THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Penn StateNittany Lions

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Penn State played 10 such games.

Big Ten, 2016

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Penn State11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #3 Ohio State, #8 Wisconsin, #24 Temple)#26 (of 71 teams · 439.9 yds/g · 4,399 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 37.2 pts/g · 372 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 355.8 yds/g allowed · 3,558 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 233 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +13.9 /g · +139 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +5 in these games · 16 taken, 11 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#102 (of 128 teams · 10% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 128 teams · 79% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#20 (of 128 teams · 742.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#16 (of 71 teams · 0.228 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.455 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 1.311 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#53 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #18–#70. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #9–#71. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#18 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #1–#52. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #1–#64. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#24 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #2–#70. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#24 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #3–#66. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#29 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #3–#69. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#59 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #1–#106. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #8–#125. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #6–#121. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #5–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#48 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #12–#69. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#19 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #2–#63. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #7–#67. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#18 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #2–#65. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #3–#70. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range #4–#58. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)
2016Michigan10–32 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Penn State, #8 Wisconsin, #10 Colorado)#29 (of 71 teams · 431.3 yds/g · 4,313 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37.8 pts/g · 378 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 246.9 yds/g allowed · 2,469 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.3 pts/g allowed · 133 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +24.5 /g · +245 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +3 in these games · 13 taken, 10 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:18 /g · 5h 33m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#105 (of 128 teams · 9% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#17 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#72 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 852.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 71 teams · 0.200 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.040 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 45% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 30% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 1.194 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Ohio State11–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan, #7 Oklahoma, #8 Wisconsin)#18 (of 71 teams · 456.1 yds/g · 4,561 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 38.7 pts/g · 387 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 295.6 yds/g allowed · 2,956 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 15.7 pts/g allowed · 157 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +23.0 /g · +230 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 16 taken, 7 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33:29 /g · 5h 35m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#86 (of 128 teams · 44% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#125 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#121 — bottom 10 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 902.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#12 (of 71 teams · 0.253 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.091 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 1.261 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Wisconsin11–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #20 LSU · postseason: #15 Western Michigan)#55 (of 71 teams · 358.7 yds/g · 3,587 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 71 teams · 26.5 pts/g · 265 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 297.8 yds/g allowed · 2,978 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 13.7 pts/g allowed · 137 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +12.8 /g · +128 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +9 in these games · 23 taken, 14 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 34:25 /g · 5h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#100 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 128 teams · 643.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 71 teams · -0.010 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 71 teams · 42% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.130 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.121 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #6 Michigan)#61 (of 71 teams · 336.4 yds/g · 3,364 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 25.5 pts/g · 255 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 344.7 yds/g allowed · 3,447 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 171 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · +8.4 /g · +84 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · +4 in these games · 12 taken, 8 given · +0.40 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 71 teams · 31:02 /g · 5h 10m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#79 (of 128 teams · 64% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#55 (of 128 teams · 558.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 71 teams · 0.119 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 71 teams · 0.085 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 1.161 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.139 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Northwestern7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #23 Pittsburgh)#38 (of 71 teams · 411.9 yds/g · 4,119 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 71 teams · 27.9 pts/g · 279 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 403.1 yds/g allowed · 4,031 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 234 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 71 teams · +4.5 /g · +45 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 19 taken, 13 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · 29:02 /g · 4h 50m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#92 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#45 (of 128 teams · 613.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#48 (of 71 teams · 0.114 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 71 teams · 0.095 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 1.302 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 71 teams · 1.212 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Minnesota9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 335.5 yds/g · 3,355 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 275 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 350.6 yds/g allowed · 3,506 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 71 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 223 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · +5.2 /g · +52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · +6 in these games · 21 taken, 15 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 31:05 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 94% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#25 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#59 (of 128 teams · 535.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#62 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 0.078 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#50 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.115 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 1.291 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Michigan State3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#35 (of 71 teams · 417.3 yds/g · 4,173 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 71 teams · 375.4 yds/g allowed · 3,754 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 28.9 pts/g allowed · 289 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · -4.2 /g · -42 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 12 taken, 15 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 32:26 /g · 5h 24m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#106 (of 128 teams · 8% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 128 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#27 (of 128 teams · 89% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 719.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 71 teams · 0.155 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 71 teams · 0.165 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 71 teams · 1.258 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 1.327 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Nebraska9–40 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#53 (of 71 teams · 367.7 yds/g · 3,677 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 226 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 71 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 246 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 71 teams · -2.0 /g · -20 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -2 in these games · 10 taken, 12 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 71 teams · 32:28 /g · 5h 25m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#15 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#74 (of 128 teams · 67% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#26 (of 128 teams · 691.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 71 teams · 0.105 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#30 (of 71 teams · 0.150 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 71 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 1.266 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 71 teams · 1.224 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Indiana6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#32 (of 71 teams · 425.8 yds/g · 4,258 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 24.7 pts/g · 247 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 71 teams · 376.9 yds/g allowed · 3,769 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 71 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 295 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#42 (of 71 teams · -4.8 /g · -48 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -12 in these games · 13 taken, 25 given · -1.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · 27:39 /g · 4h 37m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#99 (of 128 teams · 12% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#96 (of 128 teams · 54% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#53 (of 128 teams · 565.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 71 teams · 0.097 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 71 teams · 0.108 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 40% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 71 teams · 1.356 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 71 teams · 1.331 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Maryland6–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#58 (of 71 teams · 353.9 yds/g · 3,185 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 20.2 pts/g · 182 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 71 teams · 456.4 yds/g allowed · 4,108 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 297 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 71 teams · -12.8 /g · -115 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -10 in these games · 5 taken, 15 given · -1.11 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 27:32 /g · 4h 08m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 128 teams · 95% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#22 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 128 teams · 62% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#34 (of 128 teams · 652.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#43 (of 71 teams · 0.125 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 71 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 (of 71 teams · 37% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.397 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 71 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Illinois3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 295.1 yds/g · 2,951 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 17.4 pts/g · 174 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 71 teams · 425.9 yds/g allowed · 4,259 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 34.6 pts/g allowed · 346 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -17.2 /g · -172 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 71 teams · -3 in these games · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 25:21 /g · 4h 13m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#102 (of 128 teams · 48% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#93 (of 128 teams · 56% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 128 teams · 523.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.034 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 71 teams · 0.176 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#39 (of 71 teams · 1.269 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 71 teams · 1.156 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Purdue3–90 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#56 (of 71 teams · 356.8 yds/g · 3,211 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 22.9 pts/g · 206 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 71 teams · 465.2 yds/g allowed · 4,187 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 42.6 pts/g allowed · 383 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -19.7 /g · -177 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -11 in these games · 12 taken, 23 given · -1.22 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#48 (of 71 teams · 28:40 /g · 4h 18m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#77 (of 128 teams · 59% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#44 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#31 (of 128 teams · 88% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#68 (of 128 teams · 512.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.054 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 0.295 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#59 (of 71 teams · 38% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 71 teams · 1.312 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 1.362 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2016Rutgers2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2016. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 253.6 yds/g · 2,536 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#71 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 9.9 pts/g · 99 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 71 teams · 469.3 yds/g allowed · 4,693 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 40.8 pts/g allowed · 408 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -30.9 /g · -309 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · -6 in these games · 11 taken, 17 given · -0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 71 teams · 27:47 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#46 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#48 (of 128 teams · 77% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 128 teams · 585.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#69 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · -0.069 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 71 teams · 0.217 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 33% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 71 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#70 — bottom 10 (of 71 teams · 1.043 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 71 teams · 1.225 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20162016 Penn StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #53
Total offense. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #18 of 71; 2016 Michigan #29 of 71; 2016 Indiana #32 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #35 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #38 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #53 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #55 of 71; 2016 Purdue #56 of 71; 2016 Maryland #58 of 71; 2016 Iowa #61 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #62 of 71; 2016 Illinois #67 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 26 of 71. Big Ten median rank 53.
Scoring offensemedian #40
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #9 of 71; 2016 Michigan #10 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #34 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #35 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 71; 2016 Iowa #40 of 71; 2016 Indiana #46 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #46 of 71; 2016 Purdue #51 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #53 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Illinois #66 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #71 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 12 of 71. Big Ten median rank 40.
Total defensemedian #18
Total defense. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #12 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #13 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #18 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #22 of 71; 2016 Indiana #23 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #30 of 71; 2016 Illinois #41 of 71; 2016 Maryland #49 of 71; 2016 Purdue #51 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #52 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 16 of 71. Big Ten median rank 18.
Scoring defensemedian #23
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #1 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #5 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #15 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #23 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #28 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #36 of 71; 2016 Indiana #38 of 71; 2016 Maryland #48 of 71; 2016 Illinois #54 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #63 of 71; 2016 Purdue #64 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 20 of 71. Big Ten median rank 23.
Point marginmedian #24
Point margin. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #9 of 71; 2016 Iowa #14 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #22 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #24 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #35 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #40 of 71; 2016 Indiana #42 of 71; 2016 Maryland #60 of 71; 2016 Illinois #64 of 71; 2016 Purdue #66 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 8 of 71. Big Ten median rank 24.
Turnover marginmedian #24
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #10 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #10 of 71; 2016 Iowa #20 of 71; 2016 Michigan #24 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #42 of 71; 2016 Illinois #45 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #45 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #57 of 71; 2016 Maryland #64 of 71; 2016 Indiana #65 of 71; 2016 Purdue #66 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 14 of 71. Big Ten median rank 24.
Possessionmedian #29
Possession. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #5 of 71; 2016 Michigan #7 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #12 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #13 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #28 of 71; 2016 Iowa #29 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #45 of 71; 2016 Purdue #48 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #58 of 71; 2016 Indiana #60 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Illinois #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 51 of 71. Big Ten median rank 29.
Returning passingmedian #59
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Minnesota #1 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #12 of 128; 2016 Iowa #22 of 128; 2016 Illinois #25 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #37 of 128; 2016 Maryland #46 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #59 of 128; 2016 Purdue #77 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #86 of 128; 2016 Indiana #99 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #100 of 128; 2016 Michigan #105 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #106 of 128. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 102 of 128. Big Ten median rank 59.
Returning receivingmedian #44
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Minnesota #8 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #15 of 128; 2016 Michigan #17 of 128; 2016 Maryland #22 of 128; 2016 Indiana #31 of 128; 2016 Purdue #44 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #46 of 128; 2016 Iowa #74 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #92 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #98 of 128; 2016 Illinois #102 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #115 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 28 of 128. Big Ten median rank 44.
Returning rushingmedian #49
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Northwestern #6 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #25 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #27 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #27 of 128; 2016 Purdue #31 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #48 of 128; 2016 Michigan #72 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #74 of 128; 2016 Iowa #79 of 128; 2016 Maryland #85 of 128; 2016 Illinois #93 of 128; 2016 Indiana #96 of 128; 2016 Ohio State #121 of 128. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 49 of 128. Big Ten median rank 49.
Team talentmedian #37
Team talent. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #5 of 128; 2016 Michigan #8 of 128; 2016 Michigan State #22 of 128; 2016 Nebraska #26 of 128; 2016 Maryland #34 of 128; 2016 Wisconsin #37 of 128; 2016 Northwestern #45 of 128; 2016 Rutgers #49 of 128; 2016 Indiana #53 of 128; 2016 Iowa #55 of 128; 2016 Minnesota #59 of 128; 2016 Illinois #64 of 128; 2016 Purdue #68 of 128. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 20 of 128. Big Ten median rank 37.
Offensive EPAmedian #48
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #12 of 71; 2016 Michigan #22 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #35 of 71; 2016 Maryland #43 of 71; 2016 Iowa #46 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #48 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #49 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #51 of 71; 2016 Indiana #56 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #62 of 71; 2016 Purdue #63 of 71; 2016 Illinois #64 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #69 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 16 of 71. Big Ten median rank 48.
Defensive EPAmedian #19
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #3 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #4 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #13 of 71; 2016 Iowa #14 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #17 of 71; 2016 Indiana #19 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #30 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #36 of 71; 2016 Illinois #40 of 71; 2016 Maryland #43 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #46 of 71; 2016 Purdue #63 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 22 of 71. Big Ten median rank 19.
Offensive success ratemedian #44
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Ohio State #7 of 71; 2016 Michigan #14 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #31 of 71; 2016 Iowa #40 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #42 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #44 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #50 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #51 of 71; 2016 Indiana #52 of 71; 2016 Purdue #59 of 71; 2016 Maryland #61 of 71; 2016 Illinois #65 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #67 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 34 of 71. Big Ten median rank 44.
Defensive success ratemedian #18
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Michigan #2 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #3 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #9 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #10 of 71; 2016 Indiana #13 of 71; 2016 Iowa #18 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #26 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #28 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #33 of 71; 2016 Purdue #54 of 71; 2016 Illinois #56 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #57 of 71; 2016 Maryland #65 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 16 of 71. Big Ten median rank 18.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #41
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Maryland #10 of 71; 2016 Indiana #18 of 71; 2016 Purdue #26 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #30 of 71; 2016 Illinois #39 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #41 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #44 of 71; 2016 Michigan #54 of 71; 2016 Iowa #59 of 71; 2016 Wisconsin #65 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #68 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #69 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #70 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 3 of 71. Big Ten median rank 41.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #21
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Wisconsin #4 of 71; 2016 Iowa #6 of 71; 2016 Illinois #7 of 71; 2016 Maryland #13 of 71; 2016 Northwestern #16 of 71; 2016 Nebraska #20 of 71; 2016 Rutgers #21 of 71; 2016 Michigan #28 of 71; 2016 Ohio State #33 of 71; 2016 Minnesota #41 of 71; 2016 Michigan State #52 of 71; 2016 Indiana #53 of 71; 2016 Purdue #58 of 71. Marked: 2016 Penn State, ranked 48 of 71. Big Ten median rank 21.