Metrics

Old DominionMonarchs

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2017

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Old Dominion570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#114 (of 130 teams · 332.3 yds/g · 3,988 yards)#114 (of 130 teams · 20.7 pts/g · 248 points)#93 (of 130 teams · 427.7 yds/g allowed · 5,132 yards)#92 (of 130 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#111 (of 130 teams · -11.0 /g · -132 on the season)#93 (of 130 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.33 /g)#92 (of 130 teams · 28:38 /g · 5h 44m on the season)#107 (of 130 teams · 6% of last season's passing production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 67% of last season's receiving production returning)#32 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's rushing production returning)#108 (of 130 teams · 331.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#119 (of 130 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 130 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#126 (of 130 teams · 36% of plays successful)#84 (of 130 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#78 (of 130 teams · 1.176 average PPA on successful plays)#72 (of 130 teams · 1.222 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 14 Conference USA teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#73 (Total offense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #9–#130. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#86 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #8–#130. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Total defense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #5–#111. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#55 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #8–#119. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#73 (Point margin: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #10–#129. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#93 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #5–#129. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#73 (Possession: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #9–#123. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Returning passing: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #1–#127. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #9–#124. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#80 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #2–#111. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#106 (Team talent: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #75–#127. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#62 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #5–#130. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #15–#126. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#72 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #12–#130. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#71 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #10–#128. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#60 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #15–#120. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#71 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range #3–#115. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)
2017Charlotte1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#124 (of 130 teams · 303.2 yds/g · 3,638 yards)#128 (of 130 teams · 14.2 pts/g · 170 points)#111 (of 130 teams · 454.6 yds/g allowed · 5,455 yards)#103 (of 130 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 393 points)#122 (of 130 teams · -18.6 /g · -223 on the season)#116 (of 130 teams · -9 on the season · 11 taken, 20 given · -0.75 /g)#123 (of 130 teams · 26:34 /g · 5h 19m on the season)#78 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's passing production returning)#62 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#95 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#121 (of 130 teams · 283.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#128 (of 130 teams · -0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 130 teams · 0.235 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#128 (of 130 teams · 34% of plays successful)#128 (of 130 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 130 teams · 1.236 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.020 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Florida Atlantic1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 498.4 yds/g · 6,977 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 40.6 pts/g · 568 points)#64 (of 130 teams · 389.6 yds/g allowed · 5,454 yards)#34 (of 130 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +17.9 /g · +250 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +13 on the season · 26 taken, 13 given · +0.93 /g)#115 (of 130 teams · 27:28 /g · 6h 24m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 90% of last season's receiving production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#75 (of 130 teams · 470.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 0.312 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#60 (of 130 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#60 (of 130 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 130 teams · 1.284 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 130 teams · 1.181 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Florida International850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#73 (of 130 teams · 391.9 yds/g · 5,095 yards)#86 (of 130 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 333 points)#84 (of 130 teams · 414.9 yds/g allowed · 5,393 yards)#80 (of 130 teams · 28.5 pts/g allowed · 370 points)#89 (of 130 teams · -2.9 /g · -37 on the season)#85 (of 130 teams · -3 on the season · 18 taken, 21 given · -0.23 /g)#46 (of 130 teams · 30:45 /g · 6h 40m on the season)#12 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#28 (of 130 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#106 (of 130 teams · 334.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 130 teams · 0.165 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#105 (of 130 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#102 (of 130 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#73 (of 130 teams · 1.193 average PPA on successful plays)#83 (of 130 teams · 1.242 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Louisiana Tech760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 (of 130 teams · 403.0 yds/g · 5,239 yards)#48 (of 130 teams · 30.5 pts/g · 396 points)#60 (of 130 teams · 385.5 yds/g allowed · 5,012 yards)#54 (of 130 teams · 25.4 pts/g allowed · 330 points)#52 (of 130 teams · +5.1 /g · +66 on the season)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · +13 on the season · 28 taken, 15 given · +1.00 /g)#64 (of 130 teams · 30:11 /g · 6h 32m on the season)#127 (of 130 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#114 (of 130 teams · 34% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 130 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#86 (of 130 teams · 394.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 130 teams · 0.198 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 130 teams · 0.105 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#113 (of 130 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 130 teams · 1.089 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 1.062 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Marshall850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#92 (of 130 teams · 379.9 yds/g · 4,938 yards)#79 (of 130 teams · 26.7 pts/g · 347 points)#28 (of 130 teams · 341.7 yds/g allowed · 4,442 yards)#17 (of 130 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 259 points)#42 (of 130 teams · +6.8 /g · +88 on the season)#111 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 15 taken, 23 given · -0.62 /g)#40 (of 130 teams · 31:02 /g · 6h 43m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#124 (of 130 teams · 21% of last season's receiving production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#77 (of 130 teams · 445.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 130 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 130 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#21 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 130 teams · 1.307 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 130 teams · 1.233 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Middle Tennessee760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 (of 130 teams · 393.4 yds/g · 5,114 yards)#87 (of 130 teams · 25.5 pts/g · 332 points)#35 (of 130 teams · 357.3 yds/g allowed · 4,645 yards)#46 (of 130 teams · 24.7 pts/g allowed · 321 points)#73 (of 130 teams · +0.8 /g · +11 on the season)#122 (of 130 teams · -12 on the season · 11 taken, 23 given · -0.92 /g)#81 (of 130 teams · 29:27 /g · 6h 23m on the season)#26 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#37 (of 130 teams · 71% of last season's receiving production returning)#105 (of 130 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#101 (of 130 teams · 344.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 130 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 130 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#39 (of 130 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 130 teams · 1.281 average PPA on successful plays)#21 (of 130 teams · 1.100 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017North Texas950 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 130 teams · 454.7 yds/g · 6,366 yards)#19 (of 130 teams · 35.5 pts/g · 497 points)#97 (of 130 teams · 431.4 yds/g allowed · 6,040 yards)#111 (of 130 teams · 35.0 pts/g allowed · 490 points)#74 (of 130 teams · +0.5 /g · +7 on the season)#119 (of 130 teams · -11 on the season · 16 taken, 27 given · -0.79 /g)#62 (of 130 teams · 30:16 /g · 7h 04m on the season)#77 (of 130 teams · 61% of last season's passing production returning)#118 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's receiving production returning)#85 (of 130 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)#116 (of 130 teams · 303.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 130 teams · 0.218 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#107 (of 130 teams · 0.220 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 130 teams · 47% of plays successful)#71 (of 130 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#60 (of 130 teams · 1.218 average PPA on successful plays)#115 (of 130 teams · 1.323 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Rice1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#116 (of 130 teams · 331.8 yds/g · 3,982 yards)#125 (of 130 teams · 16.3 pts/g · 195 points)#90 (of 130 teams · 425.8 yds/g allowed · 5,110 yards)#113 (of 130 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 429 points)#123 (of 130 teams · -19.5 /g · -234 on the season)#129 (of 130 teams · -23 on the season · 6 taken, 29 given · -1.92 /g)#73 (of 130 teams · 29:36 /g · 5h 55m on the season)#100 (of 130 teams · 16% of last season's passing production returning)#112 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving production returning)#96 (of 130 teams · 43% of last season's rushing production returning)#100 (of 130 teams · 345.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 130 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#126 (of 130 teams · 0.293 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 130 teams · 40% of plays successful)#123 (of 130 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#48 (of 130 teams · 1.238 average PPA on successful plays)#71 (of 130 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Southern Miss850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#43 (of 130 teams · 424.6 yds/g · 5,520 yards)#58 (of 130 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 379 points)#20 (of 130 teams · 331.9 yds/g allowed · 4,315 yards)#45 (of 130 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#54 (of 130 teams · +4.7 /g · +61 on the season)#72 (of 130 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.08 /g)#60 (of 130 teams · 30:18 /g · 6h 34m on the season)#101 (of 130 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#25 (of 130 teams · 75% of last season's receiving production returning)#26 (of 130 teams · 89% of last season's rushing production returning)#87 (of 130 teams · 394.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 130 teams · 0.171 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#30 (of 130 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#23 (of 130 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 130 teams · 1.235 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 130 teams · 1.264 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017UAB850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#98 (of 130 teams · 363.2 yds/g · 4,722 yards)#72 (of 130 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 361 points)#41 (of 130 teams · 365.6 yds/g allowed · 4,753 yards)#55 (of 130 teams · 25.6 pts/g allowed · 333 points)#66 (of 130 teams · +2.1 /g · +28 on the season)#40 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 19 taken, 15 given · +0.31 /g)#93 (of 130 teams · 28:36 /g · 6h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning)#127 (of 130 teams · 170.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 130 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#46 (of 130 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#66 (of 130 teams · 43% of plays successful)#36 (of 130 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#91 (of 130 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#95 (of 130 teams · 1.265 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017UTEP0120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#130 (of 130 teams · 230.5 yds/g · 2,766 yards)#130 (of 130 teams · 11.8 pts/g · 141 points)#108 (of 130 teams · 446.6 yds/g allowed · 5,359 yards)#119 (of 130 teams · 36.8 pts/g allowed · 441 points)#129 (of 130 teams · -25.0 /g · -300 on the season)#103 (of 130 teams · -6 on the season · 14 taken, 20 given · -0.50 /g)#110 (of 130 teams · 27:47 /g · 5h 33m on the season)#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#101 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#111 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's rushing production returning)#124 (of 130 teams · 264.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#130 (of 130 teams · -0.083 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#118 (of 130 teams · 0.258 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#130 (of 130 teams · 33% of plays successful)#120 (of 130 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 130 teams · 1.154 average PPA on successful plays)#58 (of 130 teams · 1.186 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017UTSA650 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#83 (of 130 teams · 386.8 yds/g · 4,255 yards)#104 (of 130 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 259 points)#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 287.8 yds/g allowed · 3,166 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 187 points)#44 (of 130 teams · +6.5 /g · +72 on the season)#34 (of 130 teams · +4 on the season · 22 taken, 18 given · +0.36 /g)#9 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 33:13 /g · 6h 05m on the season)#62 (of 130 teams · 85% of last season's passing production returning)#21 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's receiving production returning)#80 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's rushing production returning)#119 (of 130 teams · 291.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 130 teams · 0.113 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#15 (of 130 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#72 (of 130 teams · 42% of plays successful)#10 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#116 (of 130 teams · 1.097 average PPA on successful plays)#107 (of 130 teams · 1.295 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2017Western Kentucky670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Conference USA teams in 2017. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 (of 130 teams · 395.9 yds/g · 5,146 yards)#89 (of 130 teams · 25.5 pts/g · 331 points)#53 (of 130 teams · 377.1 yds/g allowed · 4,903 yards)#66 (of 130 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 349 points)#83 (of 130 teams · -1.4 /g · -18 on the season)#111 (of 130 teams · -8 on the season · 15 taken, 23 given · -0.62 /g)#82 (of 130 teams · 29:23 /g · 6h 22m on the season)#54 (of 130 teams · 91% of last season's passing production returning)#120 (of 130 teams · 27% of last season's receiving production returning)#93 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's rushing production returning)#107 (of 130 teams · 332.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 (of 130 teams · 0.154 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 130 teams · 0.160 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 130 teams · 46% of plays successful)#77 (of 130 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#83 (of 130 teams · 1.163 average PPA on successful plays)#48 (of 130 teams · 1.177 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20172017 Old DominionConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #73
Total offense. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida Atlantic #9 of 130; 2017 North Texas #24 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #43 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #62 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #69 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #71 of 130; 2017 Florida International #73 of 130; 2017 UTSA #83 of 130; 2017 Marshall #92 of 130; 2017 UAB #98 of 130; 2017 Rice #116 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #124 of 130; 2017 UTEP #130 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 114 of 130. Conference USA median rank 73.
Scoring offensemedian #86
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida Atlantic #8 of 130; 2017 North Texas #19 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #48 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #58 of 130; 2017 UAB #72 of 130; 2017 Marshall #79 of 130; 2017 Florida International #86 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #87 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #89 of 130; 2017 UTSA #104 of 130; 2017 Rice #125 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #128 of 130; 2017 UTEP #130 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 114 of 130. Conference USA median rank 86.
Total defensemedian #60
Total defense. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 UTSA #5 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #20 of 130; 2017 Marshall #28 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #35 of 130; 2017 UAB #41 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #53 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #60 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #64 of 130; 2017 Florida International #84 of 130; 2017 Rice #90 of 130; 2017 North Texas #97 of 130; 2017 UTEP #108 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #111 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 93 of 130. Conference USA median rank 60.
Scoring defensemedian #55
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 UTSA #8 of 130; 2017 Marshall #17 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #34 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #45 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #46 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #54 of 130; 2017 UAB #55 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #66 of 130; 2017 Florida International #80 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #103 of 130; 2017 North Texas #111 of 130; 2017 Rice #113 of 130; 2017 UTEP #119 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 92 of 130. Conference USA median rank 55.
Point marginmedian #73
Point margin. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida Atlantic #10 of 130; 2017 Marshall #42 of 130; 2017 UTSA #44 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #52 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #54 of 130; 2017 UAB #66 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #73 of 130; 2017 North Texas #74 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #83 of 130; 2017 Florida International #89 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #122 of 130; 2017 Rice #123 of 130; 2017 UTEP #129 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 111 of 130. Conference USA median rank 73.
Turnover marginmedian #93
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Louisiana Tech #5 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #9 of 130; 2017 UTSA #34 of 130; 2017 UAB #40 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #72 of 130; 2017 Florida International #85 of 130; 2017 UTEP #103 of 130; 2017 Marshall #111 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #111 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #116 of 130; 2017 North Texas #119 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #122 of 130; 2017 Rice #129 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 93 of 130. Conference USA median rank 93.
Possessionmedian #73
Possession. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 UTSA #9 of 130; 2017 Marshall #40 of 130; 2017 Florida International #46 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #60 of 130; 2017 North Texas #62 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #64 of 130; 2017 Rice #73 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #81 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #82 of 130; 2017 UAB #93 of 130; 2017 UTEP #110 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #115 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #123 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 92 of 130. Conference USA median rank 73.
Returning passingmedian #62
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida Atlantic #1 of 130; 2017 Marshall #1 of 130; 2017 Florida International #12 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #26 of 130; 2017 UTEP #34 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #54 of 130; 2017 UTSA #62 of 130; 2017 North Texas #77 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #78 of 130; 2017 Rice #100 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #101 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #127 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 107 of 130. Conference USA median rank 62.
Returning receivingmedian #62
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida Atlantic #9 of 130; 2017 UTSA #21 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #25 of 130; 2017 Florida International #28 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #37 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #62 of 130; 2017 UTEP #101 of 130; 2017 Rice #112 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #114 of 130; 2017 North Texas #118 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #120 of 130; 2017 Marshall #124 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 43 of 130. Conference USA median rank 62.
Returning rushingmedian #80
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida International #2 of 130; 2017 Marshall #6 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #9 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #26 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #43 of 130; 2017 UTSA #80 of 130; 2017 North Texas #85 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #93 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #95 of 130; 2017 Rice #96 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #105 of 130; 2017 UTEP #111 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 32 of 130. Conference USA median rank 80.
Team talentmedian #106
Team talent. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida Atlantic #75 of 130; 2017 Marshall #77 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #86 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #87 of 130; 2017 Rice #100 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #101 of 130; 2017 Florida International #106 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #107 of 130; 2017 North Texas #116 of 130; 2017 UTSA #119 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #121 of 130; 2017 UTEP #124 of 130; 2017 UAB #127 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 108 of 130. Conference USA median rank 106.
Offensive EPAmedian #62
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida Atlantic #5 of 130; 2017 North Texas #29 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #40 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #53 of 130; 2017 Florida International #55 of 130; 2017 UAB #57 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #62 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #74 of 130; 2017 Marshall #80 of 130; 2017 UTSA #90 of 130; 2017 Rice #109 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #128 of 130; 2017 UTEP #130 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 119 of 130. Conference USA median rank 62.
Defensive EPAmedian #60
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 UTSA #15 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #26 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #30 of 130; 2017 Marshall #32 of 130; 2017 UAB #46 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #49 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #60 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #75 of 130; 2017 Florida International #105 of 130; 2017 North Texas #107 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #112 of 130; 2017 UTEP #118 of 130; 2017 Rice #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 89 of 130. Conference USA median rank 60.
Offensive success ratemedian #72
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Florida Atlantic #12 of 130; 2017 North Texas #13 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #16 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #27 of 130; 2017 Florida International #65 of 130; 2017 UAB #66 of 130; 2017 UTSA #72 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #77 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #79 of 130; 2017 Rice #97 of 130; 2017 Marshall #106 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #128 of 130; 2017 UTEP #130 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 126 of 130. Conference USA median rank 72.
Defensive success ratemedian #71
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 UTSA #10 of 130; 2017 Marshall #21 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #23 of 130; 2017 UAB #36 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #39 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #60 of 130; 2017 North Texas #71 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #77 of 130; 2017 Florida International #102 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #113 of 130; 2017 UTEP #120 of 130; 2017 Rice #123 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #128 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 84 of 130. Conference USA median rank 71.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #60
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Marshall #15 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #25 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #29 of 130; 2017 Rice #48 of 130; 2017 Charlotte #50 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #52 of 130; 2017 North Texas #60 of 130; 2017 Florida International #73 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #83 of 130; 2017 UTEP #87 of 130; 2017 UAB #91 of 130; 2017 UTSA #116 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #120 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 78 of 130. Conference USA median rank 60.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #71
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Charlotte #3 of 130; 2017 Louisiana Tech #7 of 130; 2017 Middle Tennessee #21 of 130; 2017 Western Kentucky #48 of 130; 2017 Florida Atlantic #54 of 130; 2017 UTEP #58 of 130; 2017 Rice #71 of 130; 2017 Marshall #81 of 130; 2017 Florida International #83 of 130; 2017 Southern Miss #93 of 130; 2017 UAB #95 of 130; 2017 UTSA #107 of 130; 2017 North Texas #115 of 130. Marked: 2017 Old Dominion, ranked 72 of 130. Conference USA median rank 71.