THIRD AND DATA

Rice game log

2017: every game, then every offensive snap for both sides.

Season
‹
›Current

Game log

Box score per game. Success is the share of runs and passes that gained 50% of the distance on 1st down, 70% on 2nd, all of it on 3rd and 4th, or scored.

DateOpponentResultPlaysYdsYds/playRushPass1st downs3rd down4th downTOPenPossOff successDef success
Aug 26vs #20 Stanford7–62 L622413.938–14610–24–95145–150–226–4526:2234%55%
Sep 9at UTEP31–14 W674376.549–30610–18–131224–100–114–3134:2251%30%
Sep 16at Houston3–38 L602424.035–12911–25–113144–140–032–1528:0335%52%
Sep 23vs Florida International7–13 L682483.641–10016–27–148195–151–214–3033:5731%38%
Sep 30at Pittsburgh10–42 L552775.023–5515–32–222144–130–034–3725:4527%54%
Oct 7vs Army12–49 L583466.037–2009–21–146174–111–163–3323:5241%57%
Oct 21at UTSA7–20 L553005.541–1556–14–145132–102–437–7029:3536%40%
Oct 28vs Louisiana Tech28–42 L634346.946–2477–17–187195–101–145–4928:3956%51%
Nov 4at UAB21–52 L594637.835–23614–24–227178–141–136–5030:4939%60%
Nov 11vs Southern Miss34–43 L653815.949–25410–16–127267–111–203–3032:4248%52%
Nov 18at Old Dominion21–24 L623315.350–2418–12–90185–110–124–3033:2338%49%
Nov 25vs North Texas14–30 L582824.942–1756–16–107134–130–415–4027:4834%48%
Season12 games1–117323,9825.4486–2244122–246–1,73820657–1477–192953–4605:55:1739%49%

Success by play

Each square is one snap, in order. Top row: Rice on offense. Bottom row: the opponent on offense, which is Rice's defense in the mirror.

Down
Play
Min to go
Player

Season, current filters:Rice offense 39% (289 of 734)Opponent offense / Rice defense 49% (391 of 796)

SuccessNot successfulTurnoverTouchdownField goalunder the square = passQuarters, aboveDrives, belowHover or tap a square for the down, distance, players and the play.
Success rate by game
0%25%50%75%100%#20 Stanford: opponent offense 55% of 74#20 Stanford: Rice offense 34% of 62UTEP: opponent offense 30% of 57UTEP: Rice offense 51% of 67Houston: opponent offense 52% of 75Houston: Rice offense 35% of 60Florida International: opponent offense 38% of 61Florida International: Rice offense 31% of 68Pittsburgh: opponent offense 54% of 67Pittsburgh: Rice offense 27% of 55Army: opponent offense 57% of 68Army: Rice offense 41% of 58UTSA: opponent offense 40% of 62UTSA: Rice offense 36% of 55Louisiana Tech: opponent offense 51% of 71Louisiana Tech: Rice offense 56% of 63UAB: opponent offense 60% of 57UAB: Rice offense 39% of 59Southern Miss: opponent offense 52% of 67Southern Miss: Rice offense 48% of 65Old Dominion: opponent offense 49% of 68Old Dominion: Rice offense 38% of 64North Texas: opponent offense 48% of 69North Texas: Rice offense 34% of 58
#20 Stanford *@ UTEP@ HoustonFlorida International@ PittsburghArmy@ UTSALouisiana Tech@ UABSouthern Miss@ Old DominionNorth Texas
Rice offenseOpponent offense (Rice defense)
Successful snaps by player
PlayerSuccessful · rate of snaps

vs #20 Stanford

7–62 L · 62 plays to 74
Rice offense 34% (21/62)Stanford offense 55% (41/74)

at UTEP

31–14 W · 67 plays to 57
Rice offense 51% (34/67)UTEP offense 30% (17/57)

at Houston

3–38 L · 60 plays to 75
Rice offense 35% (21/60)Houston offense 52% (39/75)

vs Florida International

7–13 L · 68 plays to 61
Rice offense 31% (21/68)FIU offense 38% (23/61)

at Pittsburgh

10–42 L · 55 plays to 67
Rice offense 27% (15/55)Pittsburgh offense 54% (36/67)

vs Army

12–49 L · 58 plays to 68
Rice offense 41% (24/58)Army offense 57% (39/68)

at UTSA

7–20 L · 55 plays to 62
Rice offense 36% (20/55)UTSA offense 40% (25/62)

vs Louisiana Tech

28–42 L · 63 plays to 71
Rice offense 56% (35/63)Louisiana Tech offense 51% (36/71)

at UAB

21–52 L · 59 plays to 57
Rice offense 39% (23/59)UAB offense 60% (34/57)

vs Southern Miss

34–43 L · 65 plays to 67
Rice offense 48% (31/65)Southern Miss offense 52% (35/67)

at Old Dominion

21–24 L · 64 plays to 68
Rice offense 38% (24/64)Old Dominion offense 49% (33/68)

vs North Texas

14–30 L · 58 plays to 69
Rice offense 34% (20/58)North Texas offense 48% (33/69)