Metrics

Ole MissRebels

Season
Current

SEC

SEC, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Ole Miss480 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 120 teams · 399.8 yds/g · 4,798 yards)#41 (of 120 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 367 points)#81 (of 120 teams · 399.2 yds/g allowed · 4,790 yards)#107 (of 120 teams · 35.2 pts/g allowed · 422 points)#84 (of 120 teams · -4.6 /g · -55 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 18 taken, 24 given · -0.50 /g)#62 (of 120 teams · 18:41 /g · 3h 44m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.021 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.069 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#90 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#59 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#29 (of 120 teams · 0.958 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 120 teams · 1.020 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 SEC teams in 20101 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#43 (Total offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #7–#110. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Scoring offense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #7–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Total defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #5–#93. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Scoring defense: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #3–#107. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#31 (Point margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #6–#109. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Turnover margin: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #12–#90. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Possession: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #25–#105. 0 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#39 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #3–#120. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #14–#89. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#35 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #4–#120. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #7–#78. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#36 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #3–#111. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#93 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range #6–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2010Alabama1032 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#22 (of 120 teams · 444.1 yds/g · 5,773 yards)#18 (of 120 teams · 35.7 pts/g · 464 points)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 286.4 yds/g allowed · 3,723 yards)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 13.5 pts/g allowed · 176 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22.1 /g · +288 on the season)#12 (of 120 teams · +12 on the season · 26 taken, 14 given · +0.92 /g)#33 (of 120 teams · 19:19 /g · 4h 11m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.167 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 120 teams · -0.018 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.873 average PPA on successful plays)#111 (of 120 teams · 1.005 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Arkansas1030 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 482.5 yds/g · 6,273 yards)#17 (of 120 teams · 36.5 pts/g · 474 points)#36 (of 120 teams · 347.9 yds/g allowed · 4,523 yards)#47 (of 120 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#18 (of 120 teams · +13.1 /g · +170 on the season)#52 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 25 taken, 24 given · +0.08 /g)#72 (of 120 teams · 18:22 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 120 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#35 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#43 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.037 average PPA on successful plays)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.980 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Auburn1401 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 499.2 yds/g · 6,989 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.2 pts/g · 577 points)#60 (of 120 teams · 368.4 yds/g allowed · 5,157 yards)#53 (of 120 teams · 24.1 pts/g allowed · 337 points)#11 (of 120 teams · +17.1 /g · +240 on the season)#34 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.36 /g)#50 (of 120 teams · 18:54 /g · 4h 24m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.172 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 50% of plays successful)#78 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.890 average PPA on successful plays)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.929 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Florida854 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#82 (of 120 teams · 350.9 yds/g · 4,561 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 306.5 yds/g allowed · 3,985 yards)#29 (of 120 teams · 21.3 pts/g allowed · 277 points)#33 (of 120 teams · +8.5 /g · +111 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 29 taken, 27 given · +0.15 /g)#52 (of 120 teams · 18:52 /g · 4h 05m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#14 (of 120 teams · -0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#80 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#40 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.812 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Georgia675 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#56 (of 120 teams · 385.0 yds/g · 5,005 yards)#30 (of 120 teams · 32.1 pts/g · 417 points)#23 (of 120 teams · 328.5 yds/g allowed · 4,271 yards)#36 (of 120 teams · 22.1 pts/g allowed · 287 points)#28 (of 120 teams · +10.0 /g · +130 on the season)#19 (of 120 teams · +10 on the season · 26 taken, 16 given · +0.77 /g)#46 (of 120 teams · 18:57 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#58 (of 120 teams · 0.039 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#24 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#31 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.921 average PPA on successful plays)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.984 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Kentucky670 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#27 (of 120 teams · 427.9 yds/g · 5,562 yards)#34 (of 120 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 406 points)#45 (of 120 teams · 354.1 yds/g allowed · 4,604 yards)#72 (of 120 teams · 28.4 pts/g allowed · 369 points)#56 (of 120 teams · +2.9 /g · +37 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.31 /g)#76 (of 120 teams · 18:16 /g · 3h 57m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#23 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#65 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.946 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.983 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010LSU1123 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#86 (of 120 teams · 343.1 yds/g · 4,461 yards)#45 (of 120 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 386 points)#12 (of 120 teams · 307.1 yds/g allowed · 3,993 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 18.2 pts/g allowed · 237 points)#24 (of 120 teams · +11.5 /g · +149 on the season)#20 (of 120 teams · +9 on the season · 32 taken, 23 given · +0.69 /g)#41 (of 120 teams · 19:02 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.012 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#26 (of 120 teams · -0.002 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#51 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#52 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#111 (of 120 teams · 0.829 average PPA on successful plays)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.808 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Mississippi State940 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#42 (of 120 teams · 401.3 yds/g · 5,217 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g · 377 points)#49 (of 120 teams · 356.9 yds/g allowed · 4,639 yards)#21 (of 120 teams · 19.9 pts/g allowed · 258 points)#31 (of 120 teams · +9.2 /g · +119 on the season)#27 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 28 taken, 21 given · +0.54 /g)#25 (of 120 teams · 19:29 /g · 4h 13m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.077 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#27 (of 120 teams · -0.001 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#33 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.924 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 120 teams · 0.974 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010South Carolina951 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#47 (of 120 teams · 392.8 yds/g · 5,499 yards)#38 (of 120 teams · 30.9 pts/g · 433 points)#46 (of 120 teams · 354.4 yds/g allowed · 4,961 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 23.1 pts/g allowed · 324 points)#35 (of 120 teams · +7.8 /g · +109 on the season)#55 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 26 taken, 26 given · +0.00 /g)#36 (of 120 teams · 19:14 /g · 4h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#30 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#45 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#16 (of 120 teams · 0.982 average PPA on successful plays)#89 (of 120 teams · 0.966 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Tennessee673 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#75 (of 120 teams · 363.8 yds/g · 4,729 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 27.0 pts/g · 351 points)#69 (of 120 teams · 382.1 yds/g allowed · 4,968 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g allowed · 326 points)#61 (of 120 teams · +1.9 /g · +25 on the season)#38 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 28 taken, 24 given · +0.31 /g)#58 (of 120 teams · 18:45 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 120 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.029 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#104 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#64 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 1.038 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.937 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Vanderbilt2100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 SEC teams in 2010. Range 0–5.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 120 teams · 298.3 yds/g · 3,579 yards)#112 (of 120 teams · 16.9 pts/g · 203 points)#93 (of 120 teams · 419.3 yds/g allowed · 5,031 yards)#94 (of 120 teams · 31.2 pts/g allowed · 374 points)#109 (of 120 teams · -14.3 /g · -171 on the season)#84 (of 120 teams · -5 on the season · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.42 /g)#105 (of 120 teams · 17:24 /g · 3h 29m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#120 (of 120 teams · -0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 120 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#120 (of 120 teams · 33% of plays successful)#48 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#62 (of 120 teams · 0.922 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.975 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

SEC, 20102010 Ole MissSEC medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #43
Total offense. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Auburn #7 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #9 of 120; 2010 Alabama #22 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #27 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #42 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #47 of 120; 2010 Georgia #56 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #75 of 120; 2010 Florida #82 of 120; 2010 LSU #86 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 43 of 120. SEC median rank 43.
Scoring offensemedian #38
Scoring offense. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Auburn #7 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #17 of 120; 2010 Alabama #18 of 120; 2010 Georgia #30 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #34 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #38 of 120; 2010 Florida #43 of 120; 2010 LSU #45 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #48 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #58 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #112 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 41 of 120. SEC median rank 38.
Total defensemedian #45
Total defense. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #5 of 120; 2010 Florida #9 of 120; 2010 LSU #12 of 120; 2010 Georgia #23 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #36 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #45 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #46 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #49 of 120; 2010 Auburn #60 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #69 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #93 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 81 of 120. SEC median rank 45.
Scoring defensemedian #43
Scoring defense. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #3 of 120; 2010 LSU #11 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #21 of 120; 2010 Florida #29 of 120; 2010 Georgia #36 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #43 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #47 of 120; 2010 Auburn #53 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #56 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #72 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #94 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 107 of 120. SEC median rank 43.
Point marginmedian #31
Point margin. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #6 of 120; 2010 Auburn #11 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #18 of 120; 2010 LSU #24 of 120; 2010 Georgia #28 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #31 of 120; 2010 Florida #33 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #35 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #56 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #61 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #109 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 84 of 120. SEC median rank 31.
Turnover marginmedian #38
Turnover margin. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #12 of 120; 2010 Georgia #19 of 120; 2010 LSU #20 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #27 of 120; 2010 Auburn #34 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #38 of 120; 2010 Florida #47 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #52 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #55 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #74 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #84 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 90 of 120. SEC median rank 38.
Possessionmedian #50
Possession. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Mississippi State #25 of 120; 2010 Alabama #33 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #36 of 120; 2010 LSU #41 of 120; 2010 Georgia #46 of 120; 2010 Auburn #50 of 120; 2010 Florida #52 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #58 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #72 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #76 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 62 of 120. SEC median rank 50.
Returning passing
Returning passing. SEC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. SEC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. SEC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. SEC, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #39
Offensive EPA. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Auburn #3 of 120; 2010 Alabama #4 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #12 of 120; 2010 Georgia #20 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #22 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #39 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #40 of 120; 2010 LSU #90 of 120; 2010 Florida #93 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #95 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 77 of 120. SEC median rank 39.
Defensive EPAmedian #56
Defensive EPA. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Florida #14 of 120; 2010 Alabama #16 of 120; 2010 LSU #26 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #27 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #51 of 120; 2010 Auburn #56 of 120; 2010 Georgia #58 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #69 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #72 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #77 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #89 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 82 of 120. SEC median rank 56.
Offensive success ratemedian #35
Offensive success rate. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Auburn #4 of 120; 2010 Alabama #6 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #23 of 120; 2010 Georgia #24 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #30 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #35 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #39 of 120; 2010 LSU #51 of 120; 2010 Florida #80 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #104 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #120 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 90 of 120. SEC median rank 35.
Defensive success ratemedian #45
Defensive success rate. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Alabama #7 of 120; 2010 Georgia #31 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #33 of 120; 2010 Florida #40 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #43 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #45 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #48 of 120; 2010 LSU #52 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #64 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #65 of 120; 2010 Auburn #78 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 59 of 120. SEC median rank 45.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #36
Offensive explosiveness. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Tennessee #3 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #4 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #16 of 120; 2010 Florida #18 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #36 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #59 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #62 of 120; 2010 Georgia #64 of 120; 2010 Auburn #85 of 120; 2010 Alabama #93 of 120; 2010 LSU #111 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 29 of 120. SEC median rank 36.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #93
Defensive explosiveness. SEC, 2010, best rank first: 2010 LSU #6 of 120; 2010 Florida #8 of 120; 2010 Auburn #61 of 120; 2010 Tennessee #69 of 120; 2010 South Carolina #89 of 120; 2010 Mississippi State #93 of 120; 2010 Vanderbilt #94 of 120; 2010 Arkansas #99 of 120; 2010 Kentucky #101 of 120; 2010 Georgia #102 of 120; 2010 Alabama #111 of 120. Marked: 2010 Ole Miss, ranked 112 of 120. SEC median rank 93.