Metrics

MinnesotaGolden Gophers

Season
Current

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2018

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Minnesota760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Fresno State)#85 (of 130 teams · 379.9 yds/g · 4,939 yards)#65 (of 130 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#54 (of 130 teams · 385.8 yds/g allowed · 5,015 yards)#59 (of 130 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#62 (of 130 teams · +2.4 /g · +31 on the season)#89 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 21 taken, 25 given · -0.31 /g)#26 (of 130 teams · 31:58 /g · 6h 56m on the season)#127 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning)#68 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#48 (of 130 teams · 589.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 130 teams · 0.156 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 130 teams · 0.182 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#53 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#79 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#101 (of 130 teams · 1.145 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 130 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20180 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#56 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #2–#128. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #8–#130. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #2–#128. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#51 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #8–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#66 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #9–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #11–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#59 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #6–#112. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #19–#112. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#68 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #10–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#35 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #13–#128. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #7–#126. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #4–#130. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#71 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #3–#122. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#89 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #2–#127. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#43 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range #1–#121. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2018Illinois480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#61 (of 130 teams · 409.9 yds/g · 4,919 yards)#93 (of 130 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 312 points)#128 (of 130 teams · 507.9 yds/g allowed · 6,095 yards)#124 (of 130 teams · 39.4 pts/g allowed · 473 points)#116 (of 130 teams · -13.4 /g · -161 on the season)#91 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 20 taken, 24 given · -0.33 /g)#91 (of 130 teams · 28:34 /g · 5h 43m on the season)#124 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#48 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's receiving production returning)#85 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning)#58 (of 130 teams · 562.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 130 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#126 (of 130 teams · 0.330 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#62 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#122 (of 130 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#89 (of 130 teams · 1.176 average PPA on successful plays)#109 (of 130 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Indiana570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 130 teams · 414.8 yds/g · 4,977 yards)#88 (of 130 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 317 points)#86 (of 130 teams · 424.1 yds/g allowed · 5,089 yards)#81 (of 130 teams · 29.9 pts/g allowed · 359 points)#90 (of 130 teams · -3.5 /g · -42 on the season)#37 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 25 taken, 21 given · +0.33 /g)#85 (of 130 teams · 28:48 /g · 5h 46m on the season)#84 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's passing production returning)#81 (of 130 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#84 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's rushing production returning)#57 (of 130 teams · 564.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 130 teams · 0.128 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#90 (of 130 teams · 0.198 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#89 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#121 (of 130 teams · 1.083 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 130 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Iowa940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #24 Iowa State · postseason: #18 Mississippi State)#94 (of 130 teams · 371.4 yds/g · 4,828 yards)#44 (of 130 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 405 points)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 294.8 yds/g allowed · 3,832 yards)#11 (of 130 teams · 17.8 pts/g allowed · 231 points)#17 (of 130 teams · +13.4 /g · +174 on the season)#11 (of 130 teams · +10 on the season · 27 taken, 17 given · +0.77 /g)#19 (of 130 teams · 32:31 /g · 7h 03m on the season)#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#54 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#124 (of 130 teams · 23% of last season's rushing production returning)#42 (of 130 teams · 615.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 130 teams · 0.190 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 130 teams · 0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful)#49 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#28 (of 130 teams · 1.292 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.025 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Maryland570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Texas)#93 (of 130 teams · 371.4 yds/g · 4,457 yards)#69 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 342 points)#62 (of 130 teams · 390.4 yds/g allowed · 4,685 yards)#78 (of 130 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 344 points)#72 (of 130 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 on the season)#15 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.75 /g)#81 (of 130 teams · 28:55 /g · 5h 47m on the season)#50 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing production returning)#98 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#11 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#24 (of 130 teams · 725.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 130 teams · 0.171 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 130 teams · 0.114 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#87 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.439 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 130 teams · 1.115 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Michigan1033 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern)#51 (of 130 teams · 415.7 yds/g · 5,404 yards)#21 (of 130 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 457 points)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 274.3 yds/g allowed · 3,566 yards)#16 (of 130 teams · 19.4 pts/g allowed · 252 points)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +15.8 /g · +205 on the season)#34 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 17 taken, 12 given · +0.38 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:01 /g · 7h 22m on the season)#92 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing production returning)#40 (of 130 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#64 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 862.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#27 (of 130 teams · 0.232 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 130 teams · 1.182 average PPA on successful plays)#121 (of 130 teams · 1.370 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Michigan State760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #12 Penn State)#115 (of 130 teams · 342.1 yds/g · 4,447 yards)#126 (of 130 teams · 18.7 pts/g · 243 points)#11 (of 130 teams · 303.7 yds/g allowed · 3,948 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 223 points)#66 (of 130 teams · +1.5 /g · +20 on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 23 taken, 22 given · +0.08 /g)#15 (of 130 teams · 32:50 /g · 7h 07m on the season)#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#20 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 658.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#124 (of 130 teams · 0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#11 (of 130 teams · 0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#118 (of 130 teams · 38% of plays successful)#12 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 130 teams · 1.097 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 130 teams · 1.098 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Nebraska480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#25 (of 130 teams · 456.2 yds/g · 5,474 yards)#58 (of 130 teams · 30.0 pts/g · 360 points)#94 (of 130 teams · 433.6 yds/g allowed · 5,203 yards)#88 (of 130 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 375 points)#79 (of 130 teams · -1.3 /g · -15 on the season)#86 (of 130 teams · -2 on the season · 20 taken, 22 given · -0.17 /g)#106 (of 130 teams · 27:44 /g · 5h 33m on the season)#126 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 70% of last season's receiving production returning)#20 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 711.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 130 teams · 0.215 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#71 (of 130 teams · 0.165 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#18 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#94 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 130 teams · 1.156 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 130 teams · 1.210 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Northwestern950 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #17 Utah)#108 (of 130 teams · 354.4 yds/g · 4,961 yards)#100 (of 130 teams · 24.2 pts/g · 339 points)#63 (of 130 teams · 390.5 yds/g allowed · 5,467 yards)#41 (of 130 teams · 23.2 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#69 (of 130 teams · +1.0 /g · +14 on the season)#26 (of 130 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.50 /g)#59 (of 130 teams · 29:57 /g · 6h 59m on the season)#38 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#68 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving production returning)#112 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#44 (of 130 teams · 608.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 130 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#41 (of 130 teams · 0.101 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#65 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#88 (of 130 teams · 1.179 average PPA on successful plays)#13 (of 130 teams · 1.078 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Ohio State1315 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan · postseason: #9 Washington)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #7 Michigan, #12 Penn State, #22 Northwestern · postseason: #9 Washington)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 534.3 yds/g · 7,480 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 42.4 pts/g · 593 points)#72 (of 130 teams · 403.5 yds/g allowed · 5,649 yards)#51 (of 130 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +16.9 /g · +236 on the season)#33 (of 130 teams · +6 on the season · 23 taken, 17 given · +0.43 /g)#38 (of 130 teams · 30:32 /g · 7h 08m on the season)#96 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing production returning)#19 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#74 (of 130 teams · 62% of last season's rushing production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 984.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 130 teams · 0.279 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 130 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful)#35 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 130 teams · 1.190 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 130 teams · 1.284 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Penn State940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 130 teams · 423.2 yds/g · 5,502 yards)#32 (of 130 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 439 points)#34 (of 130 teams · 350.0 yds/g allowed · 4,550 yards)#23 (of 130 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 267 points)#19 (of 130 teams · +13.2 /g · +172 on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 20 taken, 19 given · +0.08 /g)#112 (of 130 teams · 27:33 /g · 5h 58m on the season)#27 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#112 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#98 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 130 teams · 834.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 130 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 130 teams · 0.061 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#43 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#20 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 130 teams · 1.172 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 130 teams · 1.180 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Purdue670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Ohio State)#29 (of 130 teams · 443.9 yds/g · 5,771 yards)#52 (of 130 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 397 points)#115 (of 130 teams · 456.0 yds/g allowed · 5,928 yards)#82 (of 130 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 390 points)#70 (of 130 teams · +0.5 /g · +7 on the season)#107 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 13 taken, 19 given · -0.46 /g)#68 (of 130 teams · 29:37 /g · 6h 25m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#38 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's rushing production returning)#71 (of 130 teams · 520.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 130 teams · 0.192 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 130 teams · 0.205 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#102 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 130 teams · 1.217 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 130 teams · 1.154 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Rutgers1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#128 (of 130 teams · 266.3 yds/g · 3,195 yards)#130 (of 130 teams · 13.5 pts/g · 162 points)#70 (of 130 teams · 399.8 yds/g allowed · 4,798 yards)#89 (of 130 teams · 31.4 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#127 (of 130 teams · -17.9 /g · -215 on the season)#127 (of 130 teams · -14 on the season · 15 taken, 29 given · -1.17 /g)#82 (of 130 teams · 28:55 /g · 5h 47m on the season)#75 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing production returning)#91 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#121 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's rushing production returning)#60 (of 130 teams · 555.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#128 (of 130 teams · -0.029 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 130 teams · 0.173 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#130 (of 130 teams · 33% of plays successful)#74 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 130 teams · 1.119 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 130 teams · 1.217 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Wisconsin850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 130 teams · 434.6 yds/g · 5,650 yards)#62 (of 130 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 386 points)#29 (of 130 teams · 342.1 yds/g allowed · 4,447 yards)#34 (of 130 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 294 points)#43 (of 130 teams · +7.1 /g · +92 on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.08 /g)#24 (of 130 teams · 32:07 /g · 6h 58m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#51 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#19 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's rushing production returning)#35 (of 130 teams · 653.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 130 teams · 0.254 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 130 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 52% of plays successful)#71 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#127 (of 130 teams · 1.042 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.043 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20182018 MinnesotaBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #56
Total offense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #2 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #25 of 130; 2018 Purdue #29 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #35 of 130; 2018 Penn State #45 of 130; 2018 Michigan #51 of 130; 2018 Indiana #56 of 130; 2018 Illinois #61 of 130; 2018 Maryland #93 of 130; 2018 Iowa #94 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #108 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #115 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 85 of 130. Big Ten median rank 56.
Scoring offensemedian #62
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #8 of 130; 2018 Michigan #21 of 130; 2018 Penn State #32 of 130; 2018 Iowa #44 of 130; 2018 Purdue #52 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #58 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #62 of 130; 2018 Maryland #69 of 130; 2018 Indiana #88 of 130; 2018 Illinois #93 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #100 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #126 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 65 of 130. Big Ten median rank 62.
Total defensemedian #62
Total defense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #2 of 130; 2018 Iowa #7 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #11 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #29 of 130; 2018 Penn State #34 of 130; 2018 Maryland #62 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #63 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #70 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #72 of 130; 2018 Indiana #86 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #94 of 130; 2018 Purdue #115 of 130; 2018 Illinois #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 54 of 130. Big Ten median rank 62.
Scoring defensemedian #51
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan State #8 of 130; 2018 Iowa #11 of 130; 2018 Michigan #16 of 130; 2018 Penn State #23 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #34 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #41 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #51 of 130; 2018 Maryland #78 of 130; 2018 Indiana #81 of 130; 2018 Purdue #82 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #88 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #89 of 130; 2018 Illinois #124 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 59 of 130. Big Ten median rank 51.
Point marginmedian #66
Point margin. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #9 of 130; 2018 Michigan #10 of 130; 2018 Iowa #17 of 130; 2018 Penn State #19 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #43 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #66 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #69 of 130; 2018 Purdue #70 of 130; 2018 Maryland #72 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #79 of 130; 2018 Indiana #90 of 130; 2018 Illinois #116 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 62 of 130. Big Ten median rank 66.
Turnover marginmedian #62
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Iowa #11 of 130; 2018 Maryland #15 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #26 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #33 of 130; 2018 Michigan #34 of 130; 2018 Indiana #37 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #62 of 130; 2018 Penn State #62 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #62 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #86 of 130; 2018 Illinois #91 of 130; 2018 Purdue #107 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 89 of 130. Big Ten median rank 62.
Possessionmedian #59
Possession. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #6 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #15 of 130; 2018 Iowa #19 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #24 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #38 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #59 of 130; 2018 Purdue #68 of 130; 2018 Maryland #81 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #82 of 130; 2018 Indiana #85 of 130; 2018 Illinois #91 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #106 of 130; 2018 Penn State #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 26 of 130. Big Ten median rank 59.
Returning passingmedian #50
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Purdue #1 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #1 of 130; 2018 Iowa #21 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #27 of 130; 2018 Penn State #27 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #38 of 130; 2018 Maryland #50 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #75 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Michigan #92 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #96 of 130; 2018 Illinois #124 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #126 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 127 of 130. Big Ten median rank 50.
Returning receivingmedian #48
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #19 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #20 of 130; 2018 Purdue #38 of 130; 2018 Michigan #40 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #43 of 130; 2018 Illinois #48 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #51 of 130; 2018 Iowa #54 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #68 of 130; 2018 Indiana #81 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #91 of 130; 2018 Maryland #98 of 130; 2018 Penn State #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 34 of 130. Big Ten median rank 48.
Returning rushingmedian #68
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Purdue #10 of 130; 2018 Maryland #11 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #19 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #20 of 130; 2018 Michigan #64 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #66 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #74 of 130; 2018 Indiana #84 of 130; 2018 Illinois #85 of 130; 2018 Penn State #98 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #112 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #121 of 130; 2018 Iowa #124 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 68 of 130. Big Ten median rank 68.
Team talentmedian #35
Team talent. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #1 of 130; 2018 Michigan #8 of 130; 2018 Penn State #12 of 130; 2018 Maryland #24 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #25 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #34 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #35 of 130; 2018 Iowa #42 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #44 of 130; 2018 Indiana #57 of 130; 2018 Illinois #58 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #60 of 130; 2018 Purdue #71 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 48 of 130. Big Ten median rank 35.
Offensive EPAmedian #60
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Ohio State #13 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #19 of 130; 2018 Michigan #27 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #34 of 130; 2018 Purdue #51 of 130; 2018 Iowa #54 of 130; 2018 Penn State #60 of 130; 2018 Maryland #68 of 130; 2018 Illinois #74 of 130; 2018 Indiana #92 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #118 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #124 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 73 of 130. Big Ten median rank 60.
Defensive EPAmedian #45
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #7 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #11 of 130; 2018 Iowa #12 of 130; 2018 Penn State #20 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #35 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #41 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #45 of 130; 2018 Maryland #47 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #71 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #78 of 130; 2018 Indiana #90 of 130; 2018 Purdue #95 of 130; 2018 Illinois #126 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 84 of 130. Big Ten median rank 45.
Offensive success ratemedian #53
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Wisconsin #4 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #6 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #18 of 130; 2018 Michigan #23 of 130; 2018 Penn State #43 of 130; 2018 Indiana #50 of 130; 2018 Purdue #54 of 130; 2018 Illinois #62 of 130; 2018 Iowa #88 of 130; 2018 Maryland #104 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #105 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #118 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #130 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 53 of 130. Big Ten median rank 53.
Defensive success ratemedian #71
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Michigan #3 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #12 of 130; 2018 Penn State #20 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #35 of 130; 2018 Iowa #49 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #65 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #71 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #74 of 130; 2018 Maryland #87 of 130; 2018 Indiana #89 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #94 of 130; 2018 Purdue #102 of 130; 2018 Illinois #122 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 79 of 130. Big Ten median rank 71.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #89
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Maryland #2 of 130; 2018 Iowa #28 of 130; 2018 Purdue #64 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #82 of 130; 2018 Michigan #87 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #88 of 130; 2018 Illinois #89 of 130; 2018 Penn State #90 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #96 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #113 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #118 of 130; 2018 Indiana #121 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 101 of 130. Big Ten median rank 89.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #43
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Iowa #1 of 130; 2018 Wisconsin #6 of 130; 2018 Northwestern #13 of 130; 2018 Michigan State #16 of 130; 2018 Maryland #23 of 130; 2018 Purdue #35 of 130; 2018 Penn State #43 of 130; 2018 Nebraska #64 of 130; 2018 Indiana #66 of 130; 2018 Rutgers #68 of 130; 2018 Ohio State #101 of 130; 2018 Illinois #109 of 130; 2018 Michigan #121 of 130. Marked: 2018 Minnesota, ranked 81 of 130. Big Ten median rank 43.