · -177 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -11 in these games · 12 taken, 23 given · -1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 28:40 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#77 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 512.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.295 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Rutgers2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 253.6 yds/g · 2,536 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 9.9 pts/g · 99 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 469.3 yds/g allowed · 4,693 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 40.8 pts/g allowed · 408 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -30.9 /g · -309 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 27:47 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 585.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.043 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 1.225 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20162016 MinnesotaBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #53
Total offense. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #18 of 71; 2016 Penn State #26 of 71; 2016 Michigan #29 of 71; 2016 Indiana #32 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #35 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #38 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #53 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #55 of 71; 2016 Purdue #56 of 71; 2016 Maryland #58 of 71; 2016 Iowa #61 of 71; 2016 Illinois #67 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 62 of 71. Big Ten median rank 53.
Scoring offensemedian #40
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #9 of 71; 2016 Michigan #10 of 71; 2016 Penn State #12 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #34 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 71; 2016 Iowa #40 of 71; 2016 Indiana #46 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #46 of 71; 2016 Purdue #51 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #53 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Illinois #66 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 35 of 71. Big Ten median rank 40.
Total defensemedian #18
Total defense. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #12 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #18 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #22 of 71; 2016 Indiana #23 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #30 of 71; 2016 Illinois #41 of 71; 2016 Maryland #49 of 71; 2016 Purdue #51 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #52 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 13 of 71. Big Ten median rank 18.
Scoring defensemedian #23
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #5 of 71; 2016 Penn State #20 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #23 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #28 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #36 of 71; 2016 Indiana #38 of 71; 2016 Maryland #48 of 71; 2016 Illinois #54 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #63 of 71; 2016 Purdue #64 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 15 of 71. Big Ten median rank 23.
Point marginmedian #24
Point margin. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Penn State #8 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #9 of 71; 2016 Iowa #14 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #24 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #35 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #40 of 71; 2016 Indiana #42 of 71; 2016 Maryland #60 of 71; 2016 Illinois #64 of 71; 2016 Purdue #66 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 22 of 71. Big Ten median rank 24.
Turnover marginmedian #24
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #10 of 71; 2016 Penn State #14 of 71; 2016 Iowa #20 of 71; 2016 Michigan #24 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #42 of 71; 2016 Illinois #45 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #45 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #57 of 71; 2016 Maryland #64 of 71; 2016 Indiana #65 of 71; 2016 Purdue #66 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 10 of 71. Big Ten median rank 24.
Possessionmedian #29
Possession. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 71; 2016 Michigan #7 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #12 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #13 of 71; 2016 Iowa #29 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #45 of 71; 2016 Purdue #48 of 71; 2016 Penn State #51 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #58 of 71; 2016 Indiana #60 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Illinois #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 28 of 71. Big Ten median rank 29.
Returning passingmedian #59
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Nebraska #12 of 128; 2016 Iowa #22 of 128; 2016 Illinois #25 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #37 of 128; 2016 Maryland #46 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #59 of 128; 2016 Purdue #77 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #86 of 128; 2016 Indiana #99 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #100 of 128; 2016 Penn State #102 of 128; 2016 Michigan #105 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #106 of 128. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 1 of 128. Big Ten median rank 59.
Returning receivingmedian #44
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Nebraska #15 of 128; 2016 Michigan #17 of 128; 2016 Maryland #22 of 128; 2016 Penn State #28 of 128; 2016 Indiana #31 of 128; 2016 Purdue #44 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #46 of 128; 2016 Iowa #74 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #92 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #98 of 128; 2016 Illinois #102 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #115 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 8 of 128. Big Ten median rank 44.
Returning rushingmedian #49
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Northwestern #6 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #27 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #27 of 128; 2016 Purdue #31 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #48 of 128; 2016 Penn State #49 of 128; 2016 Michigan #72 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #74 of 128; 2016 Iowa #79 of 128; 2016 Maryland #85 of 128; 2016 Illinois #93 of 128; 2016 Indiana #96 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #121 of 128. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 25 of 128. Big Ten median rank 49.
Team talentmedian #37
Team talent. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #5 of 128; 2016 Michigan #8 of 128; 2016 Penn State #20 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #22 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #26 of 128; 2016 Maryland #34 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #45 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #49 of 128; 2016 Indiana #53 of 128; 2016 Iowa #55 of 128; 2016 Illinois #64 of 128; 2016 Purdue #68 of 128. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 59 of 128. Big Ten median rank 37.
Offensive EPAmedian #48
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #12 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 Michigan #22 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #35 of 71; 2016 Maryland #43 of 71; 2016 Iowa #46 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #48 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #49 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #51 of 71; 2016 Indiana #56 of 71; 2016 Purdue #63 of 71; 2016 Illinois #64 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 62 of 71. Big Ten median rank 48.
Defensive EPAmedian #19
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #14 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #17 of 71; 2016 Indiana #19 of 71; 2016 Penn State #22 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #30 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #36 of 71; 2016 Illinois #40 of 71; 2016 Maryland #43 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #46 of 71; 2016 Purdue #63 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 13 of 71. Big Ten median rank 19.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #7 of 71; 2016 Michigan #14 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #31 of 71; 2016 Penn State #34 of 71; 2016 Iowa #40 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #42 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #44 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #51 of 71; 2016 Indiana #52 of 71; 2016 Purdue #59 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Illinois #65 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #67 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 50 of 71. Big Ten median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #18
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #10 of 71; 2016 Indiana #13 of 71; 2016 Penn State #16 of 71; 2016 Iowa #18 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #26 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #28 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #33 of 71; 2016 Purdue #54 of 71; 2016 Illinois #56 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #57 of 71; 2016 Maryland #65 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 9 of 71. Big Ten median rank 18.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #41
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Penn State #3 of 71; 2016 Maryland #10 of 71; 2016 Indiana #18 of 71; 2016 Purdue #26 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #30 of 71; 2016 Illinois #39 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #41 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #44 of 71; 2016 Michigan #54 of 71; 2016 Iowa #59 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #65 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #69 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 68 of 71. Big Ten median rank 41.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #21
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #6 of 71; 2016 Illinois #7 of 71; 2016 Maryland #13 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #16 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #20 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #21 of 71; 2016 Michigan #28 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #33 of 71; 2016 Penn State #48 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #52 of 71; 2016 Indiana #53 of 71; 2016 Purdue #58 of 71. Marked: 2016 Minnesota, ranked 41 of 71. Big Ten median rank 21.