Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008New Mexico State390 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 120 teams · 355.6 yds/g · 4,267 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 22.2 pts/g · 266 points)#76 (of 120 teams · 379.6 yds/g allowed · 4,555 yards)#106 (of 120 teams · 34.1 pts/g allowed · 409 points)#108 (of 120 teams · -11.9 /g · -143 on the season)#85 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 24 taken, 29 given · -0.42 /g)#63 (of 120 teams · 18:17 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.003 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.090 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#109 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#108 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.837 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20080 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#68 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #5–#112. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#72 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #12–#106. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#76 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #21–#117. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#93 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #3–#118. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#81 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #4–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#64 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #19–#116. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#73 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #12–#115. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#77 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #16–#118. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#61 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #6–#108. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#68 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #26–#115. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#51 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #3–#118. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#58 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #14–#85. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#49 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range #8–#120. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)
2008Boise State1210 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 120 teams · 440.9 yds/g · 5,731 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 489 points)#21 (of 120 teams · 308.1 yds/g allowed · 4,006 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.6 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.0 /g · +325 on the season)#21 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 35 taken, 26 given · +0.69 /g)#88 (of 120 teams · 17:30 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.117 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#108 (of 120 teams · 1.001 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Fresno State760 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 120 teams · 387.2 yds/g · 5,034 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 29.6 pts/g · 385 points)#100 (of 120 teams · 410.9 yds/g allowed · 5,341 yards)#93 (of 120 teams · 31.1 pts/g allowed · 404 points)#76 (of 120 teams · -1.5 /g · -19 on the season)#105 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.85 /g)#70 (of 120 teams · 18:05 /g · 3h 55m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#19 (of 120 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#82 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.921 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Hawai'i770 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 120 teams · 345.8 yds/g · 4,841 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 345 points)#55 (of 120 teams · 345.6 yds/g allowed · 4,839 yards)#84 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 404 points)#87 (of 120 teams · -4.2 /g · -59 on the season)#103 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 30 taken, 41 given · -0.79 /g)#73 (of 120 teams · 17:53 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#34 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#51 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.917 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.815 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Idaho2100 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#92 (of 120 teams · 320.9 yds/g · 3,851 yards)#103 (of 120 teams · 19.6 pts/g · 235 points)#117 (of 120 teams · 472.0 yds/g allowed · 5,664 yards)#118 (of 120 teams · 42.8 pts/g allowed · 513 points)#117 (of 120 teams · -23.2 /g · -278 on the season)#116 (of 120 teams · -16 on the season · 18 taken, 34 given · -1.33 /g)#62 (of 120 teams · 18:18 /g · 3h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#85 (of 120 teams · -0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 120 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#94 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#118 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 120 teams · 0.900 average PPA on successful plays)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Louisiana Tech850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#72 (of 120 teams · 343.1 yds/g · 4,460 yards)#72 (of 120 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 320 points)#74 (of 120 teams · 376.5 yds/g allowed · 4,895 yards)#52 (of 120 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#59 (of 120 teams · +0.9 /g · +12 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 29 taken, 22 given · +0.54 /g)#115 (of 120 teams · 16:22 /g · 3h 33m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 120 teams · -0.030 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#48 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Nevada760 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 508.5 yds/g · 6,611 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 37.6 pts/g · 489 points)#94 (of 120 teams · 400.2 yds/g allowed · 5,203 yards)#100 (of 120 teams · 32.3 pts/g allowed · 420 points)#41 (of 120 teams · +5.3 /g · +69 on the season)#54 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 27 taken, 26 given · +0.08 /g)#12 (of 120 teams · 19:40 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.071 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.028 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#34 (of 120 teams · 0.955 average PPA on successful plays)#120 (of 120 teams · 1.266 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008San José State660 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 282.8 yds/g · 3,394 yards)#106 (of 120 teams · 18.7 pts/g · 224 points)#22 (of 120 teams · 311.7 yds/g allowed · 3,740 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 21.6 pts/g allowed · 259 points)#81 (of 120 teams · -2.9 /g · -35 on the season)#19 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 29 taken, 20 given · +0.75 /g)#78 (of 120 teams · 17:44 /g · 3h 33m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#118 (of 120 teams · -0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 120 teams · -0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#37 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.915 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.868 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Utah State390 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 120 teams · 334.3 yds/g · 4,011 yards)#78 (of 120 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 288 points)#102 (of 120 teams · 412.7 yds/g allowed · 4,952 yards)#108 (of 120 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 416 points)#106 (of 120 teams · -10.7 /g · -128 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 26 taken, 27 given · -0.08 /g)#94 (of 120 teams · 17:08 /g · 3h 26m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.004 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#101 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.917 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.860 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20082008 New Mexico StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #68
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Nevada #5 of 120; 2008 Boise State #16 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #43 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #68 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #72 of 120; 2008 Utah State #82 of 120; 2008 Idaho #92 of 120; 2008 San José State #112 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 62 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 68.
Scoring offensemedian #72
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #12 of 120; 2008 Nevada #12 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #37 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #71 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #72 of 120; 2008 Utah State #78 of 120; 2008 Idaho #103 of 120; 2008 San José State #106 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 89 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 72.
Total defensemedian #76
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #21 of 120; 2008 San José State #22 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #55 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #74 of 120; 2008 Nevada #94 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #100 of 120; 2008 Utah State #102 of 120; 2008 Idaho #117 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 76 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 76.
Scoring defensemedian #93
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #3 of 120; 2008 San José State #37 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #52 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #84 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #93 of 120; 2008 Nevada #100 of 120; 2008 Utah State #108 of 120; 2008 Idaho #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 106 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 93.
Point marginmedian #81
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #4 of 120; 2008 Nevada #41 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #59 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #76 of 120; 2008 San José State #81 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #87 of 120; 2008 Utah State #106 of 120; 2008 Idaho #117 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 108 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 81.
Turnover marginmedian #64
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 San José State #19 of 120; 2008 Boise State #21 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #24 of 120; 2008 Nevada #54 of 120; 2008 Utah State #64 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #103 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #105 of 120; 2008 Idaho #116 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 85 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 64.
Possessionmedian #73
Possession. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Nevada #12 of 120; 2008 Idaho #62 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #70 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #73 of 120; 2008 San José State #78 of 120; 2008 Boise State #88 of 120; 2008 Utah State #94 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #115 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 63 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 73.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #77
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #16 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #19 of 120; 2008 Nevada #32 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #64 of 120; 2008 Utah State #77 of 120; 2008 Idaho #85 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #99 of 120; 2008 San José State #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 78 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 77.
Defensive EPAmedian #61
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #6 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #34 of 120; 2008 San José State #37 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #58 of 120; 2008 Nevada #61 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #85 of 120; 2008 Utah State #97 of 120; 2008 Idaho #108 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 101 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 61.
Offensive success ratemedian #68
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #26 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #30 of 120; 2008 Nevada #41 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #59 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #68 of 120; 2008 Idaho #94 of 120; 2008 Utah State #105 of 120; 2008 San José State #115 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 109 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 68.
Defensive success ratemedian #51
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Boise State #3 of 120; 2008 Nevada #7 of 120; 2008 San José State #37 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #48 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #51 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #82 of 120; 2008 Utah State #101 of 120; 2008 Idaho #118 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 108 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 51.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #58
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Nevada #34 of 120; 2008 Boise State #47 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #54 of 120; 2008 Utah State #58 of 120; 2008 Hawai'i #59 of 120; 2008 San José State #60 of 120; 2008 Idaho #71 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #85 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 14 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 58.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #49
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Hawai'i #8 of 120; 2008 Utah State #30 of 120; 2008 San José State #32 of 120; 2008 Fresno State #49 of 120; 2008 Idaho #51 of 120; 2008 Louisiana Tech #80 of 120; 2008 Boise State #108 of 120; 2008 Nevada #120 of 120. Marked: 2008 New Mexico State, ranked 16 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 49.