THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Penn StateNittany Lions

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Big Ten, 2013

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2013Penn State7–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#43 (of 125 teams · 433.2 yds/g · 5,198 yds)#69 (of 125 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)#49 (of 125 teams · 381.3 yds/g allowed · 4,576 yds)#59 (of 125 teams · 26.2 pts/g allowed · 314 points)#66 (of 125 teams · +2.5 /g · +30 on the season)#74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 20 taken, 22 given · -0.17 /g)#70 (of 125 teams · 29:52 /g · 5h 58m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 125 teams · 0.102 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 125 teams · 0.052 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#44 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#36 (of 125 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 125 teams · 0.879 average PPA on successful plays)#104 (of 125 teams · 1.021 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big Ten teams in 20130 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#59 (Total offense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #7–#121. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#61 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #3–#121. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#43 (Total defense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #2–#123. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #3–#116. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#51 (Point margin: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #6–#119. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#56 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #10–#119. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#46 (Possession: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #1–#124. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)#55 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #6–#109. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#38 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #1–#116. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #2–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#70 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #1–#123. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#95 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #22–#124. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#25 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range #7–#112. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)
2013Michigan State13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#81 (of 125 teams · 385.5 yds/g · 5,397 yds)#64 (of 125 teams · 29.4 pts/g · 411 points)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 251.9 yds/g allowed · 3,527 yds)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 13.2 pts/g allowed · 185 points)#12 (of 125 teams · +16.1 /g · +226 on the season)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +13 on the season · 28 taken, 15 given · +0.93 /g)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 34:49 /g · 8h 07m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#95 (of 125 teams · 0.040 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.057 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#77 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 31% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 125 teams · 0.877 average PPA on successful plays)#112 (of 125 teams · 1.048 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Ohio State12–24 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 511.9 yds/g · 7,167 yds)#3 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 45.5 pts/g · 637 points)#47 (of 125 teams · 377.4 yds/g allowed · 5,284 yds)#28 (of 125 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +22.9 /g · +320 on the season)#36 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.36 /g)#40 (of 125 teams · 31:20 /g · 7h 19m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.193 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 125 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#2 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 52% of plays successful)#70 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#96 (of 125 teams · 0.891 average PPA on successful plays)#28 (of 125 teams · 0.895 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Wisconsin9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#18 (of 125 teams · 480.9 yds/g · 6,251 yds)#27 (of 125 teams · 34.9 pts/g · 453 points)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 305.1 yds/g allowed · 3,966 yds)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 16.3 pts/g allowed · 212 points)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · +18.5 /g · +241 on the season)#56 (of 125 teams · +1 on the season · 20 taken, 19 given · +0.08 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 33:34 /g · 7h 16m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 125 teams · 0.142 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#13 (of 125 teams · 0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#11 (of 125 teams · 48% of plays successful)#19 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#95 (of 125 teams · 0.892 average PPA on successful plays)#34 (of 125 teams · 0.903 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#85 (of 125 teams · 377.0 yds/g · 4,901 yds)#80 (of 125 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 342 points)#6 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 303.1 yds/g allowed · 3,940 yds)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 18.9 pts/g allowed · 246 points)#41 (of 125 teams · +7.4 /g · +96 on the season)#69 (of 125 teams · -1 on the season · 21 taken, 22 given · -0.08 /g)#46 (of 125 teams · 30:58 /g · 6h 43m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 125 teams · 0.044 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#8 — top 10 (of 125 teams · -0.008 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#52 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#24 (of 125 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.787 average PPA on successful plays)#10 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.852 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Michigan7–62 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#87 (of 125 teams · 373.5 yds/g · 4,855 yds)#46 (of 125 teams · 32.2 pts/g · 419 points)#41 (of 125 teams · 371.5 yds/g allowed · 4,829 yds)#67 (of 125 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 349 points)#51 (of 125 teams · +5.4 /g · +70 on the season)#32 (of 125 teams · +5 on the season · 26 taken, 21 given · +0.38 /g)#24 (of 125 teams · 32:13 /g · 6h 59m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 125 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#29 (of 125 teams · 0.036 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#68 (of 125 teams · 42% of plays successful)#86 (of 125 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 125 teams · 0.979 average PPA on successful plays)#7 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 0.838 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Illinois4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#46 (of 125 teams · 426.7 yds/g · 5,120 yds)#61 (of 125 teams · 29.7 pts/g · 356 points)#112 (of 125 teams · 481.5 yds/g allowed · 5,778 yds)#105 (of 125 teams · 35.4 pts/g allowed · 425 points)#90 (of 125 teams · -5.8 /g · -69 on the season)#115 (of 125 teams · -10 on the season · 11 taken, 21 given · -0.83 /g)#89 (of 125 teams · 29:07 /g · 5h 49m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#36 (of 125 teams · 0.120 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#110 (of 125 teams · 0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#24 (of 125 teams · 46% of plays successful)#115 (of 125 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 125 teams · 0.933 average PPA on successful plays)#25 (of 125 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Minnesota8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#107 (of 125 teams · 343.3 yds/g · 4,463 yds)#85 (of 125 teams · 25.7 pts/g · 334 points)#43 (of 125 teams · 373.2 yds/g allowed · 4,852 yds)#25 (of 125 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#59 (of 125 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#42 (of 125 teams · +3 on the season · 19 taken, 16 given · +0.23 /g)#14 (of 125 teams · 32:51 /g · 7h 07m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#60 (of 125 teams · 0.096 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#67 (of 125 teams · 0.079 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#80 (of 125 teams · 41% of plays successful)#80 (of 125 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#22 (of 125 teams · 1.000 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 125 teams · 0.928 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Nebraska9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#59 (of 125 teams · 412.4 yds/g · 5,361 yds)#48 (of 125 teams · 31.9 pts/g · 415 points)#40 (of 125 teams · 370.8 yds/g allowed · 4,820 yds)#50 (of 125 teams · 24.9 pts/g allowed · 323 points)#43 (of 125 teams · +7.1 /g · +92 on the season)#119 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -11 on the season · 18 taken, 29 given · -0.85 /g)#87 (of 125 teams · 29:09 /g · 6h 19m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#55 (of 125 teams · 0.099 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#24 (of 125 teams · 0.031 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#34 (of 125 teams · 45% of plays successful)#65 (of 125 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 125 teams · 0.865 average PPA on successful plays)#20 (of 125 teams · 0.874 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Northwestern5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#74 (of 125 teams · 399.6 yds/g · 4,795 yds)#83 (of 125 teams · 26.2 pts/g · 314 points)#89 (of 125 teams · 423.5 yds/g allowed · 5,082 yds)#69 (of 125 teams · 27.1 pts/g allowed · 325 points)#74 (of 125 teams · -0.9 /g · -11 on the season)#41 (of 125 teams · +3 on the season · 23 taken, 20 given · +0.25 /g)#85 (of 125 teams · 29:13 /g · 5h 51m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 125 teams · 0.098 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#68 (of 125 teams · 0.082 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#20 (of 125 teams · 47% of plays successful)#105 (of 125 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#119 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.827 average PPA on successful plays)#11 (of 125 teams · 0.857 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#9 — top 10 (of 125 teams · 508.5 yds/g · 6,102 yds)#16 (of 125 teams · 38.4 pts/g · 461 points)#123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 527.9 yds/g allowed · 6,335 yds)#116 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 38.8 pts/g allowed · 466 points)#71 (of 125 teams · -0.4 /g · -5 on the season)#81 (of 125 teams · -3 on the season · 17 taken, 20 given · -0.25 /g)#124 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 25:42 /g · 5h 08m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 125 teams · 0.104 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#116 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 0.153 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#46 (of 125 teams · 44% of plays successful)#113 (of 125 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#23 (of 125 teams · 0.999 average PPA on successful plays)#93 (of 125 teams · 0.990 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2013Purdue1–110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2013. Range 0–4.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#121 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 282.9 yds/g · 3,395 yds)#121 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 14.9 pts/g · 179 points)#105 (of 125 teams · 459.9 yds/g allowed · 5,519 yds)#113 (of 125 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 456 points)#119 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · -23.1 /g · -277 on the season)#74 (of 125 teams · -2 on the season · 20 taken, 22 given · -0.17 /g)#113 (of 125 teams · 27:29 /g · 5h 30m on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#109 (of 125 teams · 0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#106 (of 125 teams · 0.130 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)#111 (of 125 teams · 38% of plays successful)#123 — bottom 10 (of 125 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 125 teams · 0.965 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 125 teams · 0.871 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20132013 Penn StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #59
Total offense. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #7 of 125; 2013 Indiana #9 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #18 of 125; 2013 Illinois #46 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #59 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #74 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #81 of 125; 2013 Iowa #85 of 125; 2013 Michigan #87 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #107 of 125; 2013 Purdue #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 43 of 125. Big Ten median rank 59.
Scoring offensemedian #61
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #3 of 125; 2013 Indiana #16 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #27 of 125; 2013 Michigan #46 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #48 of 125; 2013 Illinois #61 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #64 of 125; 2013 Iowa #80 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #83 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #85 of 125; 2013 Purdue #121 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 69 of 125. Big Ten median rank 61.
Total defensemedian #43
Total defense. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #2 of 125; 2013 Iowa #6 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #7 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #40 of 125; 2013 Michigan #41 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #43 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #47 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #89 of 125; 2013 Purdue #105 of 125; 2013 Illinois #112 of 125; 2013 Indiana #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 49 of 125. Big Ten median rank 43.
Scoring defensemedian #50
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #3 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #6 of 125; 2013 Iowa #9 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #25 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #28 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #50 of 125; 2013 Michigan #67 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #69 of 125; 2013 Illinois #105 of 125; 2013 Purdue #113 of 125; 2013 Indiana #116 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 59 of 125. Big Ten median rank 50.
Point marginmedian #51
Point margin. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #6 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #9 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #12 of 125; 2013 Iowa #41 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #43 of 125; 2013 Michigan #51 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #59 of 125; 2013 Indiana #71 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #74 of 125; 2013 Illinois #90 of 125; 2013 Purdue #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 66 of 125. Big Ten median rank 51.
Turnover marginmedian #56
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #10 of 125; 2013 Michigan #32 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #36 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #41 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #42 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #56 of 125; 2013 Iowa #69 of 125; 2013 Purdue #74 of 125; 2013 Indiana #81 of 125; 2013 Illinois #115 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #119 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 74 of 125. Big Ten median rank 56.
Possessionmedian #46
Possession. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #1 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #8 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #14 of 125; 2013 Michigan #24 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #40 of 125; 2013 Iowa #46 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #85 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #87 of 125; 2013 Illinois #89 of 125; 2013 Purdue #113 of 125; 2013 Indiana #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 70 of 125. Big Ten median rank 46.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Penn State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Penn State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Penn State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: . Marked: 2013 Penn State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #55
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #6 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #21 of 125; 2013 Illinois #36 of 125; 2013 Indiana #49 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #55 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #56 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #60 of 125; 2013 Michigan #65 of 125; 2013 Iowa #90 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #95 of 125; 2013 Purdue #109 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 51 of 125. Big Ten median rank 55.
Defensive EPAmedian #38
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #1 of 125; 2013 Iowa #8 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #13 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #24 of 125; 2013 Michigan #29 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #66 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #67 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #68 of 125; 2013 Purdue #106 of 125; 2013 Illinois #110 of 125; 2013 Indiana #116 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 38 of 125. Big Ten median rank 38.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Ohio State #2 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #11 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #20 of 125; 2013 Illinois #24 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #34 of 125; 2013 Indiana #46 of 125; 2013 Iowa #52 of 125; 2013 Michigan #68 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #77 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #80 of 125; 2013 Purdue #111 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 44 of 125. Big Ten median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #70
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan State #1 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #19 of 125; 2013 Iowa #24 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #65 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #70 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #80 of 125; 2013 Michigan #86 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #105 of 125; 2013 Indiana #113 of 125; 2013 Illinois #115 of 125; 2013 Purdue #123 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 36 of 125. Big Ten median rank 70.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #95
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Minnesota #22 of 125; 2013 Indiana #23 of 125; 2013 Michigan #40 of 125; 2013 Purdue #50 of 125; 2013 Illinois #75 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #95 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #96 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #106 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #113 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #119 of 125; 2013 Iowa #124 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 105 of 125. Big Ten median rank 95.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #25
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2013, best rank first: 2013 Michigan #7 of 125; 2013 Iowa #10 of 125; 2013 Northwestern #11 of 125; 2013 Purdue #19 of 125; 2013 Nebraska #20 of 125; 2013 Illinois #25 of 125; 2013 Ohio State #28 of 125; 2013 Wisconsin #34 of 125; 2013 Minnesota #54 of 125; 2013 Indiana #93 of 125; 2013 Michigan State #112 of 125. Marked: 2013 Penn State, ranked 104 of 125. Big Ten median rank 25.