| 2017 | NC State9–4 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #25 (of 130 teams · 451.8 yds/g · 5,873 yards) | #40 (of 130 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 419 points) | #58 (of 130 teams · 384.2 yds/g allowed · 4,995 yards) | #51 (of 130 teams · 25.2 pts/g allowed · 328 points) | #37 (of 130 teams · +7.0 /g · +91 on the season) | #22 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.62 /g) | #11 (of 130 teams · 32:46 /g · 7h 06m on the season) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #31 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning) | #92 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning) | #44 (of 130 teams · 609.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #28 (of 130 teams · 0.219 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #59 (of 130 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #38 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #64 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #42 (of 130 teams · 1.245 average PPA on successful plays) | #76 (of 130 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| Median | of 14 ACC teams in 2017 | 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | 1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) | #60 (Total offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #3–#107. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #70 (Scoring offense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #11–#107. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #40 (Total defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #4–#113. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #51 (Scoring defense: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #2–#98. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #43 (Point margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #7–#98. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #56 (Turnover margin: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #5–#123. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #53 (Possession: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #6–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #64 (Returning passing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #1–#125. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #70 (Returning receiving: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #1–#117. 3 of 14 in the top 10.) | #91 (Returning rushing: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #14–#128. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #36 (Team talent: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #5–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #77 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #2–#116. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #57 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #2–#100. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #49 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #4–#111. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) | #49 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #2–#100. 2 of 14 in the top 10.) | #71 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #14–#119. 0 of 14 in the top 10.) | #73 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range #4–#127. 1 of 14 in the top 10.) |
| 2017 | Boston College7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #84 (of 130 teams · 386.7 yds/g · 5,027 yards) | #85 (of 130 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 334 points) | #57 (of 130 teams · 382.9 yds/g allowed · 4,977 yards) | #37 (of 130 teams · 22.9 pts/g allowed · 297 points) | #64 (of 130 teams · +2.9 /g · +37 on the season) | #30 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 25 taken, 20 given · +0.38 /g) | #53 (of 130 teams · 30:26 /g · 6h 36m on the season) | #105 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 92% of last season's receiving production returning) | #58 (of 130 teams · 69% of last season's rushing production returning) | #65 (of 130 teams · 535.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #115 (of 130 teams · 0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #35 (of 130 teams · 0.072 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #111 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #31 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #100 (of 130 teams · 1.130 average PPA on successful plays) | #68 (of 130 teams · 1.214 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Clemson12–2 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami) | 4 (4 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #7 Auburn, #10 Miami, #22 Virginia Tech, #24 NC State) | #38 (of 130 teams · 429.6 yds/g · 6,014 yards) | #32 (of 130 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 466 points) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 276.7 yds/g allowed · 3,874 yards) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 13.6 pts/g allowed · 190 points) | #7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +19.7 /g · +276 on the season) | #43 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.29 /g) | #48 (of 130 teams · 30:40 /g · 7h 09m on the season) | #110 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning) | #95 (of 130 teams · 42% of last season's receiving production returning) | #119 (of 130 teams · 26% of last season's rushing production returning) | #9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 853.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #36 (of 130 teams · 0.209 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · -0.037 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #22 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #95 (of 130 teams · 1.139 average PPA on successful plays) | #24 (of 130 teams · 1.118 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Duke7–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #21 Northwestern) | #88 (of 130 teams · 384.8 yds/g · 5,002 yards) | #80 (of 130 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 345 points) | #21 (of 130 teams · 332.6 yds/g allowed · 4,324 yards) | #21 (of 130 teams · 20.2 pts/g allowed · 263 points) | #48 (of 130 teams · +6.3 /g · +82 on the season) | #64 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g) | #27 (of 130 teams · 31:27 /g · 6h 49m on the season) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning) | #27 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning) | #66 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning) | #40 (of 130 teams · 627.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #112 (of 130 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #13 (of 130 teams · 0.030 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #86 (of 130 teams · 41% of plays successful) | #14 (of 130 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #112 (of 130 teams · 1.109 average PPA on successful plays) | #100 (of 130 teams · 1.278 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Florida State7–6 | 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #100 (of 130 teams · 351.9 yds/g · 4,575 yards) | #71 (of 130 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 362 points) | #18 (of 130 teams · 331.1 yds/g allowed · 4,304 yards) | #29 (of 130 teams · 21.2 pts/g allowed · 276 points) | #43 (of 130 teams · +6.6 /g · +86 on the season) | #102 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 15 taken, 21 given · -0.46 /g) | #67 (of 130 teams · 30:03 /g · 6h 31m on the season) | #45 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning) | #111 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving production returning) | #109 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's rushing production returning) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 925.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #82 (of 130 teams · 0.127 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #27 (of 130 teams · 0.058 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #49 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #30 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #107 (of 130 teams · 1.113 average PPA on successful plays) | #74 (of 130 teams · 1.222 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Georgia Tech5–6 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Virginia Tech) | #74 (of 130 teams · 391.6 yds/g · 4,308 yards) | #70 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 309 points) | #33 (of 130 teams · 354.3 yds/g allowed · 3,897 yards) | #64 (of 130 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 292 points) | #69 (of 130 teams · +1.6 /g · +17 on the season) | #101 (of 130 teams · -5 on the season · 10 taken, 15 given · -0.45 /g) | #6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:31 /g · 6h 09m on the season) | #106 (of 130 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning) | #8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning) | #117 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's rushing production returning) | #52 (of 130 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #58 (of 130 teams · 0.160 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #63 (of 130 teams · 0.135 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #45 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #100 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #105 (of 130 teams · 1.119 average PPA on successful plays) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.028 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Louisville8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 544.9 yds/g · 7,084 yards) | #11 (of 130 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 495 points) | #62 (of 130 teams · 388.1 yds/g allowed · 5,045 yards) | #70 (of 130 teams · 27.4 pts/g allowed · 356 points) | #23 (of 130 teams · +10.7 /g · +139 on the season) | #56 (of 130 teams · +2 on the season · 23 taken, 21 given · +0.15 /g) | #54 (of 130 teams · 30:25 /g · 6h 35m on the season) | #51 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's passing production returning) | #88 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's receiving production returning) | #62 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's rushing production returning) | #36 (of 130 teams · 641.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.336 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #61 (of 130 teams · 0.133 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 50% of plays successful) | #95 (of 130 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #14 (of 130 teams · 1.309 average PPA on successful plays) | #31 (of 130 teams · 1.146 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Miami10–3 | 1 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Notre Dame, #22 Virginia Tech) | #60 (of 130 teams · 403.7 yds/g · 5,248 yards) | #59 (of 130 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 378 points) | #38 (of 130 teams · 362.9 yds/g allowed · 4,717 yards) | #28 (of 130 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 273 points) | #35 (of 130 teams · +8.1 /g · +105 on the season) | #5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +13 on the season · 31 taken, 18 given · +1.00 /g) | #122 (of 130 teams · 26:34 /g · 5h 45m on the season) | #122 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning) | #81 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's receiving production returning) | #76 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's rushing production returning) | #20 (of 130 teams · 749.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #63 (of 130 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #28 (of 130 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #76 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #45 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #30 (of 130 teams · 1.280 average PPA on successful plays) | #59 (of 130 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | North Carolina3–9 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #96 (of 130 teams · 369.6 yds/g · 4,435 yards) | #83 (of 130 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 312 points) | #99 (of 130 teams · 435.9 yds/g allowed · 5,231 yards) | #88 (of 130 teams · 31.3 pts/g allowed · 375 points) | #96 (of 130 teams · -5.3 /g · -63 on the season) | #103 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 16 taken, 22 given · -0.50 /g) | #124 (of 130 teams · 26:33 /g · 5h 19m on the season) | #111 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning) | #117 (of 130 teams · 29% of last season's receiving production returning) | #128 (of 130 teams · 6% of last season's rushing production returning) | #27 (of 130 teams · 697.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #99 (of 130 teams · 0.098 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #86 (of 130 teams · 0.185 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #99 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful) | #82 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #34 (of 130 teams · 1.275 average PPA on successful plays) | #62 (of 130 teams · 1.192 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Pittsburgh5–7 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Miami) | #97 (of 130 teams · 366.0 yds/g · 4,392 yards) | #101 (of 130 teams · 23.9 pts/g · 287 points) | #69 (of 130 teams · 396.6 yds/g allowed · 4,759 yards) | #65 (of 130 teams · 26.6 pts/g allowed · 319 points) | #87 (of 130 teams · -2.7 /g · -32 on the season) | #64 (of 130 teams · +0 on the season · 16 taken, 16 given · +0.00 /g) | #16 (of 130 teams · 32:28 /g · 6h 30m on the season) | #115 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing production returning) | #56 (of 130 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning) | #91 (of 130 teams · 45% of last season's rushing production returning) | #34 (of 130 teams · 660.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #77 (of 130 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #68 (of 130 teams · 0.145 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #41 (of 130 teams · 45% of plays successful) | #68 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #103 (of 130 teams · 1.122 average PPA on successful plays) | #91 (of 130 teams · 1.258 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Syracuse4–8 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #1 Clemson) | #23 (of 130 teams · 456.3 yds/g · 5,476 yards) | #75 (of 130 teams · 27.4 pts/g · 329 points) | #106 (of 130 teams · 444.0 yds/g allowed · 5,328 yards) | #98 (of 130 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 386 points) | #93 (of 130 teams · -4.8 /g · -57 on the season) | #123 (of 130 teams · -12 on the season · 12 taken, 24 given · -1.00 /g) | #66 (of 130 teams · 30:09 /g · 6h 02m on the season) | #48 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's passing production returning) | #70 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving production returning) | #23 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's rushing production returning) | #63 (of 130 teams · 539.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #95 (of 130 teams · 0.106 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #100 (of 130 teams · 0.210 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #83 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful) | #78 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #71 (of 130 teams · 1.201 average PPA on successful plays) | #114 (of 130 teams · 1.319 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Virginia6–7 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 Boise State) | #107 (of 130 teams · 342.2 yds/g · 4,449 yards) | #107 (of 130 teams · 22.5 pts/g · 293 points) | #40 (of 130 teams · 365.1 yds/g allowed · 4,746 yards) | #78 (of 130 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 369 points) | #98 (of 130 teams · -5.8 /g · -76 on the season) | #72 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.08 /g) | #55 (of 130 teams · 30:24 /g · 6h 35m on the season) | #64 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing production returning) | #72 (of 130 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning) | #126 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's rushing production returning) | #47 (of 130 teams · 603.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #116 (of 130 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #57 (of 130 teams · 0.128 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #109 (of 130 teams · 39% of plays successful) | #49 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #65 (of 130 teams · 1.211 average PPA on successful plays) | #73 (of 130 teams · 1.222 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Virginia Tech9–4 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason) | #53 (of 130 teams · 412.9 yds/g · 5,367 yards) | #69 (of 130 teams · 28.1 pts/g · 366 points) | #13 (of 130 teams · 319.3 yds/g allowed · 4,151 yards) | #4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 14.8 pts/g allowed · 192 points) | #16 (of 130 teams · +13.4 /g · +174 on the season) | #30 (of 130 teams · +5 on the season · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.38 /g) | #12 (of 130 teams · 32:41 /g · 7h 05m on the season) | #125 (of 130 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning) | #109 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's receiving production returning) | #106 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning) | #33 (of 130 teams · 662.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #85 (of 130 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #54 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #119 (of 130 teams · 1.093 average PPA on successful plays) | #127 (of 130 teams · 1.387 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |
| 2017 | Wake Forest8–5 | 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 ACC teams in 2017. Range 0–4.) | 0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason) | 1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #24 NC State) | #17 (of 130 teams · 465.8 yds/g · 6,055 yards) | #21 (of 130 teams · 35.3 pts/g · 459 points) | #113 (of 130 teams · 457.3 yds/g allowed · 5,945 yards) | #76 (of 130 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points) | #37 (of 130 teams · +7.0 /g · +91 on the season) | #22 (of 130 teams · +8 on the season · 21 taken, 13 given · +0.62 /g) | #119 (of 130 teams · 27:03 /g · 5h 52m on the season) | #55 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's passing production returning) | #1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's receiving production returning) | #14 (of 130 teams · 95% of last season's rushing production returning) | #66 (of 130 teams · 527.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) | #26 (of 130 teams · 0.221 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) | #62 (of 130 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) | #44 (of 130 teams · 44% of plays successful) | #67 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better) | #67 (of 130 teams · 1.208 average PPA on successful plays) | #102 (of 130 teams · 1.280 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better) |