| 2013 | NC State3–9 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #71 (of 125 teams · 403.5 yds/g · 4,842 yds) | #98 (of 125 teams · 22.8 pts/g · 274 points) | #62 (of 125 teams · 399.9 yds/g allowed · 4,799 yds) | #84 (of 125 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 362 points) | #97 (of 125 teams · -7.3 /g · -88 on the season) | #61 (of 125 teams · +0 on the season · 21 taken, 21 given · +0.00 /g) | #36 (of 125 teams · 31:37 /g · 6h 19m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #87 (of 125 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #90 (of 125 teams · 0.106 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #93 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #67 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #68 (of 125 teams · 0.941 average PPA on successful plays) | #98 (of 125 teams · 1.004 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 14 ACC teams in 2013 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #71 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #6–#120. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #70 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #2–#116. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #34 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #3–#93. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #55 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #1–#99. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #63 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #1–#109. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #48 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #3–#103. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #55 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #7–#123. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | — (No team has a rank for this) | #63 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #1–#117. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #31 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #3–#100. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #53 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #3–#116. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #43 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #2–#94. 4 of 14 in the top 10.) | #76 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #15–#117. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #52 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range #8–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) |
| 2013 | Florida State14–0 | 3 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 519.1 yds/g · 7,267 yds) | #2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 51.6 pts/g · 723 points) | #3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 281.4 yds/g allowed · 3,940 yds) | #1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 12.1 pts/g allowed · 170 points) | #1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +39.5 /g · +553 on the season) | #3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +17 on the season · 35 taken, 18 given · +1.21 /g) | #81 (of 125 teams · 29:18 /g · 6h 50m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.273 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 52% of plays successful) | #4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #15 (of 125 teams · 1.013 average PPA on successful plays) | #18 (of 125 teams · 0.870 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Clemson11–2 | 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 507.7 yds/g · 6,600 yds) | #8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 40.1 pts/g · 522 points) | #25 (of 125 teams · 356.7 yds/g allowed · 4,637 yds) | #24 (of 125 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 288 points) | #10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +18.0 /g · +234 on the season) | #29 (of 125 teams · +6 on the season · 30 taken, 24 given · +0.46 /g) | #66 (of 125 teams · 29:58 /g · 6h 30m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #27 (of 125 teams · 0.134 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #16 (of 125 teams · 0.017 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #18 (of 125 teams · 47% of plays successful) | #6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #81 (of 125 teams · 0.913 average PPA on successful plays) | #116 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.059 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Virginia Tech8–5 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #102 (of 125 teams · 356.0 yds/g · 4,628 yds) | #100 (of 125 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 293 points) | #4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 283.6 yds/g allowed · 3,687 yds) | #11 (of 125 teams · 19.3 pts/g allowed · 251 points) | #63 (of 125 teams · +3.2 /g · +42 on the season) | #24 (of 125 teams · +7 on the season · 26 taken, 19 given · +0.54 /g) | #7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 33:41 /g · 7h 18m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #97 (of 125 teams · 0.037 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #102 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #53 (of 125 teams · 0.964 average PPA on successful plays) | #124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Boston College7–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #93 (of 125 teams · 367.2 yds/g · 4,774 yds) | #70 (of 125 teams · 27.7 pts/g · 360 points) | #93 (of 125 teams · 427.5 yds/g allowed · 5,557 yds) | #78 (of 125 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 376 points) | #75 (of 125 teams · -1.2 /g · -16 on the season) | #42 (of 125 teams · +3 on the season · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.23 /g) | #79 (of 125 teams · 29:21 /g · 6h 22m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #85 (of 125 teams · 0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #100 (of 125 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #99 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #88 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #104 (of 125 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays) | #76 (of 125 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Duke10–4 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #47 (of 125 teams · 426.1 yds/g · 5,966 yds) | #41 (of 125 teams · 32.8 pts/g · 459 points) | #83 (of 125 teams · 418.0 yds/g allowed · 5,852 yds) | #64 (of 125 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 373 points) | #48 (of 125 teams · +6.1 /g · +86 on the season) | #60 (of 125 teams · +1 on the season · 26 taken, 25 given · +0.07 /g) | #74 (of 125 teams · 29:37 /g · 6h 55m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #63 (of 125 teams · 0.089 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #80 (of 125 teams · 0.093 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #51 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #94 (of 125 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #93 (of 125 teams · 0.900 average PPA on successful plays) | #16 (of 125 teams · 0.864 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Georgia Tech7–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #44 (of 125 teams · 429.7 yds/g · 5,586 yds) | #26 (of 125 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 456 points) | #27 (of 125 teams · 360.2 yds/g allowed · 4,683 yds) | #29 (of 125 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points) | #29 (of 125 teams · +12.2 /g · +159 on the season) | #86 (of 125 teams · -4 on the season · 20 taken, 24 given · -0.31 /g) | #11 (of 125 teams · 33:09 /g · 7h 11m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #18 (of 125 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #84 (of 125 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #25 (of 125 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #72 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #37 (of 125 teams · 0.986 average PPA on successful plays) | #86 (of 125 teams · 0.981 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Maryland7–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #76 (of 125 teams · 396.9 yds/g · 5,160 yds) | #84 (of 125 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 340 points) | #44 (of 125 teams · 374.4 yds/g allowed · 4,867 yds) | #55 (of 125 teams · 25.3 pts/g allowed · 329 points) | #68 (of 125 teams · +0.8 /g · +11 on the season) | #103 (of 125 teams · -7 on the season · 21 taken, 28 given · -0.54 /g) | #63 (of 125 teams · 30:06 /g · 6h 31m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #89 (of 125 teams · 0.045 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #31 (of 125 teams · 0.038 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #97 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #33 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #17 (of 125 teams · 1.010 average PPA on successful plays) | #37 (of 125 teams · 0.909 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | North Carolina7–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #49 (of 125 teams · 425.7 yds/g · 5,534 yds) | #43 (of 125 teams · 32.7 pts/g · 425 points) | #65 (of 125 teams · 403.1 yds/g allowed · 5,241 yds) | #43 (of 125 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points) | #38 (of 125 teams · +8.2 /g · +107 on the season) | #48 (of 125 teams · +2 on the season · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.15 /g) | #101 (of 125 teams · 28:38 /g · 6h 12m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #57 (of 125 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #52 (of 125 teams · 0.066 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #45 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #55 (of 125 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #87 (of 125 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays) | #38 (of 125 teams · 0.911 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Pittsburgh7–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #98 (of 125 teams · 362.1 yds/g · 4,708 yds) | #80 (of 125 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 342 points) | #34 (of 125 teams · 367.5 yds/g allowed · 4,778 yds) | #70 (of 125 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 353 points) | #73 (of 125 teams · -0.8 /g · -11 on the season) | #69 (of 125 teams · -1 on the season · 16 taken, 17 given · -0.08 /g) | #48 (of 125 teams · 30:48 /g · 6h 40m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #31 (of 125 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #41 (of 125 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #36 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #40 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #83 (of 125 teams · 0.911 average PPA on successful plays) | #87 (of 125 teams · 0.983 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Syracuse7–6 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #86 (of 125 teams · 376.9 yds/g · 4,899 yds) | #99 (of 125 teams · 22.7 pts/g · 295 points) | #33 (of 125 teams · 367.1 yds/g allowed · 4,773 yds) | #56 (of 125 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 330 points) | #82 (of 125 teams · -2.7 /g · -35 on the season) | #48 (of 125 teams · +2 on the season · 24 taken, 22 given · +0.15 /g) | #55 (of 125 teams · 30:20 /g · 6h 34m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #101 (of 125 teams · 0.033 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #20 (of 125 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #100 (of 125 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #43 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #76 (of 125 teams · 0.930 average PPA on successful plays) | #39 (of 125 teams · 0.912 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Miami9–4 | 2 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #48 (of 125 teams · 425.9 yds/g · 5,536 yds) | #33 (of 125 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 440 points) | #90 (of 125 teams · 426.4 yds/g allowed · 5,543 yds) | #66 (of 125 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 348 points) | #43 (of 125 teams · +7.1 /g · +92 on the season) | #32 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 27 taken, 22 given · +0.38 /g) | #123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 25:51 /g · 5h 36m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #47 (of 125 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #97 (of 125 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #53 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #85 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #39 (of 125 teams · 0.980 average PPA on successful plays) | #52 (of 125 teams · 0.928 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Virginia2–10 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #90 (of 125 teams · 368.4 yds/g · 4,421 yds) | #110 (of 125 teams · 19.8 pts/g · 237 points) | #66 (of 125 teams · 403.6 yds/g allowed · 4,843 yds) | #99 (of 125 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 399 points) | #109 (of 125 teams · -13.5 /g · -162 on the season) | #94 (of 125 teams · -5 on the season · 21 taken, 26 given · -0.42 /g) | #10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 33:19 /g · 6h 40m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #117 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -0.009 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #22 (of 125 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #110 (of 125 teams · 38% of plays successful) | #9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #117 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.841 average PPA on successful plays) | #122 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 1.103 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2013 | Wake Forest4–8 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2013. Range 0–3.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | — (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) | #120 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 290.7 yds/g · 3,488 yds) | #116 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 18.3 pts/g · 220 points) | #32 (of 125 teams · 366.2 yds/g allowed · 4,394 yds) | #38 (of 125 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 289 points) | #90 (of 125 teams · -5.8 /g · -69 on the season) | #74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 21 taken, 23 given · -0.17 /g) | #54 (of 125 teams · 30:25 /g · 6h 05m on the season) | — (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards)) | — (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #116 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #23 (of 125 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense) | #116 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 37% of plays successful) | #45 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #85 (of 125 teams · 0.909 average PPA on successful plays) | #8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.840 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |