Metrics

PurdueBoilermakers

Season
Current

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2010

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2010Purdue480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#104 (of 120 teams · 311.6 yds/g · 3,739 yards)#105 (of 120 teams · 19.7 pts/g · 236 points)#62 (of 120 teams · 369.0 yds/g allowed · 4,428 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 28.8 pts/g allowed · 345 points)#95 (of 120 teams · -9.1 /g · -109 on the season)#90 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 21 taken, 27 given · -0.50 /g)#96 (of 120 teams · 17:34 /g · 3h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#116 (of 120 teams · -0.062 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 120 teams · 36% of plays successful)#86 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#118 (of 120 teams · 0.802 average PPA on successful plays)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.898 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 11 Big Ten teams in 20100 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#53 (Total offense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #8–#104. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring offense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #5–#105. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#43 (Total defense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #4–#110. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#50 (Scoring defense: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #5–#108. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#63 (Point margin: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #4–#96. 2 of 11 in the top 10.)#45 (Turnover margin: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #4–#108. 3 of 11 in the top 10.)#42 (Possession: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #3–#103. 2 of 11 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#32 (Offensive EPA: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #1–#116. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive EPA: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #9–#113. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#41 (Offensive success rate: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #1–#105. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#86 (Defensive success rate: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #6–#107. 1 of 11 in the top 10.)#100 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #15–#118. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)#46 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range #14–#105. 0 of 11 in the top 10.)
2010Illinois760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#45 (of 120 teams · 397.1 yds/g · 5,162 yards)#26 (of 120 teams · 32.5 pts/g · 423 points)#38 (of 120 teams · 351.3 yds/g allowed · 4,567 yards)#48 (of 120 teams · 23.5 pts/g allowed · 305 points)#32 (of 120 teams · +9.1 /g · +118 on the season)#22 (of 120 teams · +8 on the season · 27 taken, 19 given · +0.62 /g)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:38 /g · 4h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.082 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#25 (of 120 teams · -0.004 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#42 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.839 average PPA on successful plays)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.868 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Indiana570 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#54 (of 120 teams · 387.5 yds/g · 4,650 yards)#56 (of 120 teams · 27.2 pts/g · 326 points)#90 (of 120 teams · 410.2 yds/g allowed · 4,922 yards)#102 (of 120 teams · 34.0 pts/g allowed · 408 points)#89 (of 120 teams · -6.8 /g · -82 on the season)#99 (of 120 teams · -7 on the season · 13 taken, 20 given · -0.58 /g)#42 (of 120 teams · 19:00 /g · 3h 48m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.035 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 120 teams · 0.100 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#107 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#108 (of 120 teams · 0.840 average PPA on successful plays)#42 (of 120 teams · 0.889 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Iowa851 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#57 (of 120 teams · 382.9 yds/g · 4,978 yards)#50 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#25 (of 120 teams · 332.1 yds/g allowed · 4,317 yards)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.0 pts/g allowed · 221 points)#21 (of 120 teams · +11.9 /g · +155 on the season)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +13 on the season · 24 taken, 11 given · +1.00 /g)#43 (of 120 teams · 19:00 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.129 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.062 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#28 (of 120 teams · 44% of plays successful)#80 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.967 average PPA on successful plays)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.868 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Michigan763 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 488.7 yds/g · 6,353 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 32.8 pts/g · 426 points)#110 (of 120 teams · 450.8 yds/g allowed · 5,860 yards)#108 (of 120 teams · 35.2 pts/g allowed · 458 points)#80 (of 120 teams · -2.5 /g · -32 on the season)#108 (of 120 teams · -10 on the season · 19 taken, 29 given · -0.77 /g)#103 (of 120 teams · 17:26 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 120 teams · 0.138 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.098 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#12 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#90 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#50 (of 120 teams · 0.934 average PPA on successful plays)#45 (of 120 teams · 0.897 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Michigan State1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 120 teams · 388.5 yds/g · 5,051 yards)#47 (of 120 teams · 29.5 pts/g · 383 points)#43 (of 120 teams · 353.8 yds/g allowed · 4,599 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#39 (of 120 teams · +7.2 /g · +93 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 24 taken, 19 given · +0.38 /g)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:14 /g · 4h 23m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#24 (of 120 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.034 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#58 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#58 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.981 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.944 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Minnesota390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#77 (of 120 teams · 361.3 yds/g · 4,336 yards)#89 (of 120 teams · 23.2 pts/g · 278 points)#76 (of 120 teams · 392.2 yds/g allowed · 4,706 yards)#98 (of 120 teams · 33.0 pts/g allowed · 396 points)#96 (of 120 teams · -9.8 /g · -118 on the season)#45 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 19 taken, 17 given · +0.17 /g)#14 (of 120 teams · 19:57 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.028 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 120 teams · 0.121 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#93 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#15 (of 120 teams · 0.982 average PPA on successful plays)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.982 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Northwestern760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#48 (of 120 teams · 391.1 yds/g · 5,084 yards)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 343 points)#97 (of 120 teams · 426.1 yds/g allowed · 5,540 yards)#77 (of 120 teams · 29.0 pts/g allowed · 377 points)#81 (of 120 teams · -2.6 /g · -34 on the season)#62 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 22 taken, 23 given · -0.08 /g)#48 (of 120 teams · 18:57 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.085 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#101 (of 120 teams · 0.099 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#105 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.819 average PPA on successful plays)#49 (of 120 teams · 0.902 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Ohio State1212 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#20 (of 120 teams · 448.6 yds/g · 5,832 yards)#11 (of 120 teams · 38.8 pts/g · 504 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 261.9 yds/g allowed · 3,405 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 14.3 pts/g allowed · 186 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +24.5 /g · +318 on the season)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +15 on the season · 30 taken, 15 given · +1.15 /g)#21 (of 120 teams · 19:40 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#23 (of 120 teams · 0.108 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.041 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#16 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.861 average PPA on successful plays)#79 (of 120 teams · 0.954 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Penn State761 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#68 (of 120 teams · 372.2 yds/g · 4,839 yards)#81 (of 120 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 319 points)#35 (of 120 teams · 346.9 yds/g allowed · 4,509 yards)#50 (of 120 teams · 23.7 pts/g allowed · 308 points)#63 (of 120 teams · +0.8 /g · +11 on the season)#74 (of 120 teams · -4 on the season · 17 taken, 21 given · -0.31 /g)#59 (of 120 teams · 18:45 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#53 (of 120 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#63 (of 120 teams · 0.043 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#88 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#46 (of 120 teams · 0.937 average PPA on successful plays)#14 (of 120 teams · 0.843 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2010Wisconsin1120 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 11 Big Ten teams in 2010. Range 0–3.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 445.1 yds/g · 5,787 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 41.5 pts/g · 539 points)#20 (of 120 teams · 321.8 yds/g allowed · 4,183 yards)#25 (of 120 teams · 20.5 pts/g allowed · 267 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +20.9 /g · +272 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +14 on the season · 23 taken, 9 given · +1.08 /g)#15 (of 120 teams · 19:54 /g · 4h 19m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.212 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.059 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 54% of plays successful)#56 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.846 average PPA on successful plays)#105 (of 120 teams · 0.991 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20102010 PurdueBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #53
Total offense. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Michigan #8 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #20 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #21 of 120; 2010 Illinois #45 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #48 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #53 of 120; 2010 Indiana #54 of 120; 2010 Iowa #57 of 120; 2010 Penn State #68 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #77 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 104 of 120. Big Ten median rank 53.
Scoring offensemedian #50
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Wisconsin #5 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #11 of 120; 2010 Michigan #25 of 120; 2010 Illinois #26 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #47 of 120; 2010 Iowa #50 of 120; 2010 Indiana #56 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #63 of 120; 2010 Penn State #81 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #89 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 105 of 120. Big Ten median rank 50.
Total defensemedian #43
Total defense. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #4 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #20 of 120; 2010 Iowa #25 of 120; 2010 Penn State #35 of 120; 2010 Illinois #38 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #43 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #76 of 120; 2010 Indiana #90 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #97 of 120; 2010 Michigan #110 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 62 of 120. Big Ten median rank 43.
Scoring defensemedian #50
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #5 of 120; 2010 Iowa #7 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #25 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #39 of 120; 2010 Illinois #48 of 120; 2010 Penn State #50 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #77 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #98 of 120; 2010 Indiana #102 of 120; 2010 Michigan #108 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 74 of 120. Big Ten median rank 50.
Point marginmedian #63
Point margin. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #4 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #7 of 120; 2010 Iowa #21 of 120; 2010 Illinois #32 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #39 of 120; 2010 Penn State #63 of 120; 2010 Michigan #80 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #81 of 120; 2010 Indiana #89 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #96 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 95 of 120. Big Ten median rank 63.
Turnover marginmedian #45
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #4 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #6 of 120; 2010 Iowa #7 of 120; 2010 Illinois #22 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #32 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #45 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #62 of 120; 2010 Penn State #74 of 120; 2010 Indiana #99 of 120; 2010 Michigan #108 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 90 of 120. Big Ten median rank 45.
Possessionmedian #42
Possession. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Illinois #3 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #8 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #14 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #15 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #21 of 120; 2010 Indiana #42 of 120; 2010 Iowa #43 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #48 of 120; 2010 Penn State #59 of 120; 2010 Michigan #103 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 96 of 120. Big Ten median rank 42.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: . Marked: 2010 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #32
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Wisconsin #1 of 120; 2010 Michigan #11 of 120; 2010 Iowa #14 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #23 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #24 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #32 of 120; 2010 Illinois #35 of 120; 2010 Penn State #53 of 120; 2010 Indiana #67 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #72 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 116 of 120. Big Ten median rank 32.
Defensive EPAmedian #79
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #9 of 120; 2010 Illinois #25 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #54 of 120; 2010 Penn State #63 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #75 of 120; 2010 Iowa #79 of 120; 2010 Michigan #99 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #101 of 120; 2010 Indiana #103 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #113 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 81 of 120. Big Ten median rank 79.
Offensive success ratemedian #41
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Wisconsin #1 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #11 of 120; 2010 Michigan #12 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #16 of 120; 2010 Iowa #28 of 120; 2010 Indiana #41 of 120; 2010 Illinois #48 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #58 of 120; 2010 Penn State #59 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #88 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 105 of 120. Big Ten median rank 41.
Defensive success ratemedian #86
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Ohio State #6 of 120; 2010 Illinois #42 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #56 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #58 of 120; 2010 Iowa #80 of 120; 2010 Penn State #88 of 120; 2010 Michigan #90 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #93 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #105 of 120; 2010 Indiana #107 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 86 of 120. Big Ten median rank 86.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #100
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Minnesota #15 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #17 of 120; 2010 Iowa #25 of 120; 2010 Penn State #46 of 120; 2010 Michigan #50 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #100 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #105 of 120; 2010 Indiana #108 of 120; 2010 Illinois #109 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #114 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 118 of 120. Big Ten median rank 100.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #46
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2010, best rank first: 2010 Penn State #14 of 120; 2010 Illinois #23 of 120; 2010 Iowa #24 of 120; 2010 Indiana #42 of 120; 2010 Michigan #45 of 120; 2010 Northwestern #49 of 120; 2010 Michigan State #75 of 120; 2010 Ohio State #79 of 120; 2010 Minnesota #100 of 120; 2010 Wisconsin #105 of 120. Marked: 2010 Purdue, ranked 46 of 120. Big Ten median rank 46.