Metrics

San José StateSpartans

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2000

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2000San José State750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#30 (of 116 teams · 31.2 pts/g · 374 points) (— allowed · —)#84 (of 116 teams · 29.8 pts/g allowed · 357 points)#57 (of 116 teams · +1.4 /g · +17 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 9 Western Athletic teams in 20000 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No team has a rank for this)#66 (Scoring offense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range #13–#110. 0 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#82 (Scoring defense: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range #2–#113. 1 of 9 in the top 10.)#77 (Point margin: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range #4–#111. 1 of 9 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)
2000Fresno State750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#55 (of 116 teams · 26.4 pts/g · 317 points) (— allowed · —)#33 (of 116 teams · 20.9 pts/g allowed · 251 points)#40 (of 116 teams · +5.5 /g · +66 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000Hawai'i390 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#66 (of 116 teams · 24.5 pts/g · 294 points) (— allowed · —)#99 (of 116 teams · 33.3 pts/g allowed · 399 points)#90 (of 116 teams · -8.8 /g · -105 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000Nevada2100 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#100 (of 116 teams · 17.3 pts/g · 207 points) (— allowed · —)#113 (of 116 teams · 38.7 pts/g allowed · 464 points)#111 (of 116 teams · -21.4 /g · -257 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000Rice380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#84 (of 116 teams · 21.6 pts/g · 237 points) (— allowed · —)#82 (of 116 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 322 points)#87 (of 116 teams · -7.7 /g · -85 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000SMU390 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#110 (of 116 teams · 15.1 pts/g · 181 points) (— allowed · —)#83 (of 116 teams · 29.3 pts/g allowed · 352 points)#102 (of 116 teams · -14.3 /g · -171 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000TCU1020 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#13 (of 116 teams · 35.9 pts/g · 431 points) (— allowed · —)#2 — top 10 (of 116 teams · 11.2 pts/g allowed · 134 points)#4 — top 10 (of 116 teams · +24.8 /g · +297 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000Tulsa570 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#92 (of 116 teams · 20.0 pts/g · 240 points) (— allowed · —)#50 (of 116 teams · 23.6 pts/g allowed · 283 points)#77 (of 116 teams · -3.6 /g · -43 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2000UTEP840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 9 Western Athletic teams in 2000. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#27 (of 116 teams · 31.5 pts/g · 378 points) (— allowed · —)#78 (of 116 teams · 28.0 pts/g allowed · 336 points)#48 (of 116 teams · +3.5 /g · +42 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20002000 San José StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #66
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: 2000 TCU #13 of 116; 2000 UTEP #27 of 116; 2000 Fresno State #55 of 116; 2000 Hawai'i #66 of 116; 2000 Rice #84 of 116; 2000 Tulsa #92 of 116; 2000 Nevada #100 of 116; 2000 SMU #110 of 116. Marked: 2000 San José State, ranked 30 of 116. Western Athletic median rank 66.
Total defense
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #82
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: 2000 TCU #2 of 116; 2000 Fresno State #33 of 116; 2000 Tulsa #50 of 116; 2000 UTEP #78 of 116; 2000 Rice #82 of 116; 2000 SMU #83 of 116; 2000 Hawai'i #99 of 116; 2000 Nevada #113 of 116. Marked: 2000 San José State, ranked 84 of 116. Western Athletic median rank 82.
Point marginmedian #77
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: 2000 TCU #4 of 116; 2000 Fresno State #40 of 116; 2000 UTEP #48 of 116; 2000 Tulsa #77 of 116; 2000 Rice #87 of 116; 2000 Hawai'i #90 of 116; 2000 SMU #102 of 116; 2000 Nevada #111 of 116. Marked: 2000 San José State, ranked 57 of 116. Western Athletic median rank 77.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2000, best rank first: . Marked: 2000 San José State, which has no value for this metric.