Metrics

San Diego StateAztecs

Season
Current

Mountain West

Mountain West, 2008

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2008San Diego State2100 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#98 (of 120 teams · 312.4 yds/g · 3,749 yards)#104 (of 120 teams · 19.3 pts/g · 231 points)#114 (of 120 teams · 460.8 yds/g allowed · 5,529 yards)#114 (of 120 teams · 37.2 pts/g allowed · 446 points)#116 (of 120 teams · -17.9 /g · -215 on the season)#100 (of 120 teams · -9 on the season · 19 taken, 28 given · -0.75 /g)#118 (of 120 teams · 15:52 /g · 3h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#88 (of 120 teams · -0.010 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#113 (of 120 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#93 (of 120 teams · 37% of plays successful)#102 (of 120 teams · 45% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#30 (of 120 teams · 0.963 average PPA on successful plays)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.893 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Mountain West teams in 20080 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.)#67 (Total offense: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #14–#108. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#58 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #15–#120. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#52 (Total defense: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #1–#114. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#46 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #2–#114. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#78 (Point margin: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #7–#116. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#50 (Turnover margin: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #2–#120. 2 of 9 in the top 10.)#56 (Possession: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #2–#118. 2 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)#51 (Offensive EPA: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #10–#100. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#72 (Defensive EPA: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #2–#114. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#64 (Offensive success rate: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #3–#93. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#70 (Defensive success rate: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #1–#113. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#102 (Offensive explosiveness: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #12–#113. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)#43 (Defensive explosiveness: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range #27–#119. 0 of 9 in the top 10.)
2008Air Force850 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#67 (of 120 teams · 349.1 yds/g · 4,538 yards)#53 (of 120 teams · 26.8 pts/g · 348 points)#52 (of 120 teams · 341.5 yds/g allowed · 4,439 yards)#43 (of 120 teams · 22.2 pts/g allowed · 289 points)#44 (of 120 teams · +4.5 /g · +59 on the season)#9 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +16 on the season · 33 taken, 17 given · +1.23 /g)#31 (of 120 teams · 18:56 /g · 4h 06m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.017 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#72 (of 120 teams · 0.042 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#87 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#70 (of 120 teams · 41% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#106 (of 120 teams · 0.826 average PPA on successful plays)#81 (of 120 teams · 0.937 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008BYU1030 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#14 (of 120 teams · 444.1 yds/g · 5,773 yards)#20 (of 120 teams · 34.2 pts/g · 445 points)#63 (of 120 teams · 355.9 yds/g allowed · 4,627 yards)#39 (of 120 teams · 21.9 pts/g allowed · 285 points)#22 (of 120 teams · +12.3 /g · +160 on the season)#71 (of 120 teams · -2 on the season · 32 taken, 34 given · -0.15 /g)#56 (of 120 teams · 18:23 /g · 3h 59m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 0.143 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#84 (of 120 teams · 0.067 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#3 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 51% of plays successful)#77 (of 120 teams · 42% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#112 (of 120 teams · 0.798 average PPA on successful plays)#92 (of 120 teams · 0.956 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Colorado State760 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#41 (of 120 teams · 395.9 yds/g · 5,146 yards)#60 (of 120 teams · 25.1 pts/g · 327 points)#99 (of 120 teams · 410.1 yds/g allowed · 5,331 yards)#90 (of 120 teams · 30.2 pts/g allowed · 393 points)#88 (of 120 teams · -5.1 /g · -66 on the season)#50 (of 120 teams · +2 on the season · 23 taken, 21 given · +0.15 /g)#20 (of 120 teams · 19:12 /g · 4h 10m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.056 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#114 (of 120 teams · 0.112 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#39 (of 120 teams · 43% of plays successful)#113 (of 120 teams · 47% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#70 (of 120 teams · 0.903 average PPA on successful plays)#27 (of 120 teams · 0.851 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008New Mexico480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#79 (of 120 teams · 339.6 yds/g · 4,075 yards)#94 (of 120 teams · 21.1 pts/g · 253 points)#46 (of 120 teams · 335.8 yds/g allowed · 4,029 yards)#46 (of 120 teams · 22.8 pts/g allowed · 273 points)#78 (of 120 teams · -1.7 /g · -20 on the season)#36 (of 120 teams · +5 on the season · 28 taken, 23 given · +0.42 /g)#64 (of 120 teams · 18:15 /g · 3h 39m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#65 (of 120 teams · 0.026 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#52 (of 120 teams · 0.015 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#64 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#55 (of 120 teams · 40% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#113 (of 120 teams · 0.792 average PPA on successful plays)#41 (of 120 teams · 0.883 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008TCU1120 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#21 (of 120 teams · 421.3 yds/g · 5,477 yards)#21 (of 120 teams · 33.6 pts/g · 437 points)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 217.8 yds/g allowed · 2,831 yards)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 11.3 pts/g allowed · 147 points)#7 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +22.3 /g · +290 on the season)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +21 on the season · 36 taken, 15 given · +1.62 /g)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 20:36 /g · 4h 28m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#21 (of 120 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#2 — top 10 (of 120 teams · -0.097 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#17 (of 120 teams · 46% of plays successful)#1 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 29% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#104 (of 120 teams · 0.828 average PPA on successful plays)#119 (of 120 teams · 1.086 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008UNLV570 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#69 (of 120 teams · 345.0 yds/g · 4,140 yards)#58 (of 120 teams · 25.6 pts/g · 307 points)#106 (of 120 teams · 422.8 yds/g allowed · 5,074 yards)#101 (of 120 teams · 32.6 pts/g allowed · 391 points)#92 (of 120 teams · -7.0 /g · -84 on the season)#64 (of 120 teams · -1 on the season · 13 taken, 14 given · -0.08 /g)#81 (of 120 teams · 17:38 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#51 (of 120 teams · 0.048 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#109 (of 120 teams · 0.109 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#73 (of 120 teams · 40% of plays successful)#105 (of 120 teams · 46% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#12 (of 120 teams · 1.004 average PPA on successful plays)#40 (of 120 teams · 0.882 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Utah1300 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#35 (of 120 teams · 400.9 yds/g · 5,212 yards)#15 (of 120 teams · 36.9 pts/g · 480 points)#11 (of 120 teams · 289.1 yds/g allowed · 3,759 yards)#12 (of 120 teams · 17.2 pts/g allowed · 224 points)#8 — top 10 (of 120 teams · +19.7 /g · +256 on the season)#15 (of 120 teams · +14 on the season · 34 taken, 20 given · +1.08 /g)#10 — top 10 (of 120 teams · 19:43 /g · 4h 16m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#20 (of 120 teams · 0.094 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#56 (of 120 teams · 0.020 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#20 (of 120 teams · 45% of plays successful)#30 (of 120 teams · 37% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#100 (of 120 teams · 0.846 average PPA on successful plays)#43 (of 120 teams · 0.885 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2008Wyoming480 / 4 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Mountain West teams in 2008. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.)#108 (of 120 teams · 296.0 yds/g · 3,552 yards)#120 (of 120 teams · 12.7 pts/g · 152 points)#38 (of 120 teams · 329.7 yds/g allowed · 3,956 yards)#74 (of 120 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 333 points)#113 (of 120 teams · -15.1 /g · -181 on the season)#120 (of 120 teams · -27 on the season · 14 taken, 41 given · -2.25 /g)#82 (of 120 teams · 17:38 /g · 3h 32m on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons)#100 (of 120 teams · -0.032 predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted)#33 (of 120 teams · -0.006 allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence)#86 (of 120 teams · 38% of plays successful)#43 (of 120 teams · 38% of opponent plays successful · lower is better)#102 (of 120 teams · 0.841 average PPA on successful plays)#31 (of 120 teams · 0.862 allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Mountain West, 20082008 San Diego StateMountain West medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offensemedian #67
Total offense. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 BYU #14 of 120; 2008 TCU #21 of 120; 2008 Utah #35 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #41 of 120; 2008 Air Force #67 of 120; 2008 UNLV #69 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #79 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #108 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 98 of 120. Mountain West median rank 67.
Scoring offensemedian #58
Scoring offense. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Utah #15 of 120; 2008 BYU #20 of 120; 2008 TCU #21 of 120; 2008 Air Force #53 of 120; 2008 UNLV #58 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #60 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #94 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #120 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 104 of 120. Mountain West median rank 58.
Total defensemedian #52
Total defense. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #1 of 120; 2008 Utah #11 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #38 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #46 of 120; 2008 Air Force #52 of 120; 2008 BYU #63 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #99 of 120; 2008 UNLV #106 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 114 of 120. Mountain West median rank 52.
Scoring defensemedian #46
Scoring defense. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #2 of 120; 2008 Utah #12 of 120; 2008 BYU #39 of 120; 2008 Air Force #43 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #46 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #74 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #90 of 120; 2008 UNLV #101 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 114 of 120. Mountain West median rank 46.
Point marginmedian #78
Point margin. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #7 of 120; 2008 Utah #8 of 120; 2008 BYU #22 of 120; 2008 Air Force #44 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #78 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #88 of 120; 2008 UNLV #92 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #113 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 116 of 120. Mountain West median rank 78.
Turnover marginmedian #50
Turnover margin. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #2 of 120; 2008 Air Force #9 of 120; 2008 Utah #15 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #36 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #50 of 120; 2008 UNLV #64 of 120; 2008 BYU #71 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #120 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 100 of 120. Mountain West median rank 50.
Possessionmedian #56
Possession. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #2 of 120; 2008 Utah #10 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #20 of 120; 2008 Air Force #31 of 120; 2008 BYU #56 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #64 of 120; 2008 UNLV #81 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #82 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 118 of 120. Mountain West median rank 56.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: . Marked: 2008 San Diego State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPAmedian #51
Offensive EPA. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 BYU #10 of 120; 2008 Utah #20 of 120; 2008 TCU #21 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #40 of 120; 2008 UNLV #51 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #65 of 120; 2008 Air Force #72 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #100 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 88 of 120. Mountain West median rank 51.
Defensive EPAmedian #72
Defensive EPA. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #2 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #33 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #52 of 120; 2008 Utah #56 of 120; 2008 Air Force #72 of 120; 2008 BYU #84 of 120; 2008 UNLV #109 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #114 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 113 of 120. Mountain West median rank 72.
Offensive success ratemedian #64
Offensive success rate. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 BYU #3 of 120; 2008 TCU #17 of 120; 2008 Utah #20 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #39 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #64 of 120; 2008 UNLV #73 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #86 of 120; 2008 Air Force #87 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 93 of 120. Mountain West median rank 64.
Defensive success ratemedian #70
Defensive success rate. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 TCU #1 of 120; 2008 Utah #30 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #43 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #55 of 120; 2008 Air Force #70 of 120; 2008 BYU #77 of 120; 2008 UNLV #105 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #113 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 102 of 120. Mountain West median rank 70.
Offensive explosivenessmedian #102
Offensive explosiveness. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 UNLV #12 of 120; 2008 Colorado State #70 of 120; 2008 Utah #100 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #102 of 120; 2008 TCU #104 of 120; 2008 Air Force #106 of 120; 2008 BYU #112 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #113 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 30 of 120. Mountain West median rank 102.
Defensive explosivenessmedian #43
Defensive explosiveness. Mountain West, 2008, best rank first: 2008 Colorado State #27 of 120; 2008 Wyoming #31 of 120; 2008 UNLV #40 of 120; 2008 New Mexico #41 of 120; 2008 Utah #43 of 120; 2008 Air Force #81 of 120; 2008 BYU #92 of 120; 2008 TCU #119 of 120. Marked: 2008 San Diego State, ranked 52 of 120. Mountain West median rank 43.