THIRD AND DATA
Sign in

Metrics

OregonDucks

Season
‹
›Current

Pac-12

Pac-12, 2016

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Oregon4–80 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Utah)#15 (of 128 teams · 491.7 yds/g · 5,900 yards)#27 (of 128 teams · 35.4 pts/g · 425 points)#126 (of 128 teams · 518.4 yds/g allowed · 6,221 yards)#126 (of 128 teams · 41.4 pts/g allowed · 497 points)#97 (of 128 teams · -6.0 /g · -72 on the season)#85 (of 128 teams · -3 on the season · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.25 /g)#126 (of 128 teams · 25:44 /g · 5h 09m on the season)#111 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#72 (of 128 teams · 60% of last season's receiving production returning)#44 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's rushing production returning)#21 (of 128 teams · 738.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 128 teams · 0.262 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#126 (of 128 teams · 0.312 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#47 (of 128 teams · 45% of plays successful)#128 (of 128 teams · 52% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.369 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 128 teams · 1.164 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Pac-12 teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)1 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#47 (Total offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #10–#105. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #8–#100. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Total defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #12–#127. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #8–#127. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#45 (Point margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #3–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#49 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #1–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Possession: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #11–#126. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#74 (Returning passing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #30–#123. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#72 (Returning receiving: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #11–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#65 (Returning rushing: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #5–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#25 (Team talent: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #2–#65. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #9–#101. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #7–#126. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #4–#113. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#42 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #13–#128. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #2–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#69 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range #2–#124. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)
2016Arizona3–90 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#66 (of 128 teams · 413.1 yds/g · 4,957 yards)#100 (of 128 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 297 points)#115 (of 128 teams · 469.3 yds/g allowed · 5,632 yards)#118 (of 128 teams · 38.3 pts/g allowed · 460 points)#121 (of 128 teams · -13.6 /g · -163 on the season)#112 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.58 /g)#125 (of 128 teams · 25:50 /g · 5h 10m on the season)#64 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's passing production returning)#113 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#95 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's rushing production returning)#43 (of 128 teams · 616.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#78 (of 128 teams · 0.137 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#120 (of 128 teams · 0.272 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#106 (of 128 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#18 (of 128 teams · 1.292 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 128 teams · 1.263 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Arizona State5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#80 (of 128 teams · 390.8 yds/g · 4,689 yards)#40 (of 128 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 400 points)#127 (of 128 teams · 520.5 yds/g allowed · 6,246 yards)#124 (of 128 teams · 39.8 pts/g allowed · 478 points)#99 (of 128 teams · -6.5 /g · -78 on the season)#93 (of 128 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.33 /g)#56 (of 128 teams · 30:19 /g · 6h 04m on the season)#123 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#93 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving production returning)#55 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's rushing production returning)#25 (of 128 teams · 694.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#79 (of 128 teams · 0.136 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#122 (of 128 teams · 0.281 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#98 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#90 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#55 (of 128 teams · 1.229 average PPA on successful plays)#124 (of 128 teams · 1.396 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016California5–70 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #19 Utah)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 513.2 yds/g · 6,158 yards)#22 (of 128 teams · 37.1 pts/g · 445 points)#125 (of 128 teams · 518.3 yds/g allowed · 6,220 yards)#127 (of 128 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 511 points)#95 (of 128 teams · -5.5 /g · -66 on the season)#41 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 18 taken, 15 given · +0.25 /g)#94 (of 128 teams · 28:20 /g · 5h 40m on the season)#115 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's receiving production returning)#65 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#47 (of 128 teams · 601.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#37 (of 128 teams · 0.212 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#125 (of 128 teams · 0.303 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#26 (of 128 teams · 47% of plays successful)#127 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#80 (of 128 teams · 1.174 average PPA on successful plays)#66 (of 128 teams · 1.195 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Colorado10–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#47 (of 128 teams · 437.1 yds/g · 6,120 yards)#51 (of 128 teams · 31.1 pts/g · 435 points)#19 (of 128 teams · 342.5 yds/g allowed · 4,795 yards)#20 (of 128 teams · 21.7 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#35 (of 128 teams · +9.4 /g · +131 on the season)#32 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 26 taken, 20 given · +0.43 /g)#48 (of 128 teams · 30:56 /g · 7h 13m on the season)#67 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's passing production returning)#58 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's receiving production returning)#71 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing production returning)#62 (of 128 teams · 526.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#71 (of 128 teams · 0.149 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 128 teams · 0.035 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#28 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 128 teams · 1.097 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 128 teams · 1.093 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Oregon State4–80 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#105 (of 128 teams · 365.5 yds/g · 4,386 yards)#86 (of 128 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 314 points)#79 (of 128 teams · 429.2 yds/g allowed · 5,150 yards)#82 (of 128 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 366 points)#90 (of 128 teams · -4.3 /g · -52 on the season)#54 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 20 taken, 19 given · +0.08 /g)#40 (of 128 teams · 31:08 /g · 6h 14m on the season)#74 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's passing production returning)#29 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving production returning)#75 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#63 (of 128 teams · 524.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#101 (of 128 teams · 0.100 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#47 (of 128 teams · 0.123 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#95 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#86 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 128 teams · 1.182 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 128 teams · 1.105 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Stanford10–31 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#103 (of 128 teams · 367.4 yds/g · 4,776 yards)#83 (of 128 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 342 points)#38 (of 128 teams · 368.1 yds/g allowed · 4,785 yards)#18 (of 128 teams · 20.4 pts/g allowed · 265 points)#45 (of 128 teams · +5.9 /g · +77 on the season)#49 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 20 taken, 18 given · +0.15 /g)#16 (of 128 teams · 32:47 /g · 7h 06m on the season)#109 (of 128 teams · 5% of last season's passing production returning)#66 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's receiving production returning)#77 (of 128 teams · 66% of last season's rushing production returning)#17 (of 128 teams · 778.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 (of 128 teams · 0.153 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#62 (of 128 teams · 0.148 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#42 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#86 (of 128 teams · 1.169 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 128 teams · 1.243 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016UCLA4–81 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#90 (of 128 teams · 379.8 yds/g · 4,558 yards)#96 (of 128 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 299 points)#47 (of 128 teams · 382.0 yds/g allowed · 4,584 yards)#59 (of 128 teams · 27.5 pts/g allowed · 330 points)#82 (of 128 teams · -2.6 /g · -31 on the season)#83 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 23 taken, 25 given · -0.17 /g)#116 (of 128 teams · 26:45 /g · 5h 21m on the season)#44 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#114 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's receiving production returning)#110 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's rushing production returning)#12 (of 128 teams · 819.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#81 (of 128 teams · 0.133 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#18 (of 128 teams · 0.063 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#113 (of 128 teams · 39% of plays successful)#39 (of 128 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 128 teams · 1.297 average PPA on successful plays)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.029 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016USC10–34 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #4 Washington, #10 Colorado · postseason: #5 Penn State)#20 (of 128 teams · 477.1 yds/g · 6,202 yards)#36 (of 128 teams · 34.4 pts/g · 447 points)#36 (of 128 teams · 367.1 yds/g allowed · 4,773 yards)#38 (of 128 teams · 24.2 pts/g allowed · 315 points)#29 (of 128 teams · +10.2 /g · +132 on the season)#67 (of 128 teams · +0 on the season · 20 taken, 20 given · +0.00 /g)#28 (of 128 teams · 31:54 /g · 6h 55m on the season)#114 (of 128 teams · 4% of last season's passing production returning)#11 (of 128 teams · 91% of last season's receiving production returning)#51 (of 128 teams · 76% of last season's rushing production returning)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 936.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 128 teams · 0.234 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 128 teams · 0.134 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#13 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#24 (of 128 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#94 (of 128 teams · 1.157 average PPA on successful plays)#118 (of 128 teams · 1.337 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Utah9–40 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 USC)#51 (of 128 teams · 430.7 yds/g · 5,599 yards)#60 (of 128 teams · 29.9 pts/g · 388 points)#48 (of 128 teams · 383.0 yds/g allowed · 4,979 yards)#33 (of 128 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 311 points)#45 (of 128 teams · +5.9 /g · +77 on the season)#28 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 31 taken, 25 given · +0.46 /g)#11 (of 128 teams · 33:24 /g · 7h 14m on the season)#122 (of 128 teams · 1% of last season's passing production returning)#88 (of 128 teams · 53% of last season's receiving production returning)#123 (of 128 teams · 22% of last season's rushing production returning)#51 (of 128 teams · 580.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#77 (of 128 teams · 0.139 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 128 teams · 0.132 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#56 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#36 (of 128 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 128 teams · 1.119 average PPA on successful plays)#103 (of 128 teams · 1.276 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Washington12–20 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #10 Colorado, #18 Stanford, #19 Utah)#32 (of 128 teams · 456.9 yds/g · 6,397 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 41.8 pts/g · 585 points)#12 (of 128 teams · 316.9 yds/g allowed · 4,436 yards)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 17.7 pts/g allowed · 248 points)#3 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +24.1 /g · +337 on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +18 on the season · 33 taken, 15 given · +1.29 /g)#44 (of 128 teams · 31:02 /g · 7h 14m on the season)#30 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#111 (of 128 teams · 41% of last season's receiving production returning)#43 (of 128 teams · 83% of last season's rushing production returning)#24 (of 128 teams · 699.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.321 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.003 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#13 (of 128 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#69 (of 128 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays)#69 (of 128 teams · 1.200 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Washington State8–50 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Pac-12 teams in 2016. Range 0–4.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #18 Stanford)#18 (of 128 teams · 482.6 yds/g · 6,274 yards)#18 (of 128 teams · 38.1 pts/g · 496 points)#63 (of 128 teams · 405.9 yds/g allowed · 5,277 yards)#50 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 343 points)#23 (of 128 teams · +11.8 /g · +153 on the season)#28 (of 128 teams · +6 on the season · 23 taken, 17 given · +0.46 /g)#24 (of 128 teams · 32:19 /g · 7h 00m on the season)#55 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's passing production returning)#38 (of 128 teams · 73% of last season's receiving production returning)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's rushing production returning)#65 (of 128 teams · 522.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 128 teams · 0.248 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 128 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#19 (of 128 teams · 48% of plays successful)#73 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 128 teams · 1.219 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 128 teams · 1.223 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Pac-12, 20162016 OregonPac-12 medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #47
Total offense. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 California #10 of 128; 2016 Washington State #18 of 128; 2016 USC #20 of 128; 2016 Washington #32 of 128; 2016 Colorado #47 of 128; 2016 Utah #51 of 128; 2016 Arizona #66 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #80 of 128; 2016 UCLA #90 of 128; 2016 Stanford #103 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #105 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 15 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 47.
Scoring offensemedian #40
Scoring offense. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #8 of 128; 2016 Washington State #18 of 128; 2016 California #22 of 128; 2016 USC #36 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #40 of 128; 2016 Colorado #51 of 128; 2016 Utah #60 of 128; 2016 Stanford #83 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #86 of 128; 2016 UCLA #96 of 128; 2016 Arizona #100 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 27 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 40.
Total defensemedian #48
Total defense. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #12 of 128; 2016 Colorado #19 of 128; 2016 USC #36 of 128; 2016 Stanford #38 of 128; 2016 UCLA #47 of 128; 2016 Utah #48 of 128; 2016 Washington State #63 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #79 of 128; 2016 Arizona #115 of 128; 2016 California #125 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 126 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 48.
Scoring defensemedian #50
Scoring defense. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #8 of 128; 2016 Stanford #18 of 128; 2016 Colorado #20 of 128; 2016 Utah #33 of 128; 2016 USC #38 of 128; 2016 Washington State #50 of 128; 2016 UCLA #59 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #82 of 128; 2016 Arizona #118 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #124 of 128; 2016 California #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 126 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 50.
Point marginmedian #45
Point margin. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #3 of 128; 2016 Washington State #23 of 128; 2016 USC #29 of 128; 2016 Colorado #35 of 128; 2016 Stanford #45 of 128; 2016 Utah #45 of 128; 2016 UCLA #82 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #90 of 128; 2016 California #95 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #99 of 128; 2016 Arizona #121 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 97 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 45.
Turnover marginmedian #49
Turnover margin. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #1 of 128; 2016 Utah #28 of 128; 2016 Washington State #28 of 128; 2016 Colorado #32 of 128; 2016 California #41 of 128; 2016 Stanford #49 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #54 of 128; 2016 USC #67 of 128; 2016 UCLA #83 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #93 of 128; 2016 Arizona #112 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 85 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 49.
Possessionmedian #44
Possession. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Utah #11 of 128; 2016 Stanford #16 of 128; 2016 Washington State #24 of 128; 2016 USC #28 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #40 of 128; 2016 Washington #44 of 128; 2016 Colorado #48 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #56 of 128; 2016 California #94 of 128; 2016 UCLA #116 of 128; 2016 Arizona #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 126 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 44.
Returning passingmedian #74
Returning passing. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #30 of 128; 2016 UCLA #44 of 128; 2016 Washington State #55 of 128; 2016 Arizona #64 of 128; 2016 Colorado #67 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #74 of 128; 2016 Stanford #109 of 128; 2016 USC #114 of 128; 2016 California #115 of 128; 2016 Utah #122 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 111 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 74.
Returning receivingmedian #72
Returning receiving. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 USC #11 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #29 of 128; 2016 Washington State #38 of 128; 2016 Colorado #58 of 128; 2016 Stanford #66 of 128; 2016 Utah #88 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #93 of 128; 2016 Washington #111 of 128; 2016 Arizona #113 of 128; 2016 UCLA #114 of 128; 2016 California #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 72 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 72.
Returning rushingmedian #65
Returning rushing. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington State #5 of 128; 2016 Washington #43 of 128; 2016 USC #51 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #55 of 128; 2016 California #65 of 128; 2016 Colorado #71 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #75 of 128; 2016 Stanford #77 of 128; 2016 Arizona #95 of 128; 2016 UCLA #110 of 128; 2016 Utah #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 44 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 65.
Team talentmedian #25
Team talent. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 USC #2 of 128; 2016 UCLA #12 of 128; 2016 Stanford #17 of 128; 2016 Washington #24 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #25 of 128; 2016 Arizona #43 of 128; 2016 California #47 of 128; 2016 Utah #51 of 128; 2016 Colorado #62 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #63 of 128; 2016 Washington State #65 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 21 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 25.
Offensive EPAmedian #69
Offensive EPA. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #9 of 128; 2016 Washington State #20 of 128; 2016 USC #24 of 128; 2016 California #37 of 128; 2016 Stanford #69 of 128; 2016 Colorado #71 of 128; 2016 Utah #77 of 128; 2016 Arizona #78 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #79 of 128; 2016 UCLA #81 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #101 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 16 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 69.
Defensive EPAmedian #54
Defensive EPA. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #7 of 128; 2016 Colorado #12 of 128; 2016 UCLA #18 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #47 of 128; 2016 Utah #52 of 128; 2016 USC #54 of 128; 2016 Stanford #62 of 128; 2016 Washington State #67 of 128; 2016 Arizona #120 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #122 of 128; 2016 California #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 126 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 54.
Offensive success ratemedian #56
Offensive success rate. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #4 of 128; 2016 USC #13 of 128; 2016 Washington State #19 of 128; 2016 California #26 of 128; 2016 Utah #56 of 128; 2016 Colorado #57 of 128; 2016 Stanford #68 of 128; 2016 Arizona #87 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #95 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #98 of 128; 2016 UCLA #113 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 47 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 56.
Defensive success ratemedian #42
Defensive success rate. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Washington #13 of 128; 2016 USC #24 of 128; 2016 Colorado #28 of 128; 2016 Utah #36 of 128; 2016 UCLA #39 of 128; 2016 Stanford #42 of 128; 2016 Washington State #73 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #86 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #90 of 128; 2016 Arizona #106 of 128; 2016 California #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 128 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 42.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #69
Offensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UCLA #15 of 128; 2016 Arizona #18 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #55 of 128; 2016 Washington State #59 of 128; 2016 Washington #69 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #77 of 128; 2016 California #80 of 128; 2016 Stanford #86 of 128; 2016 USC #94 of 128; 2016 Utah #104 of 128; 2016 Colorado #112 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 2 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 69.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #69
Defensive explosiveness. Pac-12, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UCLA #2 of 128; 2016 Colorado #11 of 128; 2016 Oregon State #17 of 128; 2016 California #66 of 128; 2016 Washington #69 of 128; 2016 Washington State #85 of 128; 2016 Stanford #94 of 128; 2016 Arizona #98 of 128; 2016 Utah #103 of 128; 2016 USC #118 of 128; 2016 Arizona State #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 Oregon, ranked 49 of 128. Pac-12 median rank 69.