Metrics

Ole MissRebels

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2009

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2009Ole Miss940 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#44 (of 120 teams · 402.4 yds/g · 5,231 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 384 points)#21 (of 120 teams · 314.7 yds/g allowed · 4,091 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 17.7 pts/g allowed · 230 points)#19 (of 120 teams · +11.8 /g · +154 on the season)#101 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 24 taken, 31 given · -0.54 /g)#51 (of 120 teams · 18:47 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.027 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 120 teams · -0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#21 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 120 teams · 0.928 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.968 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 SEC teams in 20091 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#60 (Total offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #6–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #9–#113. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#26 (Total defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #2–#89. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #2–#79. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Point margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #3–#97. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Turnover margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #4–#118. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#60 (Possession: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #7–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#42 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #3–#120. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#24 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #3–#69. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #6–#117. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #3–#74. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #8–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range #5–#97. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2009Alabama1401 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 120 teams · 403.0 yds/g · 5,642 yards)#22 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 449 points)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 244.4 yds/g allowed · 3,421 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 11.7 pts/g allowed · 164 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +20.4 /g · +285 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19 on the season · 31 taken, 12 given · +1.36 /g)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:22 /g · 4h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.807 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.941 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Arkansas850 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 120 teams · 427.3 yds/g · 5,555 yards)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 36.0 pts/g · 468 points)#89 (of 120 teams · 401.1 yds/g allowed · 5,215 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#20 (of 120 teams · +10.9 /g · +142 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.15 /g)#70 (of 120 teams · 18:20 /g · 3h 58m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.090 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#70 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#72 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 120 teams · 1.002 average PPA on successful plays)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.883 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Auburn851 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#16 (of 120 teams · 431.8 yds/g · 5,613 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 433 points)#67 (of 120 teams · 374.4 yds/g allowed · 4,867 yards)#79 (of 120 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 358 points)#43 (of 120 teams · +5.8 /g · +75 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 25 taken, 22 given · +0.23 /g)#89 (of 120 teams · 17:45 /g · 3h 51m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.080 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#57 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.930 average PPA on successful plays)#33 (of 120 teams · 0.884 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Florida1314 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 457.9 yds/g · 6,410 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 502 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 252.6 yds/g allowed · 3,536 yards)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 12.4 pts/g allowed · 174 points)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +23.4 /g · +328 on the season)#24 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 23 taken, 16 given · +0.50 /g)#60 (of 120 teams · 18:37 /g · 4h 21m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.169 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 120 teams · -0.009 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 48% of plays successful)#17 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.862 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Georgia855 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 120 teams · 362.1 yds/g · 4,708 yards)#51 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#38 (of 120 teams · 339.4 yds/g allowed · 4,412 yards)#64 (of 120 teams · 25.9 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#58 (of 120 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season)#118 (of 120 teams · -16 on the season · 12 taken, 28 given · -1.23 /g)#83 (of 120 teams · 17:52 /g · 3h 52m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#44 (of 120 teams · 0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#40 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.016 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.925 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Kentucky760 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 120 teams · 331.5 yds/g · 4,310 yards)#70 (of 120 teams · 26.1 pts/g · 339 points)#53 (of 120 teams · 359.7 yds/g allowed · 4,676 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#56 (of 120 teams · +3.4 /g · +44 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 22 taken, 20 given · +0.15 /g)#65 (of 120 teams · 18:24 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.008 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.053 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#100 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#51 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#97 (of 120 teams · 0.974 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009LSU943 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#112 (of 120 teams · 304.5 yds/g · 3,959 yards)#76 (of 120 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 323 points)#26 (of 120 teams · 327.6 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 16.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points)#28 (of 120 teams · +8.6 /g · +112 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 18 taken, 14 given · +0.31 /g)#106 (of 120 teams · 17:17 /g · 3h 45m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 120 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 120 teams · -0.025 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#65 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#29 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.901 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Mississippi State570 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#65 (of 120 teams · 371.9 yds/g · 4,463 yards)#72 (of 120 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 307 points)#58 (of 120 teams · 366.0 yds/g allowed · 4,392 yards)#71 (of 120 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 321 points)#76 (of 120 teams · -1.2 /g · -14 on the season)#87 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 25 taken, 30 given · -0.42 /g)#39 (of 120 teams · 19:12 /g · 3h 50m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.019 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#21 (of 120 teams · -0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#50 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#74 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.897 average PPA on successful plays)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.802 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009South Carolina761 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 120 teams · 347.4 yds/g · 4,516 yards)#102 (of 120 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 268 points)#15 (of 120 teams · 300.7 yds/g allowed · 3,909 yards)#24 (of 120 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#68 (of 120 teams · +0.2 /g · +3 on the season)#80 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.31 /g)#28 (of 120 teams · 19:21 /g · 4h 12m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#73 (of 120 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#20 (of 120 teams · -0.019 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#19 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.983 average PPA on successful plays)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.917 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Tennessee762 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 120 teams · 383.6 yds/g · 4,987 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 381 points)#22 (of 120 teams · 318.8 yds/g allowed · 4,144 yards)#38 (of 120 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#35 (of 120 teams · +7.1 /g · +92 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 24 taken, 21 given · +0.23 /g)#49 (of 120 teams · 18:49 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.071 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.026 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#68 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.938 average PPA on successful plays)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.824 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2009Vanderbilt2100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2009. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 120 teams · 306.3 yds/g · 3,676 yards)#113 (of 120 teams · 16.3 pts/g · 196 points)#56 (of 120 teams · 362.8 yds/g allowed · 4,353 yards)#46 (of 120 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#97 (of 120 teams · -7.0 /g · -84 on the season)#44 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 19 taken, 16 given · +0.25 /g)#120 (of 120 teams · 15:51 /g · 3h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 120 teams · -0.049 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#117 (of 120 teams · 35% of plays successful)#59 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.926 average PPA on successful plays)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.887 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20092009 Ole MissSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #60
Total offense. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #6 of 120; 2009 Auburn #16 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #20 of 120; 2009 Alabama #42 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #60 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #65 of 120; 2009 Georgia #75 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #82 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #93 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #110 of 120; 2009 LSU #112 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 44 of 120. SEC median rank 60.
Scoring offensemedian #43
Scoring offense. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Arkansas #9 of 120; 2009 Florida #10 of 120; 2009 Auburn #17 of 120; 2009 Alabama #22 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #43 of 120; 2009 Georgia #51 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #70 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #72 of 120; 2009 LSU #76 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #102 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #113 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 39 of 120. SEC median rank 43.
Total defensemedian #26
Total defense. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #2 of 120; 2009 Florida #4 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #15 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #22 of 120; 2009 LSU #26 of 120; 2009 Georgia #38 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #53 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #56 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #58 of 120; 2009 Auburn #67 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #89 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 21 of 120. SEC median rank 26.
Scoring defensemedian #38
Scoring defense. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #2 of 120; 2009 Florida #4 of 120; 2009 LSU #11 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #24 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #38 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #43 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #46 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #58 of 120; 2009 Georgia #64 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #71 of 120; 2009 Auburn #79 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 15 of 120. SEC median rank 38.
Point marginmedian #35
Point margin. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #3 of 120; 2009 Alabama #5 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #20 of 120; 2009 LSU #28 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #35 of 120; 2009 Auburn #43 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #56 of 120; 2009 Georgia #58 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #68 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #76 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #97 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 19 of 120. SEC median rank 35.
Turnover marginmedian #45
Turnover margin. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #4 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #6 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 LSU #37 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #44 of 120; 2009 Auburn #45 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #45 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #52 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #80 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #87 of 120; 2009 Georgia #118 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 101 of 120. SEC median rank 45.
Possessionmedian #60
Possession. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #7 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #28 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #39 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #49 of 120; 2009 Florida #60 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #65 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #70 of 120; 2009 Georgia #83 of 120; 2009 Auburn #89 of 120; 2009 LSU #106 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #120 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 51 of 120. SEC median rank 60.
Returning passing
Returning passing. SEC, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. SEC, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. SEC, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. SEC, 2009, best rank first: . Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #42
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #3 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #25 of 120; 2009 Auburn #32 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #38 of 120; 2009 Georgia #39 of 120; 2009 Alabama #42 of 120; 2009 LSU #60 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #73 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #84 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #92 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #120 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 78 of 120. SEC median rank 42.
Defensive EPAmedian #24
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #3 of 120; 2009 LSU #18 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #20 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #21 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 Auburn #27 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #37 of 120; 2009 Georgia #44 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #47 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #65 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #69 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 12 of 120. SEC median rank 24.
Offensive success ratemedian #51
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Florida #6 of 120; 2009 Alabama #20 of 120; 2009 Auburn #27 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #33 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #50 of 120; 2009 LSU #65 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #70 of 120; 2009 Georgia #86 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #97 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #100 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #117 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 51 of 120. SEC median rank 51.
Defensive success ratemedian #40
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Alabama #3 of 120; 2009 Florida #17 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #19 of 120; 2009 LSU #29 of 120; 2009 Georgia #40 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #51 of 120; 2009 Auburn #57 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #59 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #68 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #72 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #74 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 21 of 120. SEC median rank 40.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #53
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Georgia #8 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #13 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #21 of 120; 2009 Florida #46 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #47 of 120; 2009 Auburn #53 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #56 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #70 of 120; 2009 Mississippi State #76 of 120; 2009 LSU #87 of 120; 2009 Alabama #114 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 55 of 120. SEC median rank 53.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #35
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2009, best rank first: 2009 Mississippi State #5 of 120; 2009 Tennessee #12 of 120; 2009 Florida #24 of 120; 2009 Arkansas #32 of 120; 2009 Auburn #33 of 120; 2009 Vanderbilt #35 of 120; 2009 LSU #45 of 120; 2009 South Carolina #59 of 120; 2009 Georgia #65 of 120; 2009 Alabama #75 of 120; 2009 Kentucky #97 of 120. Marked: 2009 Ole Miss, ranked 93 of 120. SEC median rank 35.