Metrics

RiceOwls

Season
Current

Conference USA

Conference USA, 2016

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2016Rice390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#85 (of 128 teams · 384.8 yds/g · 4,618 yards)#93 (of 128 teams · 25.3 pts/g · 303 points)#123 (of 128 teams · 504.1 yds/g allowed · 6,049 yards)#114 (of 128 teams · 37.3 pts/g allowed · 448 points)#113 (of 128 teams · -12.1 /g · -145 on the season)#112 (of 128 teams · -7 on the season · 11 taken, 18 given · -0.58 /g)#55 (of 128 teams · 30:25 /g · 6h 05m on the season)#96 (of 128 teams · 14% of last season's passing production returning)#44 (of 128 teams · 72% of last season's receiving production returning)#46 (of 128 teams · 78% of last season's rushing production returning)#97 (of 128 teams · 394.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#103 (of 128 teams · 0.095 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#127 (of 128 teams · 0.315 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#89 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#89 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 128 teams · 1.114 average PPA on successful plays)#125 (of 128 teams · 1.423 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 13 Conference USA teams in 20160 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)0 (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#85 (Total offense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #5–#117. 3 of 13 in the top 10.)#80 (Scoring offense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #1–#106. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#86 (Total defense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #15–#124. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#102 (Scoring defense: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #41–#123. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#102 (Point margin: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #7–#119. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#64 (Turnover margin: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #6–#125. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#68 (Possession: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #10–#106. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#62 (Returning passing: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #1–#126. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#69 (Returning receiving: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #13–#123. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#82 (Returning rushing: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #7–#120. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#96 (Team talent: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #73–#124. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#74 (Offensive EPA: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #2–#113. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#79 (Defensive EPA: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #39–#128. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)#84 (Offensive success rate: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #1–#116. 2 of 13 in the top 10.)#89 (Defensive success rate: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #6–#126. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#40 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #7–#106. 1 of 13 in the top 10.)#75 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range #19–#127. 0 of 13 in the top 10.)
2016Charlotte480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#102 (of 128 teams · 368.9 yds/g · 4,427 yards)#94 (of 128 teams · 25.2 pts/g · 302 points)#105 (of 128 teams · 453.3 yds/g allowed · 5,439 yards)#102 (of 128 teams · 34.6 pts/g allowed · 415 points)#109 (of 128 teams · -9.4 /g · -113 on the season)#17 (of 128 teams · +8 on the season · 23 taken, 15 given · +0.67 /g)#80 (of 128 teams · 29:00 /g · 5h 48m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#25 (of 128 teams · 81% of last season's receiving production returning)#63 (of 128 teams · 71% of last season's rushing production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 330.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#107 (of 128 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#79 (of 128 teams · 0.174 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#116 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#85 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#42 (of 128 teams · 1.250 average PPA on successful plays)#50 (of 128 teams · 1.164 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Florida Atlantic390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#71 (of 128 teams · 398.3 yds/g · 4,779 yards)#80 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 317 points)#124 (of 128 teams · 513.8 yds/g allowed · 6,166 yards)#123 (of 128 teams · 39.8 pts/g allowed · 477 points)#119 (of 128 teams · -13.3 /g · -160 on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 15 taken, 20 given · -0.42 /g)#105 (of 128 teams · 27:43 /g · 5h 33m on the season)#87 (of 128 teams · 40% of last season's passing production returning)#69 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's receiving production returning)#98 (of 128 teams · 50% of last season's rushing production returning)#92 (of 128 teams · 408.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#74 (of 128 teams · 0.144 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#128 (of 128 teams · 0.341 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#79 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#126 (of 128 teams · 50% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#72 (of 128 teams · 1.188 average PPA on successful plays)#96 (of 128 teams · 1.249 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Florida International480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#93 (of 128 teams · 378.4 yds/g · 4,541 yards)#106 (of 128 teams · 24.0 pts/g · 288 points)#86 (of 128 teams · 434.6 yds/g allowed · 5,215 yards)#104 (of 128 teams · 34.8 pts/g allowed · 418 points)#111 (of 128 teams · -10.8 /g · -130 on the season)#117 (of 128 teams · -9 on the season · 14 taken, 23 given · -0.75 /g)#33 (of 128 teams · 31:34 /g · 6h 19m on the season)#44 (of 128 teams · 96% of last season's passing production returning)#60 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#37 (of 128 teams · 85% of last season's rushing production returning)#110 (of 128 teams · 362.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#106 (of 128 teams · 0.088 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#103 (of 128 teams · 0.225 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#84 (of 128 teams · 42% of plays successful)#119 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 128 teams · 1.199 average PPA on successful plays)#38 (of 128 teams · 1.153 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Louisiana Tech950 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · 1 including the postseason — postseason: #25 Navy)#9 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 514.7 yds/g · 7,206 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 44.3 pts/g · 620 points)#71 (of 128 teams · 420.9 yds/g allowed · 5,893 yards)#97 (of 128 teams · 33.6 pts/g allowed · 470 points)#26 (of 128 teams · +10.7 /g · +150 on the season)#64 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 18 taken, 17 given · +0.07 /g)#93 (of 128 teams · 28:23 /g · 6h 37m on the season)#108 (of 128 teams · 7% of last season's passing production returning)#59 (of 128 teams · 65% of last season's receiving production returning)#118 (of 128 teams · 27% of last season's rushing production returning)#78 (of 128 teams · 451.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#2 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.372 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#111 (of 128 teams · 0.241 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 53% of plays successful)#118 (of 128 teams · 48% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#31 (of 128 teams · 1.271 average PPA on successful plays)#64 (of 128 teams · 1.193 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Marshall390 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#114 (of 128 teams · 350.0 yds/g · 4,200 yards)#80 (of 128 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 317 points)#107 (of 128 teams · 455.4 yds/g allowed · 5,465 yards)#107 (of 128 teams · 35.3 pts/g allowed · 423 points)#106 (of 128 teams · -8.8 /g · -106 on the season)#36 (of 128 teams · +4 on the season · 20 taken, 16 given · +0.33 /g)#64 (of 128 teams · 29:52 /g · 5h 58m on the season)#62 (of 128 teams · 82% of last season's passing production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#88 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's rushing production returning)#73 (of 128 teams · 485.5 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#113 (of 128 teams · 0.067 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#123 (of 128 teams · 0.285 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#115 (of 128 teams · 38% of plays successful)#110 (of 128 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#52 (of 128 teams · 1.234 average PPA on successful plays)#101 (of 128 teams · 1.275 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Middle Tennessee850 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#8 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 517.7 yds/g · 6,730 yards)#12 (of 128 teams · 39.7 pts/g · 516 points)#96 (of 128 teams · 449.5 yds/g allowed · 5,843 yards)#109 (of 128 teams · 35.8 pts/g allowed · 465 points)#54 (of 128 teams · +3.9 /g · +51 on the season)#79 (of 128 teams · -2 on the season · 19 taken, 21 given · -0.15 /g)#97 (of 128 teams · 28:07 /g · 6h 06m on the season)#41 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#77 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's receiving production returning)#82 (of 128 teams · 63% of last season's rushing production returning)#85 (of 128 teams · 436.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#11 (of 128 teams · 0.308 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#69 (of 128 teams · 0.155 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#29 (of 128 teams · 46% of plays successful)#91 (of 128 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 1.347 average PPA on successful plays)#30 (of 128 teams · 1.145 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016North Texas580 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#117 (of 128 teams · 341.9 yds/g · 4,444 yards)#99 (of 128 teams · 24.8 pts/g · 322 points)#89 (of 128 teams · 440.3 yds/g allowed · 5,724 yards)#96 (of 128 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 424 points)#102 (of 128 teams · -7.8 /g · -102 on the season)#58 (of 128 teams · +1 on the season · 22 taken, 21 given · +0.08 /g)#106 (of 128 teams · 27:30 /g · 5h 58m on the season)#126 (of 128 teams · 0% of last season's passing production returning)#123 (of 128 teams · 23% of last season's receiving production returning)#120 (of 128 teams · 24% of last season's rushing production returning)#113 (of 128 teams · 351.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#108 (of 128 teams · 0.086 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#49 (of 128 teams · 0.127 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#106 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#51 (of 128 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#61 (of 128 teams · 1.217 average PPA on successful plays)#75 (of 128 teams · 1.205 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Old Dominion1030 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#50 (of 128 teams · 430.9 yds/g · 5,601 yards)#31 (of 128 teams · 35.1 pts/g · 456 points)#50 (of 128 teams · 386.5 yds/g allowed · 5,025 yards)#57 (of 128 teams · 27.2 pts/g allowed · 354 points)#37 (of 128 teams · +7.8 /g · +102 on the season)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +12 on the season · 22 taken, 10 given · +0.92 /g)#68 (of 128 teams · 29:40 /g · 6h 26m on the season)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 100% of last season's passing production returning)#13 (of 128 teams · 90% of last season's receiving production returning)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's rushing production returning)#115 (of 128 teams · 347.2 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#35 (of 128 teams · 0.215 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#74 (of 128 teams · 0.168 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#59 (of 128 teams · 44% of plays successful)#74 (of 128 teams · 44% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#13 (of 128 teams · 1.320 average PPA on successful plays)#77 (of 128 teams · 1.211 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Southern Miss760 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#22 (of 128 teams · 472.4 yds/g · 6,141 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 32.9 pts/g · 427 points)#15 (of 128 teams · 324.9 yds/g allowed · 4,223 yards)#74 (of 128 teams · 29.5 pts/g allowed · 384 points)#58 (of 128 teams · +3.3 /g · +43 on the season)#125 (of 128 teams · -17 on the season · 15 taken, 32 given · -1.31 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 33:27 /g · 7h 15m on the season)#39 (of 128 teams · 98% of last season's passing production returning)#117 (of 128 teams · 32% of last season's receiving production returning)#109 (of 128 teams · 42% of last season's rushing production returning)#83 (of 128 teams · 441.3 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#41 (of 128 teams · 0.206 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#39 (of 128 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 128 teams · 43% of plays successful)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 35% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#24 (of 128 teams · 1.286 average PPA on successful plays)#127 (of 128 teams · 1.456 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016UTEP480 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#101 (of 128 teams · 369.2 yds/g · 4,430 yards)#82 (of 128 teams · 26.3 pts/g · 316 points)#69 (of 128 teams · 419.3 yds/g allowed · 5,032 yards)#105 (of 128 teams · 34.9 pts/g allowed · 419 points)#104 (of 128 teams · -8.6 /g · -103 on the season)#97 (of 128 teams · -5 on the season · 11 taken, 16 given · -0.42 /g)#59 (of 128 teams · 30:11 /g · 6h 02m on the season)#25 (of 128 teams · 99% of last season's passing production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 74% of last season's receiving production returning)#89 (of 128 teams · 58% of last season's rushing production returning)#124 (of 128 teams · 290.4 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#93 (of 128 teams · 0.111 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 128 teams · 0.239 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#105 (of 128 teams · 40% of plays successful)#123 (of 128 teams · 49% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#40 (of 128 teams · 1.256 average PPA on successful plays)#19 (of 128 teams · 1.110 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016UTSA670 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#98 (of 128 teams · 375.5 yds/g · 4,881 yards)#65 (of 128 teams · 29.1 pts/g · 379 points)#55 (of 128 teams · 392.0 yds/g allowed · 5,096 yards)#63 (of 128 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 363 points)#63 (of 128 teams · +1.2 /g · +16 on the season)#42 (of 128 teams · +3 on the season · 18 taken, 15 given · +0.23 /g)#34 (of 128 teams · 31:27 /g · 6h 49m on the season)#75 (of 128 teams · 61% of last season's passing production returning)#84 (of 128 teams · 55% of last season's receiving production returning)#36 (of 128 teams · 86% of last season's rushing production returning)#96 (of 128 teams · 397.6 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#64 (of 128 teams · 0.161 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#55 (of 128 teams · 0.137 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#97 (of 128 teams · 41% of plays successful)#56 (of 128 teams · 43% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#36 (of 128 teams · 1.260 average PPA on successful plays)#54 (of 128 teams · 1.178 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2016Western Kentucky1130 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 13 Conference USA teams in 2016. Range 0–0.)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-10 teams · none added in the postseason)0 (0 regular-season wins over top-25 teams · none added in the postseason)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 523.1 yds/g · 7,324 yards)#1 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 45.5 pts/g · 637 points)#41 (of 128 teams · 376.6 yds/g allowed · 5,272 yards)#41 (of 128 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 344 points)#7 — top 10 (of 128 teams · +20.9 /g · +293 on the season)#52 (of 128 teams · +2 on the season · 21 taken, 19 given · +0.14 /g)#85 (of 128 teams · 28:50 /g · 6h 44m on the season)#117 (of 128 teams · 3% of last season's passing production returning)#97 (of 128 teams · 49% of last season's receiving production returning)#41 (of 128 teams · 84% of last season's rushing production returning)#95 (of 128 teams · 401.8 composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#5 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 0.347 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#57 (of 128 teams · 0.141 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#6 — top 10 (of 128 teams · 51% of plays successful)#27 (of 128 teams · 39% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#14 (of 128 teams · 1.315 average PPA on successful plays)#122 (of 128 teams · 1.371 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Conference USA, 20162016 RiceConference USA medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #85
Total offense. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Kentucky #5 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #8 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #9 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #22 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #50 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #71 of 128; 2016 Florida International #93 of 128; 2016 UTSA #98 of 128; 2016 UTEP #101 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #102 of 128; 2016 Marshall #114 of 128; 2016 North Texas #117 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 85 of 128. Conference USA median rank 85.
Scoring offensemedian #80
Scoring offense. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Kentucky #1 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #2 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #12 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #31 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #41 of 128; 2016 UTSA #65 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #80 of 128; 2016 Marshall #80 of 128; 2016 UTEP #82 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #94 of 128; 2016 North Texas #99 of 128; 2016 Florida International #106 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 93 of 128. Conference USA median rank 80.
Total defensemedian #86
Total defense. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Southern Miss #15 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #41 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #50 of 128; 2016 UTSA #55 of 128; 2016 UTEP #69 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #71 of 128; 2016 Florida International #86 of 128; 2016 North Texas #89 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #96 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #105 of 128; 2016 Marshall #107 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 123 of 128. Conference USA median rank 86.
Scoring defensemedian #102
Scoring defense. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Kentucky #41 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #57 of 128; 2016 UTSA #63 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #74 of 128; 2016 North Texas #96 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #97 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #102 of 128; 2016 Florida International #104 of 128; 2016 UTEP #105 of 128; 2016 Marshall #107 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #109 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 114 of 128. Conference USA median rank 102.
Point marginmedian #102
Point margin. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Western Kentucky #7 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #26 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #37 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #54 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #58 of 128; 2016 UTSA #63 of 128; 2016 North Texas #102 of 128; 2016 UTEP #104 of 128; 2016 Marshall #106 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #109 of 128; 2016 Florida International #111 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #119 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 113 of 128. Conference USA median rank 102.
Turnover marginmedian #64
Turnover margin. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Old Dominion #6 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #17 of 128; 2016 Marshall #36 of 128; 2016 UTSA #42 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #52 of 128; 2016 North Texas #58 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #64 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #79 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #97 of 128; 2016 UTEP #97 of 128; 2016 Florida International #117 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #125 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 112 of 128. Conference USA median rank 64.
Possessionmedian #68
Possession. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Southern Miss #10 of 128; 2016 Florida International #33 of 128; 2016 UTSA #34 of 128; 2016 UTEP #59 of 128; 2016 Marshall #64 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #68 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #80 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #85 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #93 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #97 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #105 of 128; 2016 North Texas #106 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 55 of 128. Conference USA median rank 68.
Returning passingmedian #62
Returning passing. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Charlotte #1 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #1 of 128; 2016 UTEP #25 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #39 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #41 of 128; 2016 Florida International #44 of 128; 2016 Marshall #62 of 128; 2016 UTSA #75 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #87 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #108 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #117 of 128; 2016 North Texas #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 96 of 128. Conference USA median rank 62.
Returning receivingmedian #69
Returning receiving. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Old Dominion #13 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #25 of 128; 2016 UTEP #36 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #59 of 128; 2016 Florida International #60 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #69 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #77 of 128; 2016 UTSA #84 of 128; 2016 Marshall #85 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #97 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #117 of 128; 2016 North Texas #123 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 44 of 128. Conference USA median rank 69.
Returning rushingmedian #82
Returning rushing. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Old Dominion #7 of 128; 2016 UTSA #36 of 128; 2016 Florida International #37 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #41 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #63 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #82 of 128; 2016 Marshall #88 of 128; 2016 UTEP #89 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #98 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #109 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #118 of 128; 2016 North Texas #120 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 46 of 128. Conference USA median rank 82.
Team talentmedian #96
Team talent. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Marshall #73 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #78 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #83 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #85 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #92 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #95 of 128; 2016 UTSA #96 of 128; 2016 Florida International #110 of 128; 2016 North Texas #113 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #115 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #120 of 128; 2016 UTEP #124 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 97 of 128. Conference USA median rank 96.
Offensive EPAmedian #74
Offensive EPA. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisiana Tech #2 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #5 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #11 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #35 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #41 of 128; 2016 UTSA #64 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #74 of 128; 2016 UTEP #93 of 128; 2016 Florida International #106 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #107 of 128; 2016 North Texas #108 of 128; 2016 Marshall #113 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 103 of 128. Conference USA median rank 74.
Defensive EPAmedian #79
Defensive EPA. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Southern Miss #39 of 128; 2016 North Texas #49 of 128; 2016 UTSA #55 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #57 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #69 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #74 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #79 of 128; 2016 Florida International #103 of 128; 2016 UTEP #109 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #111 of 128; 2016 Marshall #123 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #128 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 127 of 128. Conference USA median rank 79.
Offensive success ratemedian #84
Offensive success rate. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Louisiana Tech #1 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #6 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #29 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #59 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #64 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #79 of 128; 2016 Florida International #84 of 128; 2016 UTSA #97 of 128; 2016 UTEP #105 of 128; 2016 North Texas #106 of 128; 2016 Marshall #115 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #116 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 89 of 128. Conference USA median rank 84.
Defensive success ratemedian #89
Defensive success rate. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Southern Miss #6 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #27 of 128; 2016 North Texas #51 of 128; 2016 UTSA #56 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #74 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #85 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #91 of 128; 2016 Marshall #110 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #118 of 128; 2016 Florida International #119 of 128; 2016 UTEP #123 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #126 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 89 of 128. Conference USA median rank 89.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #40
Offensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 Middle Tennessee #7 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #13 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #14 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #24 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #31 of 128; 2016 UTSA #36 of 128; 2016 UTEP #40 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #42 of 128; 2016 Marshall #52 of 128; 2016 North Texas #61 of 128; 2016 Florida International #70 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #72 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 106 of 128. Conference USA median rank 40.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #75
Defensive explosiveness. Conference USA, 2016, best rank first: 2016 UTEP #19 of 128; 2016 Middle Tennessee #30 of 128; 2016 Florida International #38 of 128; 2016 Charlotte #50 of 128; 2016 UTSA #54 of 128; 2016 Louisiana Tech #64 of 128; 2016 North Texas #75 of 128; 2016 Old Dominion #77 of 128; 2016 Florida Atlantic #96 of 128; 2016 Marshall #101 of 128; 2016 Western Kentucky #122 of 128; 2016 Southern Miss #127 of 128. Marked: 2016 Rice, ranked 125 of 128. Conference USA median rank 75.