THIRD AND DATA

Metrics

San Diego StateAztecs

Season
‹
›Current

Mountain West

Before 2014: Every figure covers the full season, all opponents and the postseason included; success rate, EPA and explosiveness are the provider's season figures.

Mountain West, 2003

Rank within the division. Teal is top 10, orange is bottom 10. Sorted by top-10 ranks minus bottom-10 ranks. The three count columns (top-10 classes, top-10 wins, top-25 wins) are not ranks and are not scored. Hover a team for its score, a rank for the numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2003San Diego State6–60 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#102 (of 117 teams · 18.7 pts/g · 224 points)— (— allowed · —)#13 (of 117 teams · 17.3 pts/g allowed · 207 points)#58 (of 117 teams · +1.4 /g · +17 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 8 Mountain West teams in 20030 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)— (No team has a rank for this)#60 (Scoring offense: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range #33–#109. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)#40 (Scoring defense: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range #13–#83. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)#51 (Point margin: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range #27–#92. 0 of 8 in the top 10.)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)— (No team has a rank for this)
2003Air Force7–50 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#60 (of 117 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 322 points)— (— allowed · —)#24 (of 117 teams · 20.2 pts/g allowed · 242 points)#44 (of 117 teams · +6.7 /g · +80 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Colorado State7–60 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#37 (of 117 teams · 29.3 pts/g · 381 points)— (— allowed · —)#55 (of 117 teams · 24.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#51 (of 117 teams · +4.8 /g · +63 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003New Mexico8–50 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#33 (of 117 teams · 30.1 pts/g · 391 points)— (— allowed · —)#40 (of 117 teams · 22.3 pts/g allowed · 290 points)#39 (of 117 teams · +7.8 /g · +101 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003UNLV6–60 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#89 (of 117 teams · 21.3 pts/g · 256 points)— (— allowed · —)#43 (of 117 teams · 22.7 pts/g allowed · 272 points)#67 (of 117 teams · -1.3 /g · -16 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Utah10–20 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#42 (of 117 teams · 28.7 pts/g · 344 points)— (— allowed · —)#19 (of 117 teams · 19.1 pts/g allowed · 229 points)#27 (of 117 teams · +9.6 /g · +115 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Wyoming4–80 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#76 (of 117 teams · 23.8 pts/g · 286 points)— (— allowed · —)#83 (of 117 teams · 30.0 pts/g allowed · 360 points)#84 (of 117 teams · -6.2 /g · -74 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003BYU4–80 / 0 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 8 Mountain West teams in 2003. Range 0–0.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)— (— · —)#109 — bottom 10 (of 117 teams · 16.3 pts/g · 196 points)— (— allowed · —)#62 (of 117 teams · 25.8 pts/g allowed · 310 points)#92 (of 117 teams · -9.5 /g · -114 on the season)— (—)— (— /g · — on the season)— (— of last season's passing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's receiving plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— of last season's rushing plays returning (CFBD usage, a share of plays, not yards))— (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)— (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)— (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defense)— (— of plays successful)— (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better)— (— average PPA on successful plays)— (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mountain West, 20032003 San Diego StateMountain West medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #60
Scoring offense. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: 2003 New Mexico #33 of 117; 2003 Colorado State #37 of 117; 2003 Utah #42 of 117; 2003 Air Force #60 of 117; 2003 Wyoming #76 of 117; 2003 UNLV #89 of 117; 2003 BYU #109 of 117. Marked: 2003 San Diego State, ranked 102 of 117. Mountain West median rank 60.
Total defense
Total defense. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #40
Scoring defense. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: 2003 Utah #19 of 117; 2003 Air Force #24 of 117; 2003 New Mexico #40 of 117; 2003 UNLV #43 of 117; 2003 Colorado State #55 of 117; 2003 BYU #62 of 117; 2003 Wyoming #83 of 117. Marked: 2003 San Diego State, ranked 13 of 117. Mountain West median rank 40.
Point marginmedian #51
Point margin. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: 2003 Utah #27 of 117; 2003 New Mexico #39 of 117; 2003 Air Force #44 of 117; 2003 Colorado State #51 of 117; 2003 UNLV #67 of 117; 2003 Wyoming #84 of 117; 2003 BYU #92 of 117. Marked: 2003 San Diego State, ranked 58 of 117. Mountain West median rank 51.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Mountain West, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.