Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010New Mexico State2100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 296.5 yds/g · 3,558 yards)#117 (of 120 teams · 15.7 pts/g · 188 points)#112 (of 120 teams · 453.3 yds/g allowed · 5,440 yards)#115 (of 120 teams · 39.5 pts/g allowed · 474 points)#117 (of 120 teams · -23.8 /g · -286 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 12 taken, 18 given · -0.50 /g)#13 (of 120 teams · 19:59 /g · 4h 00m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 120 teams · -0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 120 teams · 0.116 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 120 teams · 34% of plays successful)#90 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.977 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#55 (Total offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#112. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#59 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#117. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#95 (Total defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#83 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#115. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#78 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #1–#117. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#70 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #14–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#45 (Possession: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #6–#117. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#48 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#109. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#80 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #1–#112. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#77 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #3–#115. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#77 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #2–#118. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#24 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #7–#96. 3 of 9 in the top 10.)#90 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range #25–#117. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)
2010Boise State1210 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 521.3 yds/g · 6,777 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 45.1 pts/g · 586 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 254.7 yds/g allowed · 3,311 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.8 pts/g allowed · 166 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +32.3 /g · +420 on the season)#22 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 27 taken, 19 given · +0.62 /g)#45 (of 120 teams · 18:58 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.157 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.077 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 120 teams · 0.868 average PPA on successful plays)#116 (of 120 teams · 1.044 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Fresno State850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#70 (of 120 teams · 370.6 yds/g · 4,818 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 377 points)#59 (of 120 teams · 367.2 yds/g allowed · 4,774 yards)#83 (of 120 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 390 points)#71 (of 120 teams · -1.0 /g · -13 on the season)#110 (of 120 teams · -11 on the season · 13 taken, 24 given · -0.85 /g)#26 (of 120 teams · 19:28 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.063 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#38 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.013 average PPA on successful plays)#117 (of 120 teams · 1.053 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Hawai'i1040 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 500.6 yds/g · 7,009 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 39.6 pts/g · 554 points)#51 (of 120 teams · 357.6 yds/g allowed · 5,006 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 25.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#14 (of 120 teams · +14.1 /g · +197 on the season)#14 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 38 taken, 26 given · +0.86 /g)#82 (of 120 teams · 17:59 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#77 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.001 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.869 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Idaho670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#55 (of 120 teams · 386.8 yds/g · 5,028 yards)#60 (of 120 teams · 26.6 pts/g · 346 points)#95 (of 120 teams · 420.3 yds/g allowed · 5,464 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 28.3 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#78 (of 120 teams · -1.7 /g · -22 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 30 taken, 28 given · +0.15 /g)#39 (of 120 teams · 19:07 /g · 4h 09m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#83 (of 120 teams · 0.070 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#98 (of 120 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.019 average PPA on successful plays)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.947 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Louisiana Tech570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#49 (of 120 teams · 389.8 yds/g · 4,678 yards)#59 (of 120 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 321 points)#116 (of 120 teams · 462.1 yds/g allowed · 5,545 yards)#90 (of 120 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 368 points)#83 (of 120 teams · -3.9 /g · -47 on the season)#70 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 24 taken, 27 given · -0.25 /g)#117 (of 120 teams · 16:25 /g · 3h 17m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#91 (of 120 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#67 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#106 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.882 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Nevada1310 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 519.1 yds/g · 7,268 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.0 pts/g · 574 points)#54 (of 120 teams · 363.6 yds/g allowed · 5,090 yards)#31 (of 120 teams · 21.4 pts/g allowed · 300 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19.6 /g · +274 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.36 /g)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:16 /g · 4h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.180 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 120 teams · 0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#51 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.899 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.988 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010San José State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#101 (of 120 teams · 315.1 yds/g · 4,096 yards)#115 (of 120 teams · 16.1 pts/g · 209 points)#117 (of 120 teams · 463.7 yds/g allowed · 6,028 yards)#105 (of 120 teams · 34.7 pts/g allowed · 451 points)#114 (of 120 teams · -18.6 /g · -242 on the season)#106 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 17 taken, 26 given · -0.69 /g)#107 (of 120 teams · 17:19 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 120 teams · 0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#91 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#118 (of 120 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.942 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Utah State480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2010. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#84 (of 120 teams · 347.3 yds/g · 4,168 yards)#94 (of 120 teams · 22.0 pts/g · 264 points)#100 (of 120 teams · 428.8 yds/g allowed · 5,146 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 33.8 pts/g allowed · 405 points)#103 (of 120 teams · -11.8 /g · -141 on the season)#84 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 16 taken, 21 given · -0.42 /g)#87 (of 120 teams · 17:49 /g · 3h 34m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.036 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#76 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20102010 New Mexico StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #55
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Nevada #4 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #6 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #49 of 120; 2010 Idaho #55 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #70 of 120; 2010 Utah State #84 of 120; 2010 San José State #101 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 112 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 55.
Scoring offensemedian #59
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Nevada #8 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #10 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #48 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #59 of 120; 2010 Idaho #60 of 120; 2010 Utah State #94 of 120; 2010 San José State #115 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 117 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 59.
Total defensemedian #95
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #51 of 120; 2010 Nevada #54 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #59 of 120; 2010 Idaho #95 of 120; 2010 Utah State #100 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #116 of 120; 2010 San José State #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 112 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 95.
Scoring defensemedian #83
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Nevada #31 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #58 of 120; 2010 Idaho #71 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #83 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #90 of 120; 2010 Utah State #101 of 120; 2010 San José State #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 115 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 83.
Point marginmedian #78
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #1 of 120; 2010 Nevada #8 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #14 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #71 of 120; 2010 Idaho #78 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #83 of 120; 2010 Utah State #103 of 120; 2010 San José State #114 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 117 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 78.
Turnover marginmedian #70
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Hawai'i #14 of 120; 2010 Boise State #22 of 120; 2010 Nevada #34 of 120; 2010 Idaho #47 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #70 of 120; 2010 Utah State #84 of 120; 2010 San José State #106 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 90 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 70.
Possessionmedian #45
Possession. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Nevada #6 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #26 of 120; 2010 Idaho #39 of 120; 2010 Boise State #45 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #82 of 120; 2010 Utah State #87 of 120; 2010 San José State #107 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 13 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 45.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #48
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Nevada #2 of 120; 2010 Boise State #6 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #8 of 120; 2010 Idaho #36 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #48 of 120; 2010 Utah State #66 of 120; 2010 San José State #88 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #91 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 109 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 48.
Defensive EPAmedian #80
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #1 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #53 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #55 of 120; 2010 Nevada #74 of 120; 2010 Utah State #80 of 120; 2010 Idaho #83 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #97 of 120; 2010 San José State #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 110 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 80.
Offensive success ratemedian #77
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Nevada #3 of 120; 2010 Boise State #5 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #9 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #67 of 120; 2010 Idaho #77 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #84 of 120; 2010 San José State #91 of 120; 2010 Utah State #92 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 115 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 77.
Defensive success ratemedian #77
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Boise State #2 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #38 of 120; 2010 Nevada #51 of 120; 2010 Utah State #76 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #77 of 120; 2010 Idaho #98 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #106 of 120; 2010 San José State #118 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 90 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 77.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #24
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Idaho #7 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #9 of 120; 2010 Hawai'i #10 of 120; 2010 Utah State #23 of 120; 2010 San José State #40 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #68 of 120; 2010 Nevada #77 of 120; 2010 Boise State #96 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 24 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 24.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #90
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Hawai'i #25 of 120; 2010 Louisiana Tech #39 of 120; 2010 San José State #40 of 120; 2010 Idaho #76 of 120; 2010 Utah State #90 of 120; 2010 Nevada #104 of 120; 2010 Boise State #116 of 120; 2010 Fresno State #117 of 120. Marked: 2010 New Mexico State, ranked 96 of 120. Western Athletic median rank 90.