Metrics

San José StateSpartans

Season
Current

Western Athletic

Western Athletic, 2003

Rank within the division. Hover a rank for the season and per-game numbers.

SeasonTeamTop-10 clsprior 5T10 WregT25 WregTotal offenseScoring offenseTotal defenseScoring defensePoint marginTurnover marginPossessionReturning passingof last yrReturning receivingof last yrReturning rushingof last yrTeam talentOffensive EPADefensive EPAOffensive success rateDefensive success rateOffensive explosivenessDefensive explosiveness
2003San José State380 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#77 (of 117 teams · 23.6 pts/g · 259 points) (— allowed · —)#103 (of 117 teams · 35.1 pts/g allowed · 386 points)#96 (of 117 teams · -11.6 /g · -127 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
Medianof 10 Western Athletic teams in 20030 (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–10 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (Regular-season wins over teams ranked 1–25 in the final Playoff Committee Rankings: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Regular season only, with each opponent's rank frozen at the final regular-season poll — so a team you pin is measured against games it could also have played.) (No team has a rank for this)#68 (Scoring offense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range #1–#117. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this)#85 (Scoring defense: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range #12–#114. 0 of 10 in the top 10.)#73 (Point margin: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range #2–#114. 1 of 10 in the top 10.) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this) (No team has a rank for this)
2003Boise State1310 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#1 — top 10 (of 117 teams · 43.0 pts/g · 602 points) (— allowed · —)#12 (of 117 teams · 17.1 pts/g allowed · 239 points)#2 — top 10 (of 117 teams · +25.9 /g · +363 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Fresno State950 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#80 (of 117 teams · 23.0 pts/g · 322 points) (— allowed · —)#42 (of 117 teams · 22.6 pts/g allowed · 317 points)#62 (of 117 teams · +0.4 /g · +5 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Hawai'i950 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#13 (of 117 teams · 34.7 pts/g · 486 points) (— allowed · —)#85 (of 117 teams · 30.5 pts/g allowed · 427 points)#53 (of 117 teams · +4.2 /g · +59 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Louisiana Tech570 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#68 (of 117 teams · 25.8 pts/g · 310 points) (— allowed · —)#96 (of 117 teams · 32.8 pts/g allowed · 394 points)#88 (of 117 teams · -7.0 /g · -84 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Nevada660 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#78 (of 117 teams · 23.5 pts/g · 282 points) (— allowed · —)#74 (of 117 teams · 28.2 pts/g allowed · 338 points)#80 (of 117 teams · -4.7 /g · -56 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Rice570 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#43 (of 117 teams · 28.6 pts/g · 343 points) (— allowed · —)#91 (of 117 teams · 31.5 pts/g allowed · 378 points)#73 (of 117 teams · -2.9 /g · -35 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003SMU0120 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#117 (of 117 teams · 11.2 pts/g · 134 points) (— allowed · —)#93 (of 117 teams · 32.2 pts/g allowed · 386 points)#114 (of 117 teams · -21.0 /g · -252 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003Tulsa850 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#28 (of 117 teams · 30.8 pts/g · 400 points) (— allowed · —)#73 (of 117 teams · 27.8 pts/g allowed · 361 points)#56 (of 117 teams · +3.0 /g · +39 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)
2003UTEP2110 / 0 — at or above the median (Top-10 classes in the 5 recruiting cycles before that season: median of 10 Western Athletic teams in 2003. Range 0–0.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (No Playoff Committee poll for this season — the committee began in 2014. Not the same as no ranked wins.) (— · —)#84 (of 117 teams · 22.1 pts/g · 288 points) (— allowed · —)#114 (of 117 teams · 38.3 pts/g allowed · 498 points)#106 (of 117 teams · -16.1 /g · -210 on the season) () (— /g · — on the season) (— of last season's passing production returning) (— of last season's receiving production returning) (— of last season's rushing production returning) (— composite · a squad total, so not comparable across seasons) (— predicted points added per play · not opponent-adjusted) (— allowed per play · lower is better, so #1 is the best defence) (— of plays successful) (— of opponent plays successful · lower is better) (— average PPA on successful plays) (— allowed on opponent successes · lower is better)

What clusters, and what does not

One dot per team, placed by its rank within that season's division. A tight cluster is something they share; a spread is something they do not.

Western Athletic, 20032003 San José StateWestern Athletic medianVertical position is spacing only — it carries no meaning.
Total offense
Total offense. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring offensemedian #68
Scoring offense. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: 2003 Boise State #1 of 117; 2003 Hawai'i #13 of 117; 2003 Tulsa #28 of 117; 2003 Rice #43 of 117; 2003 Louisiana Tech #68 of 117; 2003 Nevada #78 of 117; 2003 Fresno State #80 of 117; 2003 UTEP #84 of 117; 2003 SMU #117 of 117. Marked: 2003 San José State, ranked 77 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 68.
Total defense
Total defense. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Scoring defensemedian #85
Scoring defense. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: 2003 Boise State #12 of 117; 2003 Fresno State #42 of 117; 2003 Tulsa #73 of 117; 2003 Nevada #74 of 117; 2003 Hawai'i #85 of 117; 2003 Rice #91 of 117; 2003 SMU #93 of 117; 2003 Louisiana Tech #96 of 117; 2003 UTEP #114 of 117. Marked: 2003 San José State, ranked 103 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 85.
Point marginmedian #73
Point margin. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: 2003 Boise State #2 of 117; 2003 Hawai'i #53 of 117; 2003 Tulsa #56 of 117; 2003 Fresno State #62 of 117; 2003 Rice #73 of 117; 2003 Nevada #80 of 117; 2003 Louisiana Tech #88 of 117; 2003 UTEP #106 of 117; 2003 SMU #114 of 117. Marked: 2003 San José State, ranked 96 of 117. Western Athletic median rank 73.
Turnover margin
Turnover margin. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Possession
Possession. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning passing
Returning passing. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning receiving
Returning receiving. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Returning rushing
Returning rushing. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Team talent
Team talent. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive EPA
Offensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive EPA
Defensive EPA. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive success rate
Offensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive success rate
Defensive success rate. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Offensive explosiveness
Offensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.
Defensive explosiveness
Defensive explosiveness. Western Athletic, 2003, best rank first: . Marked: 2003 San José State, which has no value for this metric.