THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

Penn StateNittany Lions

Season
‹
›Current

Big Ten

Includes regular season games against power-conference opponents + Notre Dame. Conference championships are excluded. Teams with fewer than 3 such games are not ranked. Penn State played 10 such games.

Big Ten, 2017

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2017Penn State11–20 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Northwestern · postseason: #11 Washington)#20 (of 70 teams · 434.4 yds/g · 4,344 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 39.1 pts/g · 391 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#16 (of 70 teams · 347.3 yds/g allowed · 3,473 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 18.6 pts/g allowed · 186 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +20.5 /g · +205 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +9 in these games · 18 taken, 9 given · +0.90 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#26 (of 70 teams · 30:47 /g · 5h 08m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 73% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#4 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 100% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 779.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.233 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 0.064 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 47% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 1.281 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 1.262 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
Medianof 14 Big Ten teams in 20170 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#46 (Total offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#69. 1 of 14 in the top 10.)#44 (Scoring offense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#68. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#22 (Total defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #1–#53. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#17 (Scoring defense: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#23 (Point margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#66. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#32 (Turnover margin: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#60. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)#40 (Possession: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #1–#62. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#79 (Returning passing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #21–#118. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#85 (Returning receiving: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #29–#126. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Returning rushing: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#113. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#37 (Team talent: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#70. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#49 (Offensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#66. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#20 (Defensive EPA: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #1–#65. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#46 (Offensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #1–#65. 2 of 14 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive success rate: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #2–#69. 4 of 14 in the top 10.)#38 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #14–#69. 0 of 14 in the top 10.)#21 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range #4–#63. 3 of 14 in the top 10.)
2017Ohio State12–25 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)2 (2 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 3 including the postseason — regular: #6 Wisconsin, #9 Penn State · postseason: #8 USC)3 (3 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 4 including the postseason — regular: #6 Wisconsin, #9 Penn State, #16 Michigan State · postseason: #8 USC)#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 510.8 yds/g · 5,108 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 43.3 pts/g · 433 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 296.0 yds/g allowed · 2,960 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#13 (of 70 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 210 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +22.3 /g · +223 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · +3 in these games · 15 taken, 12 given · +0.30 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 70 teams · 29:41 /g · 4h 57m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 47% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 79% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#2 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 959.1 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.323 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.049 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 53% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#7 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.159 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 1.347 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Wisconsin13–10 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #10 Miami)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #21 Northwestern · postseason: #10 Miami)#34 (of 70 teams · 397.7 yds/g · 3,579 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 32.0 pts/g · 288 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 233.2 yds/g allowed · 2,099 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 12.7 pts/g allowed · 114 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#5 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +19.3 /g · +174 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#33 (of 70 teams · +0 in these games · 17 taken, 17 given · +0.00 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#3 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 34:32 /g · 5h 11m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#79 (of 130 teams · 56% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#47 (of 130 teams · 66% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#113 (of 130 teams · 32% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#37 (of 130 teams · 639.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 70 teams · 0.196 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · 44% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · 1.220 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Iowa8–50 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #5 Ohio State)#56 (of 70 teams · 338.5 yds/g · 3,385 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 28.5 pts/g · 285 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 372.6 yds/g allowed · 3,726 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 222 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#18 (of 70 teams · +6.3 /g · +63 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 19 taken, 13 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 29:30 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#112 (of 130 teams · 3% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#115 (of 130 teams · 33% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#100 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 593.0 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#33 (of 70 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.044 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#34 (of 70 teams · 1.273 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.106 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Michigan8–53 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#52 (of 70 teams · 348.6 yds/g · 3,486 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 24.4 pts/g · 244 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#4 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 279.1 yds/g allowed · 2,791 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 192 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · +5.2 /g · +52 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 11 taken, 13 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 32:06 /g · 5h 21m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#40 (of 130 teams · 97% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#119 (of 130 teams · 28% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#75 (of 130 teams · 57% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#7 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 874.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#46 (of 70 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#2 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 1.344 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#63 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.395 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Michigan State10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)1 (1 regular-season win over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason — #9 Penn State)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · 2 including the postseason — regular: #9 Penn State · postseason: #18 Washington State)#49 (of 70 teams · 361.8 yds/g · 3,618 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#8 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 316.6 yds/g allowed · 3,166 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 219 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#37 (of 70 teams · -0.5 /g · -5 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#15 (of 70 teams · +5 in these games · 19 taken, 14 given · +0.50 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#1 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 35:09 /g · 5h 52m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#96 (of 130 teams · 27% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#126 — bottom 10 (of 130 teams · 20% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#39 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#30 (of 130 teams · 680.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#54 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 0.117 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 1.228 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 1.307 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Northwestern10–30 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)1 (1 regular-season win over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason — #16 Michigan State)#46 (of 70 teams · 367.6 yds/g · 3,676 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#31 (of 70 teams · 27.6 pts/g · 276 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 361.3 yds/g allowed · 3,613 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 21.1 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#17 (of 70 teams · +6.5 /g · +65 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#10 — top 10 (of 70 teams · +6 in these games · 20 taken, 14 given · +0.60 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 29:32 /g · 4h 55m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#58 (of 130 teams · 59% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#5 — top 10 (of 130 teams · 99% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#41 (of 130 teams · 627.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 70 teams · 0.078 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.127 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#28 (of 70 teams · 1.251 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Purdue7–60 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#45 (of 70 teams · 375.2 yds/g · 4,127 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 22.4 pts/g · 246 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · 368.6 yds/g allowed · 4,055 yds · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 19.2 pts/g allowed · 211 points · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · +3.2 /g · +35 in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · +1 in these games · 17 taken, 16 given · +0.09 /g · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 28:25 /g · 5h 13m in these games · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 130 teams · 98% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#98 (of 130 teams · 41% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#19 (of 130 teams · 93% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#70 (of 130 teams · 502.7 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#50 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#20 (of 70 teams · 0.084 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 41% of plays successful · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#11 (of 70 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 1.189 average PPA on successful plays · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 1.312 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 11 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Indiana5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#40 (of 70 teams · 380.4 yds/g · 3,804 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 24.3 pts/g · 243 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 357.2 yds/g allowed · 3,572 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#36 (of 70 teams · 28.7 pts/g allowed · 287 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · -4.4 /g · -44 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#56 (of 70 teams · 28:24 /g · 4h 44m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 130 teams · 96% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#86 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#101 (of 130 teams · 40% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#61 (of 130 teams · 547.9 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#49 (of 70 teams · 0.103 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 0.111 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#61 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 36% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#23 (of 70 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#32 (of 70 teams · 1.276 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#21 (of 70 teams · 1.238 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Minnesota5–70 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 294.9 yds/g · 2,949 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#57 (of 70 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 214 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#24 (of 70 teams · 366.8 yds/g allowed · 3,668 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#29 (of 70 teams · 26.4 pts/g allowed · 264 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#46 (of 70 teams · -5.0 /g · -50 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · -2 in these games · 15 taken, 17 given · -0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#35 (of 70 teams · 29:57 /g · 5h 00m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#108 (of 130 teams · 5% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 52% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#38 (of 130 teams · 80% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#62 (of 130 teams · 543.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#56 (of 70 teams · 0.075 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 0.200 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 39% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#44 (of 70 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 1.200 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#22 (of 70 teams · 1.240 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Nebraska4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#42 (of 70 teams · 377.3 yds/g · 3,773 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 24.9 pts/g · 249 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 452.4 yds/g allowed · 4,524 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 38.0 pts/g allowed · 380 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#58 (of 70 teams · -13.1 /g · -131 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 9 taken, 16 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 29:48 /g · 4h 58m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#118 (of 130 teams · 2% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#110 (of 130 teams · 36% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#108 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#29 (of 130 teams · 693.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#38 (of 70 teams · 0.126 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.302 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · 38% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 51% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 1.362 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#14 (of 70 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Illinois2–100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 277.2 yds/g · 2,495 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#68 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 13.1 pts/g · 118 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#38 (of 70 teams · 413.3 yds/g allowed · 3,720 yds · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#52 (of 70 teams · 33.7 pts/g allowed · 303 points · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -20.6 /g · -185 in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 14 taken, 21 given · -0.78 /g · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#54 (of 70 teams · 28:26 /g · 4h 16m in these games · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#91 (of 130 teams · 35% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#67 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#49 (of 130 teams · 76% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#64 (of 130 teams · 538.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#66 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#41 (of 70 teams · 0.191 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 1.199 average PPA on successful plays · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))#9 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.166 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 9 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Maryland4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 314.9 yds/g · 3,149 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#55 (of 70 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 216 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#45 (of 70 teams · 429.6 yds/g allowed · 4,296 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 39.0 pts/g allowed · 390 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -17.4 /g · -174 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#25 (of 70 teams · +2 in these games · 14 taken, 12 given · +0.20 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 27:38 /g · 4h 36m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#95 (of 130 teams · 31% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#105 (of 130 teams · 39% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#77 (of 130 teams · 55% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#28 (of 130 teams · 696.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#59 (of 70 teams · 0.061 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 0.257 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#62 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#19 (of 70 teams · 1.334 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#6 — top 10 (of 70 teams · 1.155 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))
2017Rutgers4–80 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 14 Big Ten teams in 2017. Range 0–5.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 234.8 yds/g · 2,348 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#67 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 13.8 pts/g · 138 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#43 (of 70 teams · 426.4 yds/g allowed · 4,264 yds · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#49 (of 70 teams · 32.4 pts/g allowed · 324 points · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#65 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · -18.6 /g · -186 in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#53 (of 70 teams · -7 in these games · 10 taken, 17 given · -0.70 /g · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#60 (of 70 teams · 27:49 /g · 4h 38m in these games · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#81 (of 130 teams · 54% of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#85 (of 130 teams · 44% of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#71 (of 130 teams · 58% of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))#51 (of 130 teams · 574.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 0.006 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#47 (of 70 teams · 0.204 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#64 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 35% of plays successful · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#51 (of 70 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#69 — bottom 10 (of 70 teams · 1.085 average PPA on successful plays · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))#12 (of 70 teams · 1.189 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better · 10 games vs power opponents (regular season))

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20172017 Penn StateBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #46
Total offense. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #4 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #34 of 70; 2017 Indiana #40 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #42 of 70; 2017 Purdue #45 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #46 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #49 of 70; 2017 Michigan #52 of 70; 2017 Iowa #56 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #64 of 70; 2017 Illinois #67 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 20 of 70. Big Ten median rank 46.
Scoring offensemedian #44
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #2 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #15 of 70; 2017 Iowa #25 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #31 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #41 of 70; 2017 Michigan #44 of 70; 2017 Indiana #45 of 70; 2017 Purdue #53 of 70; 2017 Maryland #55 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #57 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #57 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #67 of 70; 2017 Illinois #68 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 5 of 70. Big Ten median rank 44.
Total defensemedian #22
Total defense. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wisconsin #1 of 70; 2017 Michigan #4 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #6 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #8 of 70; 2017 Indiana #19 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #22 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #24 of 70; 2017 Purdue #25 of 70; 2017 Iowa #28 of 70; 2017 Illinois #38 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #43 of 70; 2017 Maryland #45 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 16 of 70. Big Ten median rank 22.
Scoring defensemedian #17
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wisconsin #2 of 70; 2017 Purdue #11 of 70; 2017 Michigan #12 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #13 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #14 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #17 of 70; 2017 Iowa #20 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #29 of 70; 2017 Indiana #36 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #49 of 70; 2017 Illinois #52 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #62 of 70; 2017 Maryland #65 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 10 of 70. Big Ten median rank 17.
Point marginmedian #23
Point margin. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #2 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #5 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #17 of 70; 2017 Iowa #18 of 70; 2017 Michigan #22 of 70; 2017 Purdue #23 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #37 of 70; 2017 Indiana #44 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #46 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #58 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #65 of 70; 2017 Illinois #66 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 4 of 70. Big Ten median rank 23.
Turnover marginmedian #32
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Iowa #10 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #10 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #15 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #23 of 70; 2017 Maryland #25 of 70; 2017 Purdue #32 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #33 of 70; 2017 Michigan #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #43 of 70; 2017 Indiana #53 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #53 of 70; 2017 Illinois #60 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 4 of 70. Big Ten median rank 32.
Possessionmedian #40
Possession. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Michigan State #1 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #3 of 70; 2017 Michigan #11 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #35 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #38 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #40 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #43 of 70; 2017 Iowa #44 of 70; 2017 Illinois #54 of 70; 2017 Purdue #55 of 70; 2017 Indiana #56 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #60 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 26 of 70. Big Ten median rank 40.
Returning passingmedian #79
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Northwestern #22 of 130; 2017 Purdue #32 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #34 of 130; 2017 Michigan #40 of 130; 2017 Indiana #44 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #79 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #81 of 130; 2017 Illinois #91 of 130; 2017 Maryland #95 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #96 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #108 of 130; 2017 Iowa #112 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #118 of 130. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 21 of 130. Big Ten median rank 79.
Returning receivingmedian #85
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wisconsin #47 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #58 of 130; 2017 Illinois #67 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #71 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #77 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #85 of 130; 2017 Indiana #86 of 130; 2017 Purdue #98 of 130; 2017 Maryland #105 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #110 of 130; 2017 Iowa #115 of 130; 2017 Michigan #119 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #126 of 130. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 29 of 130. Big Ten median rank 85.
Returning rushingmedian #49
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Northwestern #5 of 130; 2017 Purdue #19 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #38 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #39 of 130; 2017 Ohio State #41 of 130; 2017 Illinois #49 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #71 of 130; 2017 Michigan #75 of 130; 2017 Maryland #77 of 130; 2017 Iowa #100 of 130; 2017 Indiana #101 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #108 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #113 of 130. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 4 of 130. Big Ten median rank 49.
Team talentmedian #37
Team talent. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #2 of 130; 2017 Michigan #7 of 130; 2017 Maryland #28 of 130; 2017 Nebraska #29 of 130; 2017 Michigan State #30 of 130; 2017 Wisconsin #37 of 130; 2017 Northwestern #41 of 130; 2017 Iowa #49 of 130; 2017 Rutgers #51 of 130; 2017 Indiana #61 of 130; 2017 Minnesota #62 of 130; 2017 Illinois #64 of 130; 2017 Purdue #70 of 130. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 19 of 130. Big Ten median rank 37.
Offensive EPAmedian #49
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #4 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #21 of 70; 2017 Iowa #33 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #38 of 70; 2017 Michigan #46 of 70; 2017 Indiana #49 of 70; 2017 Purdue #50 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #53 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #54 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #56 of 70; 2017 Maryland #59 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #64 of 70; 2017 Illinois #66 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 10 of 70. Big Ten median rank 49.
Defensive EPAmedian #20
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Wisconsin #1 of 70; 2017 Michigan #6 of 70; 2017 Iowa #8 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #9 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #11 of 70; 2017 Purdue #20 of 70; 2017 Indiana #24 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #25 of 70; 2017 Illinois #41 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #47 of 70; 2017 Maryland #60 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #65 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 17 of 70. Big Ten median rank 20.
Offensive success ratemedian #46
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Ohio State #1 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #15 of 70; 2017 Purdue #32 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #36 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #46 of 70; 2017 Iowa #52 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #53 of 70; 2017 Michigan #54 of 70; 2017 Indiana #61 of 70; 2017 Maryland #62 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #64 of 70; 2017 Illinois #65 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 5 of 70. Big Ten median rank 46.
Defensive success ratemedian #21
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Michigan #2 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #4 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #7 of 70; 2017 Purdue #11 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #19 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #21 of 70; 2017 Indiana #23 of 70; 2017 Iowa #38 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #44 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #51 of 70; 2017 Illinois #55 of 70; 2017 Maryland #64 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 10 of 70. Big Ten median rank 21.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #38
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Nebraska #14 of 70; 2017 Michigan #17 of 70; 2017 Maryland #19 of 70; 2017 Indiana #32 of 70; 2017 Iowa #34 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #38 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #43 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #54 of 70; 2017 Illinois #55 of 70; 2017 Purdue #57 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #63 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #66 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #69 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 31 of 70. Big Ten median rank 38.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #21
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2017, best rank first: 2017 Iowa #4 of 70; 2017 Maryland #6 of 70; 2017 Illinois #9 of 70; 2017 Rutgers #12 of 70; 2017 Nebraska #14 of 70; 2017 Wisconsin #18 of 70; 2017 Indiana #21 of 70; 2017 Minnesota #22 of 70; 2017 Northwestern #28 of 70; 2017 Michigan State #43 of 70; 2017 Purdue #45 of 70; 2017 Ohio State #52 of 70; 2017 Michigan #63 of 70. Marked: 2017 Penn State, ranked 32 of 70. Big Ten median rank 21.