THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

OregonDucks

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-12

Pac-12, 2015

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2015Oregon9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Stanford, #25 USC)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 538.2 yds/g · 6,997 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 43.0 pts/g · 559 points)#117 (of 128 teams · 485.3 yds/g allowed · 6,309 yards)#116 (of 128 teams · 37.5 pts/g allowed · 488 points)#51 (of 128 teams · +5.5 /g · +71 on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 22 taken, 17 given · +0.38 /g)#114 (of 128 teams · 27:15 /g · 5h 54m on the season)#106 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing production returning)#14 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#20 (of 128 teams · 757.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#13 (of 128 teams · 0.281 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#102 (of 128 teams · 0.201 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#14 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#103 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#38 (of 128 teams · 1.248 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 128 teams · 1.216 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20150 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#28 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #5–#111. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#37 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #5–#115. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#83 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #31–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#70 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #13–#116. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #13–#123. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #4–#97. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#78 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #1–#126. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Returning passing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #1–#127. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#41 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #14–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #6–#124. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#29 (Team talent: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #2–#57. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#34 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #10–#106. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#73 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #16–#115. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#28 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #1–#107. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#81 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #40–#127. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#68 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #14–#122. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#53 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range #1–#127. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2015Arizona7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#16 (of 128 teams · 494.9 yds/g · 6,434 yards)#20 (of 128 teams · 37.4 pts/g · 486 points)#115 (of 128 teams · 466.8 yds/g allowed · 6,068 yards)#107 (of 128 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 465 points)#67 (of 128 teams · +1.6 /g · +21 on the season)#92 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 16 taken, 20 given · -0.31 /g)#122 (of 128 teams · 26:19 /g · 5h 42m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#21 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#53 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#45 (of 128 teams · 606.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#29 (of 128 teams · 0.231 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 128 teams · 0.229 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#33 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#89 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 128 teams · 1.294 average PPA on successful plays)#65 (of 128 teams · 1.197 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Arizona State6–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#24 (of 128 teams · 477.4 yds/g · 6,206 yards)#32 (of 128 teams · 34.6 pts/g · 450 points)#113 (of 128 teams · 463.8 yds/g allowed · 6,029 yards)#99 (of 128 teams · 33.5 pts/g allowed · 435 points)#73 (of 128 teams · +1.1 /g · +15 on the season)#51 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.15 /g)#33 (of 128 teams · 31:31 /g · 6h 50m on the season)#87 (of 128 teams · 30% of last season's passing production returning)#73 (of 128 teams · 57% of last season's receiving production returning)#54 (of 128 teams · 75% of last season's rushing production returning)#27 (of 128 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 128 teams · 0.162 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 128 teams · 0.198 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#77 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#43 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#68 (of 128 teams · 1.202 average PPA on successful plays)#127 (of 128 teams · 1.463 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015California8–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 529.1 yds/g · 6,879 yards)#17 (of 128 teams · 37.9 pts/g · 493 points)#109 (of 128 teams · 453.7 yds/g allowed · 5,898 yards)#89 (of 128 teams · 30.7 pts/g allowed · 399 points)#47 (of 128 teams · +7.2 /g · +94 on the season)#39 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 27 taken, 23 given · +0.31 /g)#81 (of 128 teams · 29:08 /g · 6h 19m on the season)#21 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#18 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's receiving production returning)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's rushing production returning)#40 (of 128 teams · 626.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 128 teams · 0.278 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#95 (of 128 teams · 0.186 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 52% of plays successful)#102 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#71 (of 128 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 128 teams · 1.147 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Colorado4–90 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 (of 128 teams · 397.0 yds/g · 5,161 yards)#97 (of 128 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 320 points)#85 (of 128 teams · 416.9 yds/g allowed · 5,420 yards)#70 (of 128 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#89 (of 128 teams · -2.9 /g · -37 on the season)#61 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#93 (of 128 teams · 28:29 /g · 6h 10m on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#41 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing production returning)#56 (of 128 teams · 542.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#76 (of 128 teams · 0.135 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#80 (of 128 teams · 0.162 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#63 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#88 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#120 (of 128 teams · 1.084 average PPA on successful plays)#53 (of 128 teams · 1.174 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Oregon State2–100 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#111 (of 128 teams · 336.4 yds/g · 4,037 yards)#115 (of 128 teams · 19.0 pts/g · 228 points)#116 (of 128 teams · 481.5 yds/g allowed · 5,778 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 37.0 pts/g allowed · 444 points)#123 (of 128 teams · -18.0 /g · -216 on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 12 taken, 16 given · -0.33 /g)#125 (of 128 teams · 26:12 /g · 5h 14m on the season)#127 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#83 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 544.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 128 teams · 0.068 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#115 (of 128 teams · 0.250 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#107 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#127 (of 128 teams · 52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 128 teams · 1.143 average PPA on successful plays)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.044 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Stanford12–21 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame · postseason: #5 Iowa)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #8 Notre Dame, #25 USC, #25 USC · postseason: #5 Iowa)#40 (of 128 teams · 435.5 yds/g · 6,097 yards)#18 (of 128 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 529 points)#43 (of 128 teams · 368.3 yds/g allowed · 5,156 yards)#32 (of 128 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 316 points)#13 (of 128 teams · +15.2 /g · +213 on the season)#65 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 14 taken, 13 given · +0.07 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 34:48 /g · 8h 07m on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's passing production returning)#52 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#58 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing production returning)#18 (of 128 teams · 766.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.295 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#73 (of 128 teams · 0.149 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#66 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#90 (of 128 teams · 1.147 average PPA on successful plays)#57 (of 128 teams · 1.179 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015UCLA8–52 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#28 (of 128 teams · 465.9 yds/g · 6,057 yards)#45 (of 128 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 419 points)#67 (of 128 teams · 401.7 yds/g allowed · 5,222 yards)#54 (of 128 teams · 26.0 pts/g allowed · 338 points)#48 (of 128 teams · +6.2 /g · +81 on the season)#66 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 19 taken, 19 given · +0.00 /g)#126 (of 128 teams · 25:56 /g · 5h 37m on the season)#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing production returning)#17 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's receiving production returning)#57 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's rushing production returning)#14 (of 128 teams · 793.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#34 (of 128 teams · 0.217 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#40 (of 128 teams · 0.094 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#79 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 128 teams · 1.236 average PPA on successful plays)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.997 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015USC8–64 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #22 Utah)#38 (of 128 teams · 437.9 yds/g · 6,131 yards)#37 (of 128 teams · 33.9 pts/g · 475 points)#65 (of 128 teams · 400.8 yds/g allowed · 5,611 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 25.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#42 (of 128 teams · +8.2 /g · +115 on the season)#11 (of 128 teams · +11 on the season · 23 taken, 12 given · +0.79 /g)#78 (of 128 teams · 29:13 /g · 6h 49m on the season)#33 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 128 teams · 37% of last season's rushing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 926.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 128 teams · 0.240 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#45 (of 128 teams · 0.107 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#27 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#81 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#53 (of 128 teams · 1.221 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 128 teams · 1.141 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Utah10–30 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #14 Michigan, #15 Oregon)#97 (of 128 teams · 363.0 yds/g · 4,719 yards)#55 (of 128 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 398 points)#41 (of 128 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 4,768 yards)#31 (of 128 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#40 (of 128 teams · +8.3 /g · +108 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +13 on the season · 34 taken, 21 given · +1.00 /g)#17 (of 128 teams · 32:43 /g · 7h 05m on the season)#31 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#79 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's receiving production returning)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#50 (of 128 teams · 574.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 128 teams · 0.118 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#23 (of 128 teams · 0.060 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#46 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.071 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 128 teams · 1.257 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Washington7–60 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #25 USC)#61 (of 128 teams · 403.1 yds/g · 5,240 yards)#55 (of 128 teams · 30.6 pts/g · 398 points)#31 (of 128 teams · 351.9 yds/g allowed · 4,574 yards)#13 (of 128 teams · 18.8 pts/g allowed · 244 points)#26 (of 128 teams · +11.8 /g · +154 on the season)#34 (of 128 teams · +5 on the season · 27 taken, 22 given · +0.38 /g)#61 (of 128 teams · 30:00 /g · 6h 30m on the season)#120 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#40 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#74 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing production returning)#29 (of 128 teams · 667.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 128 teams · 0.165 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#16 (of 128 teams · 0.032 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#54 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#40 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#45 (of 128 teams · 1.236 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 128 teams · 1.096 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2015Washington State9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2015. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #15 Oregon)#25 (of 128 teams · 469.6 yds/g · 6,105 yards)#49 (of 128 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 409 points)#83 (of 128 teams · 415.9 yds/g allowed · 5,407 yards)#74 (of 128 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#57 (of 128 teams · +3.8 /g · +49 on the season)#75 (of 128 teams · -1 on the season · 24 taken, 25 given · -0.08 /g)#56 (of 128 teams · 30:14 /g · 6h 33m on the season)#85 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's passing production returning)#88 (of 128 teams · 51% of last season's receiving production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's rushing production returning)#57 (of 128 teams · 540.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#45 (of 128 teams · 0.186 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#64 (of 128 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 128 teams · 49% of plays successful)#84 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 128 teams · 1.123 average PPA on successful plays)#55 (of 128 teams · 1.177 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20152015 OregonPac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #28
Total offense. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 California #8 of 128; 2015 Arizona #16 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #24 of 128; 2015 Washington State #25 of 128; 2015 UCLA #28 of 128; 2015 USC #38 of 128; 2015 Stanford #40 of 128; 2015 Washington #61 of 128; 2015 Colorado #67 of 128; 2015 Utah #97 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #111 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 5 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 28.
Scoring offensemedian #37
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 California #17 of 128; 2015 Stanford #18 of 128; 2015 Arizona #20 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #32 of 128; 2015 USC #37 of 128; 2015 UCLA #45 of 128; 2015 Washington State #49 of 128; 2015 Utah #55 of 128; 2015 Washington #55 of 128; 2015 Colorado #97 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #115 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 5 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 37.
Total defensemedian #83
Total defense. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Washington #31 of 128; 2015 Utah #41 of 128; 2015 Stanford #43 of 128; 2015 USC #65 of 128; 2015 UCLA #67 of 128; 2015 Washington State #83 of 128; 2015 Colorado #85 of 128; 2015 California #109 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #113 of 128; 2015 Arizona #115 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #116 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 117 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 83.
Scoring defensemedian #70
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Washington #13 of 128; 2015 Utah #31 of 128; 2015 Stanford #32 of 128; 2015 USC #50 of 128; 2015 UCLA #54 of 128; 2015 Colorado #70 of 128; 2015 Washington State #74 of 128; 2015 California #89 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #99 of 128; 2015 Arizona #107 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #114 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 116 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 70.
Point marginmedian #48
Point margin. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #13 of 128; 2015 Washington #26 of 128; 2015 Utah #40 of 128; 2015 USC #42 of 128; 2015 California #47 of 128; 2015 UCLA #48 of 128; 2015 Washington State #57 of 128; 2015 Arizona #67 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #73 of 128; 2015 Colorado #89 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #123 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 51 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 48.
Turnover marginmedian #51
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Utah #4 of 128; 2015 USC #11 of 128; 2015 Washington #34 of 128; 2015 California #39 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #51 of 128; 2015 Colorado #61 of 128; 2015 Stanford #65 of 128; 2015 UCLA #66 of 128; 2015 Washington State #75 of 128; 2015 Arizona #92 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #97 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 34 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 51.
Possessionmedian #78
Possession. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #1 of 128; 2015 Utah #17 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #33 of 128; 2015 Washington State #56 of 128; 2015 Washington #61 of 128; 2015 USC #78 of 128; 2015 California #81 of 128; 2015 Colorado #93 of 128; 2015 Arizona #122 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #125 of 128; 2015 UCLA #126 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 114 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 78.
Returning passingmedian #54
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arizona #1 of 128; 2015 Colorado #7 of 128; 2015 California #21 of 128; 2015 Utah #31 of 128; 2015 USC #33 of 128; 2015 Stanford #54 of 128; 2015 Washington State #85 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #87 of 128; 2015 UCLA #99 of 128; 2015 Washington #120 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 106 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 54.
Returning receivingmedian #41
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 UCLA #17 of 128; 2015 California #18 of 128; 2015 Arizona #21 of 128; 2015 Washington #40 of 128; 2015 Colorado #41 of 128; 2015 Stanford #52 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #73 of 128; 2015 Utah #79 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #83 of 128; 2015 Washington State #88 of 128; 2015 USC #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 14 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 41.
Returning rushingmedian #53
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Utah #6 of 128; 2015 California #9 of 128; 2015 Washington State #37 of 128; 2015 Colorado #49 of 128; 2015 Arizona #53 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #54 of 128; 2015 UCLA #57 of 128; 2015 Stanford #58 of 128; 2015 Washington #74 of 128; 2015 USC #110 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #124 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 46 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 53.
Team talentmedian #29
Team talent. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 USC #2 of 128; 2015 UCLA #14 of 128; 2015 Stanford #18 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #27 of 128; 2015 Washington #29 of 128; 2015 California #40 of 128; 2015 Arizona #45 of 128; 2015 Utah #50 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #55 of 128; 2015 Colorado #56 of 128; 2015 Washington State #57 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 20 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 29.
Offensive EPAmedian #34
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Stanford #10 of 128; 2015 California #14 of 128; 2015 USC #24 of 128; 2015 Arizona #29 of 128; 2015 UCLA #34 of 128; 2015 Washington State #45 of 128; 2015 Washington #56 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #61 of 128; 2015 Colorado #76 of 128; 2015 Utah #90 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #106 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 13 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 34.
Defensive EPAmedian #73
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Washington #16 of 128; 2015 Utah #23 of 128; 2015 UCLA #40 of 128; 2015 USC #45 of 128; 2015 Washington State #64 of 128; 2015 Stanford #73 of 128; 2015 Colorado #80 of 128; 2015 California #95 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #101 of 128; 2015 Arizona #110 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #115 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 102 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 73.
Offensive success ratemedian #28
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 California #1 of 128; 2015 Stanford #3 of 128; 2015 Washington State #16 of 128; 2015 USC #27 of 128; 2015 UCLA #28 of 128; 2015 Arizona #33 of 128; 2015 Washington #54 of 128; 2015 Utah #59 of 128; 2015 Colorado #63 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #77 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #107 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 14 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 28.
Defensive success ratemedian #81
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Washington #40 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #43 of 128; 2015 Utah #46 of 128; 2015 Stanford #66 of 128; 2015 UCLA #79 of 128; 2015 USC #81 of 128; 2015 Washington State #84 of 128; 2015 Colorado #88 of 128; 2015 Arizona #89 of 128; 2015 California #102 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 103 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 81.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #68
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 Arizona #14 of 128; 2015 Washington #45 of 128; 2015 UCLA #46 of 128; 2015 USC #53 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #68 of 128; 2015 California #71 of 128; 2015 Stanford #90 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #94 of 128; 2015 Washington State #106 of 128; 2015 Colorado #120 of 128; 2015 Utah #122 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 38 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 68.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #53
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2015, best rank first: 2015 UCLA #1 of 128; 2015 Oregon State #3 of 128; 2015 Washington #17 of 128; 2015 USC #38 of 128; 2015 California #39 of 128; 2015 Colorado #53 of 128; 2015 Washington State #55 of 128; 2015 Stanford #57 of 128; 2015 Arizona #65 of 128; 2015 Utah #98 of 128; 2015 Arizona State #127 of 128. Marked: 2015 Oregon, ranked 77 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 53.