Metrics

San José StateSpartans

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2001

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2001San José State390 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#74 (of 117 teams · 24.6 pts/g · 295 points) (— allowed · —)#111 (of 117 teams · 38.4 pts/g allowed · 461 points)#103 (of 117 teams · -13.8 /g · -166 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Western Athletic teams in 20010 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No team has a rank for this)#47 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range #4–#111. 2 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#74 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range #41–#113. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#68 (Point margin: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range #7–#111. 2 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)
2001Boise State840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#17 (of 117 teams · 34.3 pts/g · 411 points) (— allowed · —)#41 (of 117 teams · 23.3 pts/g allowed · 280 points)#20 (of 117 teams · +10.9 /g · +131 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Fresno State1130 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#5 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 40.0 pts/g · 560 points) (— allowed · —)#54 (of 117 teams · 24.6 pts/g allowed · 344 points)#7 — top 10 (of 117 teams · +15.4 /g · +216 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Hawai'i930 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#4 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 40.3 pts/g · 483 points) (— allowed · —)#67 (of 117 teams · 26.5 pts/g allowed · 318 points)#10 — top 10 (of 117 teams · +13.8 /g · +165 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Louisiana Tech750 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#20 (of 117 teams · 33.8 pts/g · 406 points) (— allowed · —)#93 (of 117 teams · 32.5 pts/g allowed · 390 points)#56 (of 117 teams · +1.3 /g · +16 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Nevada380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#63 (of 117 teams · 26.0 pts/g · 286 points) (— allowed · —)#113 (of 117 teams · 39.2 pts/g allowed · 431 points)#101 (of 117 teams · -13.2 /g · -145 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Rice840 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#47 (of 117 teams · 27.8 pts/g · 333 points) (— allowed · —)#74 (of 117 teams · 27.9 pts/g allowed · 335 points)#68 (of 117 teams · -0.2 /g · -2 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001SMU470 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#99 (of 117 teams · 20.6 pts/g · 226 points) (— allowed · —)#69 (of 117 teams · 26.8 pts/g allowed · 295 points)#84 (of 117 teams · -6.3 /g · -69 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001Tulsa1100 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#111 (of 117 teams · 17.4 pts/g · 191 points) (— allowed · —)#105 (of 117 teams · 35.2 pts/g allowed · 387 points)#111 (of 117 teams · -17.8 /g · -196 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2001UTEP290 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2001. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#90 (of 117 teams · 21.4 pts/g · 235 points) (— allowed · —)#109 (of 117 teams · 37.6 pts/g allowed · 414 points)#108 (of 117 teams · -16.3 /g · -179 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20012001 San José StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #47
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Hawai'i #4 of 117; 2001 Fresno State #5 of 117; 2001 Boise State #17 of 117; 2001 Louisiana Tech #20 of 117; 2001 Rice #47 of 117; 2001 Nevada #63 of 117; 2001 UTEP #90 of 117; 2001 SMU #99 of 117; 2001 Tulsa #111 of 117. Marked: 2001 San José State, ranked 74 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 47.
Total defense
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #74
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Boise State #41 of 117; 2001 Fresno State #54 of 117; 2001 Hawai'i #67 of 117; 2001 SMU #69 of 117; 2001 Rice #74 of 117; 2001 Louisiana Tech #93 of 117; 2001 Tulsa #105 of 117; 2001 UTEP #109 of 117; 2001 Nevada #113 of 117. Marked: 2001 San José State, ranked 111 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 74.
Point marginmedian #68
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: 2001 Fresno State #7 of 117; 2001 Hawai'i #10 of 117; 2001 Boise State #20 of 117; 2001 Louisiana Tech #56 of 117; 2001 Rice #68 of 117; 2001 SMU #84 of 117; 2001 Nevada #101 of 117; 2001 UTEP #108 of 117; 2001 Tulsa #111 of 117. Marked: 2001 San José State, ranked 103 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 68.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2001, best rank first: . Marked: 2001 San José State, which has no value for this metric.