THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

MissouriTigers

Season
‹
›Current

SEC

SEC, 2018

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2018Missouri8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)#13 (of 130 teams · 481.8 yds/g · 6,263 yards)#18 (of 130 teams · 36.6 pts/g · 476 points)#59 (of 130 teams · 387.5 yds/g allowed · 5,038 yards)#50 (of 130 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 331 points)#25 (of 130 teams · +11.2 /g · +145 on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 16 taken, 15 given · +0.08 /g)#35 (of 130 teams · 30:36 /g · 6h 38m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#74 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#77 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's rushing production returning)#46 (of 130 teams · 595.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#28 (of 130 teams · 0.224 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 130 teams · 0.113 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#41 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 130 teams · 1.103 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 130 teams · 1.244 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 SEC teams in 20182 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#42 (Total offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #6–#122. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #3–#114. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Total defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #1–#122. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#26 (Scoring defense: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #2–#113. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#27 (Point margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #2–#115. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#50 (Turnover margin: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #6–#121. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#43 (Possession: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #4–#128. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#36 (Returning passing: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #1–#119. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#74 (Returning receiving: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #8–#115. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#77 (Returning rushing: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #1–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#16 (Team talent: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #2–#46. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #2–#109. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #1–#112. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#25 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #2–#112. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #5–#120. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#78 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #20–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#34 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range #2–#123. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)
2018Alabama14–15 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)5 (5 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 6 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State, #19 Texas A&M, #23 Missouri · postseason: #4 Oklahoma)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 521.9 yds/g · 7,828 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 45.6 pts/g · 684 points)#16 (of 130 teams · 319.5 yds/g allowed · 4,792 yards)#12 (of 130 teams · 18.1 pts/g allowed · 271 points)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +27.5 /g · +413 on the season)#37 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 21 taken, 16 given · +0.33 /g)#40 (of 130 teams · 30:27 /g · 7h 37m on the season)#26 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#108 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving production returning)#42 (of 130 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 978.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.387 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 130 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 54% of plays successful)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 130 teams · 1.236 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 130 teams · 1.315 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Arkansas2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#118 (of 130 teams · 335.1 yds/g · 4,021 yards)#114 (of 130 teams · 21.7 pts/g · 260 points)#79 (of 130 teams · 413.3 yds/g allowed · 4,960 yards)#108 (of 130 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 417 points)#115 (of 130 teams · -13.1 /g · -157 on the season)#121 (of 130 teams · -10 on the season · 16 taken, 26 given · -0.83 /g)#65 (of 130 teams · 29:43 /g · 5h 57m on the season)#82 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's passing production returning)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's receiving production returning)#61 (of 130 teams · 68% of last season's rushing production returning)#27 (of 130 teams · 694.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 130 teams · 0.091 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#94 (of 130 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#112 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#105 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 130 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 130 teams · 1.112 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Auburn8–55 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Washington, #19 Texas A&M)#78 (of 130 teams · 389.9 yds/g · 5,069 yards)#48 (of 130 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 402 points)#38 (of 130 teams · 355.4 yds/g allowed · 4,620 yards)#14 (of 130 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 249 points)#24 (of 130 teams · +11.8 /g · +153 on the season)#17 (of 130 teams · +9 on the season · 22 taken, 13 given · +0.69 /g)#125 (of 130 teams · 25:58 /g · 5h 38m on the season)#15 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 88% of last season's receiving production returning)#106 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing production returning)#14 (of 130 teams · 827.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 130 teams · 0.156 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#22 (of 130 teams · 0.066 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#60 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#15 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#107 (of 130 teams · 1.128 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 130 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Florida10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #7 Michigan)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #11 LSU, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #7 Michigan)#42 (of 130 teams · 425.9 yds/g · 5,536 yards)#22 (of 130 teams · 35.0 pts/g · 455 points)#22 (of 130 teams · 334.1 yds/g allowed · 4,344 yards)#20 (of 130 teams · 20.0 pts/g allowed · 260 points)#15 (of 130 teams · +15.0 /g · +195 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +12 on the season · 26 taken, 14 given · +0.92 /g)#62 (of 130 teams · 29:48 /g · 6h 28m on the season)#60 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's passing production returning)#65 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#38 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#13 (of 130 teams · 831.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 130 teams · 0.242 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 130 teams · 0.076 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 130 teams · 48% of plays successful)#19 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#99 (of 130 teams · 1.153 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 130 teams · 1.198 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Georgia11–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida, #14 Kentucky, #23 Missouri)#18 (of 130 teams · 464.9 yds/g · 6,508 yards)#14 (of 130 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 530 points)#13 (of 130 teams · 314.3 yds/g allowed · 4,400 yards)#15 (of 130 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 269 points)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +18.6 /g · +261 on the season)#50 (of 130 teams · +3 on the season · 17 taken, 14 given · +0.21 /g)#29 (of 130 teams · 31:26 /g · 7h 20m on the season)#42 (of 130 teams · 94% of last season's passing production returning)#50 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#108 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's rushing production returning)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 964.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.339 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 130 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 51% of plays successful)#59 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 130 teams · 1.208 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.043 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Kentucky10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Florida)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #10 Florida, #18 Mississippi State, #23 Missouri · postseason: #12 Penn State)#103 (of 130 teams · 360.0 yds/g · 4,680 yards)#85 (of 130 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 346 points)#21 (of 130 teams · 332.0 yds/g allowed · 4,316 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 16.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points)#32 (of 130 teams · +9.8 /g · +127 on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#43 (of 130 teams · 30:23 /g · 6h 35m on the season)#119 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning)#96 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#34 (of 130 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#32 (of 130 teams · 670.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 130 teams · 0.152 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 130 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful)#29 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#97 (of 130 teams · 1.155 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 130 teams · 1.183 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018LSU10–35 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia · postseason: #8 UCF)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #5 Georgia, #18 Mississippi State · postseason: #8 UCF)#69 (of 130 teams · 402.1 yds/g · 5,227 yards)#38 (of 130 teams · 32.4 pts/g · 421 points)#27 (of 130 teams · 338.8 yds/g allowed · 4,404 yards)#26 (of 130 teams · 21.8 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#28 (of 130 teams · +10.6 /g · +138 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +12 on the season · 25 taken, 13 given · +0.92 /g)#27 (of 130 teams · 31:49 /g · 6h 54m on the season)#103 (of 130 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#115 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving production returning)#127 (of 130 teams · 10% of last season's rushing production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 889.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#79 (of 130 teams · 0.151 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 130 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#75 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#26 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 130 teams · 1.118 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 130 teams · 1.149 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Mississippi State8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Texas A&M)#71 (of 130 teams · 397.7 yds/g · 5,170 yards)#68 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 371 points)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 263.1 yds/g allowed · 3,421 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 13.2 pts/g allowed · 171 points)#12 (of 130 teams · +15.4 /g · +200 on the season)#24 (of 130 teams · +7 on the season · 20 taken, 13 given · +0.54 /g)#90 (of 130 teams · 28:40 /g · 6h 13m on the season)#18 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#84 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#23 (of 130 teams · 730.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#26 (of 130 teams · 0.237 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#25 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 130 teams · 1.196 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.065 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Ole Miss5–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 510.7 yds/g · 6,128 yards)#30 (of 130 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 407 points)#122 (of 130 teams · 483.3 yds/g allowed · 5,800 yards)#113 (of 130 teams · 36.2 pts/g allowed · 434 points)#85 (of 130 teams · -2.3 /g · -27 on the season)#57 (of 130 teams · +1 on the season · 15 taken, 14 given · +0.08 /g)#123 (of 130 teams · 26:21 /g · 5h 16m on the season)#85 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's passing production returning)#32 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning)#100 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning)#22 (of 130 teams · 734.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 130 teams · 0.284 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 130 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful)#113 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#51 (of 130 teams · 1.237 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 130 teams · 1.169 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018South Carolina7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #23 Missouri)#41 (of 130 teams · 426.9 yds/g · 5,550 yards)#57 (of 130 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 391 points)#84 (of 130 teams · 423.0 yds/g allowed · 5,499 yards)#69 (of 130 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 354 points)#60 (of 130 teams · +2.9 /g · +37 on the season)#99 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.38 /g)#128 (of 130 teams · 25:01 /g · 5h 25m on the season)#15 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#20 (of 130 teams · 83% of last season's receiving production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 130 teams · 750.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 130 teams · 0.195 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#96 (of 130 teams · 0.206 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#40 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#120 (of 130 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 130 teams · 1.212 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.029 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Tennessee5–72 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Kentucky)#122 (of 130 teams · 325.4 yds/g · 3,905 yards)#109 (of 130 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 273 points)#50 (of 130 teams · 377.4 yds/g allowed · 4,529 yards)#77 (of 130 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 335 points)#97 (of 130 teams · -5.2 /g · -62 on the season)#76 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 15 taken, 16 given · -0.08 /g)#77 (of 130 teams · 29:11 /g · 5h 50m on the season)#70 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's passing production returning)#75 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's receiving production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 46% of last season's rushing production returning)#15 (of 130 teams · 827.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#98 (of 130 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 130 teams · 0.170 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#108 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful)#103 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 130 teams · 1.305 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 130 teams · 1.101 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Texas A&M9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #11 LSU, #14 Kentucky)#15 (of 130 teams · 471.5 yds/g · 6,129 yards)#19 (of 130 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 468 points)#32 (of 130 teams · 348.4 yds/g allowed · 4,529 yards)#47 (of 130 teams · 25.3 pts/g allowed · 329 points)#27 (of 130 teams · +10.7 /g · +139 on the season)#107 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.46 /g)#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34:22 /g · 7h 27m on the season)#36 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#94 (of 130 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#78 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing production returning)#16 (of 130 teams · 805.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#31 (of 130 teams · 0.222 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 130 teams · 0.159 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 130 teams · 49% of plays successful)#25 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#110 (of 130 teams · 1.122 average PPA on successful plays)#123 (of 130 teams · 1.383 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2018Vanderbilt6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 SEC teams in 2018. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 130 teams · 411.2 yds/g · 5,346 yards)#70 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 370 points)#100 (of 130 teams · 438.9 yds/g allowed · 5,706 yards)#61 (of 130 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 346 points)#64 (of 130 teams · +1.9 /g · +24 on the season)#21 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 22 taken, 14 given · +0.62 /g)#34 (of 130 teams · 30:49 /g · 6h 41m on the season)#20 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#111 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#119 (of 130 teams · 30% of last season's rushing production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 612.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 130 teams · 0.223 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 130 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#37 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful)#119 (of 130 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 130 teams · 1.238 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 130 teams · 1.120 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20182018 MissouriSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #42
Total offense. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #6 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #9 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #15 of 130; 2018 Georgia #18 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #41 of 130; 2018 Florida #42 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #58 of 130; 2018 LSU #69 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #71 of 130; 2018 Auburn #78 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #103 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #118 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #122 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 13 of 130. SEC median rank 42.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #3 of 130; 2018 Georgia #14 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #19 of 130; 2018 Florida #22 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #30 of 130; 2018 LSU #38 of 130; 2018 Auburn #48 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #57 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #68 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #70 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #85 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #109 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #114 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 18 of 130. SEC median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #32
Total defense. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 130; 2018 Georgia #13 of 130; 2018 Alabama #16 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #21 of 130; 2018 Florida #22 of 130; 2018 LSU #27 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #32 of 130; 2018 Auburn #38 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #50 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #79 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #84 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #100 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #122 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 59 of 130. SEC median rank 32.
Scoring defensemedian #26
Scoring defense. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #2 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #6 of 130; 2018 Alabama #12 of 130; 2018 Auburn #14 of 130; 2018 Georgia #15 of 130; 2018 Florida #20 of 130; 2018 LSU #26 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #47 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #61 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #69 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #77 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #108 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #113 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 50 of 130. SEC median rank 26.
Point marginmedian #27
Point margin. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #2 of 130; 2018 Georgia #7 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #12 of 130; 2018 Florida #15 of 130; 2018 Auburn #24 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #27 of 130; 2018 LSU #28 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #60 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #64 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #85 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #97 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #115 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 25 of 130. SEC median rank 27.
Turnover marginmedian #50
Turnover margin. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Florida #6 of 130; 2018 LSU #6 of 130; 2018 Auburn #17 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #21 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #24 of 130; 2018 Alabama #37 of 130; 2018 Georgia #50 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #57 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #62 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #76 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #99 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #107 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #121 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 62 of 130. SEC median rank 50.
Possessionmedian #43
Possession. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Texas A&M #4 of 130; 2018 LSU #27 of 130; 2018 Georgia #29 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #34 of 130; 2018 Alabama #40 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #43 of 130; 2018 Florida #62 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #65 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #77 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #90 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #123 of 130; 2018 Auburn #125 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #128 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 35 of 130. SEC median rank 43.
Returning passingmedian #36
Returning passing. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Auburn #15 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #15 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #18 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #20 of 130; 2018 Alabama #26 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #36 of 130; 2018 Georgia #42 of 130; 2018 Florida #60 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #70 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #82 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #85 of 130; 2018 LSU #103 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #119 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 1 of 130. SEC median rank 36.
Returning receivingmedian #74
Returning receiving. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Arkansas #8 of 130; 2018 Auburn #10 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #20 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #32 of 130; 2018 Georgia #50 of 130; 2018 Florida #65 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #75 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #84 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #94 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #96 of 130; 2018 Alabama #108 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #111 of 130; 2018 LSU #115 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 74 of 130. SEC median rank 74.
Returning rushingmedian #77
Returning rushing. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #5 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2018 Florida #38 of 130; 2018 Alabama #42 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #61 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #78 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #94 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #100 of 130; 2018 Auburn #106 of 130; 2018 Georgia #108 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #119 of 130; 2018 LSU #127 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 77 of 130. SEC median rank 77.
Team talentmedian #16
Team talent. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #2 of 130; 2018 Georgia #3 of 130; 2018 LSU #6 of 130; 2018 Florida #13 of 130; 2018 Auburn #14 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #15 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #16 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #21 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #22 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #23 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #27 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #32 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #43 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 46 of 130. SEC median rank 16.
Offensive EPAmedian #29
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #2 of 130; 2018 Georgia #5 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #12 of 130; 2018 Florida #24 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #26 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #29 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #31 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #49 of 130; 2018 Auburn #72 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #78 of 130; 2018 LSU #79 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #98 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #109 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 28 of 130. SEC median rank 29.
Defensive EPAmedian #34
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Mississippi State #1 of 130; 2018 Alabama #15 of 130; 2018 Georgia #16 of 130; 2018 Auburn #22 of 130; 2018 LSU #23 of 130; 2018 Florida #27 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #34 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #68 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #75 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #94 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #96 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #99 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 46 of 130. SEC median rank 34.
Offensive success ratemedian #25
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #2 of 130; 2018 Georgia #5 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #9 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #14 of 130; 2018 Florida #20 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #25 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #37 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #40 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #59 of 130; 2018 Auburn #60 of 130; 2018 LSU #75 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #108 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #112 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 17 of 130. SEC median rank 25.
Defensive success ratemedian #29
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Alabama #5 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #7 of 130; 2018 Auburn #15 of 130; 2018 Florida #19 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #25 of 130; 2018 LSU #26 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #29 of 130; 2018 Georgia #59 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #103 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #105 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #113 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #119 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #120 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 41 of 130. SEC median rank 29.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #78
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 Tennessee #20 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #50 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #51 of 130; 2018 Alabama #52 of 130; 2018 South Carolina #69 of 130; 2018 Georgia #72 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #78 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #97 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #98 of 130; 2018 Florida #99 of 130; 2018 Auburn #107 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #110 of 130; 2018 LSU #114 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 117 of 130. SEC median rank 78.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #34
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2018, best rank first: 2018 South Carolina #2 of 130; 2018 Georgia #5 of 130; 2018 Mississippi State #10 of 130; 2018 Tennessee #18 of 130; 2018 Arkansas #21 of 130; 2018 Vanderbilt #27 of 130; 2018 LSU #34 of 130; 2018 Ole Miss #38 of 130; 2018 Kentucky #45 of 130; 2018 Florida #55 of 130; 2018 Auburn #76 of 130; 2018 Alabama #111 of 130; 2018 Texas A&M #123 of 130. Marked: 2018 Missouri, ranked 85 of 130. SEC median rank 34.