THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

New Mexico StateAggies

Season
‹
›Current

FBS Independents

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

FBS Independents, 2013

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013New Mexico State2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 125 teams · 382.1 yds/g · 4,585 yds)#104 (of 125 teams · 20.9 pts/g · 251 points)#125 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 549.5 yds/g allowed · 6,594 yds)#122 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 44.6 pts/g allowed · 535 points)#120 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -23.7 /g · -284 on the season)#97 (of 125 teams · -6 on the season · 20 taken, 26 given · -0.50 /g)#62 (of 125 teams · 30:07 /g · 6h 01m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#70 (of 125 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.172 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#81 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#117 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 125 teams · 0.946 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 125 teams · 0.966 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 6 FBS Independents teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#68 (Total offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #14–#91. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#74 (Scoring offense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #35–#117. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#58 (Total defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #31–#125. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring defense: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #22–#125. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#54 (Point margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #36–#125. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#61 (Turnover margin: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #12–#111. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#38 (Possession: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #15–#92. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#50 (Offensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #23–#100. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#93 (Defensive EPA: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #15–#118. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #9–#118. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#96 (Defensive success rate: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #11–#120. 0 of 6 in the top 10.)#54 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #10–#123. 1 of 6 in the top 10.)#58 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range #4–#80. 2 of 6 in the top 10.)
2013Notre Dame9–42 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 125 teams · 405.9 yds/g · 5,276 yds)#74 (of 125 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 354 points)#31 (of 125 teams · 366.1 yds/g allowed · 4,760 yds)#27 (of 125 teams · 22.4 pts/g allowed · 291 points)#54 (of 125 teams · +4.8 /g · +63 on the season)#61 (of 125 teams · +0 on the season · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g)#91 (of 125 teams · 29:04 /g · 6h 18m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 125 teams · 0.074 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 125 teams · 0.066 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#60 (of 125 teams · 43% of plays successful)#96 (of 125 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#26 (of 125 teams · 0.993 average PPA on successful plays)#4 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.818 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Army3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#80 (of 125 teams · 387.3 yds/g · 4,648 yds)#93 (of 125 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 293 points)#72 (of 125 teams · 410.8 yds/g allowed · 4,930 yds)#92 (of 125 teams · 31.6 pts/g allowed · 379 points)#96 (of 125 teams · -7.2 /g · -86 on the season)#61 (of 125 teams · +0 on the season · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g)#33 (of 125 teams · 31:42 /g · 6h 20m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 125 teams · 0.130 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#93 (of 125 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#48 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#92 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#107 (of 125 teams · 0.872 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 125 teams · 0.969 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013BYU8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 125 teams · 493.6 yds/g · 6,417 yds)#55 (of 125 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 392 points)#48 (of 125 teams · 378.9 yds/g allowed · 4,925 yds)#22 (of 125 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#39 (of 125 teams · +8.1 /g · +105 on the season)#48 (of 125 teams · +2 on the season · 23 taken, 21 given · +0.15 /g)#92 (of 125 teams · 29:00 /g · 6h 17m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 125 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 125 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#74 (of 125 teams · 42% of plays successful)#11 (of 125 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#54 (of 125 teams · 0.962 average PPA on successful plays)#80 (of 125 teams · 0.972 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Navy9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 125 teams · 411.3 yds/g · 5,347 yds)#35 (of 125 teams · 33.5 pts/g · 436 points)#58 (of 125 teams · 394.8 yds/g allowed · 5,132 yds)#40 (of 125 teams · 24.4 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#36 (of 125 teams · +9.2 /g · +119 on the season)#12 (of 125 teams · +12 on the season · 22 taken, 10 given · +0.92 /g)#38 (of 125 teams · 31:33 /g · 6h 50m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 125 teams · 0.141 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 125 teams · 0.126 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 49% of plays successful)#120 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.796 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.822 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Idaho1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 6 FBS Independents teams in 2013. Range 0–2.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#91 (of 125 teams · 368.3 yds/g · 4,420 yds)#117 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 18.2 pts/g · 218 points)#122 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 527.6 yds/g allowed · 6,331 yds)#125 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 46.8 pts/g allowed · 561 points)#125 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -28.6 /g · -343 on the season)#111 (of 125 teams · -8 on the season · 19 taken, 27 given · -0.67 /g)#15 (of 125 teams · 32:45 /g · 6h 33m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 125 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 125 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#118 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 37% of plays successful)#118 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 1.038 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 125 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

FBS Independents, 20132013 New Mexico StateFBS Independents medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #68
Total offense. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 BYU #14 of 125; 2013 Navy #62 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #68 of 125; 2013 Army #80 of 125; 2013 Idaho #91 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 82 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 68.
Scoring offensemedian #74
Scoring offense. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Navy #35 of 125; 2013 BYU #55 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #74 of 125; 2013 Army #93 of 125; 2013 Idaho #117 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 104 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 74.
Total defensemedian #58
Total defense. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Notre Dame #31 of 125; 2013 BYU #48 of 125; 2013 Navy #58 of 125; 2013 Army #72 of 125; 2013 Idaho #122 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 125 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 58.
Scoring defensemedian #40
Scoring defense. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 BYU #22 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #27 of 125; 2013 Navy #40 of 125; 2013 Army #92 of 125; 2013 Idaho #125 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 122 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 40.
Point marginmedian #54
Point margin. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Navy #36 of 125; 2013 BYU #39 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #54 of 125; 2013 Army #96 of 125; 2013 Idaho #125 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 120 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 54.
Turnover marginmedian #61
Turnover margin. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Navy #12 of 125; 2013 BYU #48 of 125; 2013 Army #61 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #61 of 125; 2013 Idaho #111 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 97 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 61.
Possessionmedian #38
Possession. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Idaho #15 of 125; 2013 Army #33 of 125; 2013 Navy #38 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #91 of 125; 2013 BYU #92 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 62 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 38.
Returning passing
Returning passing. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #50
Offensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Navy #23 of 125; 2013 Army #29 of 125; 2013 BYU #50 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #71 of 125; 2013 Idaho #100 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 70 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 50.
Defensive EPAmedian #93
Defensive EPA. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 BYU #15 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #51 of 125; 2013 Army #93 of 125; 2013 Navy #103 of 125; 2013 Idaho #114 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 118 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 93.
Offensive success ratemedian #60
Offensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Navy #9 of 125; 2013 Army #48 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #60 of 125; 2013 BYU #74 of 125; 2013 Idaho #118 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 81 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 60.
Defensive success ratemedian #96
Defensive success rate. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 BYU #11 of 125; 2013 Army #92 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #96 of 125; 2013 Idaho #118 of 125; 2013 Navy #120 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 117 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 96.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #54
Offensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Idaho #10 of 125; 2013 Notre Dame #26 of 125; 2013 BYU #54 of 125; 2013 Army #107 of 125; 2013 Navy #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 64 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 54.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #58
Defensive explosiveness. FBS Independents, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Notre Dame #4 of 125; 2013 Navy #5 of 125; 2013 Idaho #58 of 125; 2013 Army #77 of 125; 2013 BYU #80 of 125. Marked: 2013 New Mexico State, ranked 75 of 125. FBS Independents median rank 58.