Metrics

PurdueBoilermakers

Season
Current

Big Ten

Big Ten, 2011

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2011Purdue760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#66 (of 120 teams · 376.9 yds/g · 4,899 yards)#60 (of 120 teams · 26.9 pts/g · 350 points)#75 (of 120 teams · 396.1 yds/g allowed · 5,149 yards)#63 (of 120 teams · 26.9 pts/g allowed · 349 points)#68 (of 120 teams · +0.1 /g · +1 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 21 taken, 20 given · +0.08 /g)#39 (of 120 teams · 19:00 /g · 4h 07m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#61 (of 120 teams · 0.050 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#78 (of 120 teams · 0.068 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#52 (of 120 teams · 42% of plays successful)#80 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.944 average PPA on successful plays)#18 (of 120 teams · 0.867 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 12 Big Ten teams in 20110 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#66 (Total offense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #12–#110. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#58 (Scoring offense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #6–#111. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#24 (Total defense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #6–#110. 2 of 12 in the top 10.)#27 (Scoring defense: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #5–#114. 3 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Point margin: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #4–#110. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#47 (Turnover margin: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #3–#101. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#42 (Possession: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #16–#105. 0 of 12 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#61 (Offensive EPA: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #1–#99. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#48 (Defensive EPA: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #4–#112. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#57 (Offensive success rate: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #4–#102. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#39 (Defensive success rate: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #2–#114. 1 of 12 in the top 10.)#67 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #20–#117. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)#54 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range #17–#113. 0 of 12 in the top 10.)
2011Illinois760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#81 (of 120 teams · 355.7 yds/g · 4,624 yards)#91 (of 120 teams · 22.6 pts/g · 294 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 286.1 yds/g allowed · 3,720 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 19.6 pts/g allowed · 255 points)#59 (of 120 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season)#91 (of 120 teams · -6 on the season · 22 taken, 28 given · -0.46 /g)#20 (of 120 teams · 19:43 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.042 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#12 (of 120 teams · -0.022 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#57 (of 120 teams · 41% of plays successful)#15 (of 120 teams · 36% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.870 average PPA on successful plays)#87 (of 120 teams · 0.961 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Indiana1110 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#78 (of 120 teams · 360.4 yds/g · 4,325 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 257 points)#110 (of 120 teams · 459.0 yds/g allowed · 5,508 yards)#114 (of 120 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 448 points)#110 (of 120 teams · -15.9 /g · -191 on the season)#79 (of 120 teams · -3 on the season · 15 taken, 18 given · -0.25 /g)#105 (of 120 teams · 17:05 /g · 3h 25m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#57 (of 120 teams · 0.053 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.125 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#102 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#114 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.990 average PPA on successful plays)#17 (of 120 teams · 0.859 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Iowa760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#71 (of 120 teams · 372.5 yds/g · 4,842 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 27.5 pts/g · 358 points)#62 (of 120 teams · 378.9 yds/g allowed · 4,926 yards)#46 (of 120 teams · 23.9 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#55 (of 120 teams · +3.7 /g · +48 on the season)#47 (of 120 teams · +1 on the season · 19 taken, 18 given · +0.08 /g)#94 (of 120 teams · 17:29 /g · 3h 47m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#76 (of 120 teams · 0.065 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#48 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#70 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.908 average PPA on successful plays)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Michigan1122 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#60 (of 120 teams · 382.5 yds/g · 4,973 yards)#26 (of 120 teams · 33.3 pts/g · 433 points)#11 (of 120 teams · 300.7 yds/g allowed · 3,909 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 17.4 pts/g allowed · 226 points)#13 (of 120 teams · +15.9 /g · +207 on the season)#32 (of 120 teams · +4 on the season · 26 taken, 22 given · +0.31 /g)#68 (of 120 teams · 18:09 /g · 3h 56m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#39 (of 120 teams · 0.081 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#48 (of 120 teams · 0.024 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#41 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#72 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 120 teams · 0.966 average PPA on successful plays)#47 (of 120 teams · 0.905 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Michigan State1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#53 (of 120 teams · 390.4 yds/g · 5,466 yards)#37 (of 120 teams · 31.0 pts/g · 434 points)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 278.0 yds/g allowed · 3,892 yards)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 18.4 pts/g allowed · 257 points)#17 (of 120 teams · +12.6 /g · +177 on the season)#27 (of 120 teams · +7 on the season · 25 taken, 18 given · +0.50 /g)#33 (of 120 teams · 19:07 /g · 4h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#80 (of 120 teams · 0.024 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.050 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#71 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 32% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#82 (of 120 teams · 0.895 average PPA on successful plays)#98 (of 120 teams · 0.987 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Minnesota390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#110 (of 120 teams · 310.3 yds/g · 3,724 yards)#111 (of 120 teams · 18.4 pts/g · 221 points)#78 (of 120 teams · 403.3 yds/g allowed · 4,839 yards)#93 (of 120 teams · 31.7 pts/g allowed · 380 points)#108 (of 120 teams · -13.3 /g · -159 on the season)#101 (of 120 teams · -8 on the season · 9 taken, 17 given · -0.67 /g)#89 (of 120 teams · 17:37 /g · 3h 31m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#90 (of 120 teams · 0.014 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#108 (of 120 teams · 0.124 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#88 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#98 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#77 (of 120 teams · 0.904 average PPA on successful plays)#85 (of 120 teams · 0.959 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Nebraska940 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#62 (of 120 teams · 379.9 yds/g · 4,939 yards)#50 (of 120 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 379 points)#37 (of 120 teams · 350.8 yds/g allowed · 4,560 yards)#42 (of 120 teams · 23.4 pts/g allowed · 304 points)#42 (of 120 teams · +5.8 /g · +75 on the season)#61 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 18 taken, 19 given · -0.08 /g)#55 (of 120 teams · 18:32 /g · 4h 01m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 120 teams · 0.046 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#66 (of 120 teams · 0.047 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#68 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#35 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#59 (of 120 teams · 0.927 average PPA on successful plays)#94 (of 120 teams · 0.975 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Northwestern670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#33 (of 120 teams · 420.9 yds/g · 5,471 yards)#51 (of 120 teams · 28.9 pts/g · 376 points)#81 (of 120 teams · 407.7 yds/g allowed · 5,300 yards)#66 (of 120 teams · 27.7 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#66 (of 120 teams · +1.2 /g · +16 on the season)#37 (of 120 teams · +3 on the season · 20 taken, 17 given · +0.23 /g)#27 (of 120 teams · 19:16 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#22 (of 120 teams · 0.110 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.138 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#11 (of 120 teams · 47% of plays successful)#87 (of 120 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#117 (of 120 teams · 0.821 average PPA on successful plays)#113 (of 120 teams · 1.068 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Ohio State672 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#107 (of 120 teams · 318.1 yds/g · 4,136 yards)#81 (of 120 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 318 points)#23 (of 120 teams · 323.5 yds/g allowed · 4,206 yards)#27 (of 120 teams · 21.0 pts/g allowed · 273 points)#57 (of 120 teams · +3.5 /g · +45 on the season)#28 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 20 taken, 15 given · +0.38 /g)#42 (of 120 teams · 18:57 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.022 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#35 (of 120 teams · 0.012 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#96 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#39 (of 120 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#67 (of 120 teams · 0.914 average PPA on successful plays)#37 (of 120 teams · 0.891 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Penn State941 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#93 (of 120 teams · 342.4 yds/g · 4,451 yards)#110 (of 120 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 251 points)#24 (of 120 teams · 323.9 yds/g allowed · 4,211 yards)#5 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 16.8 pts/g allowed · 218 points)#61 (of 120 teams · +2.5 /g · +33 on the season)#53 (of 120 teams · +0 on the season · 25 taken, 25 given · +0.00 /g)#45 (of 120 teams · 18:48 /g · 4h 04m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#99 (of 120 teams · 0.001 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#32 (of 120 teams · 0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#92 (of 120 teams · 39% of plays successful)#28 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#75 (of 120 teams · 0.905 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 120 teams · 0.915 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2011Wisconsin1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 12 Big Ten teams in 2011. Range 0–2.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#12 (of 120 teams · 469.9 yds/g · 6,578 yards)#6 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 44.1 pts/g · 618 points)#20 (of 120 teams · 316.4 yds/g allowed · 4,430 yards)#13 (of 120 teams · 19.0 pts/g allowed · 266 points)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +25.1 /g · +352 on the season)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +17 on the season · 27 taken, 10 given · +1.21 /g)#16 (of 120 teams · 20:01 /g · 4h 40m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.213 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#38 (of 120 teams · 0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#4 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 49% of plays successful)#32 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#25 (of 120 teams · 0.981 average PPA on successful plays)#68 (of 120 teams · 0.936 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Big Ten, 20112011 PurdueBig Ten medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #66
Total offense. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #12 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #33 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #53 of 120; 2011 Michigan #60 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #62 of 120; 2011 Iowa #71 of 120; 2011 Indiana #78 of 120; 2011 Illinois #81 of 120; 2011 Penn State #93 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #107 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 66 of 120. Big Ten median rank 66.
Scoring offensemedian #58
Scoring offense. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #6 of 120; 2011 Michigan #26 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #37 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #50 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #51 of 120; 2011 Iowa #58 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #81 of 120; 2011 Illinois #91 of 120; 2011 Indiana #101 of 120; 2011 Penn State #110 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #111 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 60 of 120. Big Ten median rank 58.
Total defensemedian #24
Total defense. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Michigan State #6 of 120; 2011 Illinois #8 of 120; 2011 Michigan #11 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #20 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #23 of 120; 2011 Penn State #24 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #37 of 120; 2011 Iowa #62 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #78 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #81 of 120; 2011 Indiana #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 75 of 120. Big Ten median rank 24.
Scoring defensemedian #27
Scoring defense. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Penn State #5 of 120; 2011 Michigan #6 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #10 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #13 of 120; 2011 Illinois #15 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #27 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #42 of 120; 2011 Iowa #46 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #66 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #93 of 120; 2011 Indiana #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 63 of 120. Big Ten median rank 27.
Point marginmedian #57
Point margin. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #4 of 120; 2011 Michigan #13 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #17 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #42 of 120; 2011 Iowa #55 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #57 of 120; 2011 Illinois #59 of 120; 2011 Penn State #61 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #66 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #108 of 120; 2011 Indiana #110 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 68 of 120. Big Ten median rank 57.
Turnover marginmedian #47
Turnover margin. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #3 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #27 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #28 of 120; 2011 Michigan #32 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #37 of 120; 2011 Iowa #47 of 120; 2011 Penn State #53 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #61 of 120; 2011 Indiana #79 of 120; 2011 Illinois #91 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #101 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 47 of 120. Big Ten median rank 47.
Possessionmedian #42
Possession. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #16 of 120; 2011 Illinois #20 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #27 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #33 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #42 of 120; 2011 Penn State #45 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #55 of 120; 2011 Michigan #68 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #89 of 120; 2011 Iowa #94 of 120; 2011 Indiana #105 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 39 of 120. Big Ten median rank 42.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: . Marked: 2011 Purdue, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #61
Offensive EPA. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #1 of 120; 2011 Iowa #21 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #22 of 120; 2011 Michigan #39 of 120; 2011 Indiana #57 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #64 of 120; 2011 Illinois #68 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #80 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #84 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #90 of 120; 2011 Penn State #99 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 61 of 120. Big Ten median rank 61.
Defensive EPAmedian #48
Defensive EPA. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Michigan State #4 of 120; 2011 Illinois #12 of 120; 2011 Penn State #32 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #35 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #38 of 120; 2011 Michigan #48 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #66 of 120; 2011 Iowa #76 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #108 of 120; 2011 Indiana #109 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #112 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 78 of 120. Big Ten median rank 48.
Offensive success ratemedian #57
Offensive success rate. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Wisconsin #4 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #11 of 120; 2011 Michigan #41 of 120; 2011 Iowa #48 of 120; 2011 Illinois #57 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #68 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #71 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #88 of 120; 2011 Penn State #92 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #96 of 120; 2011 Indiana #102 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 52 of 120. Big Ten median rank 57.
Defensive success ratemedian #39
Defensive success rate. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Michigan State #2 of 120; 2011 Illinois #15 of 120; 2011 Penn State #28 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #32 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #35 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #39 of 120; 2011 Iowa #70 of 120; 2011 Michigan #72 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #87 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #98 of 120; 2011 Indiana #114 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 80 of 120. Big Ten median rank 39.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #67
Offensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Indiana #20 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #25 of 120; 2011 Michigan #36 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #59 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #67 of 120; 2011 Iowa #72 of 120; 2011 Penn State #75 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #77 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #82 of 120; 2011 Illinois #98 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #117 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 47 of 120. Big Ten median rank 67.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #54
Defensive explosiveness. Big Ten, 2011, best rank first: 2011 Indiana #17 of 120; 2011 Ohio State #37 of 120; 2011 Iowa #39 of 120; 2011 Michigan #47 of 120; 2011 Penn State #54 of 120; 2011 Wisconsin #68 of 120; 2011 Minnesota #85 of 120; 2011 Illinois #87 of 120; 2011 Nebraska #94 of 120; 2011 Michigan State #98 of 120; 2011 Northwestern #113 of 120. Marked: 2011 Purdue, ranked 18 of 120. Big Ten median rank 54.